Araştırma Makalesi

Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?

Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1 15 Ocak 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning between moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons. Material and Methods: The study included 40 moderate-to-late preterm twin infants (50% female), and 40 moderate-to-late preterm singleton infants (50% female). All infants were assessed from 9 up to 20 post-term weeks of corrected age using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), and between 24 and 42 months of age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Results: There were no differences between the Motor Optimality Score (MOS) and its subcategories, including fidgety movements, obtained as a result of detailed GMA (p>0.05), when the early motor repertoire results were examined. At later ages, there were also no significant differences in cognitive, language, and motor domain composite scores between twin and singleton infants, according to Bayley-III (p>0.05). Discussion: Our results suggest moderate-to-late preterm twin infants had a similar developmental process to moderate-to-late preterm singleton infants from early periods up to 3.5 years of age. However, all preterm infants, including moderate-to-late infants, should be assessed in the clinic in terms of the risks of developmental problems from the early period of life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Administration Manual. San Antonio, TX. Harcourt Assessment.
  2. Blencowe, H., Lee, A. C., Cousens, S., Bahalim, A., Narwal, R., Zhong N., et al. (2013). Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res, 74(Suppl 1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.204.
  3. Blondel, B., Macfarlane, A., Gissler, M., Breart, G., & Zeitlin, J. (2006). General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG, 113(5), 528-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00923.x.
  4. Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. (2013). A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol, 55(5), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12140.
  5. Brogna, C., Romeo, D. M., Cervesi, C., Scrofani, L., Romeo, M. G., Mercuri, E., et al. (2013). Prognostic value of the qualitative assessments of general movements in late-preterm infants. Early Hum Dev, 89(12), 1063-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.08.008.
  6. Dostanic, T., Sustersic, B., & Paro-Panjan, D. (2018). Developmental outcome in a group of twins: relation to perinatal factors and general movements. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 22(4), 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.04.006.
  7. Einspieler, C., Prechtl, H. F. R., Bos, A. F., Ferrari, F., & Cioni, G. (2004). Prechtl's Method on The Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants, (pp. 1-104).UK: MacKeith Press.
  8. Einspieler, C., Bos, A. F., Krieber-Tomantschger, M., Alvarado, E., Barbosa, V. M., Bertoncelli, N., et al. (2019). Cerebral palsy: early markers of clinical phenotype and functional outcome. J Clin Med, 8(10), 1616. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101616.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Rehabilitasyon

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Ocak 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Haziran 2023

Kabul Tarihi

21 Ağustos 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, B. N., & Mutlu, A. (2024). Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 12(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196
AMA
1.Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2024;12(1):27-34. doi:10.30720/ered.1311196
Chicago
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur, ve Akmer Mutlu. 2024. “Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12 (1): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196.
EndNote
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A (01 Ocak 2024) Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12 1 27–34.
IEEE
[1]B. N. Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu ve A. Mutlu, “Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?”, Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, c. 12, sy 1, ss. 27–34, Oca. 2024, doi: 10.30720/ered.1311196.
ISNAD
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur - Mutlu, Akmer. “Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 12/1 (01 Ocak 2024): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1311196.
JAMA
1.Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu BN, Mutlu A. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2024;12:27–34.
MLA
Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur, ve Akmer Mutlu. “Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning?”. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, c. 12, sy 1, Ocak 2024, ss. 27-34, doi:10.30720/ered.1311196.
Vancouver
1.Bilge Nur Yardımcı Lokmanoğlu, Akmer Mutlu. Do moderate-to-late preterm twins and singletons differ in the early motor repertoire and later developmental functioning? Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 01 Ocak 2024;12(1):27-34. doi:10.30720/ered.1311196

Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi by Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalcc.svg?ref=chooser-v1by.svg?ref=chooser-v1nc.svg?ref=chooser-v1