BibTex RIS Cite

Self-Concept & Its Development: Need For A Conscious Self-Concept

Year 2010, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 20 - 38, 01.12.2010

Abstract

In this study, parts of self and ego and the theoretical approaches put forward on the formation of the self to introduce the elements and the factors affecting the development. In addition, the various descriptions of the major scientific paradigms of self-concept, and sum up in a fiction, "I or Self as Knower" how much support can contribute to the formation and discussed. Because the "Me or Self as Known” and self-esteem or personal power over others, which is responsible for the forma- tion of destructive aggression and self-object experiences reviewed. As a result, “I or Self as Knower " subject is to discussed how to move.

References

  • Bacanlı, H. (1997). Sosyal ilişkilerde benlik: kendini ayarlama psikolojisi. Ankara: MEB Eğitim Dizisi: 14
  • Briere, N. M., Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Effect of private self-consciousness and suc- cess outcome on causal dimensions, The Journal of Social Psychology, 130: (3), 325-331.
  • Clinebell, H. J. (1963). Philosophical-religious factors in the etiology and treatment of alcoholism, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 24, 473 - 488.
  • Combs, A. W., Synng, G. (1959). Individual behavior, New York. Cüceloğlu, D. (1991). İnsan ve davranışı. 1. Baskı, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concaept revisited or a theory. Amaricam Psychologist, 28, 404-416
  • Feist, J. (1990). Theories of personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Inc, Chicago. Franzoi, S. L. (1996). Social psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Inc, Chicago. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Rinehart & Co., New York.
  • Hartmann, H. (1995). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. İnternational Universities Pres İnc.Madison, Connecticut.
  • Heidegger, M. (1976). Brief über den Humanismus. Wegmarken, GA. Bd. 9. Frank- furt am Main: Vittorio Kolstermann.
  • James, W. (1963). The varieties of religious experience. University Boks, New York.
  • Kara, H. (2009). Bilinç, benlik ve ölüm farkındalığı: bilincin biyolojik düzeyi ve ötesi. Psikiyatri Online, Makale No:74 Çarşamba, 07 Ocak 2009 16:44.
  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. International Universities Pres.Inc.
  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. American Life In the Age of Diminishing Expectations, New York: Warner Boks.:71–103.
  • Markus, H. (1983). Self-knowledge: An expanded viev, Journal of Personality, 51. Markus, H.R., Zajonc, R.B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology.
  • In the Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. I, 3rd Ed.), ed.: G. Lindzey &
  • E. Aronson, pp. 137-230, Random House.
  • May, R. (1987).Yaratma cesareti. (çev: Alper Oysal), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul Mead, H. (1968). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Pres.
  • Nasby, W. (1989). Private self-consciousness, articulation of the self schema, and recognition memory of trait adjectives, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: (1), 117-123.
  • Nelson-Jones, R. (1982). Danişma psikolojisi kuramlari. (Çeviri ed.: F. Akkoyun), basıldığı yer adı yok, orijinalinin basım yeri: Cassel Educational Limited.
  • Özen, Y. (2003). Özel Ben-Bilinçliliği, Genel Ben-Bilinçliliği. Bilge Adam Dergisi, C:4, s: 60-65.
  • Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy.
  • London: Constable. ISBN 1–84529–057–7
  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research: A historical overview. Social Forces, 68: (1), 34-44.
  • Roland, A. (1996). Cultural Pluralism and Psychoanalysis: The Asian and North American Experience Routledge 29 West 35th Street N.Y.10001
  • Sayar, K. (2003). Benlik: O Yakın Soru, O Uzak Ülke. Bilge Adam Dergisi, C:2, s: 11-17.
  • Sayar, K. (2000). Geçmişin bilgeliği bugünün psikoterapileriyle buluşabilir mi? Sufi psikolojisi örneği. Sufi Psikolojisi (Ed.: K. Sayar) adlı kitabın içinde, ss. 11-40, İst.: İnsan Yay.
  • Shaver, K.G. (1977). Principles of Social Psychology, Winthrop Publ.Inc.
  • Wegner, D. M., Vallacher, R. R. (1980). The self in social psychology. Newyork: Oxford University Pres.
  • Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 223–275.
  • Wylie, R. (1968). The present status of self theory. In Borgatta, E. R., and Lambert,
  • W. W. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. McNally, Chicago.

Benlik-Kavramı Ve Benliğin Gelişimi Bilen Benliğe Gereksinim Var Mı?

Year 2010, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 20 - 38, 01.12.2010

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, benlik ve benliğin bölümleri ve oluşumu üzerine ortaya konulan kuramsal yaklaşımları, benliğin ögeleri ve gelişimine etki eden faktörleri tanıtmak. Ayrıca, belli başlı bilimsel paradigmaların benlik-kavramı konusundaki çeşitli açıklamalarını bir kurgu içinde özetlemek ve “Bilen Benlik” oluşumuna ve desteklenmesine ne kadar katkı sağlayabileceğini tartıştık. Çünkü “Bilinen Benli-ğin” kişisel güç ve benlik saygısının ya da başkaları üzerinde yıkıcı saldırganlığın oluşumundan sorumlu olan kendilik nesnesi deneyimlerini inceledik. Sonuç olarak “Bilen Benliğin” özne konumuna nasıl taşınabileceğini tartışıldı.

References

  • Bacanlı, H. (1997). Sosyal ilişkilerde benlik: kendini ayarlama psikolojisi. Ankara: MEB Eğitim Dizisi: 14
  • Briere, N. M., Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Effect of private self-consciousness and suc- cess outcome on causal dimensions, The Journal of Social Psychology, 130: (3), 325-331.
  • Clinebell, H. J. (1963). Philosophical-religious factors in the etiology and treatment of alcoholism, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 24, 473 - 488.
  • Combs, A. W., Synng, G. (1959). Individual behavior, New York. Cüceloğlu, D. (1991). İnsan ve davranışı. 1. Baskı, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concaept revisited or a theory. Amaricam Psychologist, 28, 404-416
  • Feist, J. (1990). Theories of personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Inc, Chicago. Franzoi, S. L. (1996). Social psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Inc, Chicago. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Rinehart & Co., New York.
  • Hartmann, H. (1995). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. İnternational Universities Pres İnc.Madison, Connecticut.
  • Heidegger, M. (1976). Brief über den Humanismus. Wegmarken, GA. Bd. 9. Frank- furt am Main: Vittorio Kolstermann.
  • James, W. (1963). The varieties of religious experience. University Boks, New York.
  • Kara, H. (2009). Bilinç, benlik ve ölüm farkındalığı: bilincin biyolojik düzeyi ve ötesi. Psikiyatri Online, Makale No:74 Çarşamba, 07 Ocak 2009 16:44.
  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. International Universities Pres.Inc.
  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. American Life In the Age of Diminishing Expectations, New York: Warner Boks.:71–103.
  • Markus, H. (1983). Self-knowledge: An expanded viev, Journal of Personality, 51. Markus, H.R., Zajonc, R.B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology.
  • In the Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. I, 3rd Ed.), ed.: G. Lindzey &
  • E. Aronson, pp. 137-230, Random House.
  • May, R. (1987).Yaratma cesareti. (çev: Alper Oysal), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul Mead, H. (1968). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Pres.
  • Nasby, W. (1989). Private self-consciousness, articulation of the self schema, and recognition memory of trait adjectives, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: (1), 117-123.
  • Nelson-Jones, R. (1982). Danişma psikolojisi kuramlari. (Çeviri ed.: F. Akkoyun), basıldığı yer adı yok, orijinalinin basım yeri: Cassel Educational Limited.
  • Özen, Y. (2003). Özel Ben-Bilinçliliği, Genel Ben-Bilinçliliği. Bilge Adam Dergisi, C:4, s: 60-65.
  • Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy.
  • London: Constable. ISBN 1–84529–057–7
  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research: A historical overview. Social Forces, 68: (1), 34-44.
  • Roland, A. (1996). Cultural Pluralism and Psychoanalysis: The Asian and North American Experience Routledge 29 West 35th Street N.Y.10001
  • Sayar, K. (2003). Benlik: O Yakın Soru, O Uzak Ülke. Bilge Adam Dergisi, C:2, s: 11-17.
  • Sayar, K. (2000). Geçmişin bilgeliği bugünün psikoterapileriyle buluşabilir mi? Sufi psikolojisi örneği. Sufi Psikolojisi (Ed.: K. Sayar) adlı kitabın içinde, ss. 11-40, İst.: İnsan Yay.
  • Shaver, K.G. (1977). Principles of Social Psychology, Winthrop Publ.Inc.
  • Wegner, D. M., Vallacher, R. R. (1980). The self in social psychology. Newyork: Oxford University Pres.
  • Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 223–275.
  • Wylie, R. (1968). The present status of self theory. In Borgatta, E. R., and Lambert,
  • W. W. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. McNally, Chicago.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yener Özen This is me

Fikret Gülaçtı This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Özen, Y., & Gülaçtı, F. (2010). Benlik-Kavramı Ve Benliğin Gelişimi Bilen Benliğe Gereksinim Var Mı?. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 20-38.