Virtual Education Trials and Evaluation Process in Architecture

Year 2021, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 302 - 315, 30.01.2021

Hilmi Ekin Oktay Hacer Mutlu Danacı Melisa Unvan Kemal Reha Kavas İbrahim Bakır

Abstract

The word ‘virtual,’ which the entire world has become familiar with during the pandemic in 2020, was a phrase that is primarily applicable for higher education in various departments. However, for design students, the online learning medium is a new concept, and the question of how the virtual teaching environment affects the design capability of students is pertinent regarding architectural and design education. This study explores how architectural students’ perception of their education medium affects their success in organizational behavior. In this context, an in-depth online interview that aims to understand the perception of architectural students regarding their education medium was conducted to analyze the effects of the learning medium on their educational success. The findings obtained in this study may improve
architectural education concerning the virtual teaching experience.

Keywords

Architectural education, sustainable education, virtual education

References

• Bender, D. M., Vredevoogd, J. D., Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (2016). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Using Online Education Technologies to Support Studio Instruction Computer Interaction : Exploring Design Synergies for more Effective Learning Published by : International Forum of Educational Techn. 9(4).
• Berge, Z. L., & Berge, M. B. (2019). The Economic ABC s of Educating and Training Generations X, Y, and Z . Performance Improvement, 58(5), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21864
• Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference Proceedings 2003, 9–21. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=E36FCCD1F9EB81E5B9D66D1014D59989?doi=10.1.1.124.3548&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Chastain, T., & Elliott, A. (2000). Cultivating design competence: Online support for beginning design studio. Automation in Construction, 9(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00053-9
• Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9068-2
• Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M. H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9265-0
• George, B. H. (2018). Drawing online: A comparative analysis of an online basic graphics course. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.23
• Gomez Zermeño, M. G. (2020). Massive Open Online Courses as a Digital Learning Strategy of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, N/A(N/A), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0311
• Kim, T., & Lim, J. (2019). Designing an Efficient Cloud Management Architecture for Sustainable Online Lifelong Education. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061523
• Mohr, K. A. J., & Mohr, E. S. (2017). Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 1(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.15142/T3M05T
• Newman, G., George, B., Li, D., Tao, Z., Yu, S., & Lee, R. J. (2018). Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education. Landscape Journal, 37(2), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.2.41
• Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Nadlifatin, R. (2019). Understanding the generation z behavior on D-learning: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(5), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9993
• Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Information Systems Education Journal A Tribute to Bart Longenecker: An IS Education Maverick and Visionary 45. Reaching and Retaining the Next Generation: Adapting to the Expectations of Gen Z in the Classroom 55. Increasing Advocacy for Information Syst. Information Systems & Computing Academic Professioals, 16(3), 45–54.
• Shao, Y. J., Daley, L., & Vaughan, L. (2007). Exploring web 2.0 for virtual design studio teaching. ASCILITE 2007 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 918–922.