Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths of Mothers of Children with Intellectual Disabilities and Related Introductory Factors
Abstract
Objective: Children with intellectual disabilities are in the risk group in terms of sexual abuse compared to healthy peers. Mothers’ false beliefs about sexual abuse may cause the abuse or the abuser to be overlooked. This study aimed to determine the myths about childhood sexual abuse and related ıntroductory factors of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities.
Methods: The sample of the cross-sectional study consisted of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities (n=100) enrolled in two different special education institutions. Institutional permission, ethics approval, and written consent from the participants was obtained in the study. The data were collected with introductory characteristics data form and parent form of the childhood sexual abuse myths scale (CSAMS). Descriptive and non-parametric tests were used for data analyses.
Results: The mean CSAMS total score of the mothers of the children with intellectual disabilities was 33.75±11.92. There were statistically significant differences between mothers’ education level, family type, number of children, age, and CSAMS scores. There was no difference between the CSAMS scores of the mothers who received and did not receive training on childhood sexual abuse previously. Those who thought that they did not need information about protecting their children from sexual abuse had higher CSAMS scores.
Conclusion: It is recommended to plan and implement training and intervention studies by nurses to increase mothers in the risk group awareness of childhood sexual abuse myths.
Keywords
Intellectual Disabilities, belief, child, burse, sexual abuse
Supporting Institution
YOK
Project Number
YOK
References
- 1. Ferragut M, Ortiz-Tallo M, Blanca MJ. Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse in Spain: A Representative Sample Study. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP19358-NP19377. doi: 10.1177/08862605211042804.
- 2. Akbaş S, Turla A, Karabekiroğlu K, Pazvantoglu O, Keskin T, Böke Ö. Characteristics of sexual abuse in a sample of Turkish children with and without mental retardation, referred for legal appraisal of the psychological repercussions. Sex Disabil. 2009; 27:205. doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9139-7.
- 3. Kucuk S. Analyses of Child Sex Abuse Cases in Turkey: A Provincial Case. J Child Sex Abus. 2016 Apr;25(3):262-75. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2016.1153557.
- 4. Wissink IB, van Vugt E, Moonen X, Stams GJ, Hendriks J. Sexual abuse involving children with an intellectual disability (ID): a narrative review. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36:20-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.007.
- 5. Fang Z, Cerna-Turoff I, Zhang C, Lu M, Lachman JM, Barlow J. Global estimates of violence against children with disabilities: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 May;6(5):313-323. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00033-5.
- 6. Gökçe İmren S, Ayaz A, Yusufoğlu C, Rodopman Arman A. Clinical features and risk factors related with suicide attempts in sexually abused children and adolescents. Marmara Medical Journal 2015;26 (1): 11-16. doi.org/10.5472/MMJ.2012.02518.1.
- 7. Tutar Güven Ş, İşler A. Sex education and its ımportance in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2015;6(3):143-148.
- 8. Atbaşı Z. Determining how informed the mothers with mentally retarded children about preventing sexual abuse. INES Journal 2016;(8): 32-43.
- 9. Mendelson T, Letourneau EJ. Parent-Focused Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse. Prev Sci. 2015 Aug;16(6):844-52. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0553-z.
- 10. Walsh K, Brandon L. Their children's first educators: Parents' views about child sexual abuse prevention education. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2012;21(5): 734-746.