Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigation of the shear bond strength to dentin of universal adhesives applied with two different techniques

Year 2017, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 91 - 97, 15.01.2017
https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.285850

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of universal adhesives applied with self-etch and etch&rinse techniques to dentin.

Materials and Method: Fourty-eight sound extracted human third molars were used in this study. Occlusal enamel was removed in order to expose the dentinal surface, and the surface was flattened. Specimens were randomly divided into four groups and were sectioned vestibulo-lingually using a diamond disc. The universal adhesives: All Bond Universal (Group 1a and 1b), Gluma Bond Universal (Group 2a and 2b) and Single Bond Universal (Group 3a and 3b) were applied onto the tooth specimens either with self-etch technique (a) or with etch&rinse technique (b) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Clearfil SE Bond (Group 4a; self-etch) and Optibond FL (Group 4b; etch&rinse) were used as control groups. Then the specimens were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z550). After thermocycling, shear bond strength test was performed with a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture analysis was done under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests.

Results: Statistical analysis showed significant differences in shear bond strength values between the universal adhesives (p<0.05). Significantly higher bond strength values were observed in self-etch groups (a) in comparison to etch&rinse groups (b) (p<0.05). Among all groups, Single Bond Universal showed the greatest shear bond strength values, whereas All Bond Universal showed the lowest shear bond strength values with both application techniques.

Conclusion: Dentin bonding strengths of universal adhesives applied with different techniques may vary depending on the adhesive material. For the universal bonding agents tested in this study, the etch&rinse technique negatively affected the bond strength to dentin.

References

  • Thanaratikul B, Santiwong B, Harnirattisai C. Self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode did not affect the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to primary dentin. Dent Mater J 2016;35:174-9.
  • Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-11.
  • De Munck JD, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
  • Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gomes O, Patzlaff R, Loguercio A. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007;32:380-7.
  • Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:23-30.
  • Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91.
  • Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84.
  • Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-81.
  • Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
  • Woronko GA Jr, St Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1996;21:116-21.
  • Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-7.
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems: I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
  • Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-81.
  • Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3573-82.
  • Barutçugil Ç, Kürklü D, Barutçugil K, Arslan H. Farklı yüzey işlemleri uygulanmış dentine üniversal bağlayıcı ajanın bağlanma dayanımının. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;21:324-30.
  • Mena‐Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6‐month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:55-69.
  • Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-8.
  • Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8.
  • Walter R, Swift EJ, Nagaoka H, Chung Y, Bartholomew W, Braswell KM, et al. Two-year bond strengths of “all-in-one” adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2012;40:549-55.
  • Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.
  • Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 2005;84:350-4.
  • Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26:1035-42.
  • Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent 2010;38:106-12.
  • Langer A, Ilie N. Dentin infiltration ability of different classes of adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:205-16.
  • Ikeda M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Yoshida T, Miyazaki M, Platt J. Bonding durability of single-step adhesives to previously acid-etched dentin. Oper Dent 2008;33:702-9.
  • Van Landuyt K, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006;34:77-85.
  • Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 2000;16:406-11.
  • Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76.
  • Lee IS, Son S, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:479-84.
  • Sancaklı HŞ. Dentin bağlayıcı sistemler ve hibrid tabakanın oluşturulması. J Istanbul Uni Fac Dent 2010;44:189-95.
  • Pleffken PR, de Almeida Lourenco AP, Torres C, Buhler Borges A. Influence of application methods of self-etching adhesive systems on adhesive bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:517-25.
  • Amano S, Yamamoto A, Tsubota K, Rikuta A, Miyazaki M, Platt J, et al. Effect of thermal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch systems. Oper Dent 2006;31:616-22.

İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi

Year 2017, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 91 - 97, 15.01.2017
https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.285850

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kendinden pürüzlendirmeli ve asitle-yıka teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarını değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda toplam 48 adet sağlam üçüncü büyük azı dişi kullanıldı. Oklüzal mine uzaklaştırıldıktan sonra açığa çıkan dentin yüzeyleri düzleştirildi. Dişler rastgele dört gruba ayrıldı ve elmas disk yardımıyla bukko-lingual yönde ikiye bölündü. Elde edilen yarımların her birine kendinden pürüzlendirmeli (a) veya asitle-yıka teknikle (b) All Bond Universal (Grup 1a ve 1b), Gluma Bond Universal (Grup 2a ve 2b) veya Single Bond Universal (Grup 3a ve 3b) bağlayıcı sistemleri üretici firma talimatlarına göre uygulandı. Clearfil SE Bond (Grup 4a) kendinden pürüzlendirmeli ve Optibond FL (Grup 4b) asitle-yıka tekniğiyle kontrol grubu olarak kullanıldı. Örnekler nanohibrit kompozit rezin (Filtek Z550) kullanılarak restore edildi. Isıl yorma işleminden sonra örneklere üniversal test cihazında 0.5 mm/dk hızla makaslama bağlanma testi uygulandı. Oluşan kırık tipleri stereomikroskop altında ×40 büyütmede incelendi. Elde edilen veriler iki yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılarak analiz edildi.

Bulgular: Üniversal bağlayıcı sistemlerin makaslama bağlanma değerleri arasındaki farklılıklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0.05). Kendinden pürüzlendirmeli (a) gruplarında asitle-yıka (b) gruplarına göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek bağlanma değerleri gözlendi (p<0.05). Hem kendinden pürüzlendirmeli hem de asitle-yıka teknikle uygulanan materyaller arasında Single Bond Universal en yüksek bağlanma dayanımını gösterirken en düşük bağlanma dayanımı All-Bond Universal grubunda gözlendi.

Sonuç: Farklı tekniklerle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı sistemlerin dentine bağlanma dayanımları kullanılan materyale göre değişiklik gösterebilir. Asitle-yıka tekniğin kullanılması üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan bağlanma dayanımını olumsuz etkilemektedir.

References

  • Thanaratikul B, Santiwong B, Harnirattisai C. Self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode did not affect the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to primary dentin. Dent Mater J 2016;35:174-9.
  • Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-11.
  • De Munck JD, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
  • Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gomes O, Patzlaff R, Loguercio A. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007;32:380-7.
  • Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:23-30.
  • Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91.
  • Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84.
  • Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-81.
  • Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
  • Woronko GA Jr, St Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1996;21:116-21.
  • Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-7.
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems: I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
  • Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-81.
  • Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3573-82.
  • Barutçugil Ç, Kürklü D, Barutçugil K, Arslan H. Farklı yüzey işlemleri uygulanmış dentine üniversal bağlayıcı ajanın bağlanma dayanımının. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;21:324-30.
  • Mena‐Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6‐month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:55-69.
  • Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-8.
  • Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8.
  • Walter R, Swift EJ, Nagaoka H, Chung Y, Bartholomew W, Braswell KM, et al. Two-year bond strengths of “all-in-one” adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2012;40:549-55.
  • Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.
  • Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 2005;84:350-4.
  • Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26:1035-42.
  • Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent 2010;38:106-12.
  • Langer A, Ilie N. Dentin infiltration ability of different classes of adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:205-16.
  • Ikeda M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Yoshida T, Miyazaki M, Platt J. Bonding durability of single-step adhesives to previously acid-etched dentin. Oper Dent 2008;33:702-9.
  • Van Landuyt K, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006;34:77-85.
  • Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 2000;16:406-11.
  • Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76.
  • Lee IS, Son S, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:479-84.
  • Sancaklı HŞ. Dentin bağlayıcı sistemler ve hibrid tabakanın oluşturulması. J Istanbul Uni Fac Dent 2010;44:189-95.
  • Pleffken PR, de Almeida Lourenco AP, Torres C, Buhler Borges A. Influence of application methods of self-etching adhesive systems on adhesive bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:517-25.
  • Amano S, Yamamoto A, Tsubota K, Rikuta A, Miyazaki M, Platt J, et al. Effect of thermal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch systems. Oper Dent 2006;31:616-22.
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Article
Authors

Elif Yaşa This is me

Duygu Yıldızeli This is me

Zübeyir Sayıner This is me

Ali Erdem This is me

Publication Date January 15, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 34 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yaşa, E., Yıldızeli, D., Sayıner, Z., Erdem, A. (2017). İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi. Acta Odontologica Turcica, 34(3), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.285850
AMA Yaşa E, Yıldızeli D, Sayıner Z, Erdem A. İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. June 2017;34(3):91-97. doi:10.17214/gaziaot.285850
Chicago Yaşa, Elif, Duygu Yıldızeli, Zübeyir Sayıner, and Ali Erdem. “İki Farklı Teknikle Uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların Dentine Olan Makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının Incelenmesi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 34, no. 3 (June 2017): 91-97. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.285850.
EndNote Yaşa E, Yıldızeli D, Sayıner Z, Erdem A (June 1, 2017) İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi. Acta Odontologica Turcica 34 3 91–97.
IEEE E. Yaşa, D. Yıldızeli, Z. Sayıner, and A. Erdem, “İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi”, Acta Odontol Turc, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 91–97, 2017, doi: 10.17214/gaziaot.285850.
ISNAD Yaşa, Elif et al. “İki Farklı Teknikle Uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların Dentine Olan Makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının Incelenmesi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 34/3 (June 2017), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.285850.
JAMA Yaşa E, Yıldızeli D, Sayıner Z, Erdem A. İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2017;34:91–97.
MLA Yaşa, Elif et al. “İki Farklı Teknikle Uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların Dentine Olan Makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının Incelenmesi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica, vol. 34, no. 3, 2017, pp. 91-97, doi:10.17214/gaziaot.285850.
Vancouver Yaşa E, Yıldızeli D, Sayıner Z, Erdem A. İki farklı teknikle uygulanan üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların dentine olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2017;34(3):91-7.