Review

Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System

Volume: 3 Number: 2 May 31, 2019
EN

Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System

Abstract

According to the food regime theory; In the last 150 years, it has been argued that the hegemonic forces of the era shaped the agricultural production, consumption and trade in the world. Food has maintained its importance as a source of life for centuries. However, the nature of foods has changed over time. The cheap food was used by the imperialist countries in the 1870s as a pressure mechanism on wages. From the Second World War until today, there have been changes in the use of agricultural raw materials, which are mainly used as food products. These changes have led the imperialist countries and their transnational corporations to legally occupy the territories of underdeveloped countries for the provision of cheap agricultural raw materials. Today, the importance attributed to independence in agricultural production carries more vital significance. Therefore, the main subject of the article is to examine Turkey’s changing agricultural structures in the context of food regime theory. In this regard, after examining the stages of the food regime theory, the transformation of Turkey’s agricultural system has been evaluated.

Keywords

References

  1. Akad, Mehmet Tanju (2015). “Türkiye’de Kırsal Kesime Müdahaleler 1960-1980”. Türkiye’de Tarımın Ekonomi-Politiği 1923-2013. Ed. Necdet Oral. Ankara. NotaBene Yayınları. 91-111.
  2. Akman, Numan ve Şen, A. Övgü (2014). “Hayvansal Üretim”. 21. Yüzyılda Planlamayı Düşünmek Kurultayı 13-14 Mayıs 2011. Editör: Ali Somel, Aslı Yılmaz Uçar, Ozan Zengin. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve uygulama Merkezi. Yayın No: 10: 231-243.
  3. Berthelot, Jacques (2008). “The Food Price Explosion: Root Causes and How to Regulate Then”. Kurswehsel (3): 23-31.
  4. Boratav, Korkut (2004). Tarımsal Yapılar ve Kapitalizm. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  5. Boratav, Korkut (2009). Türkiye İktisat Tarihi 1908-2009. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  6. Çaşkurlu, Sibel (2012a). “Türk Tarımının Üçüncü Gıda Rejimine Eklemlenme Süreci”. Mülkiye Dergisi 36(3): 61-100.
  7. Çaşkurlu, Sibel (2012b). “Küresel Gıda Krizi: Üçüncü Gıda Rejimi, Küresel Sermaye ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler”. Ekonomik Yaklaşım 23: 161-193.
  8. Çavdar, Tevfik (1982). Türkiye’de Liberalizmin Doğuşu. İstanbul: Uygarlık Yayınları.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

May 31, 2019

Submission Date

March 25, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 1, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Çelik, T. (2019). Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System. Fiscaoeconomia, 3(2), 128-160. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006
AMA
1.Çelik T. Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System. FSECON. 2019;3(2):128-160. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006
Chicago
Çelik, Tolga. 2019. “Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System”. Fiscaoeconomia 3 (2): 128-60. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006.
EndNote
Çelik T (May 1, 2019) Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System. Fiscaoeconomia 3 2 128–160.
IEEE
[1]T. Çelik, “Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System”, FSECON, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 128–160, May 2019, doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006.
ISNAD
Çelik, Tolga. “Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System”. Fiscaoeconomia 3/2 (May 1, 2019): 128-160. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006.
JAMA
1.Çelik T. Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System. FSECON. 2019;3:128–160.
MLA
Çelik, Tolga. “Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System”. Fiscaoeconomia, vol. 3, no. 2, May 2019, pp. 128-60, doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006.
Vancouver
1.Tolga Çelik. Food Regime Theory and the Transformation of Turkey’s Agricultural System. FSECON. 2019 May 1;3(2):128-60. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.02.006

Cited By

download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjEwMTE3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiMjAyNi0wMy0xNF8wMC0xOC01OC5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiNTVjMC82NjE0LzA5NGEvNjliNDdmNjNjMjdiMDUuMDA4NTE4OTUucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzczNDQwMzcxLCJub25jZSI6IjMzYzNhMDczOTJhZDBiOWUxMjA4MTJlMzAwOTdlMDhjIn0.uxgvoBOu5rdPPckMLotZ4eBnzOQVB_StL3DcxMXqMSU


Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).