Üniversitede Akademisyen ve Yönetici Yetenekleri: Yetenek Yönetiminin Uygulanabilirliği Konusunda Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversitede akademisyen ve yönetici yeteneğinin tanımlanması ve
yetenek yönetiminin üniversitede uygulanabilirliğinin yönetici deneyim ve görüşlerine dayalı olarak
betimlenmesidir. Araştırmada temel nitel araştırma yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar ölçüt
örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu üç kamu üniversitesinden 15
öğretim üyesi oluşturmuştur. Görüşme tekniği ile toplanan veriler, içerik analizi tekniği ile
çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre yetenekli akademisyen özellikleri liyakat, zihinsel
yeterlikler, kişilik, değerler, çalışmaya karşı tutum ve uyum temaları altında bütüncül bir yapı
göstermekte; yetenekli yönetici özellikleri ise iletişim-güdüleme, yönetim, bilimsel yeterlikler ile
kişilik ve yönetsel değerler temaları altında toplanmaktadır. Yükseköğretimde yetenek yönetiminin
gerekli ve yararlı olduğu ancak uygulanabilmesinin çeşitli düzenlemeler gerektirdiği, yeteneği çekme
ve tutmada “olumlu çalışma şartları”nın önem taşıdığı, taşra ve merkez üniversitelerinde durumun
farklılaştığı ortaya konulmuştur. Yetenek yönetimi uygulamaya dönük, yetenek-potansiyellerin
tanımlanması, yetenek yönetimi ve akademik liderlik programlarının oluşturulması, üniversite-yerel
yönetim işbirlikleri ile nitelikli akademisyenleri çekecek şehrin sosyo-kültürel olanaklarının
geliştirilmesi, akademisyenlerde işdoyumu ve olumlu çalışma şartlarını inceleyen araştırmalar
önerilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnsan kaynakları yönetimi,yetenek yönetimi,yükseköğretim,akademisyen

Academic & Managerial Talent in Universities: Examining the Applicability of Talent Management

Abstract

The aim of this research is to define academics’ and managerial talent in the university and
to examine the applicability of talent management according to administrators’ experience and views.
In this study basic qualitative research method was used. Participants determined by purposeful
sampling method and study group consists of 15 faculty members-administrators from three public
universities. Data were collected through interviews and analyzed by content analysis technique.
Findings show that talented academics' characteristics exhibit an integrated structure based on merit,
high intellectual competencies, personality, values, harmony, attitude towards work themes; talented
managers’ characteristics were collected under the themes of communication-motivation, managerial
competencies, scientific competencies, personality and managerial values. It has also been revealed
that talent management is necessary and useful in higher education but applicability depends on some
regulations, positive work environment is important variable for attracting and retaining talent and
situation in central and provincial universities is differentiated. Identification of future talentspotentials;
organizing talent management and academic leadership programs, development of sociocultural
opportunities of the city that will attract talented academics through university-local
administrations collaborations, systematic examination of academics' views on job satisfaction and
positive working conditions can be recommended.

Keywords

• Human resources management,talent management,higher education,academic scholars

References

1. Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W. F., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173-179.
2. Agrawal, S. (2010). Talent development model for businness schools: Factor analysis. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(3), 481-491.
3. Akar, F. (2015). Yetenek yönetimi. Ankara: İmge Yayınevi.
4. Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2018). Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1664-1673.
5. Athey, R. (2008). It’s 2008: Do you know where your talent is? Connecting people to what matters. Journal of Business Strategy, 29 (4), 4-14.
6. Axelrod, E. L., Handfield-Jones, H., & Welsh, T. A. (2001). The war for talent, survey-part two. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 9-12. Austin, A. E., Chapman, D. W., Farah, S., Wilson, E. & Ridge, N. (2014). Expatriate academic staff in the United Arab Emirates: the nature of their work experiences in higher education institutions. Higher Education, 68(4), 541-557.
7. Austin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
8. Berger, L. A., & Berger, D. R. (2003). Talent management handbook. USA: McGraw-Hill Trade.

9. Bisbee, C. D., & Miller, M. T. (2003). A survey of the literature related to executive succession in land grant Universities. (Unpublished doctoral disssertation). University of Arkansas, USA.
10. Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of academic deanship. Leadership, 5 (3), 347- 364.
11. Brantley, M. E., & Coleman, C. Y. (2001). Winning the technology talent war: A manager's guide to recruiting and retaining tech workers in a Dot-Com world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
13. Chartered Institude of Personnel and Development. (2006). Talent management: Understanding the dimensions, CIPD, London.
14. Chartered Institude of Personnel and Development. (2007). Talent management, research insight. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
15. Cheese, P., Thomas, R. J., & Craig, E. (2008). The talent powered organizations: Strategies for globalization, talent management and high performance. Kogan Page Ltd., England: London.
16. Cembrowski, B. J., & Da Costa, J. L. (1998). Succession planning for management staff at a western Canadian postsecondary technical institute. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, USA: San Diago.
17. Christie, D. (2005). Learning to grow our own: A study of succession planning at Douglas College. (Unpublished Masters thesis), Royal Roads University, Canada.
18. Collings, D. G. (2014). Integrating global mobility and global talent management: Exploring the challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of World Business, 49, 253–261.
19. Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Cascio, W. F. (2018). Global talent management and performance in multinational enterprises: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 1-51.
20. Contreras, Y. M. (2008). A Descriptive study: Coaching school leaders for 21th century schools: A new context for leadership development. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of La Verne, California.
21. Cresswell, J. W. (2017). Karma yöntem araştırmalara giriş. M. Sözbilir (Çev). Ankara: Pegem.
22. Davies, B., & Davies, B. J. (2010). Talent management in academies. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(5), 418-426.
23. Elegbe, J. A. (2010). Talent management in the developing world: Adopting a global perspective. England: Gower Publishing Ltd.
24. Erickson, T. J., & Gratton, L, (2008). Burada çalışmak ne anlama geliyor? Yetenek yönetimi. Harward businness review dergisinden seçmeler. İstanbul: Mess Yayınları, No. 552.
25. Florida, R. (1999). The role of the university: Lleveraging talent, not technology. Issues Science Technology. 16 (4), 67–73.
26. Garrow, V., & Hirsh, W.(2008). Talent management: Issues of focus and fit. Public Personnel Management, 37(4), 389-402.
27. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş. A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu (Çev. Edt.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
28. Hatum, A. (2010). Next generation talent management: Talent management to survive turmoil. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Heuer, J. J. (2003). Successsion planning for key administrators at ıvy-plus universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, USA.
30. Ginsburg, S. G. (1993). Paving the way for the 21st century: Human factor in higher education financial management. Washinghton D.C.: National Association of Collage and University Business Officers Publication.
31. Gubman, E. L. (1998). The talent solution: Aligning strategy and people to achieve extraordinary results. NewYork: McGraw-Hill Professional Book Group.
32. Gupta, M., & Haque, M. M. (2015). Talent retention: A major concern for organizations. Conference Proceedings of international conference on research and business sustainability (pp. 624-627). Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee.
33. Kermally, S. (2004). Developing and managing talent. London: Thorogood Publishing.
34. Lapina, I., Kairiša, I., & Aramina, D. (2015). Role of organizational culture in the quality management of university. 20th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management (ICEM-2015). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 770-774.
35. Lasakowa, A., Bajzikova, L., & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of ınnovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69-79.
36. Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2010). Electronic human resources management in an e-business environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 240-250.
37. Lewis, E. R., & R. J. Heckman (2006). T+D, Talent management: a critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16 (2), 139-154.
38. Li, F. F. & Devos, P. (2008). Talent management: art or science: The invisible mechanism between talent and talent factory. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Kalmar, Sweden.
39. Löffler, K., Goldgruber, J., & Hartinger, G. (2018). Moving towards a competence center for geriatric medicine and care: Quality management and human resource management as major support factors. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 32(1), 47-55.
40. Lynch, D. (2007). Can Higher Education Manage Talent? www.csun.edu. 10.11.2018 tarihinde http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2007/11/27/lynch adresinden alınmıştır.
41. Mabaso, C., & Moloi, K.C.(2016). The influence of compensation on talent retention at a TVET College. 14.12.2018 tarihinde https://ssrn.com/abstract=2851760 adresinden alınmıştır.
42. Mabaso, C. M., & Dlamini, B. I. (2018). Total rewards and its effects on organisational commitment in higher education institutions. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1),1-8.
43. Mackey, J. A. (2008). Community college leadership succession: Perception and plans of community college Leaders. (Unpublishes doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, USA
44. McCauley, C., & Wakefield, M. (2006). Talent management in the 21 st century: Help your company find, develop and keep its strongest workers. The Journal For Quality & Participation, 29(4), 4-7.
45. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. USA: John Willey & Sons.
46. Michaels, E., Hanfield-Jones, H., & Axelroad, B. (2001). The war for talent. USA: Harvard Businness School Press.
47. Mirkamali, S. M., & Thani, F. N. (2011). A study on the quality of work life (QWL) among faculty members of University of Tehran (UT) and Sharif University of Technology (SUT). Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 179-187.
48. Naim, M. F. (2014). Leveraging social media for Generation Y retention. European Journal of Business and Management, 6 (23), 173-179.
49. Oladapo, V. (2014). The impact of talent management on retention. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(3), 19-36.
50. Pandita, D., & Ray, S. (2018). Talent management and employee engagement–a meta-analysis of their impact on talent retention. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50 (4), 185-199.
51. Peters, T. (2006). Leaders as talent fanatics. Leadership Excellence, 23(11), 12-13.
52. Philips, J. J., & Edwards, L. (2009). Managing talent retention: An ROI approach. USA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
53. Reiner, C., Meyer, S., & Sardadvar, S. (2017). Urban attraction policies for international academic talent: Munich and Vienna in comparison. Cities, 61, 27-35.
54. Riccio, S. J. (2010). Talent management in higher education: Identifying and developing emerging leaders within the administration at private colleges and universities (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Nebraska, Faculty of the Graduate College, Nebraska.
55. Rothwell, W. J. (2005). Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within. (Third Edition), USA: Amacom Books.
56. Rusu, C. (2016). From quality management to managing quality. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 287-293.
57. Salau, O., Osibanjo, A., Adeniji, A., Oludayo, O., Falola, H., Igbinoba, E., & Ogueyungbo, O. (2018). Data regarding talent management practices and innovation performance of academic staff in a technology-driven private university. Data in Brief, 19,1040–1045.
58. Sears, D. (2002). Successful talent strategies: Achieving superior business results through market-focused staffing. USA: Amacom Books.
59. Sidrat, S., & Ayadi Frikha, M. (2018). Impact of the qualities of the manager and type of university on the development of the entrepreneurial university. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29, 27–34.
60. Sinclair, M. L. (2004). A Talent managemenet strategy for the justice. Institute of BC. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal Roads University, Victoria.
61. Shelton-Johnson L. (2006). Talent management & succession planning. AASHTO Standing Committee on Quality Annual Conference.
62. Šolc, M., Markulik, S. & Sütőová, A. (2014). Quality in contemporary university environment. Social And Behavioral Sciences, 143, 703 – 707.
63. Sumardi, W. A., & Othman, R. (2009). The three faces of talent management in Malaysia. International Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 181-185.
64. Stevenson, M. (2008). Change for the future: presidents and deans real and ideal leadership practices at community and junior colleges in Mississippi. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Mississippi State University, USA.
65. Symes, C. B. (2008). Kaliteli çalışmak kaliteli yaşamak. Önce Kalite Dergisi, 17 (127), 22-25.
66. Theron, M., Barkhuizen, N., & Du Plessis, Y. (2014). Managing the academic talent void: Investigating factors in academic turnover and retention in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 01-14.
67. Thunnissen, M., & Van Arensbergen, P. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to talent: An empirical analysis of the definition of talent in Dutch academia. Personnel Review, 44(2), 182-199.
68. University of Oxford. (2011). University of Oxford HR excellence in research badge: Gap analysis and action plan pdf. 02.03.2012 tarihinde http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/personnel/documents/informationforstaff/ adresinden alınmıştır.
69. Wagner, C. (2009). When mentors and mentees switch roles. The futurist, 43(1), 6-7.
70. Yıldırım A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
71. YÖK (2018). Yüksek öğretim istatistikleri (2017-2018). Ankara: 20.07.2018 tarihinde https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ adresinden alınmıştır.