BATAILLECI YASA VE GENEL EKONOMİDEN DERRIDACI YAPIBOZUMA

Öz

Georges Bataille’ın kullandığı genel ekonomi kavramının ele alınacağı metin kutsal ve profan alanları ayıran ekonomi bağlarını incelemektedir. Kısıtlı ekonomi karşısında genel ekonomiyi savunun Bataille aşırılıklara yönelmekte ve bu ihlal durumunu doğurmaktadır. İhlal profan, yani gündelik olanın alanını ihlal etmeye dayanmakta ve bu da yasanın ihlaline yol açmaktadır. Metinde ihlal durumu köle efendi diyalektiğine yapılan vurgularla Derridacı bir tavra tabi tutulacak, ihlal eden bireyin dekonstrüksüyonla, différansif bir eşiğe erişmesi temellendirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bataille,Genel Ekonomi,Dekonstrüksüyon,Differance,İhlal,Yasa

FROM BATAILLEAN LAW AND GENERAL ECONOMY TO DERRIDAN DECONSTRUCTION

Abstract

The text, in which Georges Bataille's general economy concept will be analyzed; shows economic ties that divide profane and sacred. Bataille takes the general economy in front of the limited one, tends to excess and this rises the transgression. Transgression depends on the excessing of the daily processes and, it becomes the excess of the law. In the text, the transgression will be analyzed in a Derridean manner over master and slave dialectic and it will be shown that transgressive humans will reach the différansive threshold with deconstruction.

Keywords

• Bataille,General Economy,Deconstruction,Différance,Transgression,Law

References

1. Aydemir, M. (2007). Images of Bliss Ejaculation, Masculinity and Bliss, University of Minnesota Press.
2. Aydınalp, E.B. (2017). Jacques Derrida’da Yazı ve Anlam Oyunu, SEFAD, 38.
3. Balkin, J.M. (1987). Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory, Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 291.
4. Bataille, (1979). The Psychological Structure of Facism, trans. Carl R. Lovitt, New German Critique, No. 16.
5. Bataille, (1985). Lettre a X, chargé d’un cours sur Hegel… Paris 6 December 1937, trans. Nicola Fisher, Manchester Unversity Press, Common Sense, no. 3.
6. Bataille, (2001). Friendship, trans. Hager Weslati, Parallax, vol. 7, no. 1.
7. Bataille, (1993). The Accursed Share, Volume II & III, çev. Robert Hurley, Zone Books.
8. Baudrillard, (2013). When Bataille Attacked the Metaphysical Principle of Economy, trans. Stuart Kendall, Scapegoat.

9. Clark, T. (1992). Derrida, Heidegger, Blanchot: Sources of Derrida’s Notion and Practice of Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Derrida, (1972). Marges de la philosophie, Les Éditions de Minuit.
11. Derrida, (1978). Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass, Routledge, London, 1978.
12. Derrida, (1995). The Gift of Death, trans. David Wills, The University Of Chicago Press, London, 1995.
13. Derrida, (2012). Platon’un Eczanesi, çev. Zeynep Direk, Pinhan, İstanbul, 2012.
14. Derrida, J. (1999). Différance, Toplumbilim Dergisi:Derrida Özel sayısı, Çeviren: Önay Sözer, s.49-61.
15. Hegel After Derrida, (2001). Edit. Stuart Barnett, Routledge, NY, 2001.
16. Hegel, (1986). Tinin Görüngübilimi, çev. Aziz Yardımlı, İdea, İstanbul.
17. Krahn, R. (2011). Aufhebung and Negativity: A Hegelianism Without Transcendence, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 1.
18. Lefebvre, H. (2010). Gündelik Hayatın Eleştirisi III Moderniteden Modernizme (Gündelik Hayatın Meta-Felsefesi), çev. Işık Ergüden, Sel, İstanbul.
19. Marks, K. (2018). 1844 El Yazmaları, El Yazmaları Ekonomi Politik ve Felsefe, çev. Murat Belge, Birikim Kitapları, İstanbul.
20. Mauss, M. (2008). The Gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. Translated by W.D. Walls. London and New York: Routledge.
21. McLane, P. (2013). Sovereignity without Mastery, Societies, 3.
22. Pawlett, W. (2016). Georges Bataille The sacred and society, Routledge, NY.
23. Special Issue on Derrida and French Hegelianism, (2015). The New Centennial Review, Vol. 15.
24. The Bataille Reader, (1997). Edit. Fred Botting and Scott Wilson, Blackwell, Oxford, 1997.
25. When Bataille Attacked the Metaphysical Principle of Economy, (2013). Trans. Stuart Kendall, Scapegoat.