BibTex RIS Cite

ENDOJEN BÖLGESEL KALKINMAYA FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ

Year 2005, Issue: 24, 1 - 14, 01.01.2005

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Murat Çetin

Abstract

1970’lere kadar exojen kalkınma yaklaşımı, bölgesel kalkınmada hakim model konumundaydı. Bu anlayış çerçevesinde kalkınmanın, “kalkınma kutupları” olgusunda olduğu gibi, gelişmiş bölgelerden az gelişmiş yada geri kalmış bölgelere doğru yayılma göstereceği kabul görmüştür. 1970’li yılların sonlarına doğru bu tür modeller, bölgelerin sürdürülebilir kalkınmasını desteklemediği için terk edilmeye başlanmış, büyük ölçüde yerel kaynaklara dayalı, yerel aktör ve dinamikler tarafından gerçekleştirilen ve sürdürülen bir kalkınma anlayışı olarak tanımlanabilen endojen kalkınma yaklaşımı ön plana çıkmıştır. Bu yaklaşımın temel dinamikleri arasında yerel üretim sistemleri, şehir sistemleri ve yenilikçi çevre önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu çalışmada söz konusu dinamikler ayrıntılı ele alındığı gibi, aralarındaki etkileşimler üzerinde de durulmaktadır

Keywords

Endojen kalkınma bölgesel dinamikler

References

  • AYDALOT, P. (1986), Innovative Milieu, European Research Group on İnnovative Milieux, Paris.
  • BECATTINI, G. (1990), The Marshalian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion, Geneva.
  • BRAMANTI, A. and R. RATTI (1997), The Multi-faceted Dimensions of Local Development, Aldershot:Ashgate, pp.3-44.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1995a), The Concept of Innovative Milieu and its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions, Papers of the Regional Science Association, pp.317-340.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1995b), Global Network and Local Milieu: Towards a Theory of Economic Space, Aldershot: Avebury, pp.195-214.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1998), The City as a Milieu: Applying the GREMI Approach to Urban Evolution, Paper Presented at the GREMI Conference, June 29-30, Paris.
  • CARBONARA, N., I. GIANNOCCARO and P. PONTRANDOLFO (2002), “Supply Chains within Industrial Districts: A Theoretical Framework”, International Journal of Production Economics, 76, pp.159-176.
  • COFFEY, W. and M. POLESE (1985), “Local Development: Conceptual Bases and Policy Implications”, Regional Studies, 19(2), pp.85-93.
  • CONSOLI, D. and P.P. PATRUCCO (2003), The Knowledge Trade-off: Circulation, Growth and the Role of Knowledge-intensive Business Services in Urban Innovation Systems, EAEPE Conference ‘The Information Society-Understanding its Institutions Interdisciplinary’, November 7-10, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • ÇETİN, M. (2004), “Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Farklı Bir Bakış: Çevre/Yenilikçi Çevre Yaklaşımı”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18(3-4), ss.35-49.
  • DURANTON, G. (2002), “The Economics of Production Systems: Segmentation and Skill-Biased Change”, European Economic Review, Article in Paper, July, pp.1-30.
  • ETTLINGER, N. (1991), “The Roots of Competitive Advantage in California and Japan”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 8(13), pp.391-407.
  • FUJITA, M., P. KRUGMAN and T. MORI (1995), “On the Evolution of Hiearchical Urban Systems”, Discussion Papers, No:419, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japonya.
  • FUJITA, K. and R.C. HILL (1995), “Global Toyotaism and Local Development”, IJURR, pp.7-21.
  • GAROFOLI, G. and B.A. VAZQUEZ (1994), Organization of Production and Territory: Local Models of Development, Pavia.
  • GERTOSIO, C., N. MEBARKI and A. DUSSAUCHOY (2000), “Modelling and Simulation of the Control Framework on Flexible Manufacuring Systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, 64, pp.285-293.
  • GILLY, J.P. (1990), “Social Services and Production Technologies in Urban Development”, 30 th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, İstanbul.
  • GROSJEAN, N. and O. CREVOISIER (1998), “Territorial Production Systems: Towards a Systematic Diagnostic Method”, Working Papers, No:9802, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp.1-25.
  • HAMPSON, I., P. EWER and M. SMITH (1994), “Post-Fordism and Workplace Change: Towards a Criticial Research Agenda”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, (June), pp.30-38.
  • HANSEN, N. (1995), The Region as a Factor of Production: From Marshall’s Industrial District to Innovative Regional Milieux, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the WRS, San Diego.
  • HENDERSON, J.V. (1987), Systems of Cities and Inter-City Trade, Harword Academic Publishers, Switzerland.
  • JANSSENS, R. (1999), “A Boolean Approach to the Measurement of Group Processes and Attitudes: The Concept of Integration as an Example”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, pp.275-293.
  • KEEBLE, D. (1993), Small Firm Creation, Innovation and Growth and the Urban-Rural Shift, London: Routledge, pp.55-78.
  • MAILLAT, D., O. CREVOISIER. and B. LECOQ (1994), Innovation, Networks and Territorial Dynamics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • MAILLAT, D. (1995), “Territorial Dynamic, Innovative Milieu and Ragional Policy”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7, pp.157-165.
  • MAILLAT, D. and B. LECOQ (1992), “New Technologies and Transformation of Regional Structures in Europe: the Role of the Milieu”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4, pp:1-20
  • MAILLAT, D., G. LECHOT, B. LECOQ and M. PFISTER (1996), “Comparative Analysis of the Structural Development of Milieux: The Example of the Watch Industry in the Swiss and French Jura Arc”, Working Papers, No:9607a, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-16 .
  • MAILLAT, D. (1996), “From the Industrial District to the Innovative Milieu: Contribution to an Analysis of Territorialized Productive Organizations”, Working Papers, No: 9606b, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-28
  • MARSHALL, J. U. (1989), The Structure of Urban Systems, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  • MUEHLINGHAUS, S., S. WAELTY and H. ELSASSER (2001), Endogenous Development and Local Initiatives in Mountainous Communities in Switzerland, University of Zürich.
  • PIORE, M.J. and C. SABEL (1984), The Second Industrial Divide, New York:Basic Books.
  • PYKE, F., G. BECATTINI and W. SENGENGBERGER (1990), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Laber Studies.
  • RAFFAELE, P. and U. STEFANO (2000), “Externalities, Khnowledge Spillovers and The Spatial Distribution of Innovation”, Geo Journal, 4, pp:1-31.
  • REMMERS, G.A. (1995), Hitting A Moving Target: Endogenous Development in Marginal European Areas, Gatekeeper Series No:63, International Institute for Environment and Development, pp:1-18.
  • RUCCIO, D. F. (1993), “Fordism on a World Scale: International Dimensions of Regulation”, Review of Political Economics, 21, pp:33-53.
  • STORPER, M., (1991), Technology Districts and International Trade: the Limits to Globalisation in an Age of Flexible Production, Los Angeles, Lewis Centre for Regional Policy Studies.
  • TERLUIN, I.J. (2001), Rural Region in the EU: Exploring Differences in Economic Development, Nowember, Groningen.
  • TODLİNG, F. (1994), “Regional Networks of High-Technology Firms: The Case of the Greater Boston Region”, Technovation, 14 (5), pp:323-343.
  • VAN DER PLOEG, J.D. (1999), Endogenous Development: Practices and Perspectives in Europe, Compass Newsletter, (February), Netherlands.
  • WALSH, J. (2002), Regional Development, National University of Ireland, Maynoot, Ireland.

Year 2005, Issue: 24, 1 - 14, 01.01.2005

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Murat Çetin

Abstract

References

  • AYDALOT, P. (1986), Innovative Milieu, European Research Group on İnnovative Milieux, Paris.
  • BECATTINI, G. (1990), The Marshalian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion, Geneva.
  • BRAMANTI, A. and R. RATTI (1997), The Multi-faceted Dimensions of Local Development, Aldershot:Ashgate, pp.3-44.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1995a), The Concept of Innovative Milieu and its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions, Papers of the Regional Science Association, pp.317-340.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1995b), Global Network and Local Milieu: Towards a Theory of Economic Space, Aldershot: Avebury, pp.195-214.
  • CAMAGNI, R. (1998), The City as a Milieu: Applying the GREMI Approach to Urban Evolution, Paper Presented at the GREMI Conference, June 29-30, Paris.
  • CARBONARA, N., I. GIANNOCCARO and P. PONTRANDOLFO (2002), “Supply Chains within Industrial Districts: A Theoretical Framework”, International Journal of Production Economics, 76, pp.159-176.
  • COFFEY, W. and M. POLESE (1985), “Local Development: Conceptual Bases and Policy Implications”, Regional Studies, 19(2), pp.85-93.
  • CONSOLI, D. and P.P. PATRUCCO (2003), The Knowledge Trade-off: Circulation, Growth and the Role of Knowledge-intensive Business Services in Urban Innovation Systems, EAEPE Conference ‘The Information Society-Understanding its Institutions Interdisciplinary’, November 7-10, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • ÇETİN, M. (2004), “Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Farklı Bir Bakış: Çevre/Yenilikçi Çevre Yaklaşımı”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18(3-4), ss.35-49.
  • DURANTON, G. (2002), “The Economics of Production Systems: Segmentation and Skill-Biased Change”, European Economic Review, Article in Paper, July, pp.1-30.
  • ETTLINGER, N. (1991), “The Roots of Competitive Advantage in California and Japan”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 8(13), pp.391-407.
  • FUJITA, M., P. KRUGMAN and T. MORI (1995), “On the Evolution of Hiearchical Urban Systems”, Discussion Papers, No:419, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japonya.
  • FUJITA, K. and R.C. HILL (1995), “Global Toyotaism and Local Development”, IJURR, pp.7-21.
  • GAROFOLI, G. and B.A. VAZQUEZ (1994), Organization of Production and Territory: Local Models of Development, Pavia.
  • GERTOSIO, C., N. MEBARKI and A. DUSSAUCHOY (2000), “Modelling and Simulation of the Control Framework on Flexible Manufacuring Systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, 64, pp.285-293.
  • GILLY, J.P. (1990), “Social Services and Production Technologies in Urban Development”, 30 th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, İstanbul.
  • GROSJEAN, N. and O. CREVOISIER (1998), “Territorial Production Systems: Towards a Systematic Diagnostic Method”, Working Papers, No:9802, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp.1-25.
  • HAMPSON, I., P. EWER and M. SMITH (1994), “Post-Fordism and Workplace Change: Towards a Criticial Research Agenda”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, (June), pp.30-38.
  • HANSEN, N. (1995), The Region as a Factor of Production: From Marshall’s Industrial District to Innovative Regional Milieux, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the WRS, San Diego.
  • HENDERSON, J.V. (1987), Systems of Cities and Inter-City Trade, Harword Academic Publishers, Switzerland.
  • JANSSENS, R. (1999), “A Boolean Approach to the Measurement of Group Processes and Attitudes: The Concept of Integration as an Example”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, pp.275-293.
  • KEEBLE, D. (1993), Small Firm Creation, Innovation and Growth and the Urban-Rural Shift, London: Routledge, pp.55-78.
  • MAILLAT, D., O. CREVOISIER. and B. LECOQ (1994), Innovation, Networks and Territorial Dynamics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • MAILLAT, D. (1995), “Territorial Dynamic, Innovative Milieu and Ragional Policy”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7, pp.157-165.
  • MAILLAT, D. and B. LECOQ (1992), “New Technologies and Transformation of Regional Structures in Europe: the Role of the Milieu”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4, pp:1-20
  • MAILLAT, D., G. LECHOT, B. LECOQ and M. PFISTER (1996), “Comparative Analysis of the Structural Development of Milieux: The Example of the Watch Industry in the Swiss and French Jura Arc”, Working Papers, No:9607a, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-16 .
  • MAILLAT, D. (1996), “From the Industrial District to the Innovative Milieu: Contribution to an Analysis of Territorialized Productive Organizations”, Working Papers, No: 9606b, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-28
  • MARSHALL, J. U. (1989), The Structure of Urban Systems, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  • MUEHLINGHAUS, S., S. WAELTY and H. ELSASSER (2001), Endogenous Development and Local Initiatives in Mountainous Communities in Switzerland, University of Zürich.
  • PIORE, M.J. and C. SABEL (1984), The Second Industrial Divide, New York:Basic Books.
  • PYKE, F., G. BECATTINI and W. SENGENGBERGER (1990), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Laber Studies.
  • RAFFAELE, P. and U. STEFANO (2000), “Externalities, Khnowledge Spillovers and The Spatial Distribution of Innovation”, Geo Journal, 4, pp:1-31.
  • REMMERS, G.A. (1995), Hitting A Moving Target: Endogenous Development in Marginal European Areas, Gatekeeper Series No:63, International Institute for Environment and Development, pp:1-18.
  • RUCCIO, D. F. (1993), “Fordism on a World Scale: International Dimensions of Regulation”, Review of Political Economics, 21, pp:33-53.
  • STORPER, M., (1991), Technology Districts and International Trade: the Limits to Globalisation in an Age of Flexible Production, Los Angeles, Lewis Centre for Regional Policy Studies.
  • TERLUIN, I.J. (2001), Rural Region in the EU: Exploring Differences in Economic Development, Nowember, Groningen.
  • TODLİNG, F. (1994), “Regional Networks of High-Technology Firms: The Case of the Greater Boston Region”, Technovation, 14 (5), pp:323-343.
  • VAN DER PLOEG, J.D. (1999), Endogenous Development: Practices and Perspectives in Europe, Compass Newsletter, (February), Netherlands.
  • WALSH, J. (2002), Regional Development, National University of Ireland, Maynoot, Ireland.
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Murat Çetin This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Issue: 24

Cite

APA Çetin, Y. . D. . D. . M. (2005). ENDOJEN BÖLGESEL KALKINMAYA FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(24), 1-14.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.