ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK

Işıl Tombul

ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK

Öz

Marc Prensky, 2000'lerin başında dijital yerliler ve dijital göçmenler metaforlarını ortaya ilk attığında neredeyse iki on yılı bulacak bir tartışmayı da başlatmıştır. Prensky genellikle aşırı genellemeler yapmak, ampirik verilere dayanmamak ve tekno-determinist davranmakla eleştirilmiştir. 2000'lerin sonuna gelindiğinde, birçok tartışma ve eleştiriden sonra, Prensky yeni makaleler yayınlayarak bulduğu metaforlara yeni açıklamalar getirmiştir. Bu tartışmalar, argümantasyon kuramına uygun bir rasyonalite içinde ilerlemiştir. Modern rasyonel düşüncenin hipotetik tartışmasını sağlayan argümantasyon, tezin iyileştirilmesini sağlayan rasyonel bir konuşma biçimidir. Bu bağlamda Jürgen Habermas ve Stephen Toulmin'in argümantasyon modeli yol gösterici olmuştur. Dijital yerliler ve dijital göçmenlerle ilgili tartışmalar; iddialar, dayanaklar, gerekçeler, destekleyiciler, çürütücüler, sınırlayıcılar ile argümantatif bir ilerleme içindedir. Prensky yaklaşık on yıl sonra bu tartışmaları değerlendirici bir yazı yazmış ve dijital bilgelik metaforunu önermiştir. Bu çalışma, dijital medya alanında süren bir tartışma dönemini argümantatif bir yaklaşımla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, dijital yerli ve göçmen metaforlarının nasıl kullanıldığını, ne olduğunu, ne olmadığını yapılan tartışmalar üzerinden inceler ve bu konudaki ampirik verileri değerlendirir. Dijital yerliler fenomeni ülkelere, kültürlere, ekonomik şartlara, bireylere göre değişmektedir. Ancak dijital yerliler, destekleyenlerin zannettikleri kadar yaratıcı bir fenomen olarak karşımıza çıkmamaktadır. Diğer yandan dijital yerliler ve dijital göçmenler fenomenleri çok eleştirilmiş olsa da literatürde çok kullanılan bir metafor hâline gelmişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

ARTHUR, D. (2016). Recruiting, Interviewing, Selecting & Orienting New Employees. New York: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
BEJTKOVSKÝ, J. (2016a). The Current Generations: The Baby Boomers, X, Y and Z in The Context of Human Capital Management of The 21st Century in Selected Corporations in The Czech Republic. Littera Scripta. 9 (2): 25-45.
BEJTKOVSKÝ, J. (2016b). The Employees of Baby Boomers Generation, Generation X, Generation Y and Generation Z in Selected Czech Corporations As Conceivers of Development and Competitiveness in Their Corporation. Journal of Competitiveness. 8(4): 105 - 123.
BENNETT, S. & MATON, K. (2010). Beyond The 'Digital Natives' Debate: Towards A More Nuanced Understanding of Students’ Technology Experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26 (5): 321–331.
BOLIN, G. & WESTLUND, O. (2009). Mobile Generations: The Role of Mobile Technology in The Shaping of Swedish Media Generations. International Journal of Communication. 3: 108-124.
BOLTER, W. G. (1996). The information highway should develop according to consumer demand. The Information Highway, Ed. Charles P. Cozic, San Diego: Greenhaven Press. 77-86.
BROWN, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking The ‘Digital Native’: Beyond Digital Apartheid, Towards Digital Democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26 (5): 357-369.
BUCKINGHAM, D. (2008). Intorucing Identity. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, Ed. David Buckingham, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1-24.

BUCKINGHAM, D. (2012). After The Death of Childhood: Growing Up in The Age of Electronic The Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BUCKINGHAM, D. (2013). Is there a Digital Generation?. Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and the New Media. Ed. David Buckingham, Rebekah Willett, New York: Routledge. 1-13.
BULLEN, M. & MORGAN, T. (2011). Digital Learners Not Digital Natives. La Cuestión Universitaria. 7. 2011, 60-68.
BULLEN, M., Morgan, T. & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation Is Not The Issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 37(1).
BULLEN, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K. & Qayyum, A. (2009). The Net Generation in Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality. International Journal of Excellence in eLearning. 2(1): 1-13.
BÜHL, A. (2000). Cyberkids: Empirische Untersuchungen Zur Wirkung Von Bildschirmspielen. Münster: Lit Verlag.
DACOSTA, B., KINSELL, C. & NASAH, A. (2012). Millenials Are Gigital Natives? An Investigation Into Digital Propensity and Age. Teaching, Learning and The Net Generation: Concepts and Tools For Reaching Digital Learners: Concepts and Tools For Reaching Digital Learners, Ed. Sharmila Pixy Ferris, Hershey PA: IGI Global.
EBNER, M., SCHIEFNER, M. & NAGLER, W. (2008). Has The Net Generation Arrived At The University? – Oder Studierende Von Heute, Digital Natives?. Offener Bildungsraum Hochschule, Medien in der Wissenschaft, 48, Ed. S. Zauchner, P. Baumgartner, E. Blaschitz, A. Weissenbäck, Münster: Waxmann. 113-123.
ECK, R. V. (2006). Digital Game-Based Learning: It's Not Just The Digital Natives Who Are Restless, EDUCAUSE Review. 41(2): 16-30.
EVANS, T. M. (1997). A Dictionary of Japanese Loanwords. Westport: Green Wood Press.
FACER, K. ve FURLONG, R. (2001). Beyond The Myth of The ‘Cyberkid’: Young People At The Margins of The Information Revolution. Journal of Youth Studies. (4) 4: 451–469.
FACER, K., FURLONG, J., FURLONG, R. & SUTHERLAND, R. (2003). Screenplay: Children and Computing in The Home. London: Routledge.
FANG, I. (1997). A History of Mass Communication: Six Information Revolutions. Boston: Focal Press.
FLUCKIGER, F. (1995). From World-Wide Web to Information Superhighway. JENC6 Conference, Tel Aviv, 15-18 May 1995.
FOSTER, M. (1995). Postmodern Virtualities. Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk, Ed. M. Featherstone & R. Burrows, London: Sage. 79-96.
GARDNER, H. & DAVIS, K. (2013). The App Generation: How Today's Youth Navigate Identity, Intimacy, and Imagination in A Digital World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GERAY, H. (2003). İletişim ve Teknoloji: Uluslararası Medya Düzeninde Yeni Medya Politikaları. Ankara: Ütopya.
GRAVETT, L. & THROCKMORTON, R. (2007). Bridging The Generation Gap: How To Get Radio Babies, Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers To Work Together and Achieve More. Pompton Plains, NJ: Career Press.
GREENHILL, A. G. (1998). Commodifying Virtual Education: Virtual Classrooms, Universities and Virtual Organisational Existence. Commodification Conference, Woollongong, February 1998, http://www.spaceless.com/papers/2.htm, Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2019.
GUNTER, B., ROWLANDS, I. ve NICHOLAS, D. (2009). The Google Generation: Are ICT Innovations Changing Information Seeking Behaviour?. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
GÜRSOY ATAR, Ö. (2017). Dijital Çağda Televizyon İzleyiciliğinin Dönüşümü. Sobider. 4(15): 350-379.
HABERMAS, J. (1996). İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı. Çev: Mustafa Tüzel. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
HARTMAN, J., MOSKAL, P. & DZIUBAN, C. (2005). Preparing The Academy of Today For The Learner of Tomorrow. Educating The Net Generation, Ed. Diana G. Oblinger & James L. Oblinger, Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE. 6.1-6.15.
HELSPER, E. ve EYNON, R. (2009). Digital Natives: Where Is The Evidence?. British Educational Research Journal. 1-18.
HENRY, C. P., ALLEN, R. & CHRISMAN, R. (2009). The Obama Phenomenon: Toward A Multiracial Democracy. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
HERRING, S. C. (2008). Questioning The Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Constructions of Online Youth Identity. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, Ed. David Buckingham, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 71–92.
HOLLOWAY, S. & VALENTINE, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in The Information Age. London: Routledge Falmer.
HORRIGAN J. B. (2007). A Typology of Information and Communication Technology Users. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://195.130.87.21:8080/dspace/bitstream/123456789/554/1/A%20Typology%20of%20Information%20and%20Communication%20Technology%20Users.pdf;A. Erişim tarihi: 02.02.2018.
HOWE, N. & STRAUSS, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books.
ISRAELITE, L. (2015). Introduction. More Lies About Learning: Leading Executives Separate Truth From Fiction, Ed. Larry Israelite, Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press. xi-xx.
JENKINS, H. (2001). Convergence? I Diverge. Technology Review, June 2001, 93.
JOHNSTONE, D. M. (2001). Review of Howe and Strauss' "Millenials Rising: The Next Great Generation". The Journal of the Association for Christians in Student Development. 1, 115-117.
JONES, C. (2012). Networked Learning and Digital Technology. 8th International Conference on Networked Learning 2012, 02-04 April 2012, Maastricht, Netherlands. 456-463.
JONES, C. ve SHAO, B. (2011). The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications For Higher Education. http://oro.open.ac.uk/30014/1/Jones_and_Shao-Final.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 06.12.2019.
KANNER, B. (1982). Can Atari Stay Ahead of the Game?. New York Magazine. 16 Ağustos 1982, 15-17.
KEARNEY, P. ve SKELTON, S. (2003). Teaching Technology To The Playstation Generation. Bulletin of Applied Computing and Information Technology. 1(2). http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/bacit/0102/2003kearney_playstation.html. Erişim tarihi: 06.12.2019.
KENNEDY, G., DALGARNO, B., GRAY, K., JUDD, T., WAYCOTT, J., BENNETT, S., MATON, K., KRAUSE, K. L., BISHOP, A., CHANG, R. & CHURCHWARD, A. (2007). The Net Generation Are Not Big Users of Web 2.0 Technologies: Preliminary Findings. ICT: Providing Choices For Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore. 517-525.
KENNEDY, G., JUDD, T. DALGARNO, B. & WAYCOTT, J. (2010). Beyond Natives and Immigrants: Exploring Types of Net Generation Students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26: 332–343. KIRSCHNER, P. A. & DE BRUYCKERE, P. (2017). The Myths of The Digital Native and The Multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education. 67: 135-142.
KOUTROPOULOS, A. (2011). Digital Natives: Ten Years After. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 7(4): 525-538.
KUNDANIS, R. M. (2003). Children, Teens, Families, and Mass Media: The Millennial Generation. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
LAHAM, T. S. (2014). The Con Game: A Failure of Trust. Morrisville: Lulu Press.
LIVINGSTONE, S. & BOBER, M. (2005). UK Children Go Online: Final Report of Key Project Findings [online]. London: LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000399. Erişim tarihi: 07.12.2019.
LONDON, H. I. (2001). Decade of Denial: A Snapshot of America in the 1990s. Lanham: Lexington Book. Crandall, R.W. ve Waverman, L. (2010). Talk is Cheap: The Promise of Regulatory Reform in North American Telecommunications. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
MCKENZIE, J. (2007). Digital Nativism Digital Delusions and Digital Deprivation. From Now On. Vol 17 (2).
MICHMAN, R. D., Mazze, E. M. ve Greco, A. J. (2003). Lifestyle Marketing: Reaching the New American Consumer. Westport, CT: Praeger.
MINDLIN, F. (2010). The Myth of the 'Digital Native': Why generational stereotyping won't improve student learning. DataBus. January, 2010 (1): 12-13. https://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/14013/myth_of_the_digital_native_mindlin.pdf?x-r=pcfile_d, Erişim tarihi: 07.12.2019.
MOORE, N. (2000). Enformasyon Politikalarına Küresel Bir Bakış (Selma Alpay Aslan, Çev.), Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 14, 1, 60-81.
MORIN, R. (2017). Generation C: The Confluence Marketing at the Era of Connected Consumers. Victoria BC: Friesen Press.
MORITZ, T. (2001). Bildung Und Medienpädagogik Im Zeitalter Der Digitalen Medien. Medien Impulse. September, 01: 51-60.
OBLINGER, D. & OBLINGER, J. (2005). Is It Age or IT: First Steps Toward Understanding the Net Generation. Educating the Net Generation. Ed. Diana G. Oblinger & James L. Oblinger, Brockport Bookshelf. EDUCAUSE. 1-20.
OECD (2001). Understanding The Digital Divide. Paris: OECD Publications.
OLIVER, B. & GOERKE, V. (2007). Australian Undergraduates’ Use and Ownership of Emerging Technologies: Implications and Opportunities For Creating Engaging Learning Experiences For The Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 23, 171–186.
ÖZÇAĞLAYAN, M. (1998). Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve Değişim. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
PALFREY, J. & GASSER, U. (2008). Born Digital: Understanding The First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: A Member of The Perseus Books Group.
PALLOFF, R. M. & PRATT, K. (2003). The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
PRENSKY, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019.
PRENSKY, M. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants: Part II. Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9 (6). https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part2.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019.
PRENSKY, M. (2001c). The Digital Game-Based Learning Revolution. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Ch1-Digital%20Game-Based%20Learning.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 27.11.2019.
PRENSKY, M. (2001d). The Games Generations: How Learners Have Changed. Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Ch2-Digital%20Game-Based%20Learning.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 26.11.2019.
PRENSKY, M. (2003). Overcoming Educators' Digital Immigrant Accents: A Rebuttal. http://technologysource.org/article/overcoming_educators_digital_immigrant_accents/. Erişim tarihi: 31.01.2018.
PRENSKY, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. 5(3): Article 1.
PRENSKY, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. https://oetmanhattan.wikispaces.com/file/view/Prensky--Teaching+Digital+Natives-in+press6.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 03.02.2018.
PRENSKY, M. (2011a). Digital Wisdom and Homo Sapiens Digital. Deconstructing Digital Natives: Young People, Technology and the New Literacies. Ed. Michael Thomas, New York: Routledge. 15-29
PRENSKY, M. (2011b). From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Published in From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Education (Corwin 2012). http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-Intro_to_From_DN_to_DW.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 20.11.2019.
PRENSKY, M. (2016). Education To Better Their World. http://marcprensky.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/+++Prensky-Education_to_Better_Their_World-essay-01.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 15.11.2019.
REISENWITZ, T. H. & Iyer, R. (2009). Differences in Generation X and Generation Y: Implications For The Organization and Marketers. Marketing Management Journal. 19(2): 91-103.
ROBERTS, G. R. (2005). Technology and Learning Expectations of The Net Generation. Educating the Net Generation. Ed. Diana G. Oblinger & James L. Oblinger, Brockport Bookshelf. EDUCAUSE. 1-7.
ROWE K. A. (2010). Managing Across Generations. Infoline: Tips, Tools, and Intelligence for Trainers. 7 (1003). Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
ROWLANDS, I., NICHOLAS, D., WILLIAMS, P., HUNTINGTON, P., FIELDHOUSE, M., GUNTER, B., WITHEY, R., JAMALI, H. R., DOBROWOLSKI T. & TENOPIR, C. (2008). The Google Generation: The Information Behaviour of The Researcher of The Future. Aslib Proceedings. 60(4): 290-310.
SANDFORD, R. (2006). Digital Post-Colonialism. Flux, 14 December 2006. http://archive.li/T1rqV. Erişim tarihi: 06.12.2019.
SCHULMEISTER, R. (2009). Gibt es eine 'Net Generation'?: Erweiterte Version 3.0, http://epub.sub.uni-hamburg.de/epub/volltexte/2013/19651/pdf/schulmeister_net_generation_v3.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019.
SCHULMEISTER, R. (2010). Students, Internet, eLearning and Web 2.0. Looking Toward the Future of Technology- Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the Digital Native. Ed. Martin Ebner & Mandy Schiefner, Hershey PA: IGI Global. 13-36.
SELWYN, N. (2009). The Digital Native – Myth and Reality”. Aslib Proceedings. 61(4): 364–379.
SEUFERT, S. (2007). "Ne(x)t Generation Learning": Was gibt es Neues über das Lernen?. "Ne(x)t Generation Learning: Was gibt es Neues über das Lernen?": Wikis, Blogs, Mediacasts & Co. – Social Software und Personal Broadcasting auf der Spur. Ed. S. Seufert & T. Brahm, Swiss Centre for Innovations in Learning an der Universität St. Gallen. 2-19.
SOLOWAY, E. (1991). How the Nintendo Generation Learns. View Affiliations. Communications of the ACM. 34(9): 23-26.
STOERGER, S. (2009). The Digital Melting Pot: Bridging The Digital Native–Immigrant divide. First Monday. Vol 14. No. 7-6.
STRAUSS, W. & HOWE, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America’s Future. New York: William Morrow.
TAPSCOTT, D. (1998). Net Kids: Die digitale Generation Erobert Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Gabler. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
TAPSCOTT, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
TOULMIN, S. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
TOULMIN, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TWENGE, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled-And More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.
VANSLYKE, T. (2003). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants: Some Thoughts From The Generation Gap. The Technology Source. https://depd.wisc.edu/html/TSarticles/Digital%20Natives.htm. Erişim tarihi: 19.11.2019.
VEEN, W. & VRAKKING, B. (2006). Homo Zappiens: Growing Up in a Digital Age. London: Network Continuum Education.
WEIß, S. & BADER, H. J. (2010). How to Improve Media Literacy and Media Skills of Secondary School Teachers in Order to Prepare Them For The Next Generation of Learners: A New Type of In-Service Training For Teachers. Looking Toward The Future Of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning And The Digital Native. Ed. Martin Ebner & Mandy Schiefner, Hershey. PA: Information Science Reference. 37-54.
WILSON, J. K. (2009). Barack Obama: This Improbable Quest. New York: Routledge.
WINDHAM, C. (2005). The Student's Perpective. Educating the Net Generation. Ed. Diana G. Oblinger & James L. Oblinger, Brockport Bookshelf. EDUCAUSE. 1-16.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Communication and Media Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Işıl Tombul ^*
0000-0002-7793-7227
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2020

Submission Date

November 9, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Number: 14

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tombul, I. (2020). ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler Hakemli E-Dergisi, 14, 134-155. https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB

AMA

1.Tombul I. ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK. Yeni Düşünceler Dergisi. 2020;(14):134-155. https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB

Chicago

Tombul, Işıl. 2020. “ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK”. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler Hakemli E-Dergisi, nos. 14: 134-55. https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB.

EndNote

Tombul I (December 1, 2020) ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler Hakemli E-Dergisi 14 134–155.

IEEE

[1]I. Tombul, “ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK”, Yeni Düşünceler Dergisi, no. 14, pp. 134–155, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB

ISNAD

Tombul, Işıl. “ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK”. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler Hakemli E-Dergisi. 14 (December 1, 2020): 134-155. https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB.

JAMA

1.Tombul I. ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK. Yeni Düşünceler Dergisi. 2020;:134–155.

MLA

Tombul, Işıl. “ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK”. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler Hakemli E-Dergisi, no. 14, Dec. 2020, pp. 134-55, https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB.

Vancouver

1.Işıl Tombul. ARGÜMANTATİF YAKLAŞIMLA DİJİTAL YERLİLER VE DİJİTAL GÖÇMENLERİ TARTIŞMAK. Yeni Düşünceler Dergisi [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;(14):134-55. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83YJ98GB