Review
BibTex RIS Cite

GELECEK SALGINLARA HAZIRLIKTA SAĞLIK EĞİTİMİ VE BİREYSEL DAVRANIŞ MODELLERİ: COVID-19 ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2020, , 70 - 78, 28.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.760073

Abstract

Salgının yayılma hızını azaltmak açısından kişilerin bir salgın tehdidi karşısında gösterecekleri kendilerini korumaya yönelik bireysel davranışlara sahip olması önemlidir. Sağlık otoritelerinin eylem planları bu davranışlar üzerine odaklanarak hazırlanmalıdır. Aynı zamanda kişilerin algıları, inançları ve motivasyon durumları dikkate alınmalıdır. COVID-19 pandemisi ile mücadelede kişisel koruyucu davranışların sürdürülmesi için sağlık eğitimi odaklı olan öğrenme modellerinin kullanılması gereklidir ve sosyal medya, yakın çevre, iletişim araçları ve çevresel düzenleme ile teşvik edilerek desteklenmelidir. Böylece kazanılan bireysel davranış değişiklikleri tüm toplumu etkileyecek değişikliğe neden olabilir.

References

  • 1. Cowling BJ, Ali ST, Ng TW, Tsang TK, Li JCM, Fong MW, et al. Impact Assessment of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Influenza in Hong Kong: An Observational Study. Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6.
  • 2. Yuan S, Liao Z, Huang H, Jiang B, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao M. Comparison of the Indicators of Psychological Stress in the Population of Hubei Province and Non-Endemic Provinces in China During Two Weeks During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in February 2020. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 15;26:e923767. doi:10.12659/MSM.923767
  • 3. Chakraborty K, Chatterjee M. Psychological impact of COVID 19 pandemic on general population in West Bengal: A cross sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry 2020;62:266-72.
  • 4. West R, Michie S, Rubin GJ, Amlôt R. Applying Principles of Behaviour Change to Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Transmission. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):451-9. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9.
  • 5. Demirbilek Y, Pehlivantürk G, Özgüler ZO, Meşe EA. COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 50; (2020): 489-94.
  • 6. Lunn P, Belton C, Lavin C, McGowan F, Timmons S, Robertson D. Using behavioural science to help fght the coronavirus. 2020. Available from: https://www.esri.ie/system/files/publications/WP656_0.pdf
  • 7. Marčinko D, Jakovljević M, Jakšić N, Bjedov S, Mindoljević DA. The Importance of Psychodynamic Approach during COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(1):15-21. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2020.15.
  • 8. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):460-71.
  • 9. Balkhi F, Nasir A, Zehra A, Riaz R. Psychological and Behavioral Response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. Cureus. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7923.
  • 10. Wilder-Smith A, Freedman DO. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for oldstyle public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV) outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020;13:27(2).
  • 11. Güner R, Hasanoğlu İ, Aktaş F. COVID-19: Prevention and control measures in community. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:571-7.
  • 12. Schijns V, Lavelle EC. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 disease by controlled modulation of innate immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2020 May 21:10.1002/eji.202048693. doi:10.1002/eji.202048693.
  • 13. Schiavo R, May Leung M, Brown M. Communicating risk and promoting disease mitigation measures in epidemics and emerging disease settings. Pathog Glob Health. 2014;108(2):76-94.
  • 14. Michie S, Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
  • 15. Population Services International: PSI Behaviour Change Framework “Bubbles” : Proposed Revision. Washington DC; 2004. Available from: https://www.psi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PSI-Behavior-Change-Framework-Concept-Paper-June-2004.pdf
  • 16. Jack L, Grim M, Gross T, Lynch S, Mclin C. Theory in Health Promotion Programs. In: Fertman CI, Allensworth DD, editors. Health Promotion Programs: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Press; 2010;61-7.
  • 17. Hekler EB, Lambert J, Leventhal E, Leventhal H, Jahn E, Contrada RJ. Commonsense illness beliefs, adherence behaviors, and hypertension control among African Americans. J Behav Med, 2008;31:391-400.
  • 18. Ayres CG. Mediators of the relationship between social support and positive health practices in middle adolescents. J PediatrHealth Care. 2008;22(2):94-102.
  • 19. Hupcey JE. Clarifying the social support theory-research linkage. J Adv Nurs.1998;27(6):1231-41.
  • 20. Grover S, Sahoo S, Mehra A, Avasthi A, Tripathi A, Subramanyan A, et al. Psychological impact of COVID 19 lockdown: An online survey from India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020; June 17: Doi:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_427_20
  • 21. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecastingthe potential domestic and intirnational spread ofthe 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China:a modelling study. Lancet. 2020; 395, 689-97.
  • 22. Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:2032; doi:10.3390/ijerph17062032.
  • 23. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29:72-90.
  • 24. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 2011;26(9):1113-27.
  • 25. Case P, Sparks P, Pavey L. Identity appropriateness and the structure of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2016; 55(1):109-25.
  • 26. Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. Thenovel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public healthconsequencesbymediaexposure. Health Psychol. 2020; do: 10.1037/hea0000875
  • 27. Qazi A, Tamjidyamcholo A, Raj RG, Hardaker G, Standing C. Assessing consumers' satisfaction and expectations through online opinions: expectation and disconfirmation approach. Comput Human Behav. 2020;75:450-60.

HEALTH EDUCATION AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORAL MODELS FOR THE PREPARING FUTURE EPIDEMICS: COVID-19 SAMPLE

Year 2020, , 70 - 78, 28.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.760073

Abstract

In order to reduce the speed of the epidemic's spread, it is important that individuals have individual behaviors to protect themselves against an epidemic threat. Action plans of health authorities should be prepared by focusing on these behaviors. At the same time, people's perceptions, beliefs, and motivations should be taken into account. In order to maintain personal protective behavior in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use learning models focused on health education and should be supported by encouraging social media, immediate environment, communication tools, and environmental regulation. Thus, acquired individual behavior changes can cause changes that affect the whole society.

References

  • 1. Cowling BJ, Ali ST, Ng TW, Tsang TK, Li JCM, Fong MW, et al. Impact Assessment of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Influenza in Hong Kong: An Observational Study. Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6.
  • 2. Yuan S, Liao Z, Huang H, Jiang B, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao M. Comparison of the Indicators of Psychological Stress in the Population of Hubei Province and Non-Endemic Provinces in China During Two Weeks During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in February 2020. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 15;26:e923767. doi:10.12659/MSM.923767
  • 3. Chakraborty K, Chatterjee M. Psychological impact of COVID 19 pandemic on general population in West Bengal: A cross sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry 2020;62:266-72.
  • 4. West R, Michie S, Rubin GJ, Amlôt R. Applying Principles of Behaviour Change to Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Transmission. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):451-9. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9.
  • 5. Demirbilek Y, Pehlivantürk G, Özgüler ZO, Meşe EA. COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 50; (2020): 489-94.
  • 6. Lunn P, Belton C, Lavin C, McGowan F, Timmons S, Robertson D. Using behavioural science to help fght the coronavirus. 2020. Available from: https://www.esri.ie/system/files/publications/WP656_0.pdf
  • 7. Marčinko D, Jakovljević M, Jakšić N, Bjedov S, Mindoljević DA. The Importance of Psychodynamic Approach during COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(1):15-21. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2020.15.
  • 8. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):460-71.
  • 9. Balkhi F, Nasir A, Zehra A, Riaz R. Psychological and Behavioral Response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. Cureus. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7923.
  • 10. Wilder-Smith A, Freedman DO. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for oldstyle public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV) outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020;13:27(2).
  • 11. Güner R, Hasanoğlu İ, Aktaş F. COVID-19: Prevention and control measures in community. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:571-7.
  • 12. Schijns V, Lavelle EC. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 disease by controlled modulation of innate immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2020 May 21:10.1002/eji.202048693. doi:10.1002/eji.202048693.
  • 13. Schiavo R, May Leung M, Brown M. Communicating risk and promoting disease mitigation measures in epidemics and emerging disease settings. Pathog Glob Health. 2014;108(2):76-94.
  • 14. Michie S, Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
  • 15. Population Services International: PSI Behaviour Change Framework “Bubbles” : Proposed Revision. Washington DC; 2004. Available from: https://www.psi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PSI-Behavior-Change-Framework-Concept-Paper-June-2004.pdf
  • 16. Jack L, Grim M, Gross T, Lynch S, Mclin C. Theory in Health Promotion Programs. In: Fertman CI, Allensworth DD, editors. Health Promotion Programs: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Press; 2010;61-7.
  • 17. Hekler EB, Lambert J, Leventhal E, Leventhal H, Jahn E, Contrada RJ. Commonsense illness beliefs, adherence behaviors, and hypertension control among African Americans. J Behav Med, 2008;31:391-400.
  • 18. Ayres CG. Mediators of the relationship between social support and positive health practices in middle adolescents. J PediatrHealth Care. 2008;22(2):94-102.
  • 19. Hupcey JE. Clarifying the social support theory-research linkage. J Adv Nurs.1998;27(6):1231-41.
  • 20. Grover S, Sahoo S, Mehra A, Avasthi A, Tripathi A, Subramanyan A, et al. Psychological impact of COVID 19 lockdown: An online survey from India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020; June 17: Doi:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_427_20
  • 21. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecastingthe potential domestic and intirnational spread ofthe 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China:a modelling study. Lancet. 2020; 395, 689-97.
  • 22. Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:2032; doi:10.3390/ijerph17062032.
  • 23. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29:72-90.
  • 24. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 2011;26(9):1113-27.
  • 25. Case P, Sparks P, Pavey L. Identity appropriateness and the structure of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2016; 55(1):109-25.
  • 26. Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. Thenovel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public healthconsequencesbymediaexposure. Health Psychol. 2020; do: 10.1037/hea0000875
  • 27. Qazi A, Tamjidyamcholo A, Raj RG, Hardaker G, Standing C. Assessing consumers' satisfaction and expectations through online opinions: expectation and disconfirmation approach. Comput Human Behav. 2020;75:450-60.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Public Health, Environmental Health
Journal Section Review
Authors

İnci Arıkan 0000-0001-5060-7722

Publication Date September 28, 2020
Submission Date June 29, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

Vancouver Arıkan İ. GELECEK SALGINLARA HAZIRLIKTA SAĞLIK EĞİTİMİ VE BİREYSEL DAVRANIŞ MODELLERİ: COVID-19 ÖRNEĞİ. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi. 2020;5:70-8.

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi

Crossref Content Registration logo

Dergimiz Açık Erişim Politikasını benimsemiş olup dergimize gönderilen yayınlar için gerek değerlendirme gerekse yayınlama dahil yazarlardan hiçbir ücret talep edilmemektedir. 

by-nc.eu.png

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.