BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Issue: 42, 25 - 40, 18.05.2015

Mahmut Özdevecioğlu Yasemin Kaya Tuğba Dedeoğlu

Abstract

In this study, it is examined that big five personality traits of individuals working in organizations influence the impact on the bystander effect and the effect was examined in the intermediary role of locus of control. Bystander effect, monitoring and encouragement as the two dimensional behavior, locus of control as the internal and external locus of control are discussed. Big five personality traits are discussed in the research. According to research results, there are significant relationship between personality traits and monitoring behavior while are not any relationship with encouragement behavior. It is identified while agreeable people are prefer to stay in the event, conscientiousness, emotional stability, open to new experience and external people are interfered the event. Through the analysis of the mediating role of locus of control, it has a significant mediating effect in relationship between big five personality traits and bystander effect

Keywords

Bystander Effect Big Five Personality Trait Locus of Control

References

  • ABU ELANAIN, Hossam M.; (2010), “Work Locus of Control and Interactio- nal Justice as Mediators of The Relationship Between Openness to Experience and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), pp.170–192.
  • AKÇA, Figen and Banu YAMAN; (2010), “The Effects of Internal-External Locus of Control Variables on Burnout Levels of Teachers”Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, pp. 3976-3980.
  • ALLPORT, Gordon W. ; (1961), Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt, Rienhart and Winston.
  • BARON, Reuben M. and David A. KENNY; (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173–1182.
  • BARRICK, Murray R. and Michael K. MOUNT; (1991), “The Big Five Perso- nality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 44, pp. 1–26.
  • BOZIONELOS, Nikos; (2004), “The Big Five of Personality and Work Invol- vement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19 (1), pp.69–81.
  • BRUCK, Carly S. and Tammy D. ALLEN; (2003), “The Relationship Between Big Five Personality Traits, Negative Affectivity, Type a Behavior and Work–Family Conflict”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, pp. 457– 472.
  • CHEKROUN, Peggy and Markus BRAUER; (2002), “The Bystander Effect and Social Control Behavior: The Effect of The Presence of Others on Peop- le’s Reactions to Norm Violations”, European Journal of Social Psyc- hology, 32, pp.853–867.
  • ÇINGI, Hülya; (1994), Örnekleme Kuramı, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Basımevi.
  • DANZIS, Deborah A. and Eugene F. STONE-ROMERO; (2009), “Effects of Helper Sex, Recipient Attractiveness and Recipient Femininity on Hel- ping Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24 (8), pp.722–737.
  • DARLEY, John M. and Bibb LATANE; (1968), “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, pp.377–383.
  • D'CRUZ, Premilla and Ernesto NORONHA ; (2011), “The Limits to Workpla- ce Friendship: Managerialist HRM and Bystander Behaviour in The Context of Workplace Bullying ”, Employee Relations, 33(3), pp.269– 288.
  • DURNA, Ufuk ve Faruk K. ŞENTÜRK; (2012), “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Faaliyetlerinin Denetim Odağı Düzeyi Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Devlet Üniversitesi Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İkti- sadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.187–202.
  • FREDRICKS, Susan; Michele RAMSEY and Andrea HORNETT; (2011), “Kinship and Bystander Effect: The Role Of Others in Ethical Decisi- ons” ,Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 2(1), pp.1–23.
  • GOSLING, Samuel D.; Peter J. RENTFROW and William B. SWANN ; (2003), “A Very Brief Measure of The Big-Five Personality Domains”, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, pp. 504–528.
  • GRANTHAM, Tarek C.; (2011), “New Directions for Gifted Black Males Suf- fering From Bystander Effects: A Call for Upstanders”, Roeper Re- view, 33, pp.263–272.
  • HUDSON, James M. and Amy S. BRUCKMAN; (2004), “The Bystander Ef- fect: A Lens For Understanding Patterns Of Participation”. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(2),pp. 165–195.
  • JOHNSON, Sheena J.; Mark BATEY and Lynn HOLDSWORTH; (2009), “Personality and Health: The Mediating Role of Trait Emotional Intelli- gence and Work Locus of Control”, Personality and Individual Diffe- rences, 47, pp.470–475.
  • KINGSTON, Shauna; (2008), “Bullying as a Social Process: Factors Influen- cing Bystander Behaviour”, Master Of Arts Ontario, pp.1–173.
  • LUTHANS, Fred; (2008), Organizational Behavior, Eleventh Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
  • MCCRAE, Robert R. and Oliver P. JOHN ; (1992), “An Introduction to the Five Factor Model and Its Applications”, Journal of Personality, 60, pp.175-215.
  • MCCRAE, Robery R. and Paul T. COSTA; (1987),“Validation of the Five- Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers”, Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 81-90.
  • MCGEE, Andrew and Peter MCGEE; (2011), “Search, Effort, and Locus of Control”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5948, pp. 1-53.
  • MOUNT, Michael K., and Murray R. BARRICK; (1998), “ Five Reasons Why The “Big Five” Article Has Been Frequently Cited”, Personnel Psycho- logy, 51, pp.849-857.
  • OLIVER, Joseph E.; Paul E. JOSE and Paula BROUGH; (2006), “Confirma- tory Factor Analysis of The Work Locus of Control Scale”, Educatio- nal and Psychological Measurement, 66, pp. 835-851.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut; (2002), “Kamu ve Özel Sektör Yöneticileri Ara- sındaki Davranışsal Çalışma Koşulları ve Kişilik Farklılıklarının Belir- lenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.115-134.
  • PAULL, Megan; Mayram OMARI and Peter STANDEN; (2012),“When is a Bystander Not a Bystander? A Typology of The Roles of Bystanders in Workplace Bullying”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, pp. 351–366.
  • PAUNONEN, Sampo V.; (2003), “Big Five Factors of Personality and Replica- ted Predictions of Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psyc- hology, 84 (2), pp.411-422.
  • ROBBINS, Stephan P. and Timothy A. JUDGE; 2009. Organizational Behavi- our, Thirteenth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • ROSSIER, Jérôme; Donatien DAHOURO and Robert R. MCCRAE; (2005), Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of The Five-Factor Model and Lo- cus of Control: Further Evidence From Africa, Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 36, pp. 227-246.
  • SHI, Junqi; Han LIN; WALei WANG and Mo WANG; (2009), “Linking The Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Justice”, Social Be- havior and Personality, 37(2), pp.209-222.
  • TWENGE, Jean M.; Liqing ZHANG and Charles IM; (2004), “It's Beyond My Control: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Increasing Externality In Locus Of Control”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), pp. 308-319.
  • WILLIAMS, Kipling D. and Alvin Ty LAW; (2011), “Bystander Effect”, Hu- man Psychology and Sociology, 10, pp.132-134.

KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İZLEYİCİ ETKİSİ (BYSTANDER EFFECT) ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KONTROL ODAĞININ ROLÜ

Year 2013, Issue: 42, 25 - 40, 18.05.2015

Mahmut Özdevecioğlu Yasemin Kaya Tuğba Dedeoğlu

Abstract

Bu çalışmada örgütlerde çalışan bireylerin beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin izleyici etkisi üzerindeki etkileri ve bu etkide kontrol odağının aracılık rolü incelenmiştir. İzleyici etkisi, izleme ve cesaretlendirme davranışları olarak iki boyutlu, kontrol odağı ise iç ve dış kontrol odağı olarak ele alınmıştır. Kişilik özellikleri ise beş faktör kişilik özellikleri açısından ele alınmıştır.  Araştırma sonuçlarına göre kişilik özellikleri ile izleme davranışları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilirken cesaretlendirme davranışları ile herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. Uyumlu bireylerin olaylarda izleyici kalmayı tercih ettikleri, sorumluluk sahibi, duygusal dengesi yüksek, yeni deneyimlere açık ve dışadönük bireylerin ise gözü önünde meydana gelen olaylara izleyici kalmadıkları anlaşılmıştır. Kontrol odağının aracılık rolüne ilişkin analiz sonuçlarına göre ise, kontrol odağının uyumluluk, dışa dönüklük, yeni deneyimlere açıklık, duygusal denge ve sorumluluğun izleme davranışları üzerindeki etkisinde anlamlı kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. 

Keywords

İzleyici Etkisi Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri Kontrol Odağı.

References

  • ABU ELANAIN, Hossam M.; (2010), “Work Locus of Control and Interactio- nal Justice as Mediators of The Relationship Between Openness to Experience and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), pp.170–192.
  • AKÇA, Figen and Banu YAMAN; (2010), “The Effects of Internal-External Locus of Control Variables on Burnout Levels of Teachers”Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, pp. 3976-3980.
  • ALLPORT, Gordon W. ; (1961), Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt, Rienhart and Winston.
  • BARON, Reuben M. and David A. KENNY; (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173–1182.
  • BARRICK, Murray R. and Michael K. MOUNT; (1991), “The Big Five Perso- nality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 44, pp. 1–26.
  • BOZIONELOS, Nikos; (2004), “The Big Five of Personality and Work Invol- vement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19 (1), pp.69–81.
  • BRUCK, Carly S. and Tammy D. ALLEN; (2003), “The Relationship Between Big Five Personality Traits, Negative Affectivity, Type a Behavior and Work–Family Conflict”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, pp. 457– 472.
  • CHEKROUN, Peggy and Markus BRAUER; (2002), “The Bystander Effect and Social Control Behavior: The Effect of The Presence of Others on Peop- le’s Reactions to Norm Violations”, European Journal of Social Psyc- hology, 32, pp.853–867.
  • ÇINGI, Hülya; (1994), Örnekleme Kuramı, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Basımevi.
  • DANZIS, Deborah A. and Eugene F. STONE-ROMERO; (2009), “Effects of Helper Sex, Recipient Attractiveness and Recipient Femininity on Hel- ping Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24 (8), pp.722–737.
  • DARLEY, John M. and Bibb LATANE; (1968), “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, pp.377–383.
  • D'CRUZ, Premilla and Ernesto NORONHA ; (2011), “The Limits to Workpla- ce Friendship: Managerialist HRM and Bystander Behaviour in The Context of Workplace Bullying ”, Employee Relations, 33(3), pp.269– 288.
  • DURNA, Ufuk ve Faruk K. ŞENTÜRK; (2012), “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Faaliyetlerinin Denetim Odağı Düzeyi Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Devlet Üniversitesi Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İkti- sadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.187–202.
  • FREDRICKS, Susan; Michele RAMSEY and Andrea HORNETT; (2011), “Kinship and Bystander Effect: The Role Of Others in Ethical Decisi- ons” ,Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 2(1), pp.1–23.
  • GOSLING, Samuel D.; Peter J. RENTFROW and William B. SWANN ; (2003), “A Very Brief Measure of The Big-Five Personality Domains”, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, pp. 504–528.
  • GRANTHAM, Tarek C.; (2011), “New Directions for Gifted Black Males Suf- fering From Bystander Effects: A Call for Upstanders”, Roeper Re- view, 33, pp.263–272.
  • HUDSON, James M. and Amy S. BRUCKMAN; (2004), “The Bystander Ef- fect: A Lens For Understanding Patterns Of Participation”. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(2),pp. 165–195.
  • JOHNSON, Sheena J.; Mark BATEY and Lynn HOLDSWORTH; (2009), “Personality and Health: The Mediating Role of Trait Emotional Intelli- gence and Work Locus of Control”, Personality and Individual Diffe- rences, 47, pp.470–475.
  • KINGSTON, Shauna; (2008), “Bullying as a Social Process: Factors Influen- cing Bystander Behaviour”, Master Of Arts Ontario, pp.1–173.
  • LUTHANS, Fred; (2008), Organizational Behavior, Eleventh Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
  • MCCRAE, Robert R. and Oliver P. JOHN ; (1992), “An Introduction to the Five Factor Model and Its Applications”, Journal of Personality, 60, pp.175-215.
  • MCCRAE, Robery R. and Paul T. COSTA; (1987),“Validation of the Five- Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers”, Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 81-90.
  • MCGEE, Andrew and Peter MCGEE; (2011), “Search, Effort, and Locus of Control”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5948, pp. 1-53.
  • MOUNT, Michael K., and Murray R. BARRICK; (1998), “ Five Reasons Why The “Big Five” Article Has Been Frequently Cited”, Personnel Psycho- logy, 51, pp.849-857.
  • OLIVER, Joseph E.; Paul E. JOSE and Paula BROUGH; (2006), “Confirma- tory Factor Analysis of The Work Locus of Control Scale”, Educatio- nal and Psychological Measurement, 66, pp. 835-851.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut; (2002), “Kamu ve Özel Sektör Yöneticileri Ara- sındaki Davranışsal Çalışma Koşulları ve Kişilik Farklılıklarının Belir- lenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.115-134.
  • PAULL, Megan; Mayram OMARI and Peter STANDEN; (2012),“When is a Bystander Not a Bystander? A Typology of The Roles of Bystanders in Workplace Bullying”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, pp. 351–366.
  • PAUNONEN, Sampo V.; (2003), “Big Five Factors of Personality and Replica- ted Predictions of Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psyc- hology, 84 (2), pp.411-422.
  • ROBBINS, Stephan P. and Timothy A. JUDGE; 2009. Organizational Behavi- our, Thirteenth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • ROSSIER, Jérôme; Donatien DAHOURO and Robert R. MCCRAE; (2005), Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of The Five-Factor Model and Lo- cus of Control: Further Evidence From Africa, Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 36, pp. 227-246.
  • SHI, Junqi; Han LIN; WALei WANG and Mo WANG; (2009), “Linking The Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Justice”, Social Be- havior and Personality, 37(2), pp.209-222.
  • TWENGE, Jean M.; Liqing ZHANG and Charles IM; (2004), “It's Beyond My Control: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Increasing Externality In Locus Of Control”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), pp. 308-319.
  • WILLIAMS, Kipling D. and Alvin Ty LAW; (2011), “Bystander Effect”, Hu- man Psychology and Sociology, 10, pp.132-134.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mahmut Özdevecioğlu This is me

Yasemin Kaya This is me

Tuğba Dedeoğlu This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2013 Issue: 42

Cite

APA Özdevecioğlu, M., Kaya, Y., & Dedeoğlu, T. (2015). KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İZLEYİCİ ETKİSİ (BYSTANDER EFFECT) ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KONTROL ODAĞININ ROLÜ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(42), 25-40.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.