Despite Our Different Social Identities, We Can Co-Exist: Intergroup Positive and Negative Contact

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of the positive and negative contact experiences among the university students with different social identity categories living in the same dormitory room. The research was designed as a qualitative study utilizing phenomenological approach. A total of 45 students, who identified themselves as Turkish (22) and Kurdish (23) in terms of ethnic and cultural sub-identities were interviewed and qualitative data were collected. In the study, semi-structured interview technique was used to collect data. In the analysis of qualitative data, data reduction, data display and outcome verification steps were followed. The results of the study revealed that the students sharing the same dorm room were generally satisfied with their interactions and had frequent contact. It was also determined that the students were able to get help from each other to a large extent and as much as they could. However, it was ascertained that students refrained from discussing political issues on social identity. It was concluded that, depending on the quality of contact between groups, prejudice between the groups gradually decreased, and in close friendships the human identity and personal characteristics were taken as reference. In addition, it was also observed that as contact between groups becomes negative, social identities become more visible and pronounced. It was determined that a significant number of students were not disturbed by each other in their interactions and did not feel any anxiety. Students began to feel uncomfortable and anxious when political issues based on personal characteristics and social identities were discussed. It was stressed, albeit not as strongly, that students' social identity-based prejudice transformed positively as a result of the frequency and quality of increased social contact.

Keywords

• Cross-group friendship,intergroup contact,positive contact,negative contact

Farklı Sosyal Kimliklerimize Rağmen, Aynı Yurt Odasını Paylaşabiliriz: Gruplararası Olumlu ve Olumsuz Temas

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, yurtlarda aynı odada kalan, farklı sosyal kimlik kategorilerine sahip üniversite öğrencileri arasında yaşanan, gruplararası olumlu ve olumsuz temas deneyimlerini derinlemesine incelemektir. Araştırma nitel araştırma yaklaşımlarından fenomenolojik çalışma olarak kurgulanmıştır. Araştırma, öğrenciler ile yüz yüze görüşme yapılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kendini etnik ve kültürel alt kimlik olarak Türk (22) ve Kürt (23) olarak tanımlayan toplam 45 öğrenci ile yüz yüze derinlemesine görüşülerek nitel veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplamak için yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Nitel verilerin analizinde sırası ile veri azaltımı, veri gösterimi ve sonuç çıkarma aşamaları izlenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda, aynı yurt odasını paylaşan öğrencilerin genellikle etkileşimlerinden memnun oldukları ve sıklıkla temas kurdukları saptanmıştır. Öğrencilerin, birbirlerinden büyük ölçüde ve ellerinden geldiği sürece yardım alabildikleri saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte sosyal kimlik temelli siyasi ve politik konulara girmekten imtina edildiği belirlenmiştir. Gruplararası temas kalitesine bağlı olarak, gruplararası önyargıların zamanla azaldığı, yakın arkadaşlıklarda, birbirlerini sosyal kimliklerin ötesine geçerek, insan üst kimliği ve kişisel özellikler referans alınarak algıladıkları saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, gruplararası temas olumsuzlaşmaya başladıkça sosyal kimliklerin daha görünür olmaya ve algılanmaya başladığı belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin önemli bir kısmının etkileşimlerinde birbirlerinden rahatsız olmadıkları ve kendilerini kaygılı hissetmedikleri saptanmıştır. Öğrencilerin, kişisel ve sosyal kimlik temelli siyasi-politik konular konuşulmaya başlandığında, kendilerini rahatsız ve kaygılı hissettikleri belirlenmiştir. Az değinilmesine rağmen artan temas sıklığına ve kalitesine bağlı olarak öğrencilerin sosyal kimlik temelli önyargılarında olumlu dönüşüm gerçekleştiği bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gruplararası arkadaşlık,gruplararası temas,olumlu temas,olumsuz temas

References

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2. Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., … Sibley, C. G. (2012). The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Brown, R, & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37 (37), 255-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
5. Brown, Rupert, Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: the effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5–6), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<741::AID-EJSP972>3.0.CO;2-8
6. Cakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwär, G., & Heath, A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 606-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075.x
7. Davies, K, Wright, S. C., & Aron, A. (2011). Cross-group friendships: How interpersonal connections encourage positive intergroup attitudes. Moving beyond Prejudice Reduction: Pathways to Positive Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1037/12319-006
8. Davies, Kristin, Tropp, L. R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T. F., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103

9. Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(6), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214
10. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1327
11. Graf, S., Paolini, S., & Rubin, M. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (6), 536-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2052
12. Hayward, L. E., Tropp, L. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12220
13. Hewstone, M. (2009). Living Apart, Living Together? The Role of Intergroup Contact in Social Integration. In Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 162, 2008 Lectures (pp. 243–300). British Academy. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264584.003.0009
14. Mazziotta, A., Rohmann, A., Wright, S. C., De Tezanos-Pinto, P., & Lutterbach, S. (2015). (How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(5), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2110
15. Paolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1723-1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388667
16. Paolini, S., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., Husnu, S., Joyce, N., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 548-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2029
17. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of catholics and protestants in northern ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262848
18. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
19. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
20. Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002
21. Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.11.003
22. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
23. Selvanathan, H. P., Techakesari, P., Tropp, L. R., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690908
24. Techakesari, P., Barlow, F. K., Hornsey, M. J., Sung, B., Thai, M., & Chak, J. L. Y. (2015). An Investigation of Positive and Negative Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0022022115570313
25. Turner, R. N., & Cameron, L. (2016). Confidence in Contact: A New Perspective on Promoting Cross-Group Friendship Among Children and Adolescents. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 212–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
26. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Paolini, S., & Christ, O. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship, 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701680297
27. Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Groenewoud, J. T., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Cooperation, ethnoic salience and generalisation of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(May 1995), 649–661.