Toxic effects of some acaricides on Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae) and its predator Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions

Year 2021, Volume: 45 Issue: 4, 485 - 498, 15.12.2021

Nabi Alper Kumral Sultan Çobanoğlu Pınar Hephızlı Göksel Anıl Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.999028

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Olive bud mite, Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae) is one of the key pests that regularly needs control with acaricides in olive orchards of Bursa Province, Turkey. For the chemical control of A. oleae, it is critical the use of acaricides does not reduce the survival and fecundity of its natural enemies. The toxic effects of three concentrations of seven acaricides were assessed against both A. oleae and its predator Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) using a residual method under controlled conditions at Bursa Uludağ University during 2020-2021. The highest recommended concentrations of acequinocyl, azadirachtin, fenbutatin oxide, milbemectin, pyridaben, spirodiclofen and sulfur killed A. oleae adults with rates varying from 80 to 100%. Two concentrations of milbemectin, pyridaben and sulfur showed high mortality rates. Nevertheless, highest recommended concentrations of acequinocyl, pyridaben, spirodiclofen and sulfur were found to be highly toxic to N. californicus adults with rates varied from 82 to 100%. The high mortalities for mobile immature stages and reducing in the fecundity of N. californicus occurred by highest recommended concentrations of all tested acaricides. Based on the scale recommended by the International Organization for Biological Control, some sublethal concentrations of fenbutatin oxide, spirodiclofen and sulfur were found to be slightly harmful to both mature and immature of N. californicus.

Keywords

Acaricide, olive bud mite, phytoseiids, side effect, toxicology

Supporting Institution

Bursa Uludag University, Scientific Research Unit, Bursa, Turkey

Project Number

KUAP(Z)-2018/9

Thanks

This project was supported by Bursa Uludağ University, Scientific Research Unit, Bursa, Turkey, Grant Project No. KUAP(Z)-2018/9. The authors also wish to thank to Edward Ueckerman (Potchefstroom, South Africa) for confirmation of the mite species.

Laboratuvar koşullarında Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae) ve avcısı Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae)’a bazı akarisitlerin toksik etkileri

Abstract

Zeytin tomurcuk akarı, Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae) Bursa İli (Türkiye) zeytin bahçelerinde sürekli mücadelesinin yapılması gereken ana zararlılar arasında yer almaktadır. Zararlı akarın kimyasal mücadelesinde kullanılan akarisitlerin, doğal düşmanlarının canlılığını ve üremesini düşürmemesi çok kritiktir. Bu nedenle Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi’nde 2019-2020 yıllarında 7 akarisitin 3 farklı konsantrasyonunun hem A. oleae hem de avcısı Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) üzerindeki toksik etkileri kontrollü koşullarda bir kalıntı metodu kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Azadirachtin, acequinocyl, fenbutatin oxide, milbemectin, pyridaben, spirodiclofen ve kükürtün Türkiye’de diğer akarlara önerilen en yüksek konsantrasyonları A. oleae’nın erginlerini %80 ile 100 arasında öldürmüştür. Milbemectin, pyridaben ve kükürtün iki alt konsantrasyonunun A. oleae erginleri üzerindeki öldürücü etkisi çok yüksek bulunmuştur. Buna karşılık, acequinocyl, pyridaben, spirodiclofen ve kükürtün en yüksek konsantrasyonları N. californicus’un erginlerinin, %82 ile 100 oranında zehirli bulunmuştur. Tüm akarisitlerin en yüksek konsantrasyonları N. californicus’un hareketli ergin öncesi dönemlerinde yüksek ölüm oluşturmuş ve erginlerin yumurta bırakma miktarını çok azaltmıştır. Uluslararası Biyolojik Mücadele Organizasyonu’nun skalasına göre fenbutatin oxide, spirodiclofen ve kükürtün bazı düşük konsantrasyonları N. californicus’un hem ergin hem de ergin öncesi dönemleri için hafif zararlı bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Akarisit, zeytin tomurcuk akarı, phytoseiidler, yan etki, toksikoloji

Project Number

KUAP(Z)-2018/9

References

• Abbott, W. S., 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18 (2): 265-267.
• Abou-Awad, B. A., B. M. El-Sawaf, A. S. Reda & A. A. Abdel-Khalek, 2000. Environmental management and biological aspects of two eriophyoid fig mites in Egypt: Aceria ficus and Rhyncophytoptus ficifoliae. Acarologia, 40 (4): 419-429.
• Alinejad, M., K. Kheradmand & Y. Fathipour, 2016. Assessment of sublethal effects of spirodiclofen on biological performance of the predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 21 (3): 1-10.
• Alkan, B., 1952. Türkiye’nin Zoosesid (zoocecid)’leri (kökeni hayvansal bitki urları) üzerinde çalışmalar, I-II. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı, (8-3): 185-225. (in Turkish).
• Audenaert, J., M. Vissers & B. Gobin, 2014. Testing side-effects of common pesticides on A. swirskii under greenhouse circumstances. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 79 (2): 207-210.
• Avidov, Z. & I. Harpaz, 1969. Plant Pests of Israel. Israel University Press, Jerusalem, Israel, 549 pp.
• BKU, 2021. Plant Protection Products Database. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, General Directorate of Food and Control, Department of Plant Protection Products. (Web page: https://bku.tarim.gov.tr) (Date accessed: September 2021). (in Turkish).
• Blümel, S., C. Pertl & F. Bakker, 2000. Comparative trials on the effects of two fungicides on a predatory mite in the laboratory and in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 97 (3): 321-330.
• Cakmak, I. & S. Cobanoğlu, 2006. Amblyseius californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a new record for the Turkish fauna. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30 (1): 55-58.
• Castagnoli, M., M. Liguori, S. Simoni & C. Duso, 2005. Toxicity of some insecticides to T. urticae, N. californicus and Tydeus californicus. BioControl, 50 (3): 611-622.
• Castagnoli, M. & S. Simoni, 2003. Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari Phytoseiidae): Survey of biological and behavioral traits of a versatile predator. Redia, 86: 153-164.
• Chatti, A., S. Kreiter, K. Lebdi-Grissa & M. Ksantin, 2017. Phytophagous and predatory mites on olive trees in Tunisia. Catalogue, description of one new species and key for identification (Acari, Eriophyidae, Tetranychidae, Tenuipalpidae and Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 57 (2): 233-254.
• Çetin, H. & Ö. Alaoğlu, 2006. Mut (Mersin) ilçesindeki zeytin ağaçlarında bulunan eriophyid akar türleri ve zarar şekilleri. Turkish Journal of Entomology-Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 30 (4): 303-315. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Çetin, H., Ö. Alaoğlu, T. Turanlı & F. N. Elma, 2012. İzmir, Manisa ve Balıkesir illerinde zeytinlerde bulunan eriophyid akar türleri ve zararları. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 26 (3): 9-13. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Denizhan, E., R. Monfreda, E. De Lillo & S. Cobanoğlu, 2015. Eriophyoid mite fauna (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Turkey: new species, new distribution reports and an updated catalogue. Zootaxa, 3991 (1): 1-63.
• Dent, D., 2000. Insect Pest Management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK., xiii + 410 pp.
• Desneux, N., A. Decourtye & J. M. Delpuech, 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 52: 81-106.
• Döker, I. & C. Kazak, 2019. Non-target effects of five acaricides on a native population of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 45 (1-2): 69-74.
• El-Laithy, A. Y. M., 1999. Population abundance and spatial distribution of eriophyoid mites and associated predatory mites inhabiting olive seedlings. Phytophaga, 9: 93-102.
• Elhalawany, A. S., R. I. A. Abo-Shnaf & A. S. Sanad, 2021. Release of predatory mite, Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for its suppression two species of eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) on olive seedlings in Egypt. International Journal of Acarology, 47 (1): 35-40.
• Ersin, F., S. Kaptan, L. Erten, H. Köktürk, B. Gümüşay, E. Denizhan & İ. Cakmak, 2020. Mite diversity and population dynamics of eriophyid mites on olive trees in Western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology-Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 44 (1): 123-132.
• Evans, B., K. Krey & J. Renkema, 2018. Susceptibility of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to commonly-used insecticides approved for managing arthropod pests in Florida strawberries. EDIS, 4: 1-9.
• Fiedler, Ż. & D. Sosnowska, 2012. Side effects of fungicides and insecticides on predatory mites, in laboratory conditions. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 54 (4): 349-353.
• Fischer, S. & F. Klötzli, 2015. Management of the tomato russet mite Aculops lycopersici (Acari, Eriophyidae). Revue Suisse de Viticulture Arboriculture Horticulture, 47 (2): 88-93.
• Gazquez, J. C., J. C. López, E. J. Baeza, J. J. Pérez-Parra, C. Pérez, D. E. Meca & S. Navarro, 2011. Influence of the sulphur application method on pests, diseases and natural enemies in a greenhouse pepper crop, Acta Horticulturae, 893: 1309-1316.
• Gerson, U., R. L. Smiley & R. Ochoa, 2003. Mites (Acari) in Biological Control. Blackwell Science, Oxford, Malden, MA., UK, 539 pp.
• Ghadim Mollaloo, M., K. Kheradmand & A. A. Talebi, 2018. Sublethal effects of pyridaben on life table parameters of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zoology and Ecology, 28 (1): 56-63.
• Hatzinikolis, E. N., 1986. Contribution to the description, record and onomatology of Aceria oleae (Nalepa: 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae). Entomologia Hellenica, 4: 49-54.
• IRAC, 2021. IRAC Insecticide Mode of Action. (Web page: https://irac-online.org/mode-of-action) (Date accessed: September 2021).
• Kaçar, G., E. Denizhan & M. R. Ulusoy, 2010. Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi zeytin bahçelerinde zararlı Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) ve Türkiye için yeni bir kayıt: Tegolophus hassani (Keifer, 1959) (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoideae). Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 50 (3): 121-132. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Kaplan, P., S. Yorulmaz & R. Ay, 2012. Toxicity of insecticides and acaricides to the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 38 (8): 699-705.
• Kashyap, L., D. C. Sharma & A. K. Sood, 2015. Infestation and management of russet mite, Aculops lycopersici in tomato, Solanum lycopersicum under protected environment in North-Western India. Environment and Ecology, 33 (1): 87-90.
• Kaya, K., 2020. Seasonal population dynamics of Aceria oleae (Nalepa, 1900) (Acari: Eriophyidae) in generative organs of olives in Hatay Province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology-Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 44 (4): 503-512.
• Keifer, H. H., 1975. “Eriophyoidea Nalepa. Injurious Eriophyoid Mites, 327-533”. In: Mites Injurious to Economic Plants (Eds. L. R. Jeppson, H. H. Keifer & E. W. Baker). University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA, 704 pp.
• Kim, S. S. & S. S. Yoo, 2002. Comparative toxicity of some acaricides to the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis and the two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. BioControl, 47 (5): 563-573.
• Kılınç, G. & N. A. Kumral, 2016. “The effect of different doses of abamectin against the olive bud mite damaged on olive trees (Gemlik Variety) of Bursa Turkey, 271-271”. 6th Plant Protection Congress with International Participation (5-8 September 2016, Konya, Turkey), 938 pp. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Kolcu, A. & N. A. Kumral, 2018. “A comparative toxicological study on Tomato russet mite (Aculops lycopersici Massee) and its predator Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae), 58-58”. XI. European Congress of Entomology (2-6 July 2018, Napoli, Italy), 182 pp.
• Kumral, N. A., S. Çobanoğlu & P. Hephızlı Göksel, 2021. An integrated approach on the control of eriophyid mites in olive orchards of Bursa province. Bursa Uludag University, Scientific Research Unit, Bursa, Turkey, Grant Project No. KUAP(Z)-2018/9. Unpublished Project Report, 40 pp. (in Turkish).
• Kumral, N. A. & B. Kovancı, 2004. Mite species in olive trees of Bursa, Turkey. Journal of Uludag University Agriculture Faculty, 18 (2): 25-34. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Kumral, N. A. & B. Kovancı, 2007. The diversity and abundance of mites in agrochemical-free and conventional deciduous fruit orchards of Bursa, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology-Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 31 (2): 83-95.
• Kumral Y. A., N. A. Kumral, A. Kolcu, B. Maden & B. Artik, 2020. Simulation study for the degradation of some insecticides during different black table olive processes. ACS Omega, 5 (23): 14164-14172.
• Kumral, N. A., H. Susurluk & S. Çobanoğlu, 2010. Interactions among populations of predatory mites and insect and mite pests on olive trees in Turkey. International Journal of Acarology, 36 (6): 463-471.
• Kurubal, D. & R. Ay, 2015. The toxic effects of some insect growth regulators and bioinsecticides on predators mites Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot ve Neoseiulus californicus (Mc Gregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Turkish Journal of Entomology-Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 39 (1): 79-89. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Ky, I. R. & R. K. Shepherd, 1988. Chemical control of the tomato russet mite on tomatoes in the dry tropics of Queensland. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 45 (1): 1-8.
• Maroufpoor, M., Y. Ghoosta, A. A. Pourmirza & H. Lotfalizadeh, 2016. The effects of selected acaricides on life table parameters of the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus fed on European red mite. North-Western Journal of Zoology, 12 (1): 1-6.
• Monteiro, V. B., D. B. Lima, Jr. M. G. Gondim & H. A. Siqueira, 2012. Residual bioassay to assess the toxicity of acaricides against Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105 (4): 1419-1425.
• Mordue, A. J. & A. Blackwell, 1993. Azadirachtin: An Update. Journal of Insect Physiology, 39 (1): 903-924.
• Norris, R. F., C. E. Caswell-Chen & M. Cogan, 2003. Concepts in Integrated Pest Management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 586 pp.
• Okassa, M., S. Kreiter, S. Guichou & M. S. Tixier, 2011. Molecular and morphological boundaries of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104 (2): 393-406.
• Overmeer, W. P. J., 1985. “Rearing and Handling, 161-170”. In: Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Eds. W. Helle & M. W. Sabelis). (Vol 1b), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 458 pp.
• Overmeer, W. P. J. & A. Q. van Zon, 1982. A standardized method for testing the side effects of pesticides on the predacious mite, Amblyseius potentillae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 27 (4): 357-363.
• Pijnakker, J. & P. Ramakers, 2009. Effect of vaporizing sulphur on pest predators in greenhouses. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 49: 341-345.
• Potter, C., 1952. An improved apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films with data on the electrostatic charge on atomized spray fluids. Annals of Applied Biolology, 39 (1): 1-28.
• Roush, R. T., 1989. Designing resistance management programs: how can you choose? Pest Management Science, 26 (4): 423-441.
• Royalty, R. N. & T. M. Perring, 1987. Comparative toxicity of acaricides to Aculops lycopersici and Homeopronematus anconai (Acari: Eriophyidae, Tydeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 80 (2): 348-351.
• SAS Institute, 2015. SAS/STAT User’sGuide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
• Schuster, R. O. & A. E. Pritchard, 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 271-274.
• Shahini, S., E. Kullaj, A. Çakalli & E. de Lillo, 2009. Preliminary survey and population dynamics of some eriophid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) associated with olives in Albania. International Journal of Acarology, 35 (5): 419-423.
• Silva, A. L. da, V. R. S. Veloso, R. M. C. de Silva & M. R. da Rocha, 1988. Assay for the control of the tomato mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) (Acari: Eriophyidae) with a new acaricide. Anais das Escolas de Agronomia e Veterinária (Goiânia), 18 (1): 29-34.
• Simon, J. Y., 2014. The Toxicology and Biochemistry of Insecticides. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 380 pp.
• Sterk, G., S. A. Hassan, M. Baillod, et al, 1999. Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group ‘‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’’. Biocontrol, 44 (1): 99-117.
• Sundaram, K. M. S. & L. Sloane, 1995. Effects of pure and formulated azadirachtin, a neem-based biopesticide, on the phytophagous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part B, 30 (6): 801-814.
• Tzanakakis, M. E., 2003. Seasonal development and dormancy of insects and mites feeding on olive. A Review Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 52 (2-4): 87-224.
• van Leeuwen, T., J. Witters, R. Nauen, C. Duso & L. Tirry, 2010. The control of eriophyoid mites: state of the art and future challenges. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 51 (1-3): 205-224.
• van Zon, A. Q. & M. Wysoki, 1978. The effect of some fungicides on Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 23 (4): 371-378.
• Yorulmaz, S. & R. Ay, 2012. Resistance level and resistance mechanisms in predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) populations collected from the apple orchards in Isparta to some Acaricides. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (2): 122-132. (in Turkish with abstract in English).