Progress or Reproduction? Motherhood, Care Work, and the Contradictory Outcomes of Feminist Rights in Working Life

Abstract

This study examines the historical development of the feminist struggle against gender inequality, highlighting how certain rights and protections—initially regarded as progressive gains—can paradoxically reproduce patriarchal norms when removed from their historical and social context. By analyzing key feminist waves and theoretical approaches, the research shows that rights such as maternity leave, breastfeeding breaks, flexible working arrangements, protective labor laws, and menstrual leave, while designed to support women’s participation in the workforce, can also reinforce traditional gender roles by positioning women primarily as “natural caregivers” or “fragile subjects.” The findings reveal that feminist politics should not be viewed as static; even well-established rights must be continually questioned to assess whether they produce genuinely equal outcomes. Achieving real gender equality requires not only gaining new rights but also critically evaluating how existing policies interact with patriarchal structures. In this regard, the study emphasizes that feminist gains are not absolute but must be redefined and restructured in line with the transformation of underlying social norms.

Keywords

• Women's Rights
• Maternity Leave
• Breasfeeding Leave
• Critical Feminism
• Custody Rights

Ethical Statement

It is hereby declared that scientific and ethical principles were adhered to during the preparation of this study and that all studies used as references are listed in the bibliography.

İlerleme mi Yeniden Üretim mi? Annelik, Bakım Emeği ve Çalışma Yaşamında Feminist Hakların Çelişkili Sonuçları

Abstract

Bu çalışma, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğine karşı yürütülen feminist mücadelenin tarihsel gelişimini ele alarak, başlangıçta ilerici kazanımlar olarak görülen bazı hak ve korumaların, tarihsel ve toplumsal bağlamından koparıldığında ataerkil normları yeniden üretebilme potansiyeline dikkat çekmektedir. Feminist dalgaların ve temel kuramsal yaklaşımların katkılarıyla incelenen doğum izni, emzirme izni, esnek çalışma düzenlemeleri, koruyucu iş yasaları ve regl izni gibi hakların, kadınların iş gücüne katılımını desteklemekle birlikte, kadını öncelikle “doğal bakıcı” veya “kırılgan” olarak konumlandırarak geleneksel cinsiyet rollerini pekiştirebildiği görülmektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, feminist politikanın statik olmadığını, kazanılmış hakların dahi eşitlikçi sonuçlar doğurup doğurmadığının sürekli olarak sorgulanması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Gerçek toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin sağlanabilmesi için, yalnızca yeni haklar elde etmek değil, mevcut düzenlemelerin ataerkil yapılarla nasıl ilişkilenebileceğini eleştirel bir bakışla değerlendirmek gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, feminist kazanımların mutlak değil, dönüştürülebilir olduğuna ve toplumsal normların dönüşümüyle birlikte yeniden tasarlanması gerektiğine vurgu yapmaktadır.

Keywords

• Kadın Hakları
• Doğum İzni
• Süt İzni
• Eleştirel Feminizm
• Velayet Hakkı

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

References

1. Amin, M. & Islam, A.M. (2022) “The Impact of Paid Maternity Leave on Women’s Employment,” Policy Research Working Paper, 10188.
2. Arendt, M. & Sterken, E. (2019) “Maternity Protection at Work,” Breastfeeding Benefits Special Edition. IBFAN position paper [Preprint].
3. Astell, M. (1697) A serious proposal to the ladies, for the advancement of their true and greatest interest : in two parts. London : Printed for Richard Wilkin.
4. Baker, M., Gruber, J. and Milligan, K. (2008) “Universal Child Care, Maternal Labor Supply, and Family Well‐Being,” Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), pp. 709–745.
5. Barker, E. & Stalley, R.F. (1998) The politics. Oxford Paperbacks.
6. Bayar, A., & Köksal, B. (2024). Doğum izni sonrası göreve başlayan öğretmenlerin mesleğe yabancılaşma kavramına ilişkin düşünceleri. Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(47), 2259-2268.
7. Bobel, C. (2020) New Blood: Third-Wave Feminism and the Politics of Menstruation. Rutgers University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813549538.
8. Brinig, M.F. (2000) From contract to covenant: Beyond the law and economics of the family. Harvard University Press.

9. Budig, M.J. & England, P. (2001) “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood,” American Sociological Review, 66(2), pp. 204–225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240106600203.
10. Butler, J. (1990) “Feminism and the Subversion of Identity,” Gender trouble, 3(1), pp. 3–17.
11. Carlson, D.L., Petts, R.J. and Pepin, J.R. (2021) “Flexplace Work and Partnered Fathers’ Time in Housework and Childcare,” Men and Masculinities, 24(4), pp. 547–570.
12. Chung, H. (2022) The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self-) exploitation. Policy Press. Chung, H. & Van Der Lippe, T. (2020) “Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction,” Social Indicators Research, 151(2), pp. 365–381.
13. Cohen, M. (1993) Workshop to office: two generations of Italian women in New York City, 1900-1950. Cornell University Press.
14. Crenshaw, K. (2013) “Mapping the Margins,” in Feminist Studies. Routledge, pp. 351–364.
15. Crompton, R. & Lyonette, C. (2006) “Work-Life ‘Balance’ in Europe,” Acta Sociologica, 49(4), pp. 379–393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306071680.
16. Çakır, A. (2011). Türkiye’de Esnek Çalışma ve Kadın İşgücü Üzerindeki Etkileri, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.
17. Dedeoğlu, S. (2009). Eşitlik mi ayrımcılık mı? Türkiye’de sosyal devlet, cinsiyet eşitliği politikaları ve kadın istihdamı. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2(21), 41-54.
18. Desmond, D. & Meaney, S. (2016) “A qualitative study investigating the barriers to returning to work for breastfeeding mothers in Ireland,” International Breastfeeding Journal, 11(1), p. 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0075-8.
19. Dex, S. & Scheibl, F. (2001) “Flexible and Family‐Friendly Working Arrangements in UK‐Based SMEs: Business Cases,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(3), pp. 411–431. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00207.
20. Dunckel-Graglia, A. (2013) “‘Pink transportation’ in Mexico City: reclaiming urban space through collective action against gender-based violence,” Gender and Development, 21(2), pp. 265–276.
21. Eisenstein, Z.R. (1979) Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. Monthly Review Press.
22. Ellingsæter, D.A.L. (2012) “Experiences from Finland, Norway and Sweden.” Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/09079.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2025).
23. Eren, T., Kural, B., Yetim, A., Boran, P., & Gökçay, G. (2018). Kadın hekimlerin emzirme deneyimleri ve yasa değişikliğinin emzirme üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, 53(4), 238-244.
24. Evans, S. (2010) Tidal wave: How women changed America at century’s end. Simon and Schuster.
25. Fineman, M. (1988) “Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decisionmaking,” Harvard law review, pp. 727–774.
26. Folbre, N. (2006) “Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy,” Journal of Human Development, 7(2), pp. 183–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768512.
27. Fraser, N. (2014) Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the" postsocialist" condition. Routledge. Fraser, N. (2017) “After the family wage: A postindustrial thought experiment,” in Gender and Justice. Routledge, pp. 291–316.
28. Friedan, B. (2013) The feminine mystique. WW Norton & Company.
29. Friendly, M. (2001) “1. Child Care and Canadian Federalism in the 1990s: Canary in a Coal Mine,” in G. Cleveland and M. Krashinsky (eds.) Our Children’s Future. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 25–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678163-005.
30. Gatrell, C.J. (2007) “Secrets and lies: Breastfeeding and professional paid work,” Social Science & Medicine, 65(2), pp. 393–404.
31. Gerhard, U. (2001) Debating women’s equality: toward a feminist theory of law from a European perspective. Rutgers University Press.
32. Ginting, R.T., Gelgel, N.M.R.A. and Apriani, K.D. (2022) “Feminism and the Women’s Carriage of the KRL Jabodetabek,” in BIC 2021: Proceedings of the 6th Batusangkar International Conference, BIC 2021, 11-12 October, 2021, Batusangkar-West Sumatra, Indonesia. European Alliance for Innovation, p. 481.
33. Gornick, J.C. & Meyers, M.K. (2003) Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. Russell Sage Foundation. Available
34. Gornick, J.C., Meyers, M.K. and Ross, K.E. (1997) “Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States,” Journal of European Social Policy, 7(1), pp. 45–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879700700103.
35. Gregory, A. & Milner, S.E. (2009) “Work-life balance: a matter of choice?,” gender, Work and Organization, 16(1). Grossberg, M. (1985) Governing the hearth: Law and the family in nineteenth-century America. Univ of North Carolina Press.
36. Haas, L. & Rostgaard, T. (2011) “Fathers’ rights to paid parental leave in the Nordic countries: consequences for the gendered division of leave,” Community, Work & Family, 14(2), pp. 177–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571398.
37. Hartmann, H. (1976) “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(3, Part 2), pp. 137–169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/493283.
38. Hausman, B. (2004) “The feminist politics of breastfeeding,” Australian Feminist Studies, 19(45), pp. 273–285. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0816464042000278963.
39. Hennegan, J., Winkler, I. T., Bobel, C., Keiser, D., Hampton, J., Larsson, G., ... & Mahon, T. (2021). Menstrual health: a definition for policy, practice, and research. Sexual and reproductive health matters, 29(1), 31-38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1911618.
40. Heymann, J., Raub, A. & Earle, A. (2013) “Breastfeeding policy: a globally comparative analysis,” Bulletin of the world health organization, 91, pp. 398–406.
41. Hochschild, A. & Machung, A. (2012) The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
42. Horii, M. & Burgess, A. (2012) “Constructing sexual risk: ‘Chikan’, collapsing male authority and the emergence of women-only train carriages in Japan,” Health, Risk & Society, 14(1), pp. 41–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2011.641523.
43. Ibarra-Ortega, A., Vásquez-Garibay, E. M., Larrosa-Haro, A., Castro-Albarrán, J., & Vizmanos-Lamotte, B. (2020). Using a lactation room at the workplace is associated with longer breastfeeding duration in working mothers. Nutricion hospitalaria, 37(5), 918-925.
44. Ison, J., Forsdike, K., Henry, N., Hooker, L., & Taft, A. (2025). “I’ll try and make myself as small as possible”: women and gender-diverse people's safety work on public transport. Violence against women, 31(11), 2830-2852.
45. Ivanova, O. & O’Hern, S. (2024) “Mobility of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Transport Geography, 121, p. 104008.
46. Karadeniz, O. (2011). Türkiye’de atipik çalışan kadınlar ve yaygın sosyal güvencesizlik. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2(29), 83-127.
47. Kelly, J.B. (1994) “The determination of child custody,” The future of children, pp. 121–142.
48. Kessler-Harris, A. (1982) Out to work: A history of wage-earning women in the United States. Oxford University Press.
49. Kessler-Harris, A. (2003) A woman’s wage: Historical meanings and social consequences. University Press of Kentucky.
50. Kleven, H., Landais, C., Posch, J., Steinhauer, A., & Zweimüller, J. (2019, May). Child penalties across countries: Evidence and explanations. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 109, pp. 122-126). 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203: American Economic Association.
51. Koven, S. & Michel, S. (2013) Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states. Routledge.
52. Koyama, E. (2020) “Whose feminism is it anyway? The unspoken racism of the trans inclusion debate,” The Sociological Review, 68(4), pp. 735–744.
53. Lewis, J. (2001) “The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care,” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8(2), pp. 152–169.
54. Mahon, R. (2002) “Child care: Toward what kind of ‘social Europe’?,” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 9(3), pp. 343–379.
55. Mason, M.A. (1994) From Father’s Property to Children’s Rights: The History of Child Custody in the United States. Columbia University Press.
56. Michel, S. (1999) Children’s interests/mothers’ rights: The shaping of America’s child care policy. Yale University Press.
57. Milkman, R. (1987). Gender at work: The dynamics of job segregation by sex during World War II. University of Illinois Press.Millett, K. (1970) “Sexual politics: A manifesto for Revolution,” Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation, 12.
58. Mohanty, C. (1988) “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses,” Feminist Review, 30(1), pp. 61–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.42.
59. Morgan, K.J. (2003) “The politics of mothers’ employment: France in comparative perspective,” World politics, 55(2), pp. 259–289.
60. Morgan, K.J. & Zippel, K. (2003) “Paid to care: The origins and effects of care leave policies in Western Europe,” Social politics: International studies in gender, State & Society, 10(1), pp. 49–85.
61. Mubarok, M. & Suparman, N. (2019) “Public transport policy specifically for women: creating gender-responsive transport services,” MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 35(2), pp. 481–487.
62. Munro, E. (2013) “Feminism: A Fourth Wave?,” Political Insight, 4(2), pp. 22–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-9066.12021.
63. NTV (2017). “Malatya'da "pembe trambüs" uygulaması başladı.” Available at: https://www.ntv.com.tr/galeri/turkiye/malatyada-pembe-trambus-uygulamasi-basladi-XZNLmf0BDUOl8Q64a8AzWw/1, Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2025.
64. Offen, K. (1988) “Defining Feminism: A Comparative Historical Approach,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(1), pp. 119–157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/494494.
65. Orloff, A.S. (1993) “Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states,” American sociological review, pp. 303–328.
66. Ortner, S.B. (1972) “Is female to male as nature is to culture?,” Feminist studies, 1(2), pp. 5–31. Pinsky, M. (2024) “Women’s Mobility Challenges and Solutions in Mexico City,” Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review, 3(1).
67. Pizan, C. (1999) The book of the city of ladies. Penguin UK.
68. Prabowo, H., Rebeca, A., Salve, H. R., Fatimah, F. F., Chrisnatalia, M., Prabawati, I. N., & Handayani, N. S. (2020). The Women-only Passenger Carriage: Is It Helpful? Psychological Research on Urban Society, 3(1), 10.
69. Rehel, E.M. (2014) “When Dad Stays Home Too: Paternity Leave, Gender, and Parenting,” Gender & Society, 28(1), pp. 110–132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503900.
70. Rønsen, M. & Kitterød, R.H. (2015) “Gender-Equalizing Family Policies and Mothers’ Entry into Paid Work: Recent Evidence From Norway,” Feminist Economics, 21(1), pp. 59–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.927584.
71. Rubery, J. & Rafferty, A. (2013) “Women and recession revisited,” Work, Employment and Society, 27(3), pp. 414–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012460314.
72. Rader, R. (1984). " Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology" by Rosemary Radford Ruether (Book Review). Signs, 10(2), 378.
73. Ruhm, C.J. (1998) “The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: Lessons from Europe,” The quarterly journal of economics, 113(1), pp. 285–317.
74. Schilt, K. (2010). Just one of the guys?: Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. University of Chicago Press.
75. Shanley, M.L. (2018) “Reconceptualizing Family Relationships in an Age of Reproductive Technologies,” Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law, p. 293.
76. Sharma, D. M. (2025). Pink revolution in urban transport: Can fare-free rides improve women’s empowerment? A case study of Delhi urban transport policy intervention.
77. Shibata, S. (2020) “Are women-only cars (WOC) a solution to groping? A survey among college students in Tokyo/Kanagawa, Japan,” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 44(4), pp. 293–305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1719533.
78. Sil, A., Chowdhury, S. and Thoreau, R. (2023) “Moving towards an inclusive public transport system for women in the South and Southeast Asian region,” Transport Reviews, 43(6), pp. 1144–1164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2200983.
79. Skocpol, T. (1995). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Harvard University Press.
80. Smart, C. (Ed.). (2002). Regulating womanhood. Routledge.
81. Tillous, M. (2020) “Women, (railway) class and the state: an analysis of two controversies surrounding women-only metro carriages (Cairo – São Paulo),” Gender, Place & Culture, 27(8), pp. 1155–1175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1654435.
82. Tong, R., & Botts, T. F. (2024). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Routledge. UN (2017) Speech: “Paid parental leave is about creating freedom to define roles”— UN Women Goodwill Ambassador Anne Hathaway, UN Women – Headquarters. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2017/3/speech-anne-hathaway-iwd-2017 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2025).
83. Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Harvard University Press.
84. Winata, F., Purba, D., & Cidell, J. (2025). Transportation inequalities and access to transportation among women and people with disabilities in Indonesia. In Handbook on Transport in Asia (pp. 476-498). Edward Elgar Publishing.
85. Wollstonecraft, M. (2016) “55. Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” in R. Blaug and J. Schwarzmantel (eds.) Democracy. Columbia University Press, pp. 297–306.
86. Zhuang, J., Bresnahan, M., Zhu, Y., Yan, X., Bogdan-Lovis, E., Goldbort, J., & Haider, S. (2018). The impact of coworker support and stigma on breastfeeding after returning to work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(4), 491-508. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1498981.
87. Zimmerman, T. (2017). # Intersectionality: The fourth wave feminist Twitter community. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture and Social Justice, 38(1), 54-70.