Modern pazarlama anlayışında firmaların hedef müşteri gruplarıyla iletişimi önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Söz konusu firmalar hedef müşteri gruplarına ulaşmak için reklamlar, mobil uygulamalar, internet siteleri vb. yolları kullandıkları gibi sponsorluk faaliyetlerini de tercih etmektedir. Bir firma olarak spor takımları da sponsorluk faaliyetleri ile hedef müşteri grubu niteliğindeki taraftarlarına ulaşmakta ve grubun zihninde markanın konumlandırılmasına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, e-spor firmalarının yürüttüğü sponsorluk faaliyetlerinin tüketicilerin satın alma eğilimleri üzerindeki etkilerini haritalamaktır. Tüketici davranışlarının karar ağacı algoritmasıyla analizi, sponsorluk faaliyetlerinde bir yol haritası ortaya çıkarması yönüyle literatürdeki önemli bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Tüketici algılarını modellemek için satın alma niyeti ve ağızdan ağıza iletişim değişkenleri esas alınmış ve e-spor sponsorluklarının tüketici kararları ve davranışları üzerindeki etkisi iki karar ağacıyla haritalanmıştır. Sonuçlara bakıldığında, tüketicinin satın alma niyetinin olumsuz sponsor imajıyla negatif ilişkili olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca, ağızdan ağıza iletişim için oluşturulan karar modelinde ise tüketicinin sponsor firmaya dair samimiyet algısındaki artışın markayı çevresine tavsiye etme eğilimini olumlu yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants comply with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this study, Ethics Committee Approval was obtained from Sivas Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Social and Human Sciences Board with decision number 60 dated 10.02.2022.
The communication between companies and their target customer groups holds a significant position within modern marketing approaches. These companies employ various channels such as advertisements, mobile applications, websites, and sponsorship activities to reach their intended customer groups. This, in turn, helps in establishing and reinforcing the brand's position in the minds of the group. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of sponsorship activities carried out by e-sports companies on consumers' purchasing tendencies. To model consumer perceptions, the study considers variables such as purchase intention and word of mouth and employs two decision trees to map the effects of e-sports sponsorships on consumer decisions and behaviors. The results indicate a negative relationship between consumers' purchase intention and a negative sponsor image. Furthermore, the decision tree model developed for word-of-mouth communication reveals that an increase in consumers' perception of the sponsor company's sincerity positively influences their inclination to recommend the brand to others. By utilizing the decision tree algorithm, this analysis of consumer behavior in the context of sponsorship activities fills a significant gap in the literature and provides valuable insights for future endeavors.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | April 28, 2024 |
Publication Date | April 30, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | December 22, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 Issue: 67 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.