Abstract
Bu çalışmada, Ulusal IPv6 Protokolü Altyapı Tasarımı ve Geçiş Projesi kapsamında, IPv4’ten IPv6’ya geçişteen uygun geçiş stratejisine karar vermede, çok kriterli karar verme metotlarından Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses(AHP) yöntemi geçiş mekanizmasının kararlaştırılmasında kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bu alanda bir ilkçalışma olması, geçişe etki edecek olan parametrelerin belirlenmesi, kriter kümelerinin konuya özel olarak ilkkez belirlenmesi ve bu probleme uygulanması bu çalışmanın özgün yönleridir. Aynı zamanda, en iyi geçişstratejisinin belirlenmesi için gerekli anketler hazırlanıp uygulanmış; Super Decisions 1.6.0 paket programıkullanılarak uygun geçiş mekanizmalarına ait sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Sunulan bu çalışmanın, ülke kurum vekuruluşlarının IPv6’ya geçişinde en uygun geçiş mekanizmasının belirlenmesinin, ülke kaynaklarının daha etkinkullanılmasına, konuyla ilgili geçiş süresini kısaltacağına, geçmek isteyen kurumlara bilimsel bir yaklaşımsunmasının ülke geçiş sürecine önemli katkılar sağlayacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
Keywords
Pv4 IPv6 Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses Karar Destek Sistemi Super Decisions
References
- Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process.
- New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
- Saaty, T. L., “That is not the analytic hierarchy
- process: what the AHP is and what it is not”, J.
- Multi-Crit Decis. Anal., 6:324–235, 1987.
- Angels, D.I., Lee, C.Y., “Strategic investment
- analysis using activity based costing concepts and
- analytic hierarchy process techniques”,
- International Journal of Production Research,
- (5), 1331–1345, 1996.
- Blair A.R., Nachtmann R., Saaty, T.L., Whitaker,
- R., “Forecasting the resurgence of the US
- economy in 2001: An expert judgement
- approach”, Socio- Economic Planning Sciences,
- (2), 77–91, 2002.
- Byun, D.H., “The AHP approach for selecting an
- automobile purchase model”, Information and
- Management, 38 (5), 289–297, 2001.
- Cagno, E., Caron, F., Perego,F., “Multi-criteria
- assessment of the probability of winning in
- competitive bidding process”, International
- Journal of Production Management, 19, 313–
- , 2001.
- Arbel,A., .E. Orger, Y.E., “An application of
- AHP to bank strategic planning: The merger and
- acquisitions process”, European Journal of
- Operational Research, 48 (1), 27–37, 1990.
- Arbel, A., Seidmann, A., “Performance evaluation
- of FMS, IEEE Transactions on Systems”, Man
- and Cybernetics, 14 (4), 606–617, 1986.
- Bitici, U.S., Suwignjo, P., Carrie, A.S., “Strategy
- management through quantitative modeling of
- performance measurement system”, International
- Journal of Production Economics, 69 (1), 15–
- , 2001.
- Ahire, S.L., Rana,D.S., “Selection of TQM pilot
- projects using an MCDM approach”,
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability
- Management, 12 (1), 61–81, 1995.
- Al Harbi, K.M., “Application of AHP in project
- management”, International Journal of Project
- Management, 19 (4),19–27, 2001.
- Alidi, A.S., “Use of analytic hierarchy process to
- measure the initial viability of industrial projects”,
- International Journal of Project Management,
- (4), 205–208, 1996.
- Al Khalil, M.I., “Selecting the appropriate project
- delivery method using AHP”, International
- Journal of Project Management, 20, 469–474,
- -
- Akarte, M.M., Surendra, N.V., Ravi, B., Rangaraj,
- N., “Web based casting supplier evaluation using
- analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of the
- Operational Research Society, 52 (5), 511–522,
- -
- Andijani, A.A., “A multi-criterion approach to
- Kanban allocations”, Omega, 26 (4), 483–493,
- -
- Andijani, A.A., Anwarul, M., “Manufacturing
- blocking discipline: A multi-criterion approach for
- buffer allocations”, International Journal of
- Production Economics, 51 (3), 155–163, 1997.
- Badri, M., “Combining the AHP and GP model
- for quality control systems”, International
- Journal of Production Economics, 72 (1), 27–
- , 2001.
- Ulusal IPv6 Protokolü Altyapı Tasarımı ve Geçiş
- Projesi, TÜBİTAK-KAMAG 108G100, Dönem 2
- Raporu, Haziran 2010.
Abstract
References
- Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process.
- New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
- Saaty, T. L., “That is not the analytic hierarchy
- process: what the AHP is and what it is not”, J.
- Multi-Crit Decis. Anal., 6:324–235, 1987.
- Angels, D.I., Lee, C.Y., “Strategic investment
- analysis using activity based costing concepts and
- analytic hierarchy process techniques”,
- International Journal of Production Research,
- (5), 1331–1345, 1996.
- Blair A.R., Nachtmann R., Saaty, T.L., Whitaker,
- R., “Forecasting the resurgence of the US
- economy in 2001: An expert judgement
- approach”, Socio- Economic Planning Sciences,
- (2), 77–91, 2002.
- Byun, D.H., “The AHP approach for selecting an
- automobile purchase model”, Information and
- Management, 38 (5), 289–297, 2001.
- Cagno, E., Caron, F., Perego,F., “Multi-criteria
- assessment of the probability of winning in
- competitive bidding process”, International
- Journal of Production Management, 19, 313–
- , 2001.
- Arbel,A., .E. Orger, Y.E., “An application of
- AHP to bank strategic planning: The merger and
- acquisitions process”, European Journal of
- Operational Research, 48 (1), 27–37, 1990.
- Arbel, A., Seidmann, A., “Performance evaluation
- of FMS, IEEE Transactions on Systems”, Man
- and Cybernetics, 14 (4), 606–617, 1986.
- Bitici, U.S., Suwignjo, P., Carrie, A.S., “Strategy
- management through quantitative modeling of
- performance measurement system”, International
- Journal of Production Economics, 69 (1), 15–
- , 2001.
- Ahire, S.L., Rana,D.S., “Selection of TQM pilot
- projects using an MCDM approach”,
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability
- Management, 12 (1), 61–81, 1995.
- Al Harbi, K.M., “Application of AHP in project
- management”, International Journal of Project
- Management, 19 (4),19–27, 2001.
- Alidi, A.S., “Use of analytic hierarchy process to
- measure the initial viability of industrial projects”,
- International Journal of Project Management,
- (4), 205–208, 1996.
- Al Khalil, M.I., “Selecting the appropriate project
- delivery method using AHP”, International
- Journal of Project Management, 20, 469–474,
- -
- Akarte, M.M., Surendra, N.V., Ravi, B., Rangaraj,
- N., “Web based casting supplier evaluation using
- analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of the
- Operational Research Society, 52 (5), 511–522,
- -
- Andijani, A.A., “A multi-criterion approach to
- Kanban allocations”, Omega, 26 (4), 483–493,
- -
- Andijani, A.A., Anwarul, M., “Manufacturing
- blocking discipline: A multi-criterion approach for
- buffer allocations”, International Journal of
- Production Economics, 51 (3), 155–163, 1997.
- Badri, M., “Combining the AHP and GP model
- for quality control systems”, International
- Journal of Production Economics, 72 (1), 27–
- , 2001.
- Ulusal IPv6 Protokolü Altyapı Tasarımı ve Geçiş
- Projesi, TÜBİTAK-KAMAG 108G100, Dönem 2
- Raporu, Haziran 2010.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | February 20, 2013 |
| Submission Date | February 20, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2011 Volume: 26 Issue: 3 |