BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ
Abstract
In this study, the relationship between the intrinsic motivation,
self-efficacy and self-esteem, which constitute the personality character, and
the openness to the experience in the Big Five are examined. As a result of the
study, it was determined that the relationship between intrinsic motivation,
self-efficacy and self-esteem and openness to experience was over ()0.20.
It was seen in related field that the openness to the experience
increased as the self-factors of the individuals increased. The relationship
between openness to experience and self factors was investigated through
systematic review / meta-analysis. At the end of the study, the studies found a
positive relationship between self related factors and openness to experience.
Together this, the studies were found to be compatible with each other. Future
study possibilities and limitations of this study are discussed.
Keywords
References
- Adams, S.G., & Gullotta T. (1989). Adolescent Life Experiences. New York: Brooks Cole.Aghababaei, N., Błachnio, A., Arji, A., Chiniforoushan, M., Tekke, M., & Mehrabadi, A. F. (2016). Honesty–humility and the HEXACO structure of religiosity and well-being. Current Psychology, 35(3), 421-426.Aghababaei, N., Wasserman, J. A., & Hatami, J. (2014). Personality factors and attitudes toward euthanasia in Iran: Implications for end-of-life research and practice. Death Studies, 38, 91-99. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2012.731026Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO‐PI‐R self‐ and observer reports. European Journal of Personality. 24. 278 - 289. 10.1002/per.759.Bandura, A. (1994) Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, VS Ramachaudran (Ed), New York: Academic.Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Basım, N.H., Çetin, F., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20- 34.Bassili, J. N. (2006). Promotion and prevention orientations in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 444-455.Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational research, 64(3), 363-423.Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2008).Personality: Theory and research (10th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
- Clark, M.H., & Schroth, C.A. (2010). Examining Relationships Between Academic Motivation and Personality Among College Students. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 19-24.Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Coşkun, D. Y., & Demirel, M. (2012) Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 42, 108-120.
- Decay, J., & Kenny, M.(1994). Adolescent Development. Madison: Brown- Benchmark.
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum
- Eggers, J. H. (2000). Five-factor theory of personality: A new and useful lens to explore enterpreneurial action, or another useless dead-end? Journal of Private Equity, 4(1), 59-63.Erdle, S., & Rushton, J. P. (2011). Does self-esteem or social desirability account for a general factor of personality (GFP) in the Big Five? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1152-1154.Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G.(1969). Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity: 272–296. New York: Cambridge University.Hart, J., Stasson, M., M. Mahoney, J., & Story, P. (2007). The big five and achievement motivation: Exploring the relationship between personality and a two-factor model of motivation. Individual Differences Research. 5. 267-274.Hirsh, J., Deyoung, C., & Peterson, J. (2009). Metatraits of the Big Five Differentially Predict Engagement and Restraint of Behavior. Journal of personality. 77. 1085-102.Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1985). Molivational process in cooperalive, competitive and individualistic learning siluations. İn C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.). Research on motivation in edııcalion. USA: Academic.Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five Personality Traits as the Predictors of Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: Does Gender Matter?. The Journal of creative behavior. 47. 215-232. 10.1002/jocb.32.
- Kelly, W., & L. Johnson, J. (2006). Time Use Efficiency and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Education. 125, 511-514.Komarraju M., & Karau S.J. (2005). The Relationship Between The Big Five Personality Traits and Academic Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557-567.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 1, 2020
Submission Date
November 12, 2019
Acceptance Date
February 14, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 19 Number: 74
APA
Tekke, M., & Yıldız, A. (2020). BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(74), 828-837. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.645766
AMA
1.Tekke M, Yıldız A. BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. esosder. 2020;19(74):828-837. doi:10.17755/esosder.645766
Chicago
Tekke, Mustafa, and Atilla Yıldız. 2020. “BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ”. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 (74): 828-37. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.645766.
EndNote
Tekke M, Yıldız A (April 1, 2020) BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 74 828–837.
IEEE
[1]M. Tekke and A. Yıldız, “BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ”, esosder, vol. 19, no. 74, pp. 828–837, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.17755/esosder.645766.
ISNAD
Tekke, Mustafa - Yıldız, Atilla. “BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ”. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19/74 (April 1, 2020): 828-837. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.645766.
JAMA
1.Tekke M, Yıldız A. BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. esosder. 2020;19:828–837.
MLA
Tekke, Mustafa, and Atilla Yıldız. “BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ”. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 74, Apr. 2020, pp. 828-37, doi:10.17755/esosder.645766.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Tekke, Atilla Yıldız. BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. esosder. 2020 Apr. 1;19(74):828-37. doi:10.17755/esosder.645766