An Examination on the Similarities Between Ecosocialism and Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Population growth, urbanization, industrialization, a growth model based on production and consumption, and the intense use of fossil fuels to meet energy needs have led to environmental problems. Solving the environmental problems met today requires the establishment of economic and social structures compatible with the environment. At this point, ecosocialism, which brings together ecology and socialism, offers a wide range of ideas in the combat against environmental problems such as climate change, air, water, waste and soil pollution. Ecosocialism, which emerged in the 1970s in the context of thoughts that the profit-oriented understanding of capitalism transforms the relationship between human and nature to the detriment of the environment, proposes a transition to an ecosocialist society and economic structure in which equality, justice and access to basic needs are essential in the solution of environmental problems. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), on the other hand, provide a road map for building an environmentally compatible social and economic structure between 2015 and 2030. This study aims to reveal the similarities between the economic and social structures that ecosocialism and SDGs try to achieve in harmony with the environment. Within the scope of the study, firstly, the idea of ecosocialism and the SDGs were examined, then it was examined whether there are common points between the ecosocialist society and SDGs and the desired results. As a result of this examination, it has been determined that there are methodological and practical differences between ecosocialism and the SDGs, yet there are similarities between the environment to be achieved and the compatible social structure.

Keywords

• Sustainability
• Sustainable Development
• Sustainable Development Goals
• Ecosocialism
• Ecosocialist Society

Ekososyalizm ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları Arasındaki Benzerlikler Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Abstract

Nüfus artışı, kentleşme, sanayileşme, üretim ve tüketime dayanan büyüme anlayışı ve enerji ihtiyacının karşılanabilmesi için fosil yakıtların yoğun bir şekilde kullanılması, çevre sorunlarının yaşanmasına yol açmıştır. Günümüzde karşılaşılan çevre sorunlarının çözüme kavuşturulması, çevre ile uyumlu ekonomik ve toplumsal yapıların oluşturulmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu çerçevede ekoloji ve sosyalizmi bir araya getiren ekososyalizm, iklim değişikliği, hava, su, atık ve toprak kirliliği gibi çevre sorunlarıyla mücadelede geniş bir düşünce demeti sunmaktadır. Kapitalizmin kâra odaklanan anlayışının insan ve doğa arasındaki ilişkiyi, çevrenin aleyhine olacak şekilde dönüştürdüğüne yönelik düşünceler bağlamında 1970’li yıllarda ortaya çıkan ekososyalizm, çevre sorunlarının çözümünde eşitlik, adalet ve temel ihtiyaçlara erişimin esas olduğu ekososyalist bir toplum ve ekonomik yapıya geçişi önermektedir. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları (SKA) ise, 2015-2030 yılları arasında, çevre ile uyumlu bir toplumsal ve ekonomik yapının inşa edilmesine yönelik yol haritası sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ekososyalizm ve SKA’nın çevre ile uyumlu olarak ulaşmaya çalıştığı ekonomik ve toplumsal yapılar arasındaki benzerliklerin ortaya koyulmasıdır. Çalışma kapsamında, öncelikle ekososyalizm düşüncesi ve SKA incelenmiş, daha sonra ekososyalist toplum ve SKA ile ulaşılmak istenen sonuçlar arasında ortak noktaların olup olmadığı irdelenmiştir. Bu irdeleme sonucunda, ekososyalizm ile SKA arasında yöntem ve uygulama farkları bulunduğu, fakat buna rağmen ulaşılmak istenen çevre ile uyumlu toplumsal yapı arasında benzerlikler olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma
• Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
• Ekososyalizm
• Ekososyalist Toplum

References

1. Albritton, R. (2019). Eco-socialism for now and the future: Practical utopias and rational action. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Allen, C., Metternicht, G. ve Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13, 1453-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3
3. Bebbington, J. ve Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1): 2-24.
4. Betto, F. ve Löwy, M. (2010). Ecosocialism and spirituality. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 21(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2010.489675
5. Biermann, F., Kanie, N. ve Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
6. Burkett, P. (2006). Two stages of ecosocialism?. International Journal of Political Economy, 35(3): 23-45. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJP0891-1916350302
7. Caiado, R. G. G., Filho, W. L., Quelhas, O. L. G., Nascimento, D. L. M. ve Avila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1276-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102
8. Collado-Ruano, J. (2018). Co-evolution in big history: A transdisciplinary and biomimetic approach to the Sustainable Development Goals. Social Evolution & History, 17(2), 27-41.

9. Devine, P. (2017). Ecosocialism for a new era. R. Westra, R. Albritton ve S. Jeong (Eds.), Varieties of alternative economic systems practical utopias for an age of global crisis and austerity (s. 33-51) içinde. London and New York: Routledge
10. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. New York: UCL Press.
11. Egute, T. O., Albrecht, E. ve Egute, K. A. (2019). From Stockholm to Paris: Four decades of sustainability in international law. M. Schmidt, D. Giovannucci, D. Palekhov ve B. Hansmann (Eds.), Sustainable global value chains (s. 63-84) içinde. Cham: Springer.
12. Fernandes, S. (2020). Ecosocialism from the margins. NACLA Report on the Americas, 52(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2020.1768731
13. Filho, W. L., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Pace, P., Mifsud, M., Brandli, L., Caeiro S. S. ve Antje, D. (2018). Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: The role of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103
14. Foster, J. B. (2001). Marx’ın ekolojisi: Materyalizm ve doğa. (E. Özkaya, Çev.) Ankara: Epos Yayınları.
15. Foster, J. B. (2012). Marksist ekoloji. (B. Baysal, Çev.) İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
16. Foster, J. B., Clark, B. ve York, R. (2010). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
17. Freund, P. (2010). Capitalism, time-space, environment, and human well-being: Envisioning ecosocialist temporality and spatiality. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 21(2): 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2010.489684
18. Giupponi, C. ve Gain, A. K. (2017). Integrated spatial assessment of the water, energy and food dimensions of the Sustainable Development Goals. Regional Environmental Change, 17, 1881-1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0998-z
19. Gorz, A. (2012). Capitalism, socialism, ecology. (M. Chalmers, Çev.) London: Verso.
20. Gupta, J. ve Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3): 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z
21. He, P., Sun., Y., Shen, H., Jian, K. ve Yu. Z. (2019). Does environmental tax affect energy efficiency? An empirical study of energy efficiency in OECD countries based on DEA and logit model. Sustainability, 11(14), 3792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143792
22. Henry, L. A. ve Douhovnikoff, V. (2008). Environmental issues in Russia. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 437-460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.051007.082437
23. Heywood, A. (2007). Siyasi ideolojiler. (A. K. Bayram, Ö. Tüfekçi, H. İnaç, Ş. Akın ve B. Kalkan, Çev.). Ankara: Adres Yayınları.
24. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M. ve O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244
25. Huan, Q. (2010). Eco-socialism in an era of capitalist globalisation: Bridging the west and the east. Q. Huan (Ed.), Eco-socialism as politics: Rebuilding the basis of our modern civilisation (s. 3-12) içinde. Dordrecht: Springer.
26. Huckle, J. (2009). Sustainable schools: Responding to new challenges and opportunities. Geography, 94(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2009.12094247
27. Huckle, J. (2010). ESD and the current crisis of capitalism: Teaching beyond green new deals. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820900400119
28. Huckle, J. (2012). Even more sense and sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 845-858. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.665851
29. Jayasooria, D. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals and social work: Opportunities and challenges for social work practice in Malaysia. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 1, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0007-y
30. Kılıç, S. (2008). Çevre etiği: Ortaya çıkışı, gelişimi ve sonuçları. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
31. Kirby, P. ve O’Mahony, T. (2018). The political economy of the low-carbon transition. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Kovel, J. (2007). The enemy of nature: The end of capitalism or the end of the world?. London: Zed Books.
33. Kovel, J. (2008). Ecosocialism, global justice, and climate change. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 19(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750802091123
34. Kovel, J. (2014). Ecosocialism as a human phenomenon. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2013.879800
35. Löwy, M. (2002). From Marx to ecosocialism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 13(1): 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/104557502101245413
36. Löwy, M. (2005). What is ecosocialism?. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(2): 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750500108237
37. Löwy, M. (2015). Ecosocialism: A radical alternative to capitalist catastrophe. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
38. Löwy, M. (2016). For an ecosocialist ethics. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1139816
39. Lu, C. A., Dong, Y. G. ve Lian, J. Y. (2016). On the concept of ecological civilization in China and Joel Kovel’s ecosocialism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2015.1137078
40. Marcinkowski, T. J. (2009). Contemporary challenges and opportunities in environmental education: Where are we headed and what deserves our attention?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903210015
41. Molyneux, J. (2020). The case for ecosocialism. Irish Marxist Review, 9(28), 29-34.
42. Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., Neumann, B., Stevance, A. S., Visbeck, M. ve Stafford-Smith, M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13, 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
43. Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. ve Visbeck, M. (2016). Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534, 320-322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
44. Ökmen, M. (2000). Çevre sorunlarının sistemler-üstü niteliği ve Orta Asya. Bilig, 14, 17-29.
45. Özçağ, M. ve Hotunluoğlu, H. (2015). Kalkınma anlayışında yeni bir boyut: Yeşil ekonomi. CBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbusos.85473
46. Pepper, D. (2003). Eco-socialism: From Deep Ecology to social justice. London and New York: Routledge.
47. Pepper, D. (2010). On contemporary eco-socialism. Q. Huan (Ed.), Eco-socialism as politics: Rebuilding the basis of our modern civilisation (s. 33-44) içinde. Dordrecht: Springer.
48. Pillay, D. (2020). Happiness, wellbeing and ecosocialism- a radical humanist perspective. Globalizations, 17(2), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1652470
49. Salvia, A. L., Filho, W. L., Brandli, L. L. ve Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: Local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242
50. Schwartzman, D. (2009). Ecosocialism or ecocatastrophe?. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 20(1): 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750902727154
51. Senaratne, M. (2017). The transition from MDGs to SDGs: Rethinking buzzwords. J. Servaes (Ed.), Sustainable Development Goals in the Asian context (s. 23-40) içinde. Cham: Springer.
52. Servaes, J. (2017). Introduction: From MDGs to SDGs. J. Servaes (Ed.) Sustainable Development Goals in the Asian context (s. 1-22) içinde. Cham: Springer.
53. Sezer, S. (2015). Sosyalist ekoloji: Gereklilik mi, ütopya mı?. F. Kırışık ve Ö. Sezer (Eds.), Siyasal Ekoloji (s. 107-144) içinde. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
54. Smith, R.(2019). An ecosocialist path to limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C. Real-World Economics Review, 87, 149-180.
55. Sneddon, C., Howarth, R. B. ve Norgaard, R. B. (2006). Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland World. Ecological Economics, 57, 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013
56. Turhan, E. ve Atay, H. (2015). Ekososyalizm: Bugüne ve geleceğe dair siyasi bir tahayyül. Ayrıntı Dergi, 8, 137-149.
57. UNDP Türkiye. (2019). Türkçe çevirileri yenilenen “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları” için birlikte çalışmaya devam. https://www.undp.org/tr/turkiye/press-releases/turkce-cevirileri-yenilenen-surdurulebilir-kalkinma-amaclari-icin-birlikte-calismaya-devam (14.09.2022).
58. United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication - A synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un. org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf (16.12.2022).
59. United Nations. (2001). Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/448375#record-files-collapse-header (14.09.2022).
60. United Nations. (2012). The future we want. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents /733FutureWeWant.pdf (16.12.2022).
61. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication (14.09.2022).
62. UNWCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (14.09.2022).
63. Ünver, A. H. (2017). Paris İklim Anlaşmasına teorik yaklaşım: Neo-neo tartışması, eko-marksizm ve yeşil kapitalizm. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 14(54), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.513221
64. Venovcevs, A. (2021). Living with socialism: Toward an archaeology of a post-soviet industrial town. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.10.017
65. Wackernagel, M., Hanscom, L. ve Lin, D. (2017). Making the Sustainable Development Goals consistent with sustainability. Frontiers in Energy Research, 5, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2017.00018
66. Wall, D. (2010). The rise of the green left. London: Pluto Press.
67. Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W. ve Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and communications technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the art, needs and perspectives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 2389-2406. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2812301
68. Zeng, Y., Maxwell, S., Runting, R. K., Venter, O., Watson, J. E. M. ve Carrasco, L. R. (2020). Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 3, 795-798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0555-0
69. Ziai, A. (2016). Development discourse and global history from colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Routledge.