Volume: 5 Issue: 1

It is a scientific, peer-reviewed e-journal that aims to develop scientific and scientific publishing that is constantly evolving. It aims to increase the quality of publication of scientific studies, to contribute to their recognition and to increase the reputation of publications in national and international scientific circles.

Our journal is an academic refereed e-journal open to national participation.

Our journal is an academic refereed e-journal published in order to deal with original and qualified studies in the fields of Social Religion, Language, Philosophy, Behavior, Literature and Literary Reviews with a scientific approach. Our journal is published regularly twice a year, in JUNE and DECEMBER. If deemed necessary, special issue(s) are also published.

Journal of Young Intellectuals includes original, factual or review articles that bring innovation to the field in all modern dialects of Turkish and English, Arabic and Persian languages. In the articles published in our journal, research and publication ethical rules are followed.

TheJournal of Young Intellectuals the full texts of the papers presented vb.de domestic or international academic conferences, symposiums, workshops provided that they have not been published elsewhere.

Referee certificates are given to our professors who are referees in our journal.

Writing Rules

1. Young Thinkers Journal is a scientific refereed journal and is published twice a year, in June and December.

2. The Editorial Board is the only authorized body that decides whether the articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. Editors are considered natural members of the Editorial Board.

3. The publication language of the journal is Turkish, Arabic, English and Persian. The decision to publish articles in other languages belongs to the Editorial Board.

4. Manuscripts submitted to the journal for publication are evaluated by at least two referees. Blind referee system is applied in the journal.

5. The Evaluation Reports of the Referee and the Editorial Board must be kept confidential for 5 years in an open manner.

6. Manuscripts submitted to the journal for publication are at least 150; It should contain a maximum of 200 words of Turkish and English titles and abstracts. Manuscripts should contain appropriate keywords (Key Words) in Turkish and English that describe the subject.

7. The references used in the manuscripts should be given as a list of references at the end of the article.

8. In the article, the author's name, title, institution and contact information should be clearly stated. All legal responsibility for the ideas in the manuscripts belongs to the author.

9. Manuscripts should not exceed 15000 words, 1.15 lines are spaced on one side of A4 paper; the main text of the font Palatino Linotype is 11 points, the footnotes are the Palatino Linotype is 8 (eight) or 9 (nine) points; The margins should be left so that the left is 3 cm, the top is 3 cm, the bottom is 3 cm and the right is 3 cm.

10. Subtitles of the manuscripts should be written in 12 font size and left-aligned.

11. If there is a graphic or image in the manuscript, it should be sent in jpeg format as a maximum size of 10x20 and as a separate file.

12. Journal of Young Intellectuals, Young Thinkers Journal also includes academic activities, interviews, book and article evaluations and criticism articles, with a maximum of 600 to 6000 words.

13. The journal also includes translated articles. Imprint information such as the author, date, where it was published, volume, number and page of the article to be translated must be fully stated and if it is not covered by copyright protection, publication permission must be obtained.

14. All rights of the published articles belong to Genç Mütefekkirler Dergisi. It can be cited provided that the source is shown.

15. The articles published in our journal are scanned in the plagiarism (turnitin) program. Articles with a similar rate not exceeding 20% are published.

16. APA in-text footnote system is used in the articles published in our journal. You can examine the examples below.

BOOKS

1. Single Author Book

Rule in the bibliography Surname of the author, Author's name and name of the work, place of publication and year.

Abdulbaki, Muhammad Fuad, Mu'jamu'l-Mufahras li Elfazi'l-Qur'ani'l-Karim, Daru al-Hadith, Cairo 1945.

Example in Text: (Abdulbaki: 1945, 67).

Maturidi, Abu Mansur Muhammad b. Mahmud, Ta'vilat-i Ahli's-Sunnah, Daru al-Qutbu'l-Ilmiyya, Lebanon, 2005.

Example in Text: (Maturidî: 2005, VI, 67).

2. Book with Two Authors

Sarıçam, İbrahim – Erşahin, Seyfettin, History of Islamic Civilization, TDV Yay., Ankara 2019.

In Text: (Sarıçam-Erşahin: 2019, 54).

3. Books with More Than Two Authors

Karaman et al., Hayrettin, Qur'an Yolu Türkçe Meal ve Tafsir, DİB Yayınları, Ankara 2012.

Inside the Text: (Karaman et al.: 2012, III, 45).

ARTICLES

1. Single Author Article in Periodicals

Yılmaz, Musa Kazım, "Etiquette Highlighted by Surat Hujurat", Harran Univ. Journal of Divinity Faculty, (38), 2017, 1-30.

In Text: (Yılmaz: 2017, 35.)

SCIENTIFIC MEETING AND SYMPOSIUM

Temel, Ahmet Vefa, "Islam's View of Irritability", International Symposium on Misperceptions and True Islam, Şanlıurfa 2016, 68-95.

In-text: (Baseline: 2016, 80)

ENCYCLOPEDIA
Ögüt, Salim, "İhram", DİA, TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul 2000.

Example in Text (Öğüt: 2000, IV, 70)

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

In addition to complying with the writing rules of the articles to be published in the In addition to complying with the writing rules of the articles to be published in the Young Thinkers Journal, it should have an academic, simple and integrative language for society. Articles with divisive and marginalizing language are not accepted. In the studies published in our journal, compliance with national and international ethical rules and research and publication ethics is required.

AUTHORS

The following mandatory documents must be uploaded for the ethics committee documents such as surveys, interviews, etc. conducted in the field of Social Sciences.

1. It is mandatory to take data from individuals for studies/articles where data needs to be collected using scales, surveys, interviews and other data collection tools.

2. The author must have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the university to which he is affiliated.

3. In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (board name, date and number no) should be included in the method section and also on the first / last page of the article.

4. In case reports, it is necessary to include information in the article that the informed voluntary consent / consent form has been signed.

IN ADDITION;

It is the author's responsibility that the submitted article is of a quality that will contribute to academic fields.
The studies should be original and based on research.
The article should not be sent to different journals at the same time.
It should be ensured that the other authors whose names will be written in the article contribute to the research. It is against scientific ethics to show people who do not have academic contributions as additional authors or to rank authors with non-scientific criteria such as title, age and gender, regardless of the order of contribution.
It is assumed that the authors who submit articles to the journal have read and accepted the publication and writing principles of the journal and the authors are deemed to have committed to what is expected of them in these principles.
Citations and bibliography should be complete.
Authors should take care to provide the documents and information requested by the editor in a timely manner during the processing process.
Authors should make the referee evaluations appropriately and in a timely manner and indicate through the system that the necessary changes have been made.
Authors should inform the editor of the deficiencies or erroneous situations they see in the evaluation processes in a timely manner.
Authors should read the writing, evaluation and publication rules of the journal well and act according to these criteria.
Authors should know that they do not have the right to sort and select numbers for their accepted publications. They should act knowing that they can only give an opinion to the editor for the order of publication or issue and that this opinion will be decided by the editorial board.
Care is taken to publish an article sent to the journal at the end of the process in which it is sent. However, in accordance with the decision of the editorial board, the decision on this issue belongs to the editorial board.
Authors should take into consideration the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive also specified by the Council of Higher Education.

EDITORS:

Editors will pay attention to the criteria requested by Ulakbim and determined below.

It should be constantly in search of innovations in order to improve the journal and manage the processes well.

In order for the authors to use the process well, they should declare the detailed necessary information visibly on the journal page.

The submitted work's Copyright Transfer Form and Similarity Report should check the Ethics Permit (if necessary).

Accept articles appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal.

Impact requires board approval; live experiments, surveys, interviews, etc. should check the permission dates of the Ethics committee.

The article should definitely be taken through the dergipark system. should not manage the article processes via mail.

Provide the necessary information and documents to the referees.

Should not use a derogatory style towards the Author and Referees.

Attention should be paid to the confidentiality of the referees.

It is not possible for the referee to share the study with another person or to include it in the evaluation process without the permission of the editor. The editor should control this process and intervene when necessary.

Check whether the author has previously published the study and, if so, whether he has explicitly declared this.

In order for the evaluation processes to run healthily, the system must be constantly checked.

When necessary, the referee should change.

The evaluation of the rejection or acceptance of an article should be determined according to the opinions of the referees.

The decision process of an article belongs entirely to the editor. Referee evaluations are effective elements in the decision-making process. it should have an academic, simple and integrative language for society. Articles with divisive and marginalizing language are not accepted. In the studies published in our journal, compliance with national and international ethical rules and research and publication ethics is required.

AUTHORS

The following mandatory documents must be uploaded for the ethics committee documents such as surveys, interviews, etc. conducted in the field of Social Sciences.

1. It is mandatory to take data from individuals for studies/articles where data needs to be collected using scales, surveys, interviews and other data collection tools.

2. The author must have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the university to which he is affiliated.

3. In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (board name, date and number no) should be included in the method section and also on the first / last page of the article.

4. In case reports, it is necessary to include information in the article that the informed voluntary consent / consent form has been signed.

IN ADDITION;

It is the author's responsibility that the submitted article is of a quality that will contribute to academic fields.
The studies should be original and based on research.
The article should not be sent to different journals at the same time.
It should be ensured that the other authors whose names will be written in the article contribute to the research. It is against scientific ethics to show people who do not have academic contributions as additional authors or to rank authors with non-scientific criteria such as title, age and gender, regardless of the order of contribution.
It is assumed that the authors who submit articles to the journal have read and accepted the publication and writing principles of the journal and the authors are deemed to have committed to what is expected of them in these principles.
Citations and bibliography should be complete.
Authors should take care to provide the documents and information requested by the editor in a timely manner during the processing process.
Authors should make the referee evaluations appropriately and in a timely manner and indicate through the system that the necessary changes have been made.
Authors should inform the editor of the deficiencies or erroneous situations they see in the evaluation processes in a timely manner.
Authors should read the writing, evaluation and publication rules of the journal well and act according to these criteria.
Authors should know that they do not have the right to sort and select numbers for their accepted publications. They should act knowing that they can only give an opinion to the editor for the order of publication or issue and that this opinion will be decided by the editorial board.
Care is taken to publish an article sent to the journal at the end of the process in which it is sent. However, in accordance with the decision of the editorial board, the decision on this issue belongs to the editorial board.
Authors should take into consideration the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive also specified by the Council of Higher Education.

EDITORS:

Editors will pay attention to the criteria requested by Ulakbim and determined below.

It should be constantly in search of innovations in order to improve the journal and manage the processes well.

In order for the authors to use the process well, they should declare the detailed necessary information visibly on the journal page.

The submitted work's Copyright Transfer Form and Similarity Report should check the Ethics Permit (if necessary).

Accept articles appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal.

Impact requires board approval; live experiments, surveys, interviews, etc. should check the permission dates of the Ethics committee.

The article should definitely be taken through the dergipark system. should not manage the article processes via mail.

Provide the necessary information and documents to the referees.

Should not use a derogatory style towards the Author and Referees.

Attention should be paid to the confidentiality of the referees.

It is not possible for the referee to share the study with another person or to include it in the evaluation process without the permission of the editor. The editor should control this process and intervene when necessary.

Check whether the author has previously published the study and, if so, whether he has explicitly declared this.

In order for the evaluation processes to run healthily, the system must be constantly checked.

When necessary, the referee should change.

The evaluation of the rejection or acceptance of an article should be determined according to the opinions of the referees.

The decision process of an article belongs entirely to the editor. Referee evaluations are effective elements in the decision-making process.