Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE DYNAMICS OF ENGLISH PHONETICS: A CROSS-TEMPORAL SYNERGETIC ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL CHANGES

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 775 - 795, 24.09.2024

Abstract

The dynamic nature of English phonetic and phonological systems presents a fertile area for research, particularly when examined within the context of cross-temporal changes and synergetic theory. This study conducts a thorough investigation of the phonetic and phonological developments in English language by covering periods from historical to contemporary times and utilizing a synergetic approach to dissect the intricacies of linguistic evolution. In the study a mixed-methods research design was employed by integrating quantitative analysis of phonetic data with qualitative insights from phonological theory. The historical phonetic data were extracted from archival recordings and written texts, while the contemporary data were sourced from linguistic corpora such as the International Corpus of English (ICE) and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Acoustic analysis, involving vowel formants, consonant voicing, and prosodic patterns, was performed using Praat software, and phonological analysis was guided by Optimality Theory. In this sense, statistical modeling techniques were applied to identify patterns and trends. By tracing the development of English phonetics from Old English to the modern era, this study highlights significant shifts influenced by social change, technological innovation, and linguistic contact with other languages. The application of synergetics provides a novel framework for understanding these changes, focusing on the interaction of individual linguistic elements and their collective impact. The study further offers insights into the mechanisms driving phonological evolution and discusses implications for linguistic theory, language teaching, and future research.

References

  • Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press.
  • Boersma, P., & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), 45-86.
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
  • Brown, K. (2021). Language Acquisition in Children. Boston: Publisher.
  • Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford University Press.
  • Bybee, J. (2015). Language Change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2006). Effects of region of origin and geographic mobility on perceptual dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 18, 193-221.
  • Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Davies, M. (2015). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–present). Retrieved from https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
  • DeLacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Language Learning.
  • Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Blackwell.
  • Eckert, P. (2012). Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87-100.
  • Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag.
  • Harding, L. (2017). Accent and listening assessment: A study of the impact of accent on and construct validity of the IELTS listening test. IELTS Research Reports.
  • Honeybone, P. (2005). Diachronic Evidence in Segmental Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Specifications. In Phonology in Context, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 177-199. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hyman, L. M. (2013). Universals in Phonology. The Linguistic Review, 30(1), 83-137.
  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, K., & Thompson, C. (2019). Digital Communication and the Evolution of English Phonological Patterns. Language and Technology Journal, 22(4), 45-65.
  • Kendall, T. (2013). Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Blackwell.
  • Labov, W. (2001). The Anatomy of Sociolinguistic Change. Language, 77(3), 669-683.
  • Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2015). A Course in Phonetics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Lass, R. (1994). Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge University Press.
  • Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Milroy, J. (1992). Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Blackwell. Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1999). Social Network and Social Class: Toward an Integrated Sociolinguistic Model. Language in Society, 28(1), 1-26.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, eds. Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 137-157. John Benjamins.
  • Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Smith, L., & Charles, M. (2018). Globalization and Phonetic Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of Linguistics, 40(2), 157-176.
  • Smith, N., & Leech, G. (2012). The English Language: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tagliamonte, S. A., & D'Arcy, A. (2009). Peering into the future: Verbal -s in the Ontario dialect. Language Variation and Change, 21(3), 335–355.
  • Trudgill, P. (2010). Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact. Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, R. J. (2011). Language Myths and the History of English. Oxford University Press.

İNGİLİZCE FONETİK DİNAMİKLERİ: İNGİLİZCE’DEKİ FONETİK VE FONOLOJİK DEĞİŞİMLERİN ZAMANSAL VE SİNERJETİK ANALİZİ

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 775 - 795, 24.09.2024

Abstract

İngilizce fonetik ve fonolojik sistemlerinin dinamik doğası, özellikle zamansal değişimler ve sinerjetik teori bağlamında incelendiğinde verimli bir araştırma alanı sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, tarihsel dönemlerden modern zamanlara kadar İngilizce'nin fonetik ve fonolojik gelişimlerini kapsamlı bir şekilde incelemekte ve dil evrimindeki ayrıntıları çözümlemek için sinerjetik bir yaklaşım kullanmaktadır. Çalışmada, nicel fonetik verilerin analizi ile nitel fonolojik teoriden elde edilen verilerin birleştirildiği karma yöntemli bir araştırma tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Tarihsel fonetik veriler arşiv kayıtlarından ve yazılı metinlerden elde edilirken, modern döneme ilişkin veriler Uluslararası İngilizce Korpus'u (ICE) ve Çağdaş Amerikan İngilizcesi Korpus'u (COCA) gibi dilsel korpuslardan temin edilmiştir. Ünlü formantları, ünsüz seslendirmesi ve prosodik kalıpları içeren akustik analiz, Praat yazılımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiş ve fonolojik analizde Optimalite Teorisi’nden yararlanılmıştır. Bu amaçla, gerekli desenlerin ve eğilimlerin belirlenmesi için istatistiksel modelleme teknikleri uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada, Eski İngilizce'den modern döneme kadar İngilizce fonetiğinin gelişimi takip edilerek, sosyal değişim, teknolojik yenilikler ve diğer dillerle dilsel temasın etkilediği önemli değişimler ele alınmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, sinerjetik yaklaşım, bireysel dil unsurlarının etkileşimi ve toplu etkilerine odaklanarak bu değişimleri anlamada yenilikçi bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Çalışmada ayrıca fonolojik değişimi yönlendiren mekanizmalar hakkında görüşler sunulmakta ve dilbilim kuramı, dil öğretimi ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için önemli çıkarımlar üzerinde durulmaktadır.

References

  • Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press.
  • Boersma, P., & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), 45-86.
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
  • Brown, K. (2021). Language Acquisition in Children. Boston: Publisher.
  • Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford University Press.
  • Bybee, J. (2015). Language Change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2006). Effects of region of origin and geographic mobility on perceptual dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 18, 193-221.
  • Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Davies, M. (2015). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–present). Retrieved from https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
  • DeLacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Language Learning.
  • Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Blackwell.
  • Eckert, P. (2012). Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87-100.
  • Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag.
  • Harding, L. (2017). Accent and listening assessment: A study of the impact of accent on and construct validity of the IELTS listening test. IELTS Research Reports.
  • Honeybone, P. (2005). Diachronic Evidence in Segmental Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Specifications. In Phonology in Context, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 177-199. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hyman, L. M. (2013). Universals in Phonology. The Linguistic Review, 30(1), 83-137.
  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, K., & Thompson, C. (2019). Digital Communication and the Evolution of English Phonological Patterns. Language and Technology Journal, 22(4), 45-65.
  • Kendall, T. (2013). Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Blackwell.
  • Labov, W. (2001). The Anatomy of Sociolinguistic Change. Language, 77(3), 669-683.
  • Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2015). A Course in Phonetics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Lass, R. (1994). Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge University Press.
  • Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Milroy, J. (1992). Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Blackwell. Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1999). Social Network and Social Class: Toward an Integrated Sociolinguistic Model. Language in Society, 28(1), 1-26.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, eds. Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 137-157. John Benjamins.
  • Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Smith, L., & Charles, M. (2018). Globalization and Phonetic Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of Linguistics, 40(2), 157-176.
  • Smith, N., & Leech, G. (2012). The English Language: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tagliamonte, S. A., & D'Arcy, A. (2009). Peering into the future: Verbal -s in the Ontario dialect. Language Variation and Change, 21(3), 335–355.
  • Trudgill, P. (2010). Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact. Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, R. J. (2011). Language Myths and the History of English. Oxford University Press.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Linguistic Structures (Incl. Phonology, Morphology and Syntax), Phonetics and Speech Science
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Sinan Özyurt 0000-0002-9366-9322

Early Pub Date September 21, 2024
Publication Date September 24, 2024
Submission Date August 31, 2024
Acceptance Date September 17, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 5 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Özyurt, S. (2024). İNGİLİZCE FONETİK DİNAMİKLERİ: İNGİLİZCE’DEKİ FONETİK VE FONOLOJİK DEĞİŞİMLERİN ZAMANSAL VE SİNERJETİK ANALİZİ. Genç Mütefekkirler Dergisi, 5(3), 775-795.

       28263       31751    27502      30620         27067    19954             1997821702 21727 28414


3113431441           3144031449 31491 31584    31698  31704   32026