Abstract
Bu makalede, temelde bir dış politika konusu olan Avrupa Birliği üyeliğinin veya daha geniş anlamda Avrupa bütünleşmesinin, iç politikayı etkilemesi gerçeği bir örnek olay etrafında incelenmektedir. Örnek olay, İngiltere’de 1979-1992 yılları arasında İşçi Partisi ve Muhafazakar Parti’nin Avrupa bütünleşmesi konusunda be-nimsediği politikalardır. İnceleme göstermektedir ki, iki parti de ilk benimsedikleri politikalardan uzaklaşmışlar; zaman zaman Avrupa Birliğine daha yakın veya daha uzak olan parti olmuşlardır. Daha da önemlisi, hem sosyal haklar konusundaki ge-lişmeler nedeniyle seçmenlerin Birliğe daha sıcak bakmaları, hem de İngiltere eko-nomisinin Avrupa ile bütünleşmesiyle karşılıklı bağımlılığın artması sonucunda, ülkenin Avrupa Birliği üyeliğinden çekilmesinin gerçekçi bir politika olamayacağını her iki parti de sonuçta kabullenmiştir. Ancak bu kabullenme süreci kolay atlatılma-mış, partiler içinde bölünme ve hizipleşmeler yaşandığı gibi, bazı liderler de görev-den uzaklaştırılmıştır. Türkiye açısından bu örnek olay, hem ülkenin Avrupa Birliği ile ilişkileri hakkında son dönemlerde yapılan tartışmalara, hem de ulusal partiler içinde yaşanan gelişmelere ışık tutmaktadır.
Keywords
References
- Britain in Europe: The European Community and Your Future (1992), Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London Britain Will Win: Labour Manifesto (1987).
- BURGESS, M. and A. LEE (1990), “The United Kingdom,” in J. LODGE (Ed.), The 1989 Election of the European Parliament.: St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 190-209.
- BUTLER, D. and D. MARQUAND (1981), European Elections and British Politics.. Longman, New York.
- BUTLER, D. and P. JOWETT (1985), Party Strategies in Britain: A Study of the 1984 European Elections. Macmillan Press, London.
- DINAN, D. (1994), Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to the European Community. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Colorado.
- Fifty Questions and Answers on the European Community (1988), European Democratic Group, London.
- GEORGE, S. (1990), An Awkward Partner. Oxford University Press, New York
- --------- (1991), Britain and European Integration Since 1945. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
- GEORGE, S. and B. ROSAMOND “The European Community,” in J.M. SMITH and J. SPEAR (Eds.), The Changing Labour, Routledge, New York, 1992, pp. 171-184.
- HAAHR, J. H. (1993), Looking to Europe. Aarhus University Press, Oxford.
- HEARL, D. “The United Kingdom,” in J. LODGE (Ed.), Direct Elections to the European Parliament 1984. Macmillan, London, 1986.
- JONES, A. “Parties, Ideologies and Issues : The Case of the European Community,” in L ROBINS, H. BLACKMORE and R. PYPER (Eds.), Britain’s Changing Party System. Leicester University Press, London, 1994, pp. 75-92.
- KIRCHNER, E. “A Third Level of Government: Britain in the European Community,” in L. BUDGE and D. MCKAY (Eds.), The Developing British Political System: The 1990s. Longman, New York, 3rd edition, 1993, pp. 171-190.
- Leading Europe into the 1990s: The Conservative Manifesto for the European Elections on 15 June 1989 (1989). Conservative Central Office, London.
- New Hope for Britain: Labour’s Manifesto (1983).
- NUGENT, N. “Britain and the European Community,” in JONES, Bill (Ed.), Po-litical Issues in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 4th edition, 1994, pp. 122-140.
- OVERBEEK, H. “Caught Between Europe and Atlantic: Britain’s European Policy Under Margaret Thatcher,” in C. POLYCHRONIOU (Ed.), Perspectives and Issues in International Political Economy. Praeger, Westport, 1992, pp. 133-149.
- Politics Today (1986). Conservative Central Office, Westminster, No.5, March 1986.
- ROBINS, L. “Britain and the European Community: Twenty Years of Not Know-ing,” in B. JONES and L. ROBINS (Eds.), Two Decades in British Poli-tics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1992, pp. 243-255.
- WOOD, D. and A. DAVID. (1979), The Times Guide to the European Par-liament 1979. Times Books, London.
- YOUNG, J. W. (1993), Britain and European Unity, 1945-1992. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Abstract
References
- Britain in Europe: The European Community and Your Future (1992), Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London Britain Will Win: Labour Manifesto (1987).
- BURGESS, M. and A. LEE (1990), “The United Kingdom,” in J. LODGE (Ed.), The 1989 Election of the European Parliament.: St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 190-209.
- BUTLER, D. and D. MARQUAND (1981), European Elections and British Politics.. Longman, New York.
- BUTLER, D. and P. JOWETT (1985), Party Strategies in Britain: A Study of the 1984 European Elections. Macmillan Press, London.
- DINAN, D. (1994), Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to the European Community. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Colorado.
- Fifty Questions and Answers on the European Community (1988), European Democratic Group, London.
- GEORGE, S. (1990), An Awkward Partner. Oxford University Press, New York
- --------- (1991), Britain and European Integration Since 1945. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
- GEORGE, S. and B. ROSAMOND “The European Community,” in J.M. SMITH and J. SPEAR (Eds.), The Changing Labour, Routledge, New York, 1992, pp. 171-184.
- HAAHR, J. H. (1993), Looking to Europe. Aarhus University Press, Oxford.
- HEARL, D. “The United Kingdom,” in J. LODGE (Ed.), Direct Elections to the European Parliament 1984. Macmillan, London, 1986.
- JONES, A. “Parties, Ideologies and Issues : The Case of the European Community,” in L ROBINS, H. BLACKMORE and R. PYPER (Eds.), Britain’s Changing Party System. Leicester University Press, London, 1994, pp. 75-92.
- KIRCHNER, E. “A Third Level of Government: Britain in the European Community,” in L. BUDGE and D. MCKAY (Eds.), The Developing British Political System: The 1990s. Longman, New York, 3rd edition, 1993, pp. 171-190.
- Leading Europe into the 1990s: The Conservative Manifesto for the European Elections on 15 June 1989 (1989). Conservative Central Office, London.
- New Hope for Britain: Labour’s Manifesto (1983).
- NUGENT, N. “Britain and the European Community,” in JONES, Bill (Ed.), Po-litical Issues in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 4th edition, 1994, pp. 122-140.
- OVERBEEK, H. “Caught Between Europe and Atlantic: Britain’s European Policy Under Margaret Thatcher,” in C. POLYCHRONIOU (Ed.), Perspectives and Issues in International Political Economy. Praeger, Westport, 1992, pp. 133-149.
- Politics Today (1986). Conservative Central Office, Westminster, No.5, March 1986.
- ROBINS, L. “Britain and the European Community: Twenty Years of Not Know-ing,” in B. JONES and L. ROBINS (Eds.), Two Decades in British Poli-tics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1992, pp. 243-255.
- WOOD, D. and A. DAVID. (1979), The Times Guide to the European Par-liament 1979. Times Books, London.
- YOUNG, J. W. (1993), Britain and European Unity, 1945-1992. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2002 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2002 Issue: 19 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.