Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme

Derya Bekiroğlu; Nur Ütkür Güllühan

TR EN

Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme

Abstract

Eğitsel robotik ve yapay zekâ alanındaki hızlı gelişmeler, sosyal robotların öğrenme ortamlarına entegrasyonunu önemli ölçüde hızlandırmıştır. Bu sistematik derleme, 2013–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan çalışmaları sentezleyerek eğitsel ve sosyal robotların çocukların öğrenme ve gelişimine farklı eğitim bağlamlarında nasıl katkı sağladığını incelemektedir. PRISMA yönergeleri ve PICOS çerçevesi doğrultusunda Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect ve SpringerLink veri tabanlarından seçilen 81 hakemli dergi makalesi ve konferans bildirisi analiz edilmiştir. Tematik içerik analizi kullanılarak çalışmalar altı boyutta sentezlenmiştir: Eğitsel amaçlar, öğrenme çıktıları, hedeflenen öğrenen gruplar, metodolojik yaklaşımlar, robot özellikleri ve araştırma boşlukları. Bulgular, eğitsel robotların ağırlıklı olarak hesaplamalı düşünme, STEM öğrenmesi ve dil gelişimini desteklemek amacıyla kullanıldığını; öğrenmede etkileşimin sıklıkla aracı bir mekanizma olarak işlev gördüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmaların büyük bölümü okul öncesi ve ilkokul düzeyindeki öğrencileri hedeflerken, ortaöğretim ve yükseköğretim bağlamlarının görece yetersiz temsil edildiği görülmektedir. Raporlanan çıktılar ağırlıklı olarak bilişsel kazanımlar ve öğrenci katılımına odaklanmakta; sosyal-duygusal etkiler ise daha sınırlı ve çoğunlukla nitel ya da keşfedici verilerle desteklenmektedir. Metodolojik açıdan alan, kısa süreli müdahaleler ve küçük ölçekli örneklemlerle karakterize edilmekte; uzunlamasına ya da randomize kontrollü tasarımların kullanımı oldukça sınırlı kalmaktadır. İnsansı biçim ve ifade edici yeteneklerin iletişim ve katılımı artırdığı görülse de, öğrenme çıktılarının robot morfolojisinden ziyade kişiselleştirme ve uyarlanabilir geri bildirim gibi etkileşim tasarımı özellikleriyle daha güçlü ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Genel olarak alan hızlı bir yenilik süreci göstermesine rağmen metodolojik parçalanmışlık, sınırlı uzun dönemli kanıt ve özellikle STEM ile bilgisayar bilimleri odaklı dar disipliner yoğunlaşma gibi kısıtlarla karşı karşıyadır. Bu derleme, gelecekteki eğitsel robotik araştırmalarında daha güçlü deneysel tasarımlara, standartlaştırılmış ölçme araçlarına, daha geniş disipliner uygulamalara ve sınıf ekolojisi, etik boyutlar ile kültürel çeşitliliğe yönelik artan duyarlılığa ihtiyaç olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

Sosyal robotlar, Eğitimde robotlar, İnsan- robot etkileşimi, Sistematik derleme

Social Robots in Education: A Systematic Review Based on PRISMA Guidelines

Abstract

Rapid advances in educational robotics and artificial intelligence have accelerated the integration of social robots into learning environments. This systematic review synthesizes research published between 2013 and 2025 to examine how educational and social robots contribute to children’s learning and development across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA procedures and the PICOS framework, 81 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers were selected from Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink. Using thematic content analysis, studies were synthesized across six dimensions: educational purposes, learning outcomes, learner populations, methodological approaches, robot features, and research gaps. Findings indicate that educational robots are predominantly employed to support computational thinking, STEM learning, and language development, with engagement frequently serving as a mediating mechanism for learning. Preschool and primary school populations were most commonly targeted, while secondary and higher education contexts remain comparatively underrepresented. Reported outcomes primarily concern cognitive gains and learner engagement, whereas social–emotional effects are explored less systematically and are largely supported by qualitative or exploratory evidence. Methodologically, the literature is characterized by short-term interventions and small-scale studies, with limited use of longitudinal or randomized controlled designs. Although humanoid embodiment and expressive capabilities are associated with enhanced communication and engagement, learning outcomes appear more strongly related to interaction design features such as personalization and adaptive feedback than to robot morphology alone. Overall, the field demonstrates rapid innovation but remains constrained by methodological fragmentation, limited long-term evidence, and narrow disciplinary concentration, particularly in STEM and computer science. This review highlights the need for more rigorous experimental designs, standardized outcome measures, broader disciplinary applications, and increased attention to classroom ecology, ethical considerations, and cultural diversity in future educational robotics research

Keywords

Social robots, Robots in education, Human-robot interaction, Systematic review

References

Studies included in the systematic analysis are marked with an asterisk ().*
* Afonso, R., Soares, F., & Oliveira, P. D. M. (2021). Impact of educational robotics on student learning and motivation: A case study. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678748
* Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., & Orlando, J. (2016). Children views' on social robot's adaptations in education. Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010977
* Ahtinen, A., & Kaipainen, K. (2020). Learning and teaching experiences with a persuasive social robot in primary school–findings and implications from a 4-month field study. In S. Gramakoski (Ed.), Persuasive Technology (pp. 73–84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_6
* Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2014). Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 11(03), Article 1450022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843614500224
Al-Khalifa, H. S., Alsalman, B., Alnuhait, D., Alkhalifah, A., Meldah, O., & Aloud, S. (2017). The experience of developing Mr. Saud educational system using NAO humanoid robot. 2017 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA.2017.8336008
Alam, A. (2022). Social robots in education for long-term human-robot interaction: socially supportive behaviour of robotic tutor for creating robo-tangible learning environment in a guided discovery learning interaction. Electrochemical Society Transactions, 107(1), 12389-12403. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.12389ecst
Alonso-García, S., Fuentes, A. V. R., Navas-Parejo, M. R., & Victoria-Maldonado, J. J. (2024). Enhancing computational thinking in early childhood education with educational robotics: A meta-analysis. Heliyon, 10(13). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)09280-6
Athanasiou, K., Melegkovits, E., Andrie, E. K., Magoulas, C., Tzavara, C. K., Richardson, C., ... & Tsitsika, A. K. (2018). Cross-national aspects of cyberbullying victimization among 14–17-year-old adolescents across seven European countries. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 800. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5682-4
Amir-Behghadami, M., & Janati, A. (2020). Population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emergency Medicine Journal, 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209587

* Annunziata, S., Santos, L., Caglio, A., Geminiani, A., Brazzoli, E., Piazza, E., ... & Cavallini, A. (2024). Interactive mirroring Games wIth social robot (IOGIOCO): A pilot study on the use of intransitive gestures in a sample of Italian preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, Article 1356331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1356331
* Arent, K., Brown, D. J., Kruk-Lasocka, J., Niemiec, T. L., Pasieczna, A. H., Standen, P. J., & Szczepanowski, R. (2022). The use of social robots in the diagnosis of autism in preschool children. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8399. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178399
* Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073
Aydın, M. K., Serbest, Y., & Akça, B. A. (2025). Eğitimde robot kullanımını ele alan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 853–877. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1231728
Bal, F., Tekerek, M., Palacz, M., Gök, M., & Şimşir, R. (2024). Human robot interaction with social humanoid robots. El-Cezeri, 11(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1390219
* Balzotti, A., De Carolis, B., Massaro, S., Perla, L., & Rossano, V. (2023). Healthy pepper: Nutritional education through social robotics and storytelling. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00041
* Banko, A., Leoste, J., & Õun, T. (2025). Exploring the impact of social robots on second language learning in primary and elementary schools: Teacher involvement and learning outcomes. Educational Media International, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2025.2505505
* Barragán-Sánchez, R., Romero-Tena, R., & García-López, M. (2022). Educational robotics to address behavioral problems in early childhood. Education Sciences, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010022
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), Article eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
* Bravo Perucho, A., & Alimardani, M. (2023). Social robots in secondary education: Can robots assist young adult learners with math learning?. Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580100
* Brender, J., El-Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Zufferey, J. D., & Mondada, F. (2021). Investigating the role of educational robotics in formal mathematics education: The case of geometry for 15-year-old students. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 67–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_6
* Brown, L. N., & Howard, A. M. (2014). The positive effects of verbal encouragement in mathematics education using a social robot. 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891009
* Brown, L., & Howard, A. M. (2013). Engaging children in math education using a socially interactive humanoid robot. 2013 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2013.7029974
* Buchem, I., Balaban, I., Badari, J., Ružić, I., & Bäcker, N. (2025). NAO robot in school education: Insights from the European survey and design of teacher training. In D. Alimisis, G. J. Naluka, & M. Moro (Eds.), International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE 2024) (pp. 12–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73419-9_2
* Caballero-González, Y. A., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2020). Fortaleciendo el pensamiento computacional y habilidades sociales mediante actividades de aprendizaje con robótica educativa en niveles escolares iniciales. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 58, 117–142. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.75059
Campa, R. (2016). The rise of social robots: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 26(1), 106–113. http://jetpress.org/v26.1/campa.htm
* Cano, S. (2022). A methodological approach to the teaching STEM skills in Latin America through educational robotics for school teachers. Electronics, 11(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030395
Canva. (2026). Magic Media (Versiyon 2.0) https://www.canva.com
Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1572–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.023
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
* Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). Pedagogical uses of Thymio II: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education?. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2535080
* Chiazzese, G., Arrigo, M., Chifari, A., Lonati, V., & Tosto, C. (2019). Educational robotics in primary school: Measuring the development of computational thinking skills with the Bebras tasks. Informatics, 6(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6040043
* Chin, K. Y., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Impact of using an educational robot-based learning system on students’ motivation in elementary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2346757
* Chiou, Y. M., Barnes, T., Jelenewicz, S. M., Mouza, C., & Shen, C. C. (2021). Teacher views on storytelling-based cybersecurity education with social robots. IDC '21: Interaction Design and Children, 508–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3465205
* Chookaew, S., Howimanporn, S., Pratumsuwan, P., Hutamarn, S., Sootkaneung, W., & Wongwatkit, C. (2018). Enhancing high-school students' computational thinking with educational robotics learning. 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2018.00047
Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091
Collaborative, A. H. R. A. (2025, June). Programming Approach to Improving Middle School Students' Computational Thinking. In Blended Learning. Sustainable and Flexible Smart Learning: 18th International Conference on Blended Learning, ICBL 2025, Bangkok, Thailand, July 22-25, 2025, Proceedings (Vol. 15721, p. 100). Springer Nature.
* Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A., Cirasa, C., & Di Nuovo, S. (2017). A comparison of kindergarten storytelling by human and humanoid robot with different social behavior. Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038359
* Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, S., & Di Nuovo, A. (2020). Social robots to support practitioners in the education and clinical care of children: The CARER-AID project. Life Span and Disability, 23(1), 17–30.
* Costa Junior, A. D. O., Guedes, E. B., Lima’e Silva, J. P. F., & Rivera, J. A. (2024). Developing computational thinking in middle school with an educational robotics resource. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 110(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02082-7
* Da Silva, M. D. G. T., Araújo Maia, C. J. D. N., Fernandes Curvelo, C. D. C., Garcia, L. T. D. S., & Gonçalves, L. M. G. (2025). Educational robotics as a pedagogical resource for K-12 students with learning difficulties. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 35923. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19821-x
Dağlarlı, E., Köse, H., & Günel, G. Ö. (2017). Rehabilitation applications using brain inspired cognitive architecture for humanoid robots. 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2017.7960677
* Dantas, I. M., Alves, K. M., Da Silva, M. D. G., Junior, O. V., & Gonçalves, L. M. (2023). Implementation of an extension project in educational robotics in a public school: A case study in the city of Natal/RN. 2023 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 689–694. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE59448.2023.10333022
Davis, D. M., Harrison, M., & Recio-Mitter, D. (2022). Two robots moving geodesically on a tree. Algebraic & Geometric Topology, 22(2), 785-814. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2022.22.785
Demir, B. Ç. (2025). Sosyal robotlar: Sosyal bilimlerdeki araştırma eğilimlerinin bibliyometrik verilerle değerlendirilmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(03), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1617725
* Deshmukh, A., Cross, E. S., & Foster, M. E. (2025). Leveraging social robots to promote hand hygiene: A cross-cultural and socio-economic study of children in diverse school settings. 2025 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1145/3700736.3712399
Derakhshan, A., Teo, T., Saeedy Robat, E., Janebi Enayat, M., & Jahanbakhsh, A. A. (2025). Robot-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95(4), 747-774. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241247227
* Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell'Omo, M., ... & Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018
* Díaz, J., Queiruga, C., Tzancoff, C. B., Fava, L., & Harari, V. (2015). Educational robotics and videogames in the classroom. 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170616
* Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2022). Social robots in applied settings: A long-term study on adaptive robotic tutors in higher education. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, Article 831633. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.831633
* Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2025). Application of social robots in higher education: A long-term study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 17(10), 2311–2326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01286-7
* Dorotea, N., Piedade, J., & Pedro, A. (2021). Mapping K-12 computer science teacher’s interest, self-confidence, and knowledge about the use of educational robotics to teach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080443
* Eguchi, A. (2021). AI-powered educational robotics as a learning tool to promote artificial intelligence and computer science education. In International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE) (pp. 279–287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_26
El Naqa, I., & Murphy, M. J. (2015). What is machine learning?. In Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology (pp. 3–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3_1
Elumar-Efe, E., Akyumuk, E., & Sani-Bozkurt, S. (2022). GenAI and Robots in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A New Frontier in the Age of Human-AI Interaction. In Rethinking Education and Agency in the Age of Human-Generative AI Interaction (pp. 373-398). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Flasiński, M. (2016). History of artificial intelligence. In Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40022-8_1
* Forliano, R., & Di Grassi, A. (2025). Educational robotics and the logic-mathematics approach in early childhood: An integrated model for cognitive and social development. INTED2025 Proceedings, 4687–4694. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2025.1169
* Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M. S. (2024). Assessing teacher readiness for educational robotics integration in primary and preschool education. Education 3-13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2300699
Genç, Z., & Çelik, B. (2022). Sosyal robotların özel eğitimde kullanılması üzerine sistematik derleme çalışması. 15. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu (ICITS), 52.Holistence Publications.
Ghallab, M., & Ingrand, F. (2020). Robotics and artificial intelligence. In P. Marquis, O. Papini, & H. Prade (Eds.), A Guided Tour of Artificial Intelligence Research: Volume III: Interfaces and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 389–436). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06170-8_12
* Giang, C., & Negrini, L. (2021). Educational robotics in online distance learning: An experience from primary school. In International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE) (pp. 34–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_4
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep learning (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-800). Cambridge: MIT press.
Gordon, G. (2019). Social behaviour as an emergent property of embodied curiosity: A robotics perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374(1771), Article 20180029. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0029
Gordon, M., Rivera, E., Ackermann, E., & Breazeal, C. (2015). Designing a relational social robot toolkit for preschool children to explore computational concepts. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771915
Govers, F. X. (2018). Artificial intelligence for robotics: Build intelligent robots that perform human tasks using AI techniques. Packt Publishing.
Grove, S. K., Burns, N., & Gray, J. R. (2012). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier Health Sciences.
* Guerreiro-Santalla, S., Bellas, F., & Mallo, A. (2023). Introducing high school students in natural interaction through the Robobo educational robot. ROBOT2022: Fifth Iberian Robotics Conference, 589, 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21065-5_41
Hangün, M. E., Kalınkara, Y., Bayer, H., & Tekin, A. (2022). Eğitimde robotik kullanımına yönelik araştırmaların incelenmesi: Bir içerik analizi çalışması. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 558–578. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.944933
Heath, S., Durantin, G., Boden, M., Hensby, K., Taufatofua, J., Olsson, O., ... & Wiles, J. (2017). Spatiotemporal aspects of engagement during Dialogic storytelling child–robot interaction. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00027
* Hari, D., Kerneža, M., Zemljak, D., & Flogie, A. (2025). Social robots and AI-driven learning: A pilot study on student engagement in higher education. Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, 575–579.
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savović, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, Article d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
* Jawawi, D., Jamal, N., Abdul Halim, S., Sa'adon, N., Mamat, R., Isa, M., Mohamad, R., & Abdull Hamed, H. (2022). Nurturing secondary school student computational thinking through educational robotics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.25581
Ji-Elle. (2016). Aldebaran Pepper [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aldebaran_Pepper.jpg
Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Gill, B. T. (2012). Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now: Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033
Kartal, G., & Yeşilyurt, YE (2024). 1995 ve 2022 yılları arasında ikinci dil öğretiminde ve uygulamalı dilbilimde yapay zekanın bibliyometrik analizi. ReCALL, 36(3), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344024000077
Kalaitzidou, M., & Pachidis, T. P. (2023). Recent robots in STEAM education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030272
Kaul, V., Enslin, S., & Gross, S. A. (2020). History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 92(4), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040
Kelleher, J. D. (2019). Deep learning. MIT press.
Kouroupa, A., Laws, K. R., Irvine, K., Mengoni, S. E., Baird, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). The use of social robots with children and young people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one, 17(6), e0269800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269800
* Komatsubara, T., Shiomi, M., Kaczmarek, T., Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2019). Estimating children’s social status through their interaction activities in classrooms with a social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0474-7
* Konijn, E. A., Jansen, B., Mondaca Bustos, V., Hobbelink, V. L., & Preciado Vanegas, D. (2022). Social robots for (second) language learning in (migrant) primary school children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(3), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00824-3
Korn, O. (Ed.). (2019). Social robots: Technological, societal and ethical aspects of human-robot interaction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0
Kory-Westlund, J. M., & Breazeal, C. (2019). A long-term study of young children's rapport, social emulation, and language learning with a peer-like robot playmate in preschool. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6, 81. ps://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00081
Köksalan, B., Akpınar, B., & Akyıldız, T. Y. (2024). Eğitimde insansı robot kullanımının avantaj ve dezavantajlarına (frankeştayn sendromu) dair öğretmen görüşlerinin analizi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(92), 1394-1415. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1483914
* Krcho, J., & Miková, K. (2024). Introducing self-assessment through rubrics in the teaching of educational robotics at a secondary vocational school-preliminary results. 2024 21st International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET61869.2024.10837609
* Lanzilotti, R., Piccinno, A., Rossano, V., & Roselli, T. (2021). Social robot to teach coding in primary school. 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 102–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00038
* Lee, Y. N., & Chiu, F. Y. (2024). Exploring the factors that influence the recommendation of educational robotics courses for elementary school students. Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (ICDTE), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696230.3696241
* Lemaignan, S., Newbutt, N., Rice, L., & Daly, J. (2024). “It’s important to think of Pepper as a teaching aid or resource external to the classroom”: A social robot in a school for autistic children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 16(6), 1083–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00928-4
* Leoste, J., & Heidmets, M. (2019). The impact of educational robots as learning tools on mathematics learning outcomes in basic education. In Digital Turn in Schools—Research, Policy, Practice (pp. 203–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7361-9_14
Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2022). The effects of robot-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100425
Lin, H. T., Leisk, G. G., & Trimmer, B. (2011). GoQBot: A caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 6(2), 026007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026007
López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Parra-Gonzalez, M. E. (2021). Robotics in education: A scientific mapping of the literature in Web of Science. Electronics, 10(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10100291
* Lopez-Caudana, E., Ponce, P., Mazon, N., & Baltazar, G. (2022). Improving the attention span of elementary school children for physical education through an NAO robotics platform in developed countries. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 16(2), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00851-y
* Mahmud, S., Kamel, Z., Singh, A., & Kim, J. H. (2023). RoboRecycle Buddy: Enhancing early childhood green education and recycling habits through playful interaction with a social robot. International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction, 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53827-8_29
* Mantzanidou, G. (2019). Educational robotics in kindergarten, a case study. In International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE) (pp. 52–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_5
* Maurelli, F., Waqar Mughal, M., Sun, S., Mehdi, A., Shingissov, B., Zakypbaevich, K., & Ferreira, F. (2025). Remote access to marine robotics: Pilots in educational robotics involving schools and universities in Europe and Asia. In International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE) (pp. 448–459). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98762-5_38
* Meral, M., & Yalcin, S. A. (2025). The effect of educational robotics applications on middle school students' innovative thinking skills. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(2), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1079
Meral, M., & Yalçın, S. A. (2024). Eğitsel robotik alanındaki güncel çalışmaların eğilimleri: Bir içerik analizi. Trakya Journal of Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1332498
* Merlo-Espino, R. D., Villareal-Rodgríguez, M., Morita-Aleander, A., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., Pérez-Soto, G. I., & Camarillo-Gómez, K. A. (2018). Educational robotics and its impact in the development of critical thinking in higher education students. 2018 XX Congreso Mexicano de Robótica (COMRob), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMROB.2018.8689122
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
* Mutawa, A. M., Al Mudhahkah, H. M., Al-Huwais, A., Al-Khaldi, N., Al-Otaibi, R., & Al-Ansari, A. (2023). Augmenting mobile app with NAO robot for autism education. Machines, 11(8), 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11080833
Muthukrishnan, N., Maleki, F., Ovens, K., Reinhold, C., Forghani, B., & Forghani, R. (2020). Brief history of artificial intelligence. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 30(4), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.007
Nadeem, M., Barakat, J. M. H., Daas, D., & Potams, A. (2025). A review of socially assistive robotics in supporting children with autism spectrum disorder. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(9), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9090098
* Neumann, M. M., & Barry, R. J. (2025). Preschool children’s engagement with a social robot during early literacy and language activities. Education and Information Technologies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13727-x
* Neumann, M. M., Calteaux, I., Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2023). Exploring teachers’ perspectives on the benefits and barriers of using social robots in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 193(13-14), 1503–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2023.2257000
Qi, J., Gao, H., Su, H., Han, L., Su, B., Huo, M., ... & Deng, Z. (2023). Reinforcement learning-based stable jump control method for asteroid-exploration quadruped robots. Aerospace Science and Technology, 142, 108689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108689
* Olaru, C. T., & Achirei, S. D. (2025). STEM education framework: Learning Rubik's Cube solving with Nao. 2025 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1109/SACI66288.2025.11030183
* Oliveira, D. S., Curvelo, C. D. C. F., Melo, J. C., de Santana, O. V., Barrios-Aranibar, D., Patino-Escarcina, R. E., ... & Gonçalves, L. M. G. (2021). Edurosc-prof: Continuous education method for teacher formation in educational robotics for K-12 teaching. 2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE54079.2021.9605449
* Oliveira, D. S., Garcia, L. T. D. S., & Gonçalves, L. M. G. (2021). A survey on the continuous education of teachers in the area of educational robotics. 2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE54079.2021.9605366
* Oliveira, J. F., Quarto, C. C., Dos Santos, A. L. S., Belfort, I. C. P., Sá, E. D. J. V., & Santos, J. R. S. (2022). Developing computational thought in mathematics through educational robotics in basic education: A practical research analysis. 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00014
Ouyang, F., & Xu, W. (2024). The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: A multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM education, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00469-4
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
* Palestra, G., Bortone, I., Cazzato, D., Adamo, F., Argentiero, A., Agnello, N., & Distante, C. (2014). Social robots in postural education: A new approach to address body consciousness in ASD children. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 290–299). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_30
Paluch, S., & Wirtz, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and robots in the service encounter. Journal of Service Management Research, 4(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2020-1-3
Pandey, A. K., Gelin, R., Ruocco, M., Monforte, M., & Siciliano, B. (2017). When a social robot might learn to support potentially immoral behaviors in the name of privacy. 2017 Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (Workshop on Privacy-Sensitive Robotics), 1–4.
* Pandey, D., Subedi, A., & Mishra, D. (2022). Improving language skills and encouraging reading habits in primary education: A pilot study using NAO robot. 2022 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1109/SII52469.2022.9708843
* Papakostas, G. A., Strolis, A. K., Panagiotopoulos, F., & Aitsidis, C. N. (2018). Social robot selection: A case study in education. 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2018.8555844
* Pasalidou, C., Fachantidis, N., & Koiou, E. (2023). Using augmented reality and a social robot to teach geography in primary school. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 371–385). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_27
* Paucar-Curasma, R., Villalba-Condori, K., Arias-Chavez, D., Le, N. T., Garcia-Tejada, G., & Frango-Silveira, I. (2022). Evaluation of computational thinking using four educational robots with primary school students in Peru. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, Article e26161. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.26161
* Polyntsev, E., Zhelonkin, V., & Shandarov, E. (2021). ‘MEOW’–A social robot platform for school. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Robotics (pp. 162–171). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87725-5_14
Rama. (2011). Nao robot at the Fêtons Linux in Geneva, Switzerland [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F%C3%AAtons_Linux_-Nao-_1.jpg
* Rosanda, V., & Istenič, A. (2021). A stranger in the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ anxiety and negative attitudes toward humanoid social robots. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 461–473). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_29
* Rutatola, E. P., Stroeken, K., & Belpaeme, T. (2025). “Habari, colleague!”: A qualitative exploration of the perceptions of primary school mathematics teachers in Tanzania regarding the use of social robots. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8483. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158483
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
* Rybakova, A., & Choi, J. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of social robots in enhancing English language acquisition and educational engagement: A study with adults and its implications for Korean kindergarten children. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93861-0_21
Saltan, Y., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2024). Eğitici robot setlerinin etkililiği: 2010-2021 yıllarını kapsayan bir meta analiz çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 14(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.1358742
Sapounidis, T., Tselegkaridis, S., & Stamovlasis, D. (2024). Educational robotics and STEM in primary education: A review and a meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(4), 462-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2160394
Scassellati, B., Boccanfuso, L., Huang, C. M., Mademtzi, M., Qin, M., Salomons, N., ... & Tanaka, F. (2018). Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat7544. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544
* Shipepe, A., Uwu-Khaeb, L., De Villiers, C., Jormanainen, I., & Sutinen, E. (2022). Co-learning computational and design thinking using educational robotics: A case of primary school learners in Namibia. Sensors, 22(21), 8169. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218169
* Sisman, B., Gunay, D., & Kucuk, S. (2019). Development and validation of an educational robot attitude scale (ERAS) for secondary school students. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474234
* Smakman, M., Vogt, P., & Konijn, E. A. (2021). Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Computers & Education, 174, 104317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104317
* Stergiopoulou, M., Karatrantou, A., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2016). Educational robotics and STEM education in primary education: A pilot study using the H&S electronic systems platform. International Conference EduRobotics 2016, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_7
Sun, L., & Zhou, D. (2023). Effective instruction conditions for educational robotics to develop programming ability of K‐12 students: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 380-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12750
Tang, A. L., Tung, V. W. S., & Cheng, T. O. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of the potential use of educational robotics in management education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1780269
Talan, T. (2020). Eğitsel robotik uygulamaları üzerine yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 34(2), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2020342177
* Torrado, J. C., Schulz, T., Guldberg, K., Søfting, B., Eide, H., Thygesen, H., ... & Fuglerud, K. S. (2025). Lessons learned from two pilots using social robots with children with autism in a special education school in Norway. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93851-1_17
Trapero-González, I., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Martínez-Menéndez, A. (2024, December). Didactic impact of educational robotics on the development of STEM competence in primary education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1480908). Frontiers Media SA. |https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1480908
Turner, J. (2018). Robot rules: Regulating artificial intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96235-1
* Varsos, D. A., Dimitriou, G., & Zygouris, N. C. (2022). The implementation of the flipped classroom model in the teaching of educational robotics: A study in secondary school students. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766812
* Veselovská, M., & Mayerová, K. (2017a). Assessment of lower secondary school pupils’ work at educational robotics classes. International Conference EduRobotics 2016, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_13
* Veselovská, M., & Mayerová, K. (2017b). Programming constructs in curriculum for educational robotics at lower secondary school. International Conference EduRobotics 2016, 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_22
Vincent, J., Taipale, S., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., & Fortunati, L. (Eds.). (2015). Social robots from a human perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15672-9
Wang, F., & Cheung, A. C. (2025). Robots’ social behaviors for language learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 175-212. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216437
Westlund, O. (2015). News consumption in an age of mobile media: Patterns, people, place, and participation. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914563361
* Wu, C. H., Ahtinen, A., & Väänänen, K. (2024). Social robots as physical education instructors for primary school pupils: Exploration of child-robot interaction at a summer camp. International Conference on Social Robotics, 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3519-1_37
* Wu, Q., Wang, S., Cao, J., He, B., Yu, C., & Zheng, J. (2019). Object recognition-based second language learning educational robot system for Chinese preschool children. IEEE Access, 7, 7301–7312. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890438
Yılmaz, H. E., & Kara, M. (2023). Eğitimde robot kullanımının avantajları: Türkiye’de yapılan tez araştırmalarının yöntemleri ve bulguları üzerine bir inceleme. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(2), 115–129 https://doi.org/10.53694/bited.1378066
Xie, W., & Lu, J. (2025). Effects of early social robot-based ınterventions for social–emotional development in children with autism spectrum disorders and typically developing children: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2587245
* Yu, X., Garcia, M. A. G., & Soto-Varela, R. (2023). Are educational robots any good for communicative English learning for primary school students?. Texto Livre, 16, Article e41469. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.41469
Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Effects of educational robotics on the creativity and problem-solving skills of K-12 students: A meta-analysis. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1539-1557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3428366.
Zhang, Y., Luo, R., Zhu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2021). Educational robots improve K-12 students’ computational thinking and STEM attitudes: Systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1450-1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121994070
Zhou, Z. H. (2021). Machine learning. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3
* Ziouzios, D., Rammos, D., Bratitsis, T., & Dasygenis, M. (2021). Utilizing educational robotics for environmental empathy cultivation in primary schools. Electronics, 10(19), 2389. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192389

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Development of Science, Technology and Engineering Education and Programs

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Derya Bekiroğlu
0000-0002-5322-8290
Türkiye

Nur Ütkür Güllühan ^*
0000-0003-2062-5430
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 31, 2026

Submission Date

November 24, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 24, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 12 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU

APA

Bekiroğlu, D., & Ütkür Güllühan, N. (2026). Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 173-219. https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU

AMA

1.Bekiroğlu D, Ütkür Güllühan N. Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme. GJES. 2026;12(2):173-219. https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU

Chicago

Bekiroğlu, Derya, and Nur Ütkür Güllühan. 2026. “Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 12 (2): 173-219. https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU.

EndNote

Bekiroğlu D, Ütkür Güllühan N (July 1, 2026) Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 12 2 173–219.

IEEE

[1]D. Bekiroğlu and N. Ütkür Güllühan, “Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme”, GJES, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 173–219, July 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU

ISNAD

Bekiroğlu, Derya - Ütkür Güllühan, Nur. “Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 12/2 (July 1, 2026): 173-219. https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU.

JAMA

1.Bekiroğlu D, Ütkür Güllühan N. Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme. GJES. 2026;12:173–219.

MLA

Bekiroğlu, Derya, and Nur Ütkür Güllühan. “Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 2, July 2026, pp. 173-19, https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU.

Vancouver

1.Derya Bekiroğlu, Nur Ütkür Güllühan. Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme. GJES [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 1;12(2):173-219. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA75XU73LU

Eğitimde Sosyal Robotlar: PRISMA Yönergelerine Dayalı Sistematik Bir İnceleme

Abstract

Keywords

Social Robots in Education: A Systematic Review Based on PRISMA Guidelines

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite