VERTICAL COLLECTIVISM, FAMILY-CONSCIOUSNESS AND URBANIZATION IN TURKEY

Year 2013, Volume: 12 Issue: 47, 232 - 251, 01.03.2013

Ayse Ayçiçeği-dınn Catherine L. Caldwell-harrıs

Abstract

Abstract
Urban living offers conveniences which reduce the need to rely on family and close friends. The current paper tested the urbanization hypothesis, which is that residents of urban areas will be more individualistic and less collectivistic than rural residents. Individualism, collectivism and family-consciousness were assessed in college students in several Turkish cities and one US city (Boston). Urbanization co-varied most strongly not with individualism, but with low values of vertical collectivism, which is the tendency to subordinate personal goals to those of in-group authority figures, and with family-consciousness (communalism within the family group). family-consciousness and vertical collectivism were less frequently endorsed in larger urban areas compared to rural areas. These associations provide a foundation for asking more specific questions about what aspects of urban living (e.g., income, education, religious belief, less frequent co-residence with family) influence collectivist values.
Key Words: individualism, collectivism, modernization, cross-cultural psychology

Keywords

individualism, collectivism, modernization, cross-cultural psychology

VERTICAL COLLECTIVISM, FAMILY-CONSCIOUSNESS AND URBANIZATION IN TURKEY

Abstract

Öz
Şehir yaşamı insanlara, ailelerine ve yakın arkadaşlarına güvenme ihtiyacını azaltan kolaylıklar sunmaktadır. Bu araştırmada büyük şehirde yaşayanların kırsalda yaşayanlara göre daha bireyselci ve daha az toplulukçu olacağını öne süren şehirleşme hipotezi sınanmıştır. Bireyselcilik, toplulukçuluk ve ailecilik Türkiye'nin birkaç şehrinde ve bir ABD şehrindeki (Boston) üniversite öğrencileri arasında ölçülmüştür. Şehirleşmenin bireycilikten çok grup içi otorite figürlerinin bireysel amaçların önüne geçmesi olarak tanımlanan dikey toplulukçuluğun düşük düzeyleri ve ailecilikle (aile içi toplumsalcılıkla) ilişkili olarak değiştiği bulgulanmıştır. Ailecilik ve dikey toplulukçuluk kırsal alanlara nazaran, geniş kentsel alanlarda daha az kabul görmektedir. Bu ilişkiler, şehir yaşamının hangi özelliklerinin (gelir düzeyi, eğitim düzeyi, dini inanç, aileyle yaşamanın pek tercih edilmemesi) toplulukçu değerleri etkilemesine ilişkin daha spesifik sorular sormak için bir temel oluşturmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: bireyselcilik, toplulukçuluk, modernleşme, kültürlerarası psikoloji

Keywords

bireyselcilik, toplulukçuluk, modernleşme, kültürlerarası psikoloji.

References

• Alwin, D. F. (1989). Social stratification, conditions of work, and parental socialization values. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and social perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Aycan, Z., & Eskin, M. (2005). Relative contributions of childcare, spousal support, and organizational support in reducing work-family conflict for men and women: The Case of Turkey. Sex Roles, 53, 453-471.
• Aycicegi-Dinn, A., & Caldwell-Harris, C.L. (2011). Individualism-collectivism among Americans, Turks and Turkish immigrants to the U.S. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 9-16.
• Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49-56.
• Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
• Caldwell-Harris, C.L., & Ayçiçeği, A. (2006). When personality and culture clash: The psychological distress of allocentrics in an individualist culture and idiocentrics in a collectivist culture. Transcultural Psychiatry, 43, 331-361.
• Camilleri, C. & Malevska-Peyre, H. (1997). Socialization and Identity Strategies. Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Saraswathi, T. S. (ed.). Basic Processes and Human Development. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (v. 2). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
• Chirkov, V.I., Lynch M., Niwa S. (2005). Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 469–490. Conway, L.G., Ryder, A.G., Tweed, R.G., & Sokol, B.W. (2001). Intranational cultural variation: exploring further implications of collectivism within the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 681-697.
• Cukur, C.S., De Guzman, M.R.T., & Carlos, G. (2004). Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism: a study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 613-635.
• Freeberg, A. L., & Stein, C. H. (1996). Felt obligations towards parents in Mexican-American and Anglo-American young adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 457-47
• Freeman, M.A. (1997). Demographic correlates of individualism and collectivism: a study of social values in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 321-341.
• Fu, J.H.Y., & Chiu, C.Y. (2007). Local culture's responses to globalization: Exemplary persons and their attendant values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 636-653. Georgas, J. (1989). Changing family values in Greece. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 80-91.
• Green, E.G.T., Deschamps, J.-C., & Páez, D. (2005). Variation of individualism and collectivism within and between 20 countries: A typological analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 36, 321-339.
• Han, G., & Choe, S. (1994). Effects of family, region, and school network ties on interpersonal intentions and the analysis of network activities in Korea. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kağıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 213-224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGrawHill.
• Hui, C.H., & Triandis, H.C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.
• Hwang, K. K. (2005). The third wave of culture psychology: The indigenous movement. The Psychologist, 18(2), 80-82.
• Inkeles,A. (1966).The modernization of man. In M.Weiner (Eds.) Modernization: The dynamics of growth (pp.151–163). New York: Basic Books.
• Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H., & Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man. Hamondsworth, UK: Penguin.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1982). Old-age security value of children and development. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 13, 29-42.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996a). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996b). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1, 180-196.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J.W. Berry, M.H. Segall, & C. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Volume 3: Social behavior and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 317-337.
• Kara, M.A. (2007). Applicability of the principle of respect for autonomy: the perspective of Turkey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 627-630.
• Kashima, Y., Kokubo, T., Kashima, E. S., Boxall, D., Yamaguchi, S., & Macrae, K. (2004). Culture and self: Are there within-culture differences in self between metropolitan areas and regional cities? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 816-823.
• Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S.C., Gelfand, M. J., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
• Lay, C., Fairlie, P., Jackson, S., Ricci, T., Eisenberg, J., Sato., T., et al. (1998). Domainspecific allocentrism-idiocentrism: A measure of family connectedness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 434-460.
• Mango, A. (2004). The Turks today. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press.
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
• Nelson, M.R., & Shavitt, S. (2002). Horizontal and vertical individualism and achievement values: A multimethod examination of Denmark and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 439-458.
• Nelson, M.R., & Shavitt, S. (2002). Horizontal and vertical individualism and achievement values: A multimethod examination of Denmark and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 439-458.
• Nisbett, R.E. (2004). The geography of thought: how Asians and westerners think differently... and why. New York: Free Press.
• Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
• Razi, Z. (1993). The myth of the immutable English family, past and present. A Journal of Historical Studies, 140, 3-44.
• Reykowski, J. (1994). Collectivism and individualism as dimensions of social change. In U. Kim., H.C. Triandis., C. Kağıtçıbaşı, S.C. Choi., & G. Yoon. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. London: Sage Publications.
• Sato, T. (2007). The family allocentrism-idiocentrism scale: Convergent validity and construct exploration. Individual Differences Research, 5, 194-200.
• Shafiro, M.V., Himelein, M.J., & Best, D.L. (2003). Ukrainian and U.S. American Females: Differences in individualism/collectivism and gender attitudes. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 34, 297-303.
• Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism within culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 35-47.
• Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kağıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 123-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Way, N., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H., Kalman, R., & Niwa, E.Y. (2008). Parents' goals for children: The dynamic co-existence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social Development, 17, 183-209.
• Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
• Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
• Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
• Triandis, H.C. (1988). Collectivism and development. In D. Sinha & H.S.R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives (pp. 286-303). New Delhi: Sage. Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Triandis, H.C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
• Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualistic and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-1
• Vandello, J.A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279-292.
• Yang, K.S (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernisation. In M.H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 479-49