Araştırma Makalesi

Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment

Cilt: 49 Sayı: 2 25 Haziran 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment

Abstract

Pesticides are the important contaminants for the environment. In this study, insecticide residues of the soils, taken from agricultural lands and around water resources in the Çanakkale-Central district were investigated. The Quick-Easy-Cheap-Efficient-Rugged-Safe (QuEChERS) method was employed to determine residues. Method verification was performed by spiking blank samples at 1 and 8 times the limit of quantification. 54 soil samples were taken from study area in 2020 and subjected to residue analyses. Of these samples, 44 had insecticides at various concentrations. Twenty insecticides were detected at various frequencies. Insecticide residue levels were between 1.01 and 760.01 µg/kg. Maximum etoxazole was detected as 760.01 µg/kg in one sample. This sample was sampled from the nearby fields where wastes were seen. In addition, 17 insecticides were found at various concentrations in the same sample. Risk assessments revealed low hazard for children and adults. In terms of hazard quotient (HQ) levels, maximum values were encountered for pyridaben (445.00*10-7 for children and 59.33*10-7 for adults). The sum of HQs for all insecticides was 1310.00*10-7 for children and 174.67*10-7 for adults. It was concluded that farmers should be encouraged to use insecticides with low HQ values to mitigate soil contamination in places where insecticides are detected.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

This study was supported by Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Scientific Research Unit, Çanakkale, Türkiye, Grant Project No: FBA2020-3228.

Proje Numarası

FBA2020-3228

Kaynakça

  1. Adeyinka, G. C., B. Moodley, G. Birungi & P. Ndungu, 2019. Evaluation of organochlorinated pesticide (OCP) residues in soil, sediment and water from the Msunduzi River in South Africa. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78 (6): 1-13.
  2. Ahamad, A. & J. Kumar, 2023. Pyrethroid pesticides: An overview on classification, toxicological assessment and monitoring. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 10 (2023): 100284 (1-15).
  3. Anonymous, 2024. Çanakkale provincial directorate of agriculture and forestry data. Çanakkale Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry, 1 pp (in Turkish).
  4. Anonymous, 2025. National pesticide information center; Pesticide half-life. (Web page https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/half-life.html) (Date accessed: January 2025).
  5. Aysal, P., Á. Ambrus, S. J. Lehotay & A. Cannavan, 2007. Validation of an efficient method for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using ethyl acetate for extraction. Journal of Environ-mental Science and Health, Part B, 42 (5): 481-490.
  6. Balderacchi, M., M. Filippini, A. Gemitzi, B. Klöve, M. Petitta, M. Trevisan & A. Gargini, 2014. Does groundwater protection in Europe require new EU-wide environmental quality standards? Frontiers in Chemistry, 2 (32):1-6.
  7. Balkan, T., 2021. Determination of chlorsulfuron and pendimethalin in soil samples using modified QuEChERS method by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 31 (1): 539-544.
  8. Balkan, T. & H. Karaağaçlı, 2023. Determination of 301 pesticide residues in tropical fruits imported to Turkey using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS. Food Control, 147 (2023): 109576 (1-12).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Pestisititler ve Toksikoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Şubat 2025

Kabul Tarihi

19 Haziran 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Polat, B., & Tiryaki, O. (2025). Investigation of insecticide residues in the soil of agricultural areas and around water resources and associated risk assessment. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 49(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.1638561

Cited By