Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel atiklik kavramını açıklayarak, çalışanların bilgi teknolojilerini benimseme derecelerinin örgütsel atikliğe ilişkin algıları üzerindeki etkisini ortaya çıkarmaktır. “Bilgi teknolojileri” ifadesiyle bilgisayarlar ve bilgisayar sayesinde yararlanılan internet gibi çeşitli teknolojiler kastedilmektedir. Anket çalışmasına dayalı olarak yapılan araştırma sonucunda; algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan kullanışlılık, kullanıcı ilgisi, kullanmaya yönelik tutum ve gerçek kullanım ile örgütsel atiklik arasında olumlu bir ilişkinin olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca kontrol değişkenleri olarak ele alınan yaş, kullanıcının deneyimi, örgütteki kıdemi ve eğitim düzeyinin de örgütsel atiklik algısını etkilediği belirlenmiştir
References
- BREU, K., C. J. HEMINGWAY, M. STRATHERN and D. BRIDGER (2001), “Workforce Agility: the New Employee Strategy for the Knowledge Economy”, Journal of Information Technology, 17, pp. 21-31.
- BULLINGER, H. J. (1999), “Turbulent Times Require Creative Thinking: New European Concept in Production Management”, International Journal of Production Economies, 60-61, pp. 9-27.
- BUSTAMANTE, G.P. (1999), “Knowledge Management in Agile Innovative Organizations”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 (1), pp. 6-17.
- CLEGG, C., N. CAREY, G. DEAN, P. HORNBY and R. BOLDEN (1997), “Users’ Reactions to Information Technology: Some Multivariate Models and Their Implications”, Journal of Information Technology, 12, pp.15- 32.
- DAVIS, F. D., R. P. BAGOZZI and P. R. WARSHAW (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982-1003.
- DOVE, R. (1999), “Agility: Knowledge Management and Response Ability”, Automotive Manufacturing and Production, March, pp. 16-18.
- HONG, C. and C.L. KUO (1999), “Knowledge Management in The Learning Organization”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 20(4), pp. 207-215.
- HUANG, C.Y. and S. Y. NOF (1999), “Enterprise Agility: A View from the PRISM Lab.”, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(1), pp.51-59.
- İŞCAN, Ö. ve A. NAKTİYOK (2005), Dijital Çağ Örgütleri, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
- KASSIM, N. M. and M. ZAIN (2004), “Assessing The Measurement of Organizational Agility,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 4, pp. 174-177.
- KURTULUŞ, K. (2004), Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Genişletilmiş 7. Basım, Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
- MCCANN, J. (2004), “Organizational Effectiveness: Changing Concepts for Changing Environments”, Human Resource Planning, 27 (1), pp. 42-50.
- MCCHARTY, I. and C. TSINOPOULOS (2003), “Strategies for Agility: An Evolutionary and Configurational Approach,” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14 (2), pp. 103-113.
- MISCHE, M. A. (2001), Strategic Renewal: Becoming a High Performance Organization, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
- ÖZDAMAR, K. (1999), Paket Programlarla İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1, Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
- SAUNDERS, M., P. LEWIS and A. THORNHILL (2003), Research Methods for Business Students, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Harlow.
- VENKATESH, V., M. G. MORRIS, G. B. DAVIS and F. D. DAVIS (2003), “User Acceptence of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425-478.
- WILLIAMS, C. (2002), Effective Management; A Multi Media Approach, South Western Inc., USA.
- ZAIN, M., N. M. KASSIM and E. MOKTHAR (2003), “Use of Information Technology and Information Systems for Organizational Agility in Malaysian Firms”, Singapore Management Review, 25(1), pp. 69-83.
- ZAIN, M., R. C. ROSE, I. ABDULLAH and M. MASROM (2005), “The Relationship Organizational Agility in Malaysia”, Information and Management, 42, pp. 829-839. Information Technology Acceptance and
Abstract
References
- BREU, K., C. J. HEMINGWAY, M. STRATHERN and D. BRIDGER (2001), “Workforce Agility: the New Employee Strategy for the Knowledge Economy”, Journal of Information Technology, 17, pp. 21-31.
- BULLINGER, H. J. (1999), “Turbulent Times Require Creative Thinking: New European Concept in Production Management”, International Journal of Production Economies, 60-61, pp. 9-27.
- BUSTAMANTE, G.P. (1999), “Knowledge Management in Agile Innovative Organizations”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 (1), pp. 6-17.
- CLEGG, C., N. CAREY, G. DEAN, P. HORNBY and R. BOLDEN (1997), “Users’ Reactions to Information Technology: Some Multivariate Models and Their Implications”, Journal of Information Technology, 12, pp.15- 32.
- DAVIS, F. D., R. P. BAGOZZI and P. R. WARSHAW (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982-1003.
- DOVE, R. (1999), “Agility: Knowledge Management and Response Ability”, Automotive Manufacturing and Production, March, pp. 16-18.
- HONG, C. and C.L. KUO (1999), “Knowledge Management in The Learning Organization”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 20(4), pp. 207-215.
- HUANG, C.Y. and S. Y. NOF (1999), “Enterprise Agility: A View from the PRISM Lab.”, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(1), pp.51-59.
- İŞCAN, Ö. ve A. NAKTİYOK (2005), Dijital Çağ Örgütleri, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
- KASSIM, N. M. and M. ZAIN (2004), “Assessing The Measurement of Organizational Agility,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 4, pp. 174-177.
- KURTULUŞ, K. (2004), Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Genişletilmiş 7. Basım, Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
- MCCANN, J. (2004), “Organizational Effectiveness: Changing Concepts for Changing Environments”, Human Resource Planning, 27 (1), pp. 42-50.
- MCCHARTY, I. and C. TSINOPOULOS (2003), “Strategies for Agility: An Evolutionary and Configurational Approach,” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14 (2), pp. 103-113.
- MISCHE, M. A. (2001), Strategic Renewal: Becoming a High Performance Organization, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
- ÖZDAMAR, K. (1999), Paket Programlarla İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1, Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
- SAUNDERS, M., P. LEWIS and A. THORNHILL (2003), Research Methods for Business Students, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Harlow.
- VENKATESH, V., M. G. MORRIS, G. B. DAVIS and F. D. DAVIS (2003), “User Acceptence of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425-478.
- WILLIAMS, C. (2002), Effective Management; A Multi Media Approach, South Western Inc., USA.
- ZAIN, M., N. M. KASSIM and E. MOKTHAR (2003), “Use of Information Technology and Information Systems for Organizational Agility in Malaysian Firms”, Singapore Management Review, 25(1), pp. 69-83.
- ZAIN, M., R. C. ROSE, I. ABDULLAH and M. MASROM (2005), “The Relationship Organizational Agility in Malaysia”, Information and Management, 42, pp. 829-839. Information Technology Acceptance and
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 1, 2006 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2006 Issue: 26 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.