How Close Are Teachers to Think in a Scientific Manner?

Abstract

Lately, The Ministry of National Education (Turkey) has announced ‘2023 Education Vision’ for raising qualified generations equipped with a variety of skills and for meeting the needs of educators. Students, families, teachers and schools are four primary elements of the report. Especially upskilling teachers who appeal future generations and evaluating their skills are often referred in the report. In this regard, the present survey study aimed to determine and compare scientific thinking skills of teachers in accordance with their working experiences. Sampling of the study comprised of 62 teachers working in schools of Aegean region of Turkey from a variety of disciplines such as mathematics, science, and information technologies, and of working experiences from 1 to 28 years. Data of the study are gathered through sequential inquiry-based activity sheets administered simultaneously with the implementation of inquiry-based activities regarding electromagnetism. Findings of the study revealed that teachers had irrational and intuitive levels of thinking skills at the beginning and they could improve their level of thinking through activities and approached to think more in a scientific manner. However, this improvement differed as working experience changes. Novice teachers who have working career for less than 2 years could not show statistically significant improvement in their statements, in contrast, well-experienced teachers showed statistically significant increase in their scientific thinking scores. They could record their predictions and explanations consistently by considering variables, and evidence-data, they could make observations in an objective way which are the analyzing criteria determined by considering the literature. With the light of the findings, it is argued that especially novice teachers need support to improve their abilities and that they could be encouraged in a longer period with such inquiry-based activities fostering their thinking skills which eventually result in having scientific thinking generations as intended in 2023 education vision.

Keywords

• Scientific thinking,Teacher experience,Evaluation,2023 Education vision

References

1. As' ari, A. R., Mahmudi, A., & Nuerlaelah, E. (2017). Our prospective mathematic teachers are not critical thinkers yet. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 145-156. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150240.pdf Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com /doi/abs/10.3102 /00028312026004473? Journal Code=aera Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657-674. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000122 Darling-Hammond, L. & Schlan, E. (1996). Who teaches and why? Dilemmas of building a better profession for twenty-first century schools. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. (2nd. ed., pp. 67-101). New York: MacMillan. Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 814–825. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.021 Haynes, L. (2011). Novice teachers' perceptions of their mentoring experiences (Doctoral dissertation). Lamar University-Beaumont. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/922678446?pq-origsite=gscholar Huang, J. L. (2015). Cultivating teacher thinking: Ideas and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(3), 247-257. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10671-015-9184-1 Husu, J., Toom, A., & Patrikainen, S. (2008). Guided reflection as a means to demonstrate and develop student teachers’ reflective competencies. Reflective Practice, 9(1), 37-51. doi:10.1080/14623940701816642 Karataş, P., & Karaman, A. C. (2013). Challenges faced by novice language teachers: Support, identity, and pedagogy in the initial years of teaching. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 4(3), 10-23. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/90261 Kember, D., Leung, D. Y., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., ... & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. doi:10.1080/713611442 Kim, K. A., & Roth, G. L. (2011). Novice teachers and their acquisition of work-related information. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). 2023 eğitim vizyonu Ankara: MEB. Retrieved from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_VIZYON_ENG.pdf Mirzaei, F., Phang, F. A., & Kashefi, H. (2014). Assessing and improving reflective thinking of experienced and inexperienced teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 633-639. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.111 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019), OECD skills outlook 2019: Thriving in a digital world, Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/df80bc12-en. Perschbach, J.W. (2006). Blogging: An inquiry into the efficacy of a web-based technology for student reflection in community college computer science programs. (Doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University. Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences: Florida. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143. doi:10.1002/sce.10044 Zimmerman, A. S. (2017). Knots in thinking and the problem of enactment: Exploring the classroom thinking of three novice teachers. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 29(4). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165681