Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Comparative Analysis of Global Competition: North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 115 - 142, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.414768

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare and explain the similarities and differences of NATO and the SCO, in the context of Eurasianism which was part of daily discussion ın Turkey. For this purpose, organization objectives and classification, establishment processes, alliance obligations, threat perceptions, qualifications of members, decision making systems, responsibility fields, mutual interactions and activities were analyzed through comparative method. At the end of analysis, it was determined that there are considerable differences, despite some similarities, between NATO and SCO in aspect of quality, aim and context. Turkey can collaborate with SCO as long as it does not harm Turkey’s commitment in NATO.

References

  • Akihiro, Iwashita; (2004), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Its Implications for Eurasian Security: A New Dimension of “Partnership” after the Post-Cold War Period”, Slavic Eurasia’s Integration into the World Economy and Community, Sapporo: Slavic Research Centre, Hokkaido University, pp. 259-281.Ambrosio, Thomas; (2008), “Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia”, Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8): 1321-1344.Andican, Ahat; (2006), “Çin Satrancında Orta Asya”, Avrasya Dosyası, 12 (1): 14-16.Arı, Tayyar; (2013), Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika, MKM Yayıncılık, Bursa.Aris, Stephen; (2009), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the Three Evils’. A Regional Response to Non-traditional Security Challenges or an Anti-Western Bloc?” Europe-Asia Studies, 61(3): 457–482.Bailes, Alyson JK; (2007), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Europe”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 5(3): 13-18.Bailes, Alyson JK., Dunay, P., Guang, P. and Troitskiy, M. (2007) “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization” SIPRI Policy Paper, 17.Baizakova, Kuralai I.; (2013), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s Role in Countering Threats and Challenges to Central Asian Regional Security”, Russian Politics and Law, 51(1): 59–79.Blank, Stephen; (2006), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an Energy Club, Portents for the Future,” Central Asia-Caucuses Institute Analyst, 1-3. Brzezinski, Zbigniew; (2009), “An Agenda for NATO”, Foreign Affairs, 88(5).Carroll, William E.; (2011), “China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Hegemony, Multi-Polar Balance, or Cooperation in Central Asia”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(19): 1-8.Cheng, Joseph Y. S.; (2011), “The Shanghai Co-operation Organisation: China’s Initiative in Regional Institutional Building”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4): 632–656. Çakmak, Haydar; (2003), Avrupa Güvenliği, Ankara, Akçağ Yayınları.Çolakoğlu, Selçuk; (2004), “Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü’nün Geleceği ve Çin”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1(1): 173-197.Çomak, Hasret ve Gökalp, Ayşegül; (2009), “2010’lu Yıllarda Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü’nün Geleceği ve Türkiye”, Orta Asya Toplumlarında Sosyal, Siyasi, Ekonomik Arayışlar Kongresi, 22-24 Ekim 2008 Bişkek / Kırgızistan, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınevi.Dönmez, Suat; (2010), “Güvenlik Anlayışının Dönüşümü: İttifak Kavramı ve NATO”, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.Dwivedi, Sangit Sarita; (2012), “Alliances In Internatonal Relations Theory”, International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1(8): 224-227.Ekrem, Erkin; (2012), “Türkiye’nin Şanghay işbirliği Örgütü Üyeliği”, http://www.sde.org.tr/tr/authordetail/-turkiyenin-sanghay-isbirligi-orgutu-uyeligi/1107, (27.01.2017).Gaddis, John Lewis; (1997), We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History, Oxford University Press.Gaddis, John Lewis; (2005), The Cold War: A New History, New York, Penguen. Germanovich, Gene; (2008), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Threat to American Interests in Central Asia?”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 6(1): 19-38. Graham, Craig, Ozment Turner, Kagan; (2014), The Heritage of World Civilization, Ninth Edition, USA, Pearson.Guoping, Cheng; (2012), “SCO: A Wonderful Book” Chinascope, pp.23-25.Gürkaynak, Muharrem; (2004), Avrupa’da Savunma ve Güvenlik Ankara, Asıl Yayınevi.Hale, William; (2013), Turkish Foreign Policy Since 1774, London, Routledge.Hass, Marcel de; (2007), “The Shanghai Cooperation and the OSCE: Two of a Kind”, Helsinki Monitor, 46. Heywood, Andrew; (2013), Küresel Siyaset, Çev. Nasuh Uslu ve Haluk Özdemir, Ankara, Adres Yayınları.Holsti, Ole, Hopmann, T. and Sulliva, J.; (1973), Unity and Disintegration in International Alliance, New York, Wiley-Interscience Publication.Huasheng, Zhao; (2006), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization at 5: Achievements and Challenges Ahead” China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 4(3): 105-123.İşyar, Ö. Göksel; (2013), Avrasya ve Avrasyacılık, Bursa, Dora.Jia, Qingguo (no date),”The Success of the Shanghai Five: Interests, Norms and Pragmatism”, http://www.comw.org, (08.04.2018).Liska, George; (1962), Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Mate, Robert; (2009), "NATO of the East?: An International Relations Analysis of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization", Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p363868_index.html, (25.05. 2013).Mccalla, Robert B.; (1996), "NATO's Persistence After the Cold War", International Organization, 50(3): 445-475.Morgenthau, Hans J.; (2006), Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th. Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York.Morozov, Evgeni (08.06.2006) “NATO’s Evil Twin?”, TCS Daily, http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=060806A, (15.10.2017)NATO 2014 Zirve Bildirisi, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm, (11.11.2014).NATO stratejik Konsept 2010, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_82705.htm, (09.10.2013).NATO Stratejik Konsept, 1991, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_23847.htm, (11.08.2013).NATO Stratejik Konsept, 1999, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_27433.htm, (11.11.2014). Özdal, Barış ve Genç, Mehmet; (2005), AGSP’nin Türkiye-AB İlişkilerine Etkileri, İstanbul, Aktüel Yayınevi.Özdaşlı, Esma; (2012), “Çin ve Rusya Federasyonu’nun Perspektifinden Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü”, MAÜ SBE Dergisi 4(6): 108-122.Pantucci, Raffaello ve Alexandros Petersen (05 Mayıs 2013), “Türkiye, ŞİÖ için AB’den Vaz mı Geçecek?”, http://www.dunyabulteni.net/?aType=yazarHaber&ArticleID=18900, (15.11.2014).Sander, Oral; (1989), Siyasi Tarih 21 Baskı, Ankara, İmge.Sander, Oral; (2011), Siyasi Tarih 23. Baskı, Ankara, İmge. Shilong, Yang; (2012), “The Balance Power of the SCO” Chinascope. Snyder, Glenn H.; (1990), “Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut”, Journal of International Affairs, 44: 103-123.Sönmezoğlu, Faruk; (2013), Uluslararası Politika ve Dış Politika, İstanbul, Remzi.ŞİÖ’nün Kuruluş Bildirgesi, http://www.hrichina.org/content/5203, (26.08.2012).ŞİÖ’nün Temel Dökümanları, http://www.hrichina.org/content/5207, (11.11.2013).Telatar, Gökhan; (2005), “Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü: 21. Yüzyılın Bölgesel/Küresel Çekim Merkezi”, Atilla Sandıklı ve İlhan Güllü (Der.), Geleceğin Süper Gücü Çin: Uzakdoğu’daki Entegrasyonlar ve Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü, İstanbul, TASAM.Walt, Stephen M.; (1987), The Origins of Alliances, Cornell University Press Ithaca NY, 273-281.Waltz, Keneth; (1979, reisssued in 2010), Theory of International Politics, Illionis, Waveland Press.We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History adlı kitap incelemesi, Howard H. Lentner, City University of New York, Published on H-Teachpol, February, 1998. Weber, Steve; (1992), “Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power: Multilateralism in NATO”, International Organization, 46(3): 633-680. Wolfer, Arnold; (1968), “Alliances”, David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York, Macmillan.Yiğit, Süreyya; (2012), “Türkiye, Büyük Orta Asya ve ŞİÖ Pekin Zirvesi” Ortadoğu Analiz, 4(44): 52-67.

Küresel Rekabetin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi: Kuzey Atlantik Antlaşması Örgütü (NATO) ve Şangay İşbirliği Örgütü (ŞİÖ)

Year 2018, Issue: 52, 115 - 142, 28.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.414768

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, Türkiye’de gündemde olan Avrasyacılık tartışmaları bağlamında iki örgütün karşılaştırmalı analizini yapmak ve böylece NATO ve ŞİÖ’nün benzerliklerini ve farklılıklarını ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla örgütlerin, kuruluş amaçları ve sınıflandırılmaları, kuruluş süreçleri, ittifak yükümlükleri, tehdit algılamaları, üyelerin nitelikleri, karar alma sistemleri, sorumluluk sahaları ve etkinlikleri karşılaştırma yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, bazı benzerliklere rağmen, NATO ile ŞİÖ arasında nitelik, nitelik, amaç ve kapsam açısından önemli farklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye NATO yükümlülüklerine zarar vermeden ŞİÖ ile yakın işbirliği yapması olası görünmektedir.

References

  • Akihiro, Iwashita; (2004), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Its Implications for Eurasian Security: A New Dimension of “Partnership” after the Post-Cold War Period”, Slavic Eurasia’s Integration into the World Economy and Community, Sapporo: Slavic Research Centre, Hokkaido University, pp. 259-281.Ambrosio, Thomas; (2008), “Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia”, Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8): 1321-1344.Andican, Ahat; (2006), “Çin Satrancında Orta Asya”, Avrasya Dosyası, 12 (1): 14-16.Arı, Tayyar; (2013), Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika, MKM Yayıncılık, Bursa.Aris, Stephen; (2009), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the Three Evils’. A Regional Response to Non-traditional Security Challenges or an Anti-Western Bloc?” Europe-Asia Studies, 61(3): 457–482.Bailes, Alyson JK; (2007), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Europe”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 5(3): 13-18.Bailes, Alyson JK., Dunay, P., Guang, P. and Troitskiy, M. (2007) “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization” SIPRI Policy Paper, 17.Baizakova, Kuralai I.; (2013), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s Role in Countering Threats and Challenges to Central Asian Regional Security”, Russian Politics and Law, 51(1): 59–79.Blank, Stephen; (2006), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an Energy Club, Portents for the Future,” Central Asia-Caucuses Institute Analyst, 1-3. Brzezinski, Zbigniew; (2009), “An Agenda for NATO”, Foreign Affairs, 88(5).Carroll, William E.; (2011), “China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Hegemony, Multi-Polar Balance, or Cooperation in Central Asia”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(19): 1-8.Cheng, Joseph Y. S.; (2011), “The Shanghai Co-operation Organisation: China’s Initiative in Regional Institutional Building”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4): 632–656. Çakmak, Haydar; (2003), Avrupa Güvenliği, Ankara, Akçağ Yayınları.Çolakoğlu, Selçuk; (2004), “Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü’nün Geleceği ve Çin”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1(1): 173-197.Çomak, Hasret ve Gökalp, Ayşegül; (2009), “2010’lu Yıllarda Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü’nün Geleceği ve Türkiye”, Orta Asya Toplumlarında Sosyal, Siyasi, Ekonomik Arayışlar Kongresi, 22-24 Ekim 2008 Bişkek / Kırgızistan, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınevi.Dönmez, Suat; (2010), “Güvenlik Anlayışının Dönüşümü: İttifak Kavramı ve NATO”, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.Dwivedi, Sangit Sarita; (2012), “Alliances In Internatonal Relations Theory”, International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1(8): 224-227.Ekrem, Erkin; (2012), “Türkiye’nin Şanghay işbirliği Örgütü Üyeliği”, http://www.sde.org.tr/tr/authordetail/-turkiyenin-sanghay-isbirligi-orgutu-uyeligi/1107, (27.01.2017).Gaddis, John Lewis; (1997), We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History, Oxford University Press.Gaddis, John Lewis; (2005), The Cold War: A New History, New York, Penguen. Germanovich, Gene; (2008), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Threat to American Interests in Central Asia?”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 6(1): 19-38. Graham, Craig, Ozment Turner, Kagan; (2014), The Heritage of World Civilization, Ninth Edition, USA, Pearson.Guoping, Cheng; (2012), “SCO: A Wonderful Book” Chinascope, pp.23-25.Gürkaynak, Muharrem; (2004), Avrupa’da Savunma ve Güvenlik Ankara, Asıl Yayınevi.Hale, William; (2013), Turkish Foreign Policy Since 1774, London, Routledge.Hass, Marcel de; (2007), “The Shanghai Cooperation and the OSCE: Two of a Kind”, Helsinki Monitor, 46. Heywood, Andrew; (2013), Küresel Siyaset, Çev. Nasuh Uslu ve Haluk Özdemir, Ankara, Adres Yayınları.Holsti, Ole, Hopmann, T. and Sulliva, J.; (1973), Unity and Disintegration in International Alliance, New York, Wiley-Interscience Publication.Huasheng, Zhao; (2006), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization at 5: Achievements and Challenges Ahead” China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 4(3): 105-123.İşyar, Ö. Göksel; (2013), Avrasya ve Avrasyacılık, Bursa, Dora.Jia, Qingguo (no date),”The Success of the Shanghai Five: Interests, Norms and Pragmatism”, http://www.comw.org, (08.04.2018).Liska, George; (1962), Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Mate, Robert; (2009), "NATO of the East?: An International Relations Analysis of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization", Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p363868_index.html, (25.05. 2013).Mccalla, Robert B.; (1996), "NATO's Persistence After the Cold War", International Organization, 50(3): 445-475.Morgenthau, Hans J.; (2006), Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th. Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York.Morozov, Evgeni (08.06.2006) “NATO’s Evil Twin?”, TCS Daily, http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=060806A, (15.10.2017)NATO 2014 Zirve Bildirisi, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm, (11.11.2014).NATO stratejik Konsept 2010, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_82705.htm, (09.10.2013).NATO Stratejik Konsept, 1991, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_23847.htm, (11.08.2013).NATO Stratejik Konsept, 1999, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_27433.htm, (11.11.2014). Özdal, Barış ve Genç, Mehmet; (2005), AGSP’nin Türkiye-AB İlişkilerine Etkileri, İstanbul, Aktüel Yayınevi.Özdaşlı, Esma; (2012), “Çin ve Rusya Federasyonu’nun Perspektifinden Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü”, MAÜ SBE Dergisi 4(6): 108-122.Pantucci, Raffaello ve Alexandros Petersen (05 Mayıs 2013), “Türkiye, ŞİÖ için AB’den Vaz mı Geçecek?”, http://www.dunyabulteni.net/?aType=yazarHaber&ArticleID=18900, (15.11.2014).Sander, Oral; (1989), Siyasi Tarih 21 Baskı, Ankara, İmge.Sander, Oral; (2011), Siyasi Tarih 23. Baskı, Ankara, İmge. Shilong, Yang; (2012), “The Balance Power of the SCO” Chinascope. Snyder, Glenn H.; (1990), “Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut”, Journal of International Affairs, 44: 103-123.Sönmezoğlu, Faruk; (2013), Uluslararası Politika ve Dış Politika, İstanbul, Remzi.ŞİÖ’nün Kuruluş Bildirgesi, http://www.hrichina.org/content/5203, (26.08.2012).ŞİÖ’nün Temel Dökümanları, http://www.hrichina.org/content/5207, (11.11.2013).Telatar, Gökhan; (2005), “Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü: 21. Yüzyılın Bölgesel/Küresel Çekim Merkezi”, Atilla Sandıklı ve İlhan Güllü (Der.), Geleceğin Süper Gücü Çin: Uzakdoğu’daki Entegrasyonlar ve Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü, İstanbul, TASAM.Walt, Stephen M.; (1987), The Origins of Alliances, Cornell University Press Ithaca NY, 273-281.Waltz, Keneth; (1979, reisssued in 2010), Theory of International Politics, Illionis, Waveland Press.We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History adlı kitap incelemesi, Howard H. Lentner, City University of New York, Published on H-Teachpol, February, 1998. Weber, Steve; (1992), “Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power: Multilateralism in NATO”, International Organization, 46(3): 633-680. Wolfer, Arnold; (1968), “Alliances”, David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York, Macmillan.Yiğit, Süreyya; (2012), “Türkiye, Büyük Orta Asya ve ŞİÖ Pekin Zirvesi” Ortadoğu Analiz, 4(44): 52-67.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ayça Eminoğlu

Sertif Demir This is me

Publication Date December 28, 2018
Acceptance Date October 22, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 52

Cite

APA Eminoğlu, A., & Demir, S. (2018). Küresel Rekabetin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi: Kuzey Atlantik Antlaşması Örgütü (NATO) ve Şangay İşbirliği Örgütü (ŞİÖ). Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(52), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.414768

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.