Research Article

Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898) in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf): Impacts on some seed characteristics and marketing price

Volume: 41 Number: 2 June 28, 2017
EN TR

Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898) in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf): Impacts on some seed characteristics and marketing price

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898, Coleoptera: Dermestidae) on weight, grain quality and marketing price losses in various durum wheat cultivars stored in controlled conditions in laboratory of Faculty of Agriculture at Harran University. Experiment was conducted from 13 January to 4 September 2015. Durum wheat cultivars, Şahinbey, Diyarbakır-81, Zühre, Artuklu, Güney Yıldızı, Fırat-93, Aydın-93, Sarıçanak-98, Eyyübi and Altıntoprak-98, were infested by three different young larval stages. Three samples (80 g) of grain from each cultivar were put into 250-mL glass jars covered with the muslin cloth with the rubber bands and 5, 10 or 15 neonates khapra beetle larvae added. A randomized complete block design with 3 replicates was employed for grain weight losses and a split plot design with 4 replicates (purchasers) was employed for marketing price losses. Grain weight, marketing price and grain quality losses were recorded. The result revealed that geometric mean of weight loss was 4.075% in about 8 months. There were response differences between wheat cultivars against khapra beetle infestation. Except for Zeleny sedimentation, some of quality characteristics such as 1000 kernel weight (g), gluten (%) and gluten index (%) were affected negatively depending on increasing ratio of insect infestations. Geometric means of marketing prices reduced from 418 to 315 USD t-1 in 8 months. Marketing price loss was 103 USD t-1. It was concluded that Fırat-93, Zühre and Altıntoprak-98 were the cultivars least affected by khapra beetle with less weight and marketing price losses.

Keywords

References

  1. AACC Approved Methods, 2000. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Method 56-60 (Sedimentation), tenth edition, The AACC, St. Paul, MN.USA
  2. AACC Approved Methods, 2000a. Wet gluten, dry gluten, water-binding capacity and gluten index method 38-12 A, tenth edition AACC, St. Paul, MN,USA
  3. Ahmad, H., 1984. Storage of wheat in Pakistan .Progr. Farm. (4): 36-40.
  4. Ahmad, M., M. R. Khan, A. Iqbal & M. Hassan, 1986. Farm level storage loss of wheat by insect pests in Samundri Tehsil. Pakistan Entomology 8: 41-44.
  5. Ahmedani, M. S., M. I. Haque, S. N. Afzal, M. Naeem, T. Hussain & S. Naz, 2011. Quantitative losses and physical damage caused to wheat kernel (Triticum aestivum L.) by khapra beetle infestation. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(1): 659-668.
  6. Ahmedani, M. S., M. I. Haque, S. N. Afzal, M. Aslam & S Naz, 2009. Varietal changes in nutritional composition of wheat kernel (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Khapra beetle infestation. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(3):1511-1519.
  7. Anonymous, 2005. Industry biosecurity plan for the grains industry. Threat- specific contingency plan 2005. Dept. of Agriculture, Bently Delivery Centre, WA,6983 Australia.
  8. Beal, R. S., 1982. A new stored product species of Trogoderma from Bolivia. Coleopterist’s Bulletin 36 211-215.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fethiye Özberk
HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

İrfan Özberk
HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Abuzer Yücel
HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Ayhan Atlı
HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Duygu İzol This is me
HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 28, 2017

Submission Date

February 4, 2017

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 41 Number: 2

APA
Özberk, F., Özberk, İ., Yücel, A., Atlı, A., & İzol, D. (2017). Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898) in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf): Impacts on some seed characteristics and marketing price. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 41(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.289663

Cited By