Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Mekansal ve Kentsel Bağlamda ‘Ortak Çalışma Mekanı’ Kavramı: Kolektif House Üzerinden Bir İnceleme

Year 2019, , 297 - 312, 27.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.667316

Abstract

“İş” ve “İş yeri” kavramı son yıllarda bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmelere
paralel olarak değişmektedir. Yeni çalışma yöntemleri; esnek, mobil
ve çok konumlu olarak tanımlanmıştır. Ortak çalışma alanları (Co-working space),
dünya çapında yeni bir çalışma alanı konsepti olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Farklı
kullanım biçimlerine sahip bu alanlar esnek ve uygun bir çalışma ortamı vaad
etmektedir. Bu çalışmada; Ortak Çalışma Alanı kavramı tanımlanarak özellikleri
ve gelişimi incelenmiş, seçilen örnek üzerinden kentsel ve mekansal bağlamda
analiz edilerek, tasarım kriterleri, mekansal çözüm ve donatıları incelenmiştir.
Çalışma kapsamında İstanbul’un merkezi ticaret bölgesi olarak tanımlanabilecek
Levent ilçesinde yer alan “Kolektif House” mekanı incelenmiştir. Alan, orjinal
işlevini yitirmiş eski bir fabrika binasının sürdürülebilir bir gelişme projesi
olarak değerlendirilmesiyle dönüştürülmüştür. Çalışmada kullanılan veriler;
literatür araştırması, çizimler ve görsel materyaller, görüşmeler ve gözlemlere
dayanmaktadır. Değişen çalışma alışkanlıklarının ve kullanıcı ihtiyaçlarının yeni
çalışma mekanları yarattığı ve seçilen örnekte yeniden işlevlendirme sonucu üretilen
mekan ile kentsel ve mekansal bağlamda yaratılan değerin pozitif olduğu
düşünülmektedir.

References

  • Amabile, T. M., ‘‘A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations’’, Reasearch in Organizational Behaviour, vol.10, 1998. Bouncken, R. B. - Reuschl, A. J., ‘‘ Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship’’, Review of Managerial Science, vol 12, issue 1, 2016. Duffy, F., ‘‘ Lumbering to Extinction in the Digital Field: The Taylorist Office Building’’, Harvard Design Magazine, no. 29, Fall Winter, 2008. Gillen, N. M., ‘‘The future workplace, opportunities, realities and myths: A practical approach to creating meaningful environments’’. Reinventing the Workplace, ed. In J. Worthington Ed., 2nd ed., Oxford, Architectural Press, 2006. Harrison, A. - Wheeler, P. - Whitehead, C., The Distributed Workplace: Sustainable Work Environments, SponPress, 2004. Hislop, D. - Axtell, C., “To infinity and beyond: workspace and the multi-location worker”, New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009. Huwart, J. Y. - Dichter, G. - Vanrie, P., ‘‘Co-working: collaborative space for micro entrepreneurs’’, Technical Note #1, Brussels, European Business and Innovation Centre Network EBN, 2012. Johns, T. - Gratton, L., ‘‘The third wave of virtual work’’, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 2013. Kojo, I. - Nenonen , S., ‘‘Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? ’’, Facilities, vol. 34 iss 5/6, 2016. Moriset, B., “Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces”, Proceedings of the 2nd Geography of Innovation, Utrecht University International Conference, 2014. Parrino, L., ‘‘Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange’’, Knowledge Management Research &Practice, 13, 2013. Pohler, N., ‘‘Neue arbeitsräume für neue arbeitsformen: coworking spaces [New workspaces for new forms of work: coworking spaces] ’’, Österr.Z.Soziologie. 37, 2012, doi:10.1007/s11614-012-0021-y. Spinuzzi, C., “Working alone together: co-working as emergent collaborative activity”, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, 2012. Suarez, R. - Segreti, A., The Co-working Handbook: Learn How To Create and Manage a Successful Co-working Space, Amazon, Bedfordshire, 2014. Tapan, M., “Prefabrike Elemanlarla Yapımda Esneklik ve Değişkenlik Sorunu”, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Bülteni, İstanbul, 1972. Thanem, T. - Värlander, S. - Cummings, S., “Open Space = open minds? The Ambiguities of Pro-creative Office Design”, Int. J. Work Organization and Emotion, vol 4, no 1, 2011. [URL-1] timelinehttp://wiki.coworking.org/w/page/68852527/History%20 of%20Coworking%20-%20a%20timeline& http://www.deskmag.com/en/thehistory- of-coworking-spaces-in-a- Waber, B. - Magnolfi, J. - Lindsay, G., ‘‘Workspaces that move people’’, Harvard Business Review, 29 (10), 2014. Yürekli, K. F., Mimari Tasarımda Belirsizlik; Esneklik/Uyabilirlik İhtiyacının Kaynakları ve Çözümü Üzerine bir Araştırma, İstanbul, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, 1983. 11.04.2017, Interview, Kontra Architectural Office, Istanbul 21.02.2017, Interview, Kolektif House Management, Istanbul

Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’

Year 2019, , 297 - 312, 27.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.667316

Abstract

The concept of ‘Work’ and ‘Workplace’ started to change in recent decades
in parallel with developments in information and communication Technologies.
New ways of working have been defined as flexible, mobile and multi-locational.
Co-working spaces have emerged worldwide as a new type of workspace
concept. These places offer a flexible and appropriate work environment with
various usage options. The aim of the study is to define the characteristics and
development of the co-working space concept and analyzing the urban and spatial
context as well as design criteria, the spatial solution, material and furniture
selection of the selected case. In this study the case of ‘Kolektif House’ a co-working
space, in Levent district in İstanbul has been selected, as the location can
be defined as the central commercial district of the city. The space is created by
refunctioning a part of an old factory-building which is evaluated as a sustainable
devolepment project. The data used in this study is based on architectural drawings,
visual materials, interviews, observations, as well as a literature review. The
study demonstrates that changing work habits and user needs created new types
of working place and in the selected case the created value in urban and spatial
context by re-functioning an existed building was found to be positive.

References

  • Amabile, T. M., ‘‘A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations’’, Reasearch in Organizational Behaviour, vol.10, 1998. Bouncken, R. B. - Reuschl, A. J., ‘‘ Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship’’, Review of Managerial Science, vol 12, issue 1, 2016. Duffy, F., ‘‘ Lumbering to Extinction in the Digital Field: The Taylorist Office Building’’, Harvard Design Magazine, no. 29, Fall Winter, 2008. Gillen, N. M., ‘‘The future workplace, opportunities, realities and myths: A practical approach to creating meaningful environments’’. Reinventing the Workplace, ed. In J. Worthington Ed., 2nd ed., Oxford, Architectural Press, 2006. Harrison, A. - Wheeler, P. - Whitehead, C., The Distributed Workplace: Sustainable Work Environments, SponPress, 2004. Hislop, D. - Axtell, C., “To infinity and beyond: workspace and the multi-location worker”, New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009. Huwart, J. Y. - Dichter, G. - Vanrie, P., ‘‘Co-working: collaborative space for micro entrepreneurs’’, Technical Note #1, Brussels, European Business and Innovation Centre Network EBN, 2012. Johns, T. - Gratton, L., ‘‘The third wave of virtual work’’, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 2013. Kojo, I. - Nenonen , S., ‘‘Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? ’’, Facilities, vol. 34 iss 5/6, 2016. Moriset, B., “Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces”, Proceedings of the 2nd Geography of Innovation, Utrecht University International Conference, 2014. Parrino, L., ‘‘Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange’’, Knowledge Management Research &Practice, 13, 2013. Pohler, N., ‘‘Neue arbeitsräume für neue arbeitsformen: coworking spaces [New workspaces for new forms of work: coworking spaces] ’’, Österr.Z.Soziologie. 37, 2012, doi:10.1007/s11614-012-0021-y. Spinuzzi, C., “Working alone together: co-working as emergent collaborative activity”, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, 2012. Suarez, R. - Segreti, A., The Co-working Handbook: Learn How To Create and Manage a Successful Co-working Space, Amazon, Bedfordshire, 2014. Tapan, M., “Prefabrike Elemanlarla Yapımda Esneklik ve Değişkenlik Sorunu”, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Bülteni, İstanbul, 1972. Thanem, T. - Värlander, S. - Cummings, S., “Open Space = open minds? The Ambiguities of Pro-creative Office Design”, Int. J. Work Organization and Emotion, vol 4, no 1, 2011. [URL-1] timelinehttp://wiki.coworking.org/w/page/68852527/History%20 of%20Coworking%20-%20a%20timeline& http://www.deskmag.com/en/thehistory- of-coworking-spaces-in-a- Waber, B. - Magnolfi, J. - Lindsay, G., ‘‘Workspaces that move people’’, Harvard Business Review, 29 (10), 2014. Yürekli, K. F., Mimari Tasarımda Belirsizlik; Esneklik/Uyabilirlik İhtiyacının Kaynakları ve Çözümü Üzerine bir Araştırma, İstanbul, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, 1983. 11.04.2017, Interview, Kontra Architectural Office, Istanbul 21.02.2017, Interview, Kolektif House Management, Istanbul
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Researches and Studies
Authors

Elif Süyük Makaklı 0000-0002-5045-927X

Ebru Yücesan This is me 0000-0002-5978-4394

Betül Ozar 0000-0003-1245-0044

Publication Date December 27, 2019
Acceptance Date October 14, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Makaklı, E. S., Yücesan, E., & Ozar, B. (2019). Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi(14), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.667316
AMA Makaklı ES, Yücesan E, Ozar B. Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2019;(14):297-312. doi:10.16947/fsmia.667316
Chicago Makaklı, Elif Süyük, Ebru Yücesan, and Betül Ozar. “Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’”. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, no. 14 (December 2019): 297-312. https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.667316.
EndNote Makaklı ES, Yücesan E, Ozar B (December 1, 2019) Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 14 297–312.
IEEE E. S. Makaklı, E. Yücesan, and B. Ozar, “Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’”, FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, no. 14, pp. 297–312, December 2019, doi: 10.16947/fsmia.667316.
ISNAD Makaklı, Elif Süyük et al. “Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’”. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 14 (December 2019), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.667316.
JAMA Makaklı ES, Yücesan E, Ozar B. Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;:297–312.
MLA Makaklı, Elif Süyük et al. “Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’”. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, no. 14, 2019, pp. 297-12, doi:10.16947/fsmia.667316.
Vancouver Makaklı ES, Yücesan E, Ozar B. Co-Working Space Concept in the Spatial and Urban Context: A Case Study of ‘Kolektif House’. FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019(14):297-312.