Research Article

From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization

Volume: 2 Number: 1 February 28, 2018
  • Bayram Eşiyok
EN

From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization

Abstract

History of capitalism is the history of crises and reconstruction. After the second sharing, this period that will continue till the middle of 1970’s and be qualified as the golden age of capitalism is the most social period also as the result of the expansionary welfare State applications of capitalism. In the golden age of capitalism, as the result of import substitution industrialization strategy applied in the environmental countries, important structural transformations occurred in the production structure of many countries also including Turkey, and the share of industry increased significantly. The main actor was the state in the import substitution industrialization strategy applied in the environmental countries. Developmental state, using resource allocation for the productive sectors (primarily the production industry), important transformations were obtained in industry. By means of the selective industrial politics applied by the developmental state, many nearby countries the export structure of which depends on the agricultural products due to the production went up to the statute of industrial exporting country. As the result of the erosion observed in the productivity growth in the developer countries and stagflation escalated, the golden age of capitalism ended in the middle of the 1970’s. The neoliberal reconstruction policies depending on the financial collection were carried into effect instead of it. In this period, in which developmental state and its tools were rectified and the financial crises increased day by day, Turkey came face to face with deindustrialization fact like the Latin America countries, and its industrializations were obstructed in an early stage. In the conditions of the 21st Century, when the socio-economic problems of the nearby countries increasing day by day were considered (except China and South Korea), the developmental state and the policies it will apply are evaluated as the basic solution.

Keywords

References

  1. Adda, Jacques (2002), Ekonominin Küreselleşmesi, Çev:Sevgi İnce , İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  2. Ahmad, Feroz (2002), Modern Türkiye’nin Oluşumu (3.Basım), İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
  3. Bagchi, A.Kumar (2000), “The Past and Future of the Developmental State”, Journal of World- Systems Research, 11 (2), s.398.
  4. Bağımsız Sosyal Bilimciler İktisat Grubu (BSB)(2007), 2007 İlkyazında Türkiye ve Dünya Ekonomisine Bakış, http://www.bagimsizsosyalbilimciler.org
  5. Cardoso, Fernendo Henrique ve Enzo Faletto (1979), Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  6. Castells, Manuel (2005), Ağ Toplumunum Yükselişi, Çev:Ebru Kılıç, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  7. Chang, Ha-Joon (1999), “The Economic Theory of the Developmental State”, In Woo-Cummings, M. (Ed.), The Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  8. Chang, Ha-Joon ve Peter Evans (2009), “Ekonomik Değişimde Kurumların Rolü”, Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma Seçme Yazılar, Fikret Şenses (Der.), İstanbul:İletişim Yayınları, s.617–678.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Bayram Eşiyok This is me
0000-0003-0678-0055
Türkiye

Publication Date

February 28, 2018

Submission Date

January 3, 2018

Acceptance Date

January 15, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Eşiyok, B. (2018). From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization. Fiscaoeconomia, 2(1), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003
AMA
1.Eşiyok B. From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization. FSECON. 2018;2(1):71-102. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003
Chicago
Eşiyok, Bayram. 2018. “From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization”. Fiscaoeconomia 2 (1): 71-102. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003.
EndNote
Eşiyok B (February 1, 2018) From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization. Fiscaoeconomia 2 1 71–102.
IEEE
[1]B. Eşiyok, “From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization”, FSECON, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–102, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003.
ISNAD
Eşiyok, Bayram. “From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization”. Fiscaoeconomia 2/1 (February 1, 2018): 71-102. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003.
JAMA
1.Eşiyok B. From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization. FSECON. 2018;2:71–102.
MLA
Eşiyok, Bayram. “From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization”. Fiscaoeconomia, vol. 2, no. 1, Feb. 2018, pp. 71-102, doi:10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003.
Vancouver
1.Bayram Eşiyok. From Developmental and Industrialization to Neoliberal Premature Deindustrialization. FSECON. 2018 Feb. 1;2(1):71-102. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2018.s1.003
download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjEwMTE3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiMjAyNi0wMy0xNF8wMC0xOC01OC5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiNTVjMC82NjE0LzA5NGEvNjliNDdmNjNjMjdiMDUuMDA4NTE4OTUucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzczNDQwMzcxLCJub25jZSI6IjMzYzNhMDczOTJhZDBiOWUxMjA4MTJlMzAwOTdlMDhjIn0.uxgvoBOu5rdPPckMLotZ4eBnzOQVB_StL3DcxMXqMSU


Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).