BibTex RIS Cite

An Evaluation Related to the In service Training about Laboratory Usage

Year 2007, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 179 - 193, 01.03.2007

Abstract

In this study, following aspects related to the twenty-three Anatolian Teacher Training High School teachers were examined: How much they are familiar with the new teaching approaches and techniques, their views related to the laboratory usage and the cognitive level of the questions they prepared to test the understanding of the students. For the study, the case study method which is one of the descriptive investigation methods was used. The data were gained by examining the teachers\' level of familiarity with the new teaching approaches and techniques, Likert scales which reveal their views about the usage of laboratory and the questions related to the topic that the teachers choose to test the understanding of the students. With the in-service training, the study results proved that there occurred meaningful changes in teacher\'s views about the new teaching approaches and laboratory usage and in question levels which the teachers prepared tKimya öğretmenleri, hizmeti-içi eğitim kursu, laboratuvar kullanımı, öğretim yaklaşımları, soru hazırlamaChemistry teachers, in-service course, laboratory usage, instruction approaches, question preparation Tam Metin

References

  • Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi (2. Baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın.
  • Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Gunstone, R. & Loughran, J. (1999) Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), 27-31.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1. cognitive domain. London: Longmans.
  • Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom Questions, Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 6 (6), Eric Document reproduction no: ED 422407.
  • Colletta, E. & Chiapetta, A., (1989), Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (second edition). Merrill Publishing Company, Toronto, Canada.
  • Dori Y. J. & Herscovitz O. (2005). Case-based long-term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 14131446.
  • Garnett, P. J. & Garnett, P. J. (1995) Refocussing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-32.
  • Gay, L. R. (1981). Educational research: competences for analysis and application, 2nd ed, Upsaddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
  • Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J.,& Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655-675.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
  • Hofstein, A., Navon, A., Kipnis, M. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791806.
  • Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89, 140-165.
  • Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T. & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a longterm in-service training program on teachers' beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education, International Journal of Science Education, 26 309-328.
  • Ruba, P. A. (1985). Chemistry teachers' in-service needs. Journal of Chemical Education, 58, 430-431
  • Tekin, S., ve Ayas. A., (2002) Kimya Öğretmenlerinin Profesyonel Gelişim Süreçleri Ve Hizmet İçi Eğitime Bakış Açıları”, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
  • Wickman, P. (2004) The Practical epistemologies of the classroom: a study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325-344.
  • Wilkinson, J. W. & Ward, M. (1997). The purpose and perceived effectiveness of laboratory work in secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(2), 49-55.

Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2007, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 179 - 193, 01.03.2007

Abstract

Bu çalışmada; laboratuvar kullanımı hizmet-içi eğitim kursuna katılan 23 Anadolu Öğretmen Lisesi kimya öğretmeninin; yeni öğretim yaklaşımları ve tekniklerinden ne derece haberdar oldukları, laboratuvar kullanımıyla ilgili bakış açıları ve öğrencilerin anlama düzeyini ölçmek için hazırladıkları soruların bilişsel seviyeleri incelendi. Araştırma için betimsel araştırma metotlarından biri olan durum incelemesi metodu kullanıldı. Veriler, öğretmenlerin yeni öğretim yaklaşım ve tekniklerinden haberdarlık seviyelerini ve laboratuvarların kullanımına bakış açılarını ortaya koyan likert ölçekleri ile öğretmenlerin seçtikleri konuyla ilgili öğrencilerin anlama düzeylerini ölçmek için hazırladıkları soruların incelenmesinden elde edildi. Araştırma sonuçları, yapılan hizmet-içi eğitim kursuyla öğretmenlerinIn this study, following aspects related to the twenty-three Anatolian Teacher Training High School teachers were examined: How much they are familiar with the new teaching approaches and techniques, their views related to the laboratory usage and the cognitive level of the questions they prepared to test the understanding of the students. For the study, the case study method which is one of the descriptive investigation methods was used. The data were gained by examining the teachers\' level of familiarity with the new teaching approaches and techniques, Likert scales which reveal their views about the usage of laboratory and the questions related to the topic that the teachers choose to test the understanding of the students. With the in-service training, the study results proved that there occurred meaningful changes in teacher\'s views about the new teaching approaches and laboratory usage and in question levels which the teachers prepared tKimya öğretmenleri, hizmeti-içi eğitim kursu, laboratuvar kullanımı, öğretim yaklaşımları, soru hazırlamaChemistry teachers, in-service course, laboratory usage, instruction approaches, question preparation Tam Metin

References

  • Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi (2. Baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın.
  • Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Gunstone, R. & Loughran, J. (1999) Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), 27-31.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1. cognitive domain. London: Longmans.
  • Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom Questions, Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 6 (6), Eric Document reproduction no: ED 422407.
  • Colletta, E. & Chiapetta, A., (1989), Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (second edition). Merrill Publishing Company, Toronto, Canada.
  • Dori Y. J. & Herscovitz O. (2005). Case-based long-term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 14131446.
  • Garnett, P. J. & Garnett, P. J. (1995) Refocussing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-32.
  • Gay, L. R. (1981). Educational research: competences for analysis and application, 2nd ed, Upsaddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
  • Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J.,& Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655-675.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
  • Hofstein, A., Navon, A., Kipnis, M. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791806.
  • Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89, 140-165.
  • Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T. & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a longterm in-service training program on teachers' beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education, International Journal of Science Education, 26 309-328.
  • Ruba, P. A. (1985). Chemistry teachers' in-service needs. Journal of Chemical Education, 58, 430-431
  • Tekin, S., ve Ayas. A., (2002) Kimya Öğretmenlerinin Profesyonel Gelişim Süreçleri Ve Hizmet İçi Eğitime Bakış Açıları”, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
  • Wickman, P. (2004) The Practical epistemologies of the classroom: a study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325-344.
  • Wilkinson, J. W. & Ward, M. (1997). The purpose and perceived effectiveness of laboratory work in secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(2), 49-55.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hüseyin Akkuş This is me

Hakkı Kadayıfçı This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2007
Published in Issue Year 2007 Volume: 27 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Akkuş, H., & Kadayıfçı, H. (2007). Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 179-193.
AMA Akkuş H, Kadayıfçı H. Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme. GEFAD. March 2007;27(1):179-193.
Chicago Akkuş, Hüseyin, and Hakkı Kadayıfçı. “Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme”. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 27, no. 1 (March 2007): 179-93.
EndNote Akkuş H, Kadayıfçı H (March 1, 2007) Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 27 1 179–193.
IEEE H. Akkuş and H. Kadayıfçı, “Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme”, GEFAD, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 179–193, 2007.
ISNAD Akkuş, Hüseyin - Kadayıfçı, Hakkı. “Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme”. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 27/1 (March 2007), 179-193.
JAMA Akkuş H, Kadayıfçı H. Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme. GEFAD. 2007;27:179–193.
MLA Akkuş, Hüseyin and Hakkı Kadayıfçı. “Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme”. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 27, no. 1, 2007, pp. 179-93.
Vancouver Akkuş H, Kadayıfçı H. Laboratuvar Kullanımı Konulu Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme. GEFAD. 2007;27(1):179-93.