Research Article

THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING

Volume: 2 September 1, 2015
  • Tolga Gök
EN

THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING

Abstract

The technology providing quick and easy online access to information and social activities has undeniable effects on academic lives and study hours of students. It was therefore important to investigate what we know about the impact of digital technologies and social networking sites (SNS) on education. This study investigates the effects of developing technologies and social media on the students’ daily life. The research was conducted with 220 university students. Data were collected using a survey designed for gathering the students’ opinions about the digital devices and social media. The students were asked some questions such as why/how long/when do they use the digital devices and social media. The results of the research indicated that the digital devices and SNS had negative impact on students’ knowledge and learning due to distraction from academic tasks. The study reveals that most of the students spent more time on social media (facebook, twitter, youtube etc.) than academic courses. Detailed results and recommendations based on the academic success are presented in the study.  

Keywords

References

  1. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsyhology & Behavior, 8, 39-51. Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., d'Acremont, M., Ceschi, G., & Zermatten, A. (2007). Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 527-537. Bond, E. (2010). Managing mobile relationship: Children’s perception of the impact of the mobile phone on relationships in their everyday lives. Childhood, 17, 514-529. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210, 230. Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 577- 592 Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2, 371-387. Choliz, M. (2010). Mobile phone addiction: Point of issue. Addiction, 105(2), 373-374. Chou, C., & Hsiao, M. C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: The Taiwan college students’ case. Computers and Education, 35(1), 65-80. Coyle, C., & Vaughn, H. (2008). Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution? Bell Labs Technical Journal, 13(2), 13-17. Dhindsa, H. S., & Emran, S. (2011). Using interactive whiteboard technology rich constructivist learning environment to minimize gender differences in chemistry achievement. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(4), 393-414. Duncan, D. K., Hoekstra, A. R., & Wilcox, B. R. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: Does in class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11, 010108, 1-4. Hakoyama, M., & Hakoyama, S. (2011). The impact of cell phone use on social networking and development among college students. The American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences Journal, 15, 1-20. Hwang, Y. S., Fisher, W., & Vrongistinos, K. (2009). Calibrating a measure of gender differences in motivation for learning technology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3), 259-272. Joiner, R., Iacovides, J., Owen, M., Gavin, C., Clibbery, S., Darling, J., & Drew, B. (2011). Digital games, gender and learning in engineering: Do females benefit as much as males? Journal of Science Educational Technology, 20, 178-185. Junco, R., Merson, D., & Salter, D. W. (2010). The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college students’ use of communication technologies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 619-627. Kadijevich, D. (2000). Gender differences in computer attitude among ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(2), 145-154. Kaino, L. M. (2008). Usefulness and enjoyment of using computers in learning: A gender dimension. Gender & Behaviour, 6(2), 1841 – 1857. Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well- being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189. Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301. Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behaviors: An overview. Prevention Researcher, 17, 3-6. Nalwa, K., & Anand, A. P. (2003). Internet addiction in students: A cause of concern. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(6), 653-656. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multi-taskers. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(33), 15583-15587. Osman, M. A., Talib, A. Z., Sanusi, Z. A., Shiang-Yen, T., & Alwi, A. S. (2012). A study of the trend of smartphone and its usage behavior in Malaysia. International Journal of New Computer Architectures and Their Applications, 2(1), 274-285. Salas, G., & Alexander, J. S. (2008). Technology for institutional enrollment, communication, and student success. In Junco, R., & Timm, D. M. (Eds.), Using emerging technologies to enhance student engagement. New directions for student services, Number 124. 103-116. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schill, R. (2011). Social networking teens more likely to drink, use drugs, study finds. Retrieved on February 3, 2015 from website: http://jjie.org/teens-on-facebook-more-likely-drink-or-use-drugs-study-finds/ Thanuskodi, S. (2013). Gender differences in internet usage among college students: A comparative study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1052, 1-13. Timm, D. M., & Duven, C. J. (2008). Privacy and social networking sites. In Junco, R., & Timm, D. M. (Eds.), Using emerging technologies to enhance student engagement. New directions for student services, Number124. 89-102. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1-5 Wang, Q., Chen,W., & Liang, Y. (2011). The effects of social media on college students. MBA Student Scholarship, 5,1-12. Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. F. (2012). Gender difference of confidence in using technology for learning. The Journal of Technology Studies, 38(2), 74-79. Zulkefly, S. N., & Baharundin, R. (2009). Mobile phone use amongst students in a university in Malaysia: It’s correlates and relationship to psychological health. Open Journal of Scientific Research, 37(2), 206- 218.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tolga Gök This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2015

Submission Date

August 7, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 2

APA
Gök, T. (2015). THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 2, 173-177. https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD
AMA
1.Gök T. THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING. EPESS. 2015;2:173-177. https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD
Chicago
Gök, Tolga. 2015. “THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 2 (April): 173-77. https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD.
EndNote
Gök T (April 1, 2015) THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 2 173–177.
IEEE
[1]T. Gök, “THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING”, EPESS, vol. 2, pp. 173–177, Apr. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD
ISNAD
Gök, Tolga. “THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 2 (April 1, 2015): 173-177. https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD.
JAMA
1.Gök T. THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING. EPESS. 2015;2:173–177.
MLA
Gök, Tolga. “THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, vol. 2, Apr. 2015, pp. 173-7, https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD.
Vancouver
1.Tolga Gök. THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING. EPESS [Internet]. 2015 Apr. 1;2:173-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA49LS22LD