BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye'de Dijital Eşitsizlik: TÜBİTAK-BİLTEN Anketleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2005, Issue: 24, 111 - 132, 01.01.2005

Abstract

Bu çalışmada bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinden yararlanmada yaşanan eşitsizlikleri tanımlamak için kullanılan “Dijital Uçurum” sorunu Türkiye açısından incelenmiştir. Öncelikle dijital uçurumun ülke açısından önemi gösterilmeye çalışılmış ve TÜBİTAK-BİLTEN tarafından 1997 ve 2000 yıllarında Türkiye üzerine gerçekleştirilen saha araştırması sonuçları, diğer ülkelerdeki durumla karşılaştırılarak bir değerlendirme yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Sorunun giderilmesine yönelik dünyadaki çabalara yer verilerek, Türkiye'de bu sorunun aşılabilmesi için çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Mevcut veriler ışığında, Türkiye'de de bir dijital uçurumdan bahsedilebileceği ve gerekli önlemler alınmadığı taktirde sorunun daha da derinleşebileceği sonucuna varılmıştır

References

  • ACC, (1997), “Statement on Universal Access to Basic Communication and Information Services”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.itu.int/acc/rtc/acc- rep.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 12.06.2003.
  • ARIAS, O. (2000), “Are All Men Benefiting from the New Economy? Male Economic Marginalization in Argentina, Brazil, and Costa Rica”, The World Bank, LCSPR Working Paper, January 2000.
  • BARBET, P. and N. COUTINET (2001): “Measuring the Digital Economy: State- of-the-Art Developments and Future Prospects”, Communications & Strategies, 42(2), pp. 1-23.
  • BIRDSALL, W. F. (2000), “The Digital Divide in the Liberal State: a Canadian Perspective”, First Monday, 5(12), December 2000, İnternet Adresi: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_12/index.html, Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2003.
  • CAMPBELL, D. (2001), “Can the Digital Divide Be Contained?”, International Labour Review, 140 (2), pp.119-141.
  • CID (2002): The Global Information Technology Report 2001-2002: Readiness for the Networked World, Center for International Development at Harvard University, cr/gitr2002_press.html, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2003. Adresi:
  • http://www.cid.harvard.edu/
  • COLBY, D. (2001), “Conceptualizing The 'Digital Divide'”, Communication Law & Policy, 6(1), Winter 2001, pp.123-174.
  • CORROCHER, N. and A. ORDANINI (2002), “"Measuring the Digital Divide: A Framework for the Analysis of Cross-Country Differences”, Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), March 2002, pp.9-19.
  • DASGUPTA, S. et al (2001), “Policy Reform, Economic Growth, and the Digital Divide: An Econometric Analysis”, World Bank, Development Research http://econ.worldbank.org/files/ 1615_wps2567.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2003. Working Papers, İnternet Adresi:
  • DRAGULANESCU, N. (2002), “Social Impact of the 'Digital Divide' in a Central–Eastern European Country”, The International Information & Library Review, 34(2), June 2002, pp.139-151.
  • DURA, C. ve H. ATİK (2002), Bilgi Toplumu, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Türkiye, Literatür Yayınları No: 72, Mart 2002, İstanbul.
  • FREIRE, F. (1999), “Inequality and Information Technology: A Preliminary Assessment”, The World Bank, February 1999.
  • GDI (2001): "A Global ICT Skills Offensive to Bridge the Digital Divide Between North and South" German Development Institute, Briefing Paper (2/2001).
  • http://europa.eu.int/comm/information_society/eeurope/index_en.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 7.02.2004.
  • http://www.bridges.org, Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2003.
  • http://www.digitaldivide.gov, Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2004.
  • http://www.digitaldivide.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2004.
  • http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org, Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2003.
  • http://www. neweconomyindex.org, Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2003.
  • http://www.pbs.org/digitaldivide, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2004.
  • IDC (2002): “World Times Information Society Index: Measuring the Global Impact of Information Technology and Internet Adoption.” International Data Corporation, İnternet Adresi: http://www.idc.com, Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2004.
  • ILO (2001), “The Digital Divide: Employment and Development Implications”, International Labour Review, 140(2), pp.113-117 ITU (2001), Yearbook of Statistics:
  • Telecommunication Services
  • Chronological Time Series 1991-2000, International Telecommuncation
  • Union, ITU Publications, Geneva.
  • _________(2002), World Telecommunication Development Report 2002: Reinventing Telecoms, International Telecommuncation Union, ITU Publications, Geneva.
  • JUNG, J. et al (2001), “Internet Connectedness and Inequality: Beyond the Divide”, Communication Research, 28 (4), pp.507-535.
  • NORRIS, P. (2001), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • OECD (2001), Understanding Digital Divide, OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development), Paris.
  • ÖZCİVELEK, R., vd. (2000), “Sayısal Uçurum: Dünya ve Türkiye'de Durum”, VI.Türkiye'de Internet Konferansı, 9-11 Kasım 2000, İstanbul.
  • ÖZTÜRK, L. ve S. BAŞAR (2002), “Yeni Ekonomi ve Elektronik Ticaret: Dünyadaki Gelişmeler ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”, Atatürk Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3/4), pp.11-30.
  • ÖZTÜRK, L. (2002), “Dijital Uçurumun Küresel Boyutları”, Ege Üniversitesi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 2(1), pp.127-136.
  • PROGRESSIVE POLICY INSTITUTE, 2002, İnternet Adresi: http://www. neweconomyindex.org, Erişim Trihi: 21.12.2003.
  • RICCI, A. (2000), “Measuring Information Society: Dynamics of European Data on Usage of Information and Communication Technologies in Europe Since 1995”, Telematics & Informatics, 17(1), pp.141-167.
  • RODRIGUEZ, F. and E. J. WILSON III (2000), “Are Poor Countries Losing the Information Revolution?”, The World Bank Group, Global Information and Communication Technologies Department, The Information for Development Program Working Paper, May 2000. İnternet Adresi: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/library/papers/ewilson/apxc.pdf, Tarihi: 20.08.2003. Erişim
  • QUIBRIA, M.G. et al (2003), “Digital Divide: Determinants and Policies With Special Reference to Asia”, Journal of Asian Economics, 13, pp. 811- 825.
  • TELEKOMÜNİKASYON KURUMU (2002), Sayısal Uçurum (Digital Divide), Telekomünikasyon Kurumu Sektörel Araştırma ve Stratejiler Dairesi Başkanlığı, http://www.tk.gov.tr/pdf/Sayisal_Ucurum.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2004. Ankara, İnternet Adresi:
  • TÜBİTAK-BİLTEN (1998), Yetenek ve Kullanım Saptaması, TÜBİTAK- BİLTEN, pdf/1200-G-T-A-2.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2003. Adresi:
  • http://www.tuena.tubitak.gov.tr/rapor/
  • ________(2001), Bilgi Teknolojileri Yaygınlık ve Kullanım Araştırması 2000, Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ocak 2001, Ankara.
  • ________(2002), Instruments to Combat Digital Divide: An Evaluation Based on the Turkish Experience, TÜBİTAK BİLTEN, Mart 2002, Ankara.
  • U.S. DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE (1998), "Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide", U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunication and Information Administration, July 1998. İnternet Adresi: 11.01.2003. Erişim Tarihi:
  • ________(1999), "Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide", U.S. Department Information Administration, A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America, July 1999, İnternet Adresi: http:// www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html, Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2003. National
  • Telecommunications and
  • _________(2000), "Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion", U.S. Department Information Administration, A Report on Americans’ Access to National
  • Telecommunications and Technology http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/Falling.htm, 11.01.2003. October 2000, İnternet Adresi: Tarihi: Erişim
  • WARSCHAUER, M. (2002), “Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide”, First Monday, 7(7), July 1st 2002, İnternet Adresi: http://www.firstmonday.dk issues/issue7_7/index, html. Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2003.
Year 2005, Issue: 24, 111 - 132, 01.01.2005

Abstract

References

  • ACC, (1997), “Statement on Universal Access to Basic Communication and Information Services”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.itu.int/acc/rtc/acc- rep.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 12.06.2003.
  • ARIAS, O. (2000), “Are All Men Benefiting from the New Economy? Male Economic Marginalization in Argentina, Brazil, and Costa Rica”, The World Bank, LCSPR Working Paper, January 2000.
  • BARBET, P. and N. COUTINET (2001): “Measuring the Digital Economy: State- of-the-Art Developments and Future Prospects”, Communications & Strategies, 42(2), pp. 1-23.
  • BIRDSALL, W. F. (2000), “The Digital Divide in the Liberal State: a Canadian Perspective”, First Monday, 5(12), December 2000, İnternet Adresi: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_12/index.html, Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2003.
  • CAMPBELL, D. (2001), “Can the Digital Divide Be Contained?”, International Labour Review, 140 (2), pp.119-141.
  • CID (2002): The Global Information Technology Report 2001-2002: Readiness for the Networked World, Center for International Development at Harvard University, cr/gitr2002_press.html, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2003. Adresi:
  • http://www.cid.harvard.edu/
  • COLBY, D. (2001), “Conceptualizing The 'Digital Divide'”, Communication Law & Policy, 6(1), Winter 2001, pp.123-174.
  • CORROCHER, N. and A. ORDANINI (2002), “"Measuring the Digital Divide: A Framework for the Analysis of Cross-Country Differences”, Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), March 2002, pp.9-19.
  • DASGUPTA, S. et al (2001), “Policy Reform, Economic Growth, and the Digital Divide: An Econometric Analysis”, World Bank, Development Research http://econ.worldbank.org/files/ 1615_wps2567.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2003. Working Papers, İnternet Adresi:
  • DRAGULANESCU, N. (2002), “Social Impact of the 'Digital Divide' in a Central–Eastern European Country”, The International Information & Library Review, 34(2), June 2002, pp.139-151.
  • DURA, C. ve H. ATİK (2002), Bilgi Toplumu, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Türkiye, Literatür Yayınları No: 72, Mart 2002, İstanbul.
  • FREIRE, F. (1999), “Inequality and Information Technology: A Preliminary Assessment”, The World Bank, February 1999.
  • GDI (2001): "A Global ICT Skills Offensive to Bridge the Digital Divide Between North and South" German Development Institute, Briefing Paper (2/2001).
  • http://europa.eu.int/comm/information_society/eeurope/index_en.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 7.02.2004.
  • http://www.bridges.org, Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2003.
  • http://www.digitaldivide.gov, Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2004.
  • http://www.digitaldivide.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2004.
  • http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org, Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2003.
  • http://www. neweconomyindex.org, Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2003.
  • http://www.pbs.org/digitaldivide, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2004.
  • IDC (2002): “World Times Information Society Index: Measuring the Global Impact of Information Technology and Internet Adoption.” International Data Corporation, İnternet Adresi: http://www.idc.com, Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2004.
  • ILO (2001), “The Digital Divide: Employment and Development Implications”, International Labour Review, 140(2), pp.113-117 ITU (2001), Yearbook of Statistics:
  • Telecommunication Services
  • Chronological Time Series 1991-2000, International Telecommuncation
  • Union, ITU Publications, Geneva.
  • _________(2002), World Telecommunication Development Report 2002: Reinventing Telecoms, International Telecommuncation Union, ITU Publications, Geneva.
  • JUNG, J. et al (2001), “Internet Connectedness and Inequality: Beyond the Divide”, Communication Research, 28 (4), pp.507-535.
  • NORRIS, P. (2001), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • OECD (2001), Understanding Digital Divide, OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development), Paris.
  • ÖZCİVELEK, R., vd. (2000), “Sayısal Uçurum: Dünya ve Türkiye'de Durum”, VI.Türkiye'de Internet Konferansı, 9-11 Kasım 2000, İstanbul.
  • ÖZTÜRK, L. ve S. BAŞAR (2002), “Yeni Ekonomi ve Elektronik Ticaret: Dünyadaki Gelişmeler ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”, Atatürk Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(3/4), pp.11-30.
  • ÖZTÜRK, L. (2002), “Dijital Uçurumun Küresel Boyutları”, Ege Üniversitesi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 2(1), pp.127-136.
  • PROGRESSIVE POLICY INSTITUTE, 2002, İnternet Adresi: http://www. neweconomyindex.org, Erişim Trihi: 21.12.2003.
  • RICCI, A. (2000), “Measuring Information Society: Dynamics of European Data on Usage of Information and Communication Technologies in Europe Since 1995”, Telematics & Informatics, 17(1), pp.141-167.
  • RODRIGUEZ, F. and E. J. WILSON III (2000), “Are Poor Countries Losing the Information Revolution?”, The World Bank Group, Global Information and Communication Technologies Department, The Information for Development Program Working Paper, May 2000. İnternet Adresi: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/library/papers/ewilson/apxc.pdf, Tarihi: 20.08.2003. Erişim
  • QUIBRIA, M.G. et al (2003), “Digital Divide: Determinants and Policies With Special Reference to Asia”, Journal of Asian Economics, 13, pp. 811- 825.
  • TELEKOMÜNİKASYON KURUMU (2002), Sayısal Uçurum (Digital Divide), Telekomünikasyon Kurumu Sektörel Araştırma ve Stratejiler Dairesi Başkanlığı, http://www.tk.gov.tr/pdf/Sayisal_Ucurum.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.01.2004. Ankara, İnternet Adresi:
  • TÜBİTAK-BİLTEN (1998), Yetenek ve Kullanım Saptaması, TÜBİTAK- BİLTEN, pdf/1200-G-T-A-2.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2003. Adresi:
  • http://www.tuena.tubitak.gov.tr/rapor/
  • ________(2001), Bilgi Teknolojileri Yaygınlık ve Kullanım Araştırması 2000, Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ocak 2001, Ankara.
  • ________(2002), Instruments to Combat Digital Divide: An Evaluation Based on the Turkish Experience, TÜBİTAK BİLTEN, Mart 2002, Ankara.
  • U.S. DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE (1998), "Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide", U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunication and Information Administration, July 1998. İnternet Adresi: 11.01.2003. Erişim Tarihi:
  • ________(1999), "Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide", U.S. Department Information Administration, A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America, July 1999, İnternet Adresi: http:// www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html, Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2003. National
  • Telecommunications and
  • _________(2000), "Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion", U.S. Department Information Administration, A Report on Americans’ Access to National
  • Telecommunications and Technology http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/Falling.htm, 11.01.2003. October 2000, İnternet Adresi: Tarihi: Erişim
  • WARSCHAUER, M. (2002), “Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide”, First Monday, 7(7), July 1st 2002, İnternet Adresi: http://www.firstmonday.dk issues/issue7_7/index, html. Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2003.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Arş. gör. Dr. Lütfü Öztürk This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Issue: 24

Cite

APA Öztürk, A. . . . . . D. . L. (2005). Türkiye’de Dijital Eşitsizlik: TÜBİTAK-BİLTEN Anketleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(24), 111-132.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.