BÖLÜNMÜŞ TOPLUMLARDA ÇOĞUNLUK ESASINA DAYANAN SEÇİM SİSTEMİNİN ZORLUKLARI VE AZINLIKLARIN TEMSİLİ: ETİYOPYA ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2016, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 219 - 236, 30.07.2016

Ender Akyol , Yasin Yimam Mohammed

https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346926

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Demokratik siyasal
sistemlerde seçimin önemli olduğu bilinen bir gerçektir. Ancak demokratik siyasal
sistemler için dünya genelinde en iyi olarak kabul edilebilecek bir seçim
sistemi yoktur. Bu yüzden farklı ülkelerde birbirinden farklı seçim sistemleri
kullanılmakta, kimileri özellikle Afrika ülkeleri, sadece kendi sömürgeci
ülkelerindeki seçim sistemini benimsemişken kimileri de özenli bir kamusal
tartışma sonucunda kendi seçim sistemlerini oluşturmuşlardır. Diğer Afrika
ülkelerinden farklı olarak, Etiyopya bağımsız bir devlet olup, Hile-sellassie
rejiminin (1930-1974) bazı göstermelik seçimlerinin dışında demokratik modern
seçim türlerinin herhangi birinden tarihsel deneyim yaşamadan, 1994/5’te kabul
edilen anayasa ile çoğunlukçu siyasal sistem ve özellikle çoğunluk esasına
dayanan seçim sistemini kabul etmiştir. Bu çalışma bölünmüş toplumlarda özellikle
Etiyopya üzerinde çoğunluk esasına dayanan seçim sisteminin zorluklarını
değerlendirmekte ve temsil sorununu ele alarak, “Aktarılabilir Tek Oy”  seçim sistemini Etiyopya için alternatif olabilecek bir seçim sistemi olarak
önermektedir.

Keywords

Seçim Sistemi, Demokrasi, Bölünmüş Toplum, Çoğunluk Esasına Dayanan Seçim Sistemi, Nisbi Temsil Seçim Sistemi

The Challenges of Majoritarian Electoral System in Divided Societies and Minority Representation: The Case of Ethiopia

Abstract

It is undeniable fact that, election and electoral
systems to be an important element in democratic political system. However, for
democratic political systems there is no commonly accepted best types of electoral
system that works best all over the world. As a result, different countries
have employed variety of electoral system in which some, particularly African
countries have simply adopted the electoral system from their colonial masters
while others have choosen an electoral syetem through discussion and public
debate wisely. Despite its independence from any colonial power uniquely from
other African countries, and with the exception of some pretended elections of
Hile sellassie regime(1930-1974), 
together with the introduction of 1994/5 constitution, Ethiopia with no
hsitorical experience of modern types of democratic election, has installed the
simple plurality majoritarian electoral system. This study assessed the
challenges of majoritarian electoral system in divided societies particularly
to Ethiopia and the finding conclude by proposing the “alternative single
transferable voting system” as means to handle the problem of representation.

Keywords

Electoral System, Democracy, Divided Society, Majoritarian Electoral System, Proportional Electoral System

References

• Bilgin, H.D.(2003), “Seçimler ve Seçim Sistemleri” S. Sayarı ve H.D.Bilgin (Ed.), Karşılaştırmalı Siyaset: Temel Konular ve Yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Birch, A. (2001), The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
• Buran, H. (2005), Seçim Sistemleri ve Türkiye İçin Yeni Bir Seçim Sistemi Önerisi, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• CIA Report 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/et.html
• Dahl, Robert, (2001), Demokrasi Üstüne, (çev.Betül Kadıoğlu), Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
• Dessalegn, B. (2013). “The Right of Minorities to Political Participation Under The Ethiopian Electoral System”. Mizan Law Review, 7(1), 67-100.
• Dutter, L. E. (1990), “Theoretical Perspectives on Ethnic Political Behavior in the Soviet Union”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, June, vol. 34 no. 2 s.311-334.
• Duverger, M. (1959), Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, Second English Revised edn. London: Methuen & Co.LTD
• Federal Democratic Republc of Ethiopian Constitution,1994, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
• Griffith-Traversy, M. A. (2002), Democracy, Parliament and Electoral Systems, London, Sterling, Virginia: Pluto Press.
• Ishiyama, J. (2007). “Examining the 2005 Ethiopian Parliamentary Election Results Under Alternative Electoral Rules”. 4th International Conference on Ethiopian Development Studies (4th ICEDS) The Challenges of Peace and Development in Ethiopia & The Horn of Africa, August 3-5, 2007, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
• Ishiyama, J. (2009). “Alternative Electoral Systems and the 2005 Ethiopian Parliamentary Election” African Studies Quarterly, 10(4), 37-56. Chicago
• Kühne, W. (2010), The Role of Elections in Emerging Democracies and Post-Conflict Countries. International Policy Analysis. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/07416.pdf
• Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries, Yale University Press.
• Lijphart, A. (2008),Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice, Routledge.
• Lindberg, S. I. (2005), “Consequences of Electoral Systems in Africa: A Preliminary Inquiry”. Electoral Studies, 24 s.41–64.
• Nicolaysen, L. G. (2008), Consociationalism and Segmented Cleavages: The Case of Lebanon, Master thesis in Political Science, STV 3902 Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Tromso.
• Norris, P. (2004), Electoral Engineering Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Peleg, I. (2004), “Transforming Ethnic Orders to Pluralist Regimes: Theoretical, Comparative and Historical Analysis”.
• A. Guelke (Ed.) Democracy and Ethnic Conflict: Advancing Peace in Deeply Divided Societies s:7-25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967),The Concept of Representation London, England: University of California Press, Ltd.
• Poluha, E. (2002), “Beyond the Silence of Women in Ethiopian Politics”. In M. A. Laakso (Ed.), Multi-Party Elections in Africa (pp. 60-65), New York: James Currey Ltd.
• Preece, J. J. (2008), “Democracy, Minority Rights and Plural Societies: Plus Ça Change?” Sociology Compass. Volume 2, Issue 2, s:609–624, March 2008.
• Reilly, B. (2001), Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering For Conflict Management, Cambridge University Press.
• Reynolds. A; Reilly. B; & Ellis .A (2005), Electoral System Design: The new International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design, Stockholm.
• Hix S., Ron J. Iain McLean (2010), “Choosing an Electoral System” A Research Report Prepared for the British Academy, London.
• Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), (Mart, 2003), Background Documents Country Strategy 2003–2007 Structures and Relations of Power.
• Simonsen, S. G. (2005), “Addressing Ethnic Divisions in Post-Conflict Institution-Building: Lessons from Recent Cases” Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3): s:297-318.
• Sözen A (2004) “5 A Model of Power-Sharing in Cyprus: From the 1959 London-Zurich Agreements to the Annan Plan”, Turkish Studies, 5:1, s:61-77.
• The 1994/5 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopian Constitution, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
• The Amended Electoral Law of Ethiopia, Proclamation No. 532/2007, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
• Wolff, S. (2006), Electoral Systems Design and Power-Sharing Regimes, University of Michigan Press.