Research Article
Year 2019,
Volume: 18 Issue: 70, 710 - 719, 01.04.2019
Abstract
Bu araştırmanın amacı, Canary ve Stafford (1992) tarafından
geliştirilen İlişkileri Sürdürme Stratejileri Ölçeği’nin (İSSÖ) genç
yetişkinlerden oluşan bir örneklemde geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasını
yapmaktır. Araştırma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi’nde pedagojik formasyon eğitimi
alan ve Eğitim Fakültesi’nin çeşitli bölümlerine devam eden dördüncü sınıf
öğrencileri olan toplam 352’u kız,126’i erkek olmak üzere toplam 478 öğrenci
ile yürütülmüştür. İSSÖ’nün beş faktörlü yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi
yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, İSSÖ’nün beş faktörlü
yapısının doğrulandığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca ölçeğin dil geçerliği de
incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışması, test-tekrar test güvenirlik
katsayısı ve iç tutarlılık katsayısı ile hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar,
İSSÖ’nün genç yetişkinlerde ilişkileri sürdürme stratejilerini değerlendirmek
üzere geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini
göstermiştir.
Keywords
References
- Adams, R. D.ve Baptist, J. A. (2012). Relationship maintenance behavior and adult attachment: An analysis of the actor-partner interdependence model. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40(3), 230-244. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2011.605047.Anderegg, C., Dale, K., ve Fox, J. (2014). Media portrayals of romantic relationship maintenance: A content analysis of relational maintenance behaviors on prime-time television. Mass Communication& Society, 17, 733–753. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.846383Canary, D.J., ve Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03637759209376268.Canary, D. J. ve Dainton, M. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–743). New York, NY:Cambridge University PressDainton, M.ve Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10,255–271.Dainton, M. ve Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191. doi:10.1080/08824090802237600Dindia, K. ve Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173.Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In D. J.Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Haas, S.M. ve Stafford, L. (2005). Maintenance behaviors in same-sex and marital relationships: A matched sample comparison. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_3. Ledbetter, A.M. (2009). Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: Direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research, 35, 130–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01341.x.Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J. ve Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,17, 67–94.Merolla, A.J. (2012). Connecting here and there: A model of long-distance relationshipmaintenance. Personal Relationships, 19, 775–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2011.01392.x.Myers, S.A. ve Goodboy, A.K. (2010). Relational maintenance behaviors and communication channel use among adult siblings. North American Journal of Psychology, 12, 103–116.Ramirez, A. (2008). An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relationship maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 943–965.Ogolsky, B.G. ve Bowers, J.R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338.Ogolsky, B. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115.Oswald, D. L. ve Clark, E. M. (2006). How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels? Personal Relationships, 13, 333–348.Stafford, L. ve Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. doi:10.1177/0265407591082004Stafford, L. ve Canary, D.J. (2006). Equity and interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 227–254. http://dx.doi. org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0604_1.Stafford, L., Dainton, M. ve Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323.Weigel, D.J. ve Ballard-Reisch, D.S. (2008). Relational maintenance, satisfaction, and commitment in marriages: An actor–partner analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 8(3), 212–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802182522.Weiser,D.A. ve Weigel,D.,J. (2016). Self-efficacy in romantic relationships: direct and indirect effects on relationship maintenance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences,89, 152- 156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.013Weigel, D.J, Weiser,D.A ve Lalasz,C.B. (2017). Testing Motivational Model of Relationship Maintenance: The Role of Approachand Avoidance Relationship Goals. Western Journal of Communication.81(3),341-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1240372
- Anderegg, C., Dale, K., ve Fox, J. (2014). Media portrayals of romantic relationship maintenance: A content analysis of relational maintenance behaviors on prime-time television. Mass Communication& Society, 17, 733–753. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.846383
Year 2019,
Volume: 18 Issue: 70, 710 - 719, 01.04.2019
Abstract
References
- Adams, R. D.ve Baptist, J. A. (2012). Relationship maintenance behavior and adult attachment: An analysis of the actor-partner interdependence model. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40(3), 230-244. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2011.605047.Anderegg, C., Dale, K., ve Fox, J. (2014). Media portrayals of romantic relationship maintenance: A content analysis of relational maintenance behaviors on prime-time television. Mass Communication& Society, 17, 733–753. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.846383Canary, D.J., ve Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03637759209376268.Canary, D. J. ve Dainton, M. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–743). New York, NY:Cambridge University PressDainton, M.ve Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10,255–271.Dainton, M. ve Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191. doi:10.1080/08824090802237600Dindia, K. ve Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173.Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In D. J.Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Haas, S.M. ve Stafford, L. (2005). Maintenance behaviors in same-sex and marital relationships: A matched sample comparison. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_3. Ledbetter, A.M. (2009). Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: Direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research, 35, 130–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01341.x.Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J. ve Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,17, 67–94.Merolla, A.J. (2012). Connecting here and there: A model of long-distance relationshipmaintenance. Personal Relationships, 19, 775–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2011.01392.x.Myers, S.A. ve Goodboy, A.K. (2010). Relational maintenance behaviors and communication channel use among adult siblings. North American Journal of Psychology, 12, 103–116.Ramirez, A. (2008). An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relationship maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 943–965.Ogolsky, B.G. ve Bowers, J.R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338.Ogolsky, B. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115.Oswald, D. L. ve Clark, E. M. (2006). How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels? Personal Relationships, 13, 333–348.Stafford, L. ve Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. doi:10.1177/0265407591082004Stafford, L. ve Canary, D.J. (2006). Equity and interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 227–254. http://dx.doi. org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0604_1.Stafford, L., Dainton, M. ve Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323.Weigel, D.J. ve Ballard-Reisch, D.S. (2008). Relational maintenance, satisfaction, and commitment in marriages: An actor–partner analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 8(3), 212–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802182522.Weiser,D.A. ve Weigel,D.,J. (2016). Self-efficacy in romantic relationships: direct and indirect effects on relationship maintenance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences,89, 152- 156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.013Weigel, D.J, Weiser,D.A ve Lalasz,C.B. (2017). Testing Motivational Model of Relationship Maintenance: The Role of Approachand Avoidance Relationship Goals. Western Journal of Communication.81(3),341-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1240372
- Anderegg, C., Dale, K., ve Fox, J. (2014). Media portrayals of romantic relationship maintenance: A content analysis of relational maintenance behaviors on prime-time television. Mass Communication& Society, 17, 733–753. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.846383
There are 2 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Business Administration |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 1, 2019 |
| Submission Date | July 19, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 18 Issue: 70 |
Cited By
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Electronic Journal of Social Sciences), Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
ESBD Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Electronic Journal of Social Sciences), Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu tarafından tescil edilmiştir. Marka No:2011/119849.