Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YEŞİL ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI

Year 2023, Issue: 65, 41 - 46, 31.08.2023

Mine Elagöz , Canan Gamze Bal

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1174798
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Chen vd. (2014) tarafından geliştirilen “Yeşil Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeği”nin Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Öncelikle orijinal ölçeği geliştiren yazarlardan elektronik ortamda izin alma işlemleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha sonra ölçek araştırmacı tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiş ve çeviri hakkında uzman görüşleri alınmıştır. Dil ve anlam bakımından eşdeğerliliği sağlanan ölçek Türkiye genelinde farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren 207 çalışana uygulanmıştır. Hedef kitleden elde edilen veriler için yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda ölçekte bulunan altı maddenin tek faktör altında toplandığı ve açıklanan varyans oranının %57,143 olduğu görülmüştür. Uyarlanan ölçeğin faktör yapısının doğruluğunu test etmek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış ve yapılan analiz sonucunda elde edilen değerler; AGFI=,87 GFI=,94 CFI=,96, NFI=,94 RFI=,91 IFI=,96 şeklindedir. İç tutarlılık ve güvenilirlik analizinde Cronbach Alpha kat sayı değeri %84’tür. Elde edilen bu sonuçlara göre anketin güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

öz yeterlilik yeşil öz yeterlilik ölçek uyarlama

References

  • Abraham,J.,Pane,M.,& Chairiyani,R. (2015). An investigation on cynicism and environmental self- efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior. Psychology, 6. 234-242. doi:10.4236/psych.2015.63023
  • Aeknarajindawat.,& Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). The mediating impact of green self-efficacy and green mindfulness in the relationship between green shared vision and green creativity among the manufacturing firms in Thai Sports Industry. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 44. 2262–2275. doi:10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.43
  • Arseven,A., Arseven, İ.,& Tepehan, T. (2015). “Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematik Öğretimine Yönelik Öz-Yeterlik Algılarının İncelenmesi.”Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 4(2),29-40 doi:10.30703/cije.321367
  • Axboe,M,K.,Christensen,K,S., Kofoed,P,E & Ammentorp, J (2016).Development an validation of a self efficacy questionnaire measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals BMC Medical Education, 16 (272),1-10. doi :10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7
  • Aydın, S. & Tufan, F. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil kavramları bağlamında y kuşağının satın alma davranışları. Selçuk İletişim, 11(2),397-420.
  • Bandura,A. (1982) “Self-efficacy nechanisn in human agency”, Reprinted from American Psychologist, 37 (2). 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.1
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bandura,A, & Adams, N, E.(1997) Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4),287-310.
  • Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum, Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik.Ankara:Pegem Yayıncılık
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak,E.,Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Yayıncılık
  • Carter, W, R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., & Parker, S. K.(2018). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: A longitudinal field study.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2483-2502.
  • Chen, Y., Chang, C., Yeh, S.,& Cheng, H.(2014) Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and greenself- efficacy. Qual. Quant. 49, 1169–1184
  • Chen, S., Hsiao ,C., Chang,H,C & Chou, C. (2015) Can the entrepreneurship course ımprove the entrepreneurial ıntentions of students? Int. Entrep. Manag. Journal 11,557–569.
  • Çokluk, Ö.,Şekercioğlu, G.,& Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G.,& Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatisik : SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları.Pegem Akademi.
  • Erkuş, A. (2010). Psikometrik terimlerin Türkçe karşılıklarının anlamları ile yapılan işlemlerin uyuşmazlığı, Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2),72-77.
  • Ervin, D., Wu, J.,Khanna, M.,Jones., & Wirkkala,T.(2013). Motivations and barriers to corporate environmental management”. Bus. Strategy Environ. 22, 390–409. Field, A.P. (2005). Discovering statistics Using SPSS, London: Sage.
  • Gecas,V.(1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology 291-236.
  • Gholami, R.(2014). Senior managers perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Inf. Manag. 50,431-438.
  • Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2005). Factor analyzis using spss for windows and macintosh: analyzing and understanding data.
  • Guo, L., Xu, Y., Liu, G., & Wang, T. (2019). Understanding firm performance on green ustainable practices through managers as cribed responsibility and waste management: Green self-efficacy as moderator. Sustainability 11, 4976.
  • Güney,S (2020). “Yönetim ve organizasyon el kitabı”. Nobel Yayın Daǧıtım.
  • Hsu,C.,Yang,Y,L., & C.,Lin,C.F. (2015). Development of a cloud-based service framework for energy conservation in a sustainable intelligent transportation system. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 454-461.
  • Herrera, R. S., Del Campo, L., & Ames, M. H. (1993). A Serial approach for translating family science instrumentation. Family Relations, Jstore Database. 42, 357- 360.
  • Huang, H. (2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206-2212.
  • Jansson, J. (2010).Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J. Consum. Mark, 27, 358–370.
  • Jeong, J.(2004). Analysis of the factor sand the roles of hard in organizational learning styles as ıdentified by key ınformants at selected corporations in the republic of Korea”. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) Texas A&M University, USA.
  • Jöreskog, K,G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). Lisrel 8.30 and Prelis 2.30. In: Scientific Software International.
  • Kayış, A. (2006) Güvenilirlik analizi, SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri.Ş.Kalaycı (ed) Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kim,A., Kim,Y., Han,K., Jackson,S., & Ployhart, R, E. (2017). Multi level influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335–1358.
  • Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Liao, Z., Weng, C., Long, S., & Xiao, Z. (2020) Do social ties foster firms’ environmental innovation The moderating effect of resource bricolage. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag.33, 476–490.
  • Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez D,B., & Schwarzer,R.,(2005).General self efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries”, International Journal of Psychology, 40,(2), 80-89.
  • Luszczynska, A., Schwarzer, R., Lippke, S., & Mazurkiewicz, M. (2011). Self-efficacy as a moderator of the planning–behaviour relationship in interventions designed to promote physical activity. Psychology and Health, 26(2), 151-166.
  • Meinhold,J., & Malkus.,A.J.(2005).,“Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference. Environ. Behav. 37, 511–532.
  • Meydan C., & Şeşen H,(2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları, Detay Yayıncılık
  • Morgil İ., Seçken N., & Yücel N.(2014). “Kimya öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inançlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1), 62-72.
  • Nordlund, A.(2003) “Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use”. J. Environ. Psychol. 23,339–347.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into practice, 41(2), 116-125.
  • Savaşır, I. (1994). Ölçek uyarlamasındaki bazı sorunlar ve çözüm yolları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi , 33 (9), 27-32.
  • Scherer, R, F., Wiebe, F. A., Luther, D. C., & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 763-770.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
  • Tabachnick,B,G., & Linda S. Fidell (2013), Using multivariate statistics (Sixth Edition), Pearson Education Limited.
  • Tavşancıl E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Akademi.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (2004). Likert tipi ölçeklere madde seçmede geleneksel madde analizi tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 77-89.
  • Tölkes, C., & Butzmann, E., (2018) Motivating Pro-sustainable behavior: The potential of green events—A Case-Study from the Munich Street life Festival. Sustainability, 10, 3731. Ulusoy,A.,Güngör,A., Akyol, K,Subaşı,G.,Ünver,G., & Erdamar,G. (2011).Eğitim Psikolojisi.Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Ying, M.,Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., & Raza, A. (2020). How does servant leadership Foster Employees' voluntary green behavior? A sequential mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1792. Zimmerman, B.J.(2000).Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
  • Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self-efficacy: A concept analysis, Journal Compilation, Vol. 44,(2),93-102.

GREEN SELF-EFFICIENCY SCALE: ADAPTATION TO TURKISH

Year 2023, Issue: 65, 41 - 46, 31.08.2023

Mine Elagöz , Canan Gamze Bal

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1174798
Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this research adapt to Turkish the “Green Self Efficacy Scale” which is developed by Chen vd.(2014). Firs of all permission to use the scale was obtained electronically from the autor who
developed the orjinal scale. After than the scale was translated into Turkish by the researcher and expert opinion was taken about the translated scale The scale which equivalence in terms of language and meaning was applied to 207 employees operating in different sectors throughout Turkey. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis for the data obtained from the target population, it was seen that six items in the scale were grouped under a single factor and the explained variance rate was 57,143%. In order to test the accuracy of the factor structure of the adapted scale, confirmatory factor analysis was performed and the values obtained as a result of the analysis were AGFI= ,87 GFI= .94 CFI= .96, NFI =.94 RFI =.91 IFI = .96. In the analysis, the Cronbach Alpha coefficient is 84% and it has been concluded that the scale is a reliable measurement tool.

Keywords

adapt to scale self efficacy green self efficacy.

References

  • Abraham,J.,Pane,M.,& Chairiyani,R. (2015). An investigation on cynicism and environmental self- efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior. Psychology, 6. 234-242. doi:10.4236/psych.2015.63023
  • Aeknarajindawat.,& Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). The mediating impact of green self-efficacy and green mindfulness in the relationship between green shared vision and green creativity among the manufacturing firms in Thai Sports Industry. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 44. 2262–2275. doi:10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.43
  • Arseven,A., Arseven, İ.,& Tepehan, T. (2015). “Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematik Öğretimine Yönelik Öz-Yeterlik Algılarının İncelenmesi.”Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 4(2),29-40 doi:10.30703/cije.321367
  • Axboe,M,K.,Christensen,K,S., Kofoed,P,E & Ammentorp, J (2016).Development an validation of a self efficacy questionnaire measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals BMC Medical Education, 16 (272),1-10. doi :10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7
  • Aydın, S. & Tufan, F. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil kavramları bağlamında y kuşağının satın alma davranışları. Selçuk İletişim, 11(2),397-420.
  • Bandura,A. (1982) “Self-efficacy nechanisn in human agency”, Reprinted from American Psychologist, 37 (2). 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.1
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bandura,A, & Adams, N, E.(1997) Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4),287-310.
  • Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum, Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik.Ankara:Pegem Yayıncılık
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak,E.,Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Yayıncılık
  • Carter, W, R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., & Parker, S. K.(2018). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: A longitudinal field study.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2483-2502.
  • Chen, Y., Chang, C., Yeh, S.,& Cheng, H.(2014) Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and greenself- efficacy. Qual. Quant. 49, 1169–1184
  • Chen, S., Hsiao ,C., Chang,H,C & Chou, C. (2015) Can the entrepreneurship course ımprove the entrepreneurial ıntentions of students? Int. Entrep. Manag. Journal 11,557–569.
  • Çokluk, Ö.,Şekercioğlu, G.,& Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G.,& Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatisik : SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları.Pegem Akademi.
  • Erkuş, A. (2010). Psikometrik terimlerin Türkçe karşılıklarının anlamları ile yapılan işlemlerin uyuşmazlığı, Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2),72-77.
  • Ervin, D., Wu, J.,Khanna, M.,Jones., & Wirkkala,T.(2013). Motivations and barriers to corporate environmental management”. Bus. Strategy Environ. 22, 390–409. Field, A.P. (2005). Discovering statistics Using SPSS, London: Sage.
  • Gecas,V.(1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology 291-236.
  • Gholami, R.(2014). Senior managers perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Inf. Manag. 50,431-438.
  • Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2005). Factor analyzis using spss for windows and macintosh: analyzing and understanding data.
  • Guo, L., Xu, Y., Liu, G., & Wang, T. (2019). Understanding firm performance on green ustainable practices through managers as cribed responsibility and waste management: Green self-efficacy as moderator. Sustainability 11, 4976.
  • Güney,S (2020). “Yönetim ve organizasyon el kitabı”. Nobel Yayın Daǧıtım.
  • Hsu,C.,Yang,Y,L., & C.,Lin,C.F. (2015). Development of a cloud-based service framework for energy conservation in a sustainable intelligent transportation system. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 454-461.
  • Herrera, R. S., Del Campo, L., & Ames, M. H. (1993). A Serial approach for translating family science instrumentation. Family Relations, Jstore Database. 42, 357- 360.
  • Huang, H. (2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206-2212.
  • Jansson, J. (2010).Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J. Consum. Mark, 27, 358–370.
  • Jeong, J.(2004). Analysis of the factor sand the roles of hard in organizational learning styles as ıdentified by key ınformants at selected corporations in the republic of Korea”. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) Texas A&M University, USA.
  • Jöreskog, K,G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). Lisrel 8.30 and Prelis 2.30. In: Scientific Software International.
  • Kayış, A. (2006) Güvenilirlik analizi, SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri.Ş.Kalaycı (ed) Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kim,A., Kim,Y., Han,K., Jackson,S., & Ployhart, R, E. (2017). Multi level influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335–1358.
  • Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Liao, Z., Weng, C., Long, S., & Xiao, Z. (2020) Do social ties foster firms’ environmental innovation The moderating effect of resource bricolage. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag.33, 476–490.
  • Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez D,B., & Schwarzer,R.,(2005).General self efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries”, International Journal of Psychology, 40,(2), 80-89.
  • Luszczynska, A., Schwarzer, R., Lippke, S., & Mazurkiewicz, M. (2011). Self-efficacy as a moderator of the planning–behaviour relationship in interventions designed to promote physical activity. Psychology and Health, 26(2), 151-166.
  • Meinhold,J., & Malkus.,A.J.(2005).,“Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference. Environ. Behav. 37, 511–532.
  • Meydan C., & Şeşen H,(2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları, Detay Yayıncılık
  • Morgil İ., Seçken N., & Yücel N.(2014). “Kimya öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inançlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1), 62-72.
  • Nordlund, A.(2003) “Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use”. J. Environ. Psychol. 23,339–347.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into practice, 41(2), 116-125.
  • Savaşır, I. (1994). Ölçek uyarlamasındaki bazı sorunlar ve çözüm yolları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi , 33 (9), 27-32.
  • Scherer, R, F., Wiebe, F. A., Luther, D. C., & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 763-770.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
  • Tabachnick,B,G., & Linda S. Fidell (2013), Using multivariate statistics (Sixth Edition), Pearson Education Limited.
  • Tavşancıl E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Akademi.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (2004). Likert tipi ölçeklere madde seçmede geleneksel madde analizi tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 77-89.
  • Tölkes, C., & Butzmann, E., (2018) Motivating Pro-sustainable behavior: The potential of green events—A Case-Study from the Munich Street life Festival. Sustainability, 10, 3731. Ulusoy,A.,Güngör,A., Akyol, K,Subaşı,G.,Ünver,G., & Erdamar,G. (2011).Eğitim Psikolojisi.Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Ying, M.,Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., & Raza, A. (2020). How does servant leadership Foster Employees' voluntary green behavior? A sequential mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1792. Zimmerman, B.J.(2000).Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
  • Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self-efficacy: A concept analysis, Journal Compilation, Vol. 44,(2),93-102.
There are 50 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mine Elagöz 0000-0002-5780-9009

Canan Gamze Bal 0000-0003-1031-2588

Early Pub Date August 18, 2023
Publication Date August 31, 2023
Acceptance Date May 2, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 65

Cite

APA Elagöz, M., & Bal, C. G. (2023). YEŞİL ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(65), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1174798

Cited By

Yeşil Yeterlilik Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması
Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.1509811
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.