Examination of the Quality Teaching in Turkish Higher Education Based on the External Evaluation Reports from Multiple Perspectives

Year 2021, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 102 - 125, 30.01.2021

Kamil Yıldırım Aydın Aslan

Abstract

External evaluation has a critical function to promote quality. In this study, the Turkish Higher Education System's teaching quality was examined through multiple perspectives. For this purpose, the institutional external evaluation reports prepared for 115 higher education institutions in Turkey were analyzed according to the International Quality Assurance Standards, National Institutional External Criteria, and the literature's quality indicators. The content analyses, which were conducted independently by the researchers, were compared to derive the findings. findings revealed findings revealed a lack of conceptual components, accountability, and detailed submission reports in terms of reporting. The analysis concluded that the input dimension was prioritized, whereas the process and output dimensions were neglected in the external evaluation criteria. Three different quality indicators revealed that the level of quality teaching in Turkish higher education was low. The implications were developed to promote quality teaching.

Keywords

Higher education, quality teaching, national criteria

References

• Akar, T., & Babadoğan, M. C. (2018). Opinions of academic administrators of regarding constructing aquality culture at education faculties. Journal of Education and Future, 1-11.
• Alzafari, K., & Ursin, J. (2019) Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 58-75, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069
• Basoglu, T. (2019). The relationship between student satisfaction and employee satisfaction within total quality management in higher education institutions. (Unpublished Master Thesis). İstanbul Esenyurt University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
• Bollman, L. A. (2001). Conversations on quality: perspectives on teaching and learning in higher ducation. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Minnesota, Faculty of Graduate School, the USA.
• Cetinsaya, G. (2014). Growing, quality and internationalization: A guide map for higher Education in Turkey. Ankara: Council of Higher Education Publishing.
• Council of Higher Education. (2018). Institutional external evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr web address on 14.07.2018.
• Dakovic, G., & Gover, A. (2019) Impact evaluation of external quality assurance by the Institutional Evaluation Program. Quality in Higher Education, 25 (2), 208-224, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2019.1635304
• Dicker, M., Garcia, A. Kelly., & H. Mulrooney (2019) What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers, Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1425-1441, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987
• Elken, M., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Conceptualizing ‘quality work’ in higher education, Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 189-202, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2018.1554782
• ENQA. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area-ESG. Brussels: Eurashe.
• Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Gallagher, C. E. (2017). Teacher evaluation designs in an external accountability environment. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). State University of New York, Department of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, the USA.
• Gökmen, S. (2019). Total quality management perception in higher education institutions: Düzce University and Oviedo University samples. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Duzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Düzce.
• Grothe, O., & Schmid, F. (2011) Kendall's Reconsidered. Communications in Statistics, Simulation and Computation, 40(2), 285-305, DOI:10.1080/03610918.2010.538791
• Gunn, A. (2018) Metrics and methodologies for measuring teaching quality in higher education: developing the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF). Educational Review, 70(2), 129-148, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2017.1410106
• Gusu, S. (2018). State level higher education boards in the USA and reform suggestions for Turkey: governance, quality assurance, and finance. Education and Science, 43 (193), 45-61.
• Hacifazlioglu, Ö. (2006). Quality indicators in European higher education and Turkey sample. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
• Hénard, F. (2010). Review of quality teaching in higher education. Paris: OECD Publication. Joshi, A., (2017). Quality assurance of teaching and learning in Indian higher education institutions. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Southampton, School of Education, England.
• Kavak, Y. (2011). Growth of the higher education in Turkey: an overview to last decade and long-term (2010-2050) growth projections. Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 95-102.
• Kaya, M. (2017). Quality assurance institutions in various countries in teacher education and uggestions for Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(3), 411-418.
• Kooli, C. (2019). Governing and managing higher education institutions: the quality of audit ontributions. Evaluation and Planning, 77, 1-9.
• Ministry of Education. (2019). Ministry of National Education of Republic of Turkey Strategic Plan for 015 through 2019. Ankara: Strategy Development Presidency.
• Ministry of Development. (2018). Tenth Development Plan. Retrieved from http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Pages/ KalkinmaPlanlari.aspx on 15.06.2018.
• Ozdemir, M. (2015). Examination of instructional procedures and learning resources within the context of European Union higher education quality indicators (The sample of Gaziantep University). (Unpublished Master Thesis). Gaziantep University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage
• Pedro, E., Mendes, L., & Lourenço, L. (2018). Perceived service quality and students’ satisfaction in higher Education: The influence of teaching methods. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(1), 165-192.
• Stensaker, B., & Leiber, T. (2015). Assessing the organizational impact of external quality assurance: hypothesising key dimensions and mechanisms, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), 328-342. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2015.1111009
• Tekneci, P.D. (2016). Evolution of Turkish Higher Education System in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(3), 277-287. DOI. 10.5961/jhes.2016.164.
• THEQC. (2019). Annual Situation Report 2018. Retrieved from www.yokak.gov.tr on14.08.2019.
• THEQC. (2018). Annual Situation Report 2017. Retrieved from www.yokak.gov.tr on 14.08.2019.
• THEQC. (2017). Annual Situation Report 2016. Retrieved from www.yok.gov.tr on 14.08.2019.
• Ustunluoglu, E. (2017) Teaching quality matters in higher education: a case study from Turkey and Slovakia. Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 367-382.
• Ustunluoglu, E. (2016) Perceptions versus realities: Teaching quality in higher education. Education and Science,41, 367-382. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2016.6095
• Wang, D., Sun, Y., & Jiang, T. (2018). The Assessment of Higher Education Quality from the Perspective of Students through a Case Study Analysis. Front. Educ. China, 13(2): 267–287 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-018-0014-0
• Wells, P. J. (2018). The role of quality assurance in higher Education: Challenges, developments, trends. NY: UNESCO Publication.
• Yildirim, K. (2018). Human resource management at school. N., Cemaloglu, & M. G., Gurkan (Ed.) In chool Administration from Theory to Application. 187-218. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.