Research Article

Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?

Volume: 12 Number: 1 January 15, 2024
TR EN

Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning between moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons. Material and Methods: The study included 40 moderate-to-late preterm twin infants (50% female), and 40 moderate-to-late preterm singleton infants (50% female). All infants were assessed from 9 up to 20 post-term weeks of corrected age using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), and between 24 and 42 months of age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Results: There were no differences between the Motor Optimality Score (MOS) and its subcategories, including fidgety movements, obtained as a result of detailed GMA (p>0.05), when the early motor repertoire results were examined. At later ages, there were also no significant differences in cognitive, language, and motor domain composite scores between twin and singleton infants, according to Bayley-III (p>0.05). Discussion: Our results suggest moderate-to-late preterm twin infants had a similar developmental process to moderate-to-late preterm singleton infants from early periods up to 3.5 years of age. However, all preterm infants, including moderate-to-late infants, should be assessed in the clinic in terms of the risks of developmental problems from the early period of life.

Keywords

References

  1. Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Administration Manual. San Antonio, TX. Harcourt Assessment.
  2. Blencowe, H., Lee, A. C., Cousens, S., Bahalim, A., Narwal, R., Zhong N., et al. (2013). Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res, 74(Suppl 1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.204.
  3. Blondel, B., Macfarlane, A., Gissler, M., Breart, G., & Zeitlin, J. (2006). General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG, 113(5), 528-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00923.x.
  4. Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. (2013). A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol, 55(5), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12140.
  5. Brogna, C., Romeo, D. M., Cervesi, C., Scrofani, L., Romeo, M. G., Mercuri, E., et al. (2013). Prognostic value of the qualitative assessments of general movements in late-preterm infants. Early Hum Dev, 89(12), 1063-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.08.008.
  6. Dostanic, T., Sustersic, B., & Paro-Panjan, D. (2018). Developmental outcome in a group of twins: relation to perinatal factors and general movements. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 22(4), 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.04.006.
  7. Einspieler, C., Prechtl, H. F. R., Bos, A. F., Ferrari, F., & Cioni, G. (2004). Prechtl's Method on The Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants, (pp. 1-104).UK: MacKeith Press.
  8. Einspieler, C., Bos, A. F., Krieber-Tomantschger, M., Alvarado, E., Barbosa, V. M., Bertoncelli, N., et al. (2019). Cerebral palsy: early markers of clinical phenotype and functional outcome. J Clin Med, 8(10), 1616. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101616.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Rehabilitation

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 15, 2024

Submission Date

June 7, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 21, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 12 Number: 1

APA
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, B. N., & Mutlu, A. (2024). Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 12(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196
AMA
1.Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2024;12(1):27-34. doi:10.30720/ered.1311196
Chicago
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur, and Akmer Mutlu. 2024. “Do Moderate-to-Late Preterm Twins and Singletons Differ in the Early Motor Repertoire and Later Developmental Functioning?”. Ergoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12 (1): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196.
EndNote
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A (January 1, 2024) Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12 1 27–34.
IEEE
[1]B. N. Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu and A. Mutlu, “Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?”, Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.30720/ered.1311196.
ISNAD
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur - Mutlu, Akmer. “Do Moderate-to-Late Preterm Twins and Singletons Differ in the Early Motor Repertoire and Later Developmental Functioning?”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12/1 (January 1, 2024): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196.
JAMA
1.Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2024;12:27–34.
MLA
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur, and Akmer Mutlu. “Do Moderate-to-Late Preterm Twins and Singletons Differ in the Early Motor Repertoire and Later Developmental Functioning?”. Ergoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 27-34, doi:10.30720/ered.1311196.
Vancouver
1.Bilge Nur Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Akmer Mutlu. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2024 Jan. 1;12(1):27-34. doi:10.30720/ered.1311196

Journal of Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation by Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalcc.svg?ref=chooser-v1by.svg?ref=chooser-v1nc.svg?ref=chooser-v1