Research Article

Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment

Volume: 49 Number: 2 June 25, 2025
EN TR

Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment

Abstract

Pesticides are the important contaminants for the environment. In this study, insecticide residues of the soils, taken from agricultural lands and around water resources in the Çanakkale-Central district were investigated. The Quick-Easy-Cheap-Efficient-Rugged-Safe (QuEChERS) method was employed to determine residues. Method verification was performed by spiking blank samples at 1 and 8 times the limit of quantification. 54 soil samples were taken from study area in 2020 and subjected to residue analyses. Of these samples, 44 had insecticides at various concentrations. Twenty insecticides were detected at various frequencies. Insecticide residue levels were between 1.01 and 760.01 µg/kg. Maximum etoxazole was detected as 760.01 µg/kg in one sample. This sample was sampled from the nearby fields where wastes were seen. In addition, 17 insecticides were found at various concentrations in the same sample. Risk assessments revealed low hazard for children and adults. In terms of hazard quotient (HQ) levels, maximum values were encountered for pyridaben (445.00*10-7 for children and 59.33*10-7 for adults). The sum of HQs for all insecticides was 1310.00*10-7 for children and 174.67*10-7 for adults. It was concluded that farmers should be encouraged to use insecticides with low HQ values to mitigate soil contamination in places where insecticides are detected.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This study was supported by Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Scientific Research Unit, Çanakkale, Türkiye, Grant Project No: FBA2020-3228

Project Number

FBA2020-3228

References

  1. Adeyinka, G. C., B. Moodley, G. Birungi & P. Ndungu, 2019. Evaluation of organochlorinated pesticide (OCP) residues in soil, sediment and water from the Msunduzi River in South Africa. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78 (6): 1-13.
  2. Ahamad, A. & J. Kumar, 2023. Pyrethroid pesticides: An overview on classification, toxicological assessment and monitoring. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 10 (2023): 100284 (1-15).
  3. Anonymous, 2024. Çanakkale provincial directorate of agriculture and forestry data. Çanakkale Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry, 1 pp (in Turkish).
  4. Anonymous, 2025. National pesticide information center; Pesticide half-life. (Web page https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/half-life.html) (Date accessed: January 2025).
  5. Aysal, P., Á. Ambrus, S. J. Lehotay & A. Cannavan, 2007. Validation of an efficient method for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using ethyl acetate for extraction. Journal of Environ-mental Science and Health, Part B, 42 (5): 481-490.
  6. Balderacchi, M., M. Filippini, A. Gemitzi, B. Klöve, M. Petitta, M. Trevisan & A. Gargini, 2014. Does groundwater protection in Europe require new EU-wide environmental quality standards? Frontiers in Chemistry, 2 (32):1-6.
  7. Balkan, T., 2021. Determination of chlorsulfuron and pendimethalin in soil samples using modified QuEChERS method by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 31 (1): 539-544.
  8. Balkan, T. & H. Karaağaçlı, 2023. Determination of 301 pesticide residues in tropical fruits imported to Turkey using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS. Food Control, 147 (2023): 109576 (1-12).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pesticides and Toxicology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 25, 2025

Submission Date

February 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 19, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 49 Number: 2

APA
Polat, B., & Tiryaki, O. (2025). Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 49(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.1638561

Cited By