İYİ VE YANLIŞ HASAT SONRASI UYGULAMALARIN MARUL VE DOMATES TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE YAŞANAN KAYIPLAR ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Marul ve domateste hasat sonrası süreçlerdeki iyi ve yanlış uygulamalar, sonucu oluşan kayıpların miktarı reel tedarik zinciri koşullarında belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada ticari kayıpların yanı sıra, ürünlerin besin içerikleri ve mikrobiyolojik kalitesindeki değişimler de ölçülmüştür. Sonuçlar, marul ve domateste hasat sonrası süreçlerdeki iyi uygulamaların ağırlık kaybında, sırasıyla, üç ve dokuz kat azalmayla sonuçlandığını göstermiştir. Hasat sonrası süreçte, ürünün perakende-teşhiri ve nakliyesinin, kaliteyi etkileyen en kritik tedarik zinciri aşamaları olduğu belirlenmiştir. Hasat sonrası süreçte yapılan yanlış uygulamaların ürünlerin besin kalitesi üzerine etkisi ise ürüne ve bileşiğe bağlı olarak farklılıklar göstermiştir. Buna karşın, hasat sonrasındaki yanlış uygulamaların ürünlerin mikrobiyal kalitesini olumsuz etkilediği de belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, hâlihazırda bilinen hasat sonrası süreçlerdeki iyi uygulamaların, ürün tedarik zincirlerinde bütünsel bir bakış açısıyla kullanılması durumunda hasat sonrası kayıpların büyük ölçüde engellenebileceği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• gıda kayıpları
• Hasat sonrası
• soğuk zincir
• marul
• domates

EFFECT OF GOOD AND POOR POSTHARVEST HANDLING PRACTICES ON THE LOSSES IN LETTUCE AND TOMATO SUPPLY CHAINS

Abstract

The amount of losses caused by good (GHP) and poor (PHP) practices in the post-harvest processes of lettuce and tomato was determined under real supply chain conditions. Along with the commercial losses, changes in the nutritional and microbiological quality of crops were also quantified. The results showed that the weight loss of lettuce and tomato was reduced three and nine-fold, respectively by GHP during supply chains. The retail-display and transportation of the product in the postharvest process were determined to be the most critical supply chain stages affecting quality. The nutritional quality of crops exposed to PHP has shown differences by both crop and compound. The microbial quality of the produces, however, was adversely affected by the poor postharvest handling practices. In conclusion, still huge amounts of postharvest losses can be avoided if already known good postharvest handling practices are employed with a holistic perspective in produce supply chains.

Keywords

• food waste
• Postharvest
• cold chain
• lettuce
• tomato

References

1. Agüero MV, Ponce AG, Moreira MR, Roura SI. (2011). Lettuce quality loss under conditions that favor the wilting phenomenon. Postharvest Biol Technol, 59: 124–131, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.08.018
2. Bergquist SÅM, Gertsson UE, Olsson ME. (2005). Influence of growth stage and postharvest storage on ascorbic acid and carotenoid content and visual quality of baby spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). J Sci Food Agric, 86:346–355, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2373
3. Davies JN, Hobson GE, McGlasson WB. (1981). The constituents of tomato fruit — the influence of environment, nutrition, and genotype. C R C Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 15: 205–280, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398109527317
4. Dong H, Beer SV. (2000). Riboflavin induces disease resistance in plants by activating a novel signal transduction pathway. Phytopathology, 90: 801–811.
5. Falomir MP, Gozalbo D, Rico H. (2010). Coliform bacteria in fresh vegetables: from cultivated lands to consumers. Curr Res Technol Educ Top Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol, 2:1175–1181.
6. Geysen S, Escalona VH, Verlinden BE, Aertsen A, Geeraerd AH, Michiels CW, Van Impe JF, Nicolaï BM.(2006). Validation of predictive growth models describing superatmospheric oxygen effects on Pseudomonas fluorescens and Listeria innocua on fresh-cut lettuce. Int J Food Microbiol, 111: 48–58, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.044
7. Gogo EO, Opiyo AM, Ulrichs C, Huyskens-Keil S. (2017). Nutritional and economic postharvest loss analysis of African indigenous leafy vegetables along the supply chain in Kenya. Postharvest Biol Technol,130:39–47, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.04.007
8. Hodges RJ, Buzby JC, Bennett B. (2011). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J Agric Sci, 149:37–45, https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0021859610000936

9. Kader AA.(2005). Increasing food availability by reducing postharvest losses of fresh produce. Acta Hort, 2169–2176, https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.296
10. Kelly K, Madden R, Emond JP, do Nascimento Nunes MC.(2019). A novel approach to determine the impact level of each step along the supply chain on strawberry quality. Postharvest Biol Technol, 147:78–88, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.09.012
11. Kim MJ, Moon Y, Tou JC, Mou B, Waterland NL.(2016). Nutritional value, bioactive compounds and health benefits of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J Food Compos Anal, 49:19–34, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.03.004
12. Lebersorger S, Schneider F.(2014). Food loss rates at the food retail, influencing factors and reasons as a basis for waste prevention measures. Waste Manag, 34:1911–1919, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.013
13. Lee SK, Kader AA.(2000). Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol Technol, 20:207–220, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00133-2
14. Managa MG, Tinyani PP, Senyolo GM, Soundy P, Sultanbawa Y, Sivakumar D.(2018). Impact of transportation, storage, and retail shelf conditions on lettuce quality and phytonutrients losses in the supply chain. Food Sci Nutr, 6:1527–1536, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.685
15. Marsh KS, Hammig MD, Singer NS.(2001). Estimates of international transport losses of world food supply. J Int Food Agribus Mark, 12:69–84, https://doi.org/10.1300/J047v12n03_04
16. Marty I, Bureau S, Sarkissian G, Gouble B, Audergon JM, Albagnac G.(2005). Ethylene regulation of carotenoid accumulation and carotenogenic gene expression in colour-contrasted apricot varieties (Prunus armeniaca). J Exp Bot, 56:1877–1886, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri177
17. Mena C, Terry LA, Williams A, Ellram L.(2014). Causes of waste across multi-tier supply networks: Cases in the UK food sector. Int J Prod Econ, 152:144–158, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.012
18. Nunes MCN, Emond JP, Dea S, Yagiz Y.(2011). Distribution center and retail conditions affect the sensory and compositional quality of bulk and packaged slicing cucumbers. Postharvest Biol Technol, 59:280–288, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.10.004
19. Nunes MCN, Emond JP, Rauth M, Dea S, Chau K V. (2009). Environmental conditions encountered during typical consumer retail display affect fruit and vegetable quality and waste. Postharvest Biol Technol, 51:232–24, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.07.016
20. Oms-Oliu G, Hertog MLATM, Van de Poel B, Ampofo-Asiama J, Geeraerd AH, Nicolaï BM.(2011). Metabolic characterization of tomato fruit during preharvest development, ripening, and postharvest shelf-life. Postharvest Biol Technol, 62:7–16, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.010
21. Paull R.(1999). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on fresh commodity quality. Postharvest Biol Technol, 15:263–277, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00090-8
22. Rediers H, Claes M, Peeters L, Willems KA.(2009). Evaluation of the cold chain of fresh-cut endive from farmer to plate. Postharvest Biol Technol, 51:257–262, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.07.017
23. Saini RK, Shang XM, Ko EY, Choi JH, Keum YS.(2016). Stability of carotenoids and tocopherols in ready-to-eat baby-leaf lettuce and salad rocket during low-temperature storage. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 67:489–495, https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2016.1172059
24. Saltveit M.E.(2003). Temperature extremes, in: Postharvest Physiology and Pathology of Vegetables. Bartz, J.A., Brecht, J.K. (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 457–483.
25. Turkstat (2018). Population statistics by provinces [https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=1].
26. Vazquez-Salinas C, Lakshminarayana S.(2018). Compositional Changes in Mango Fruit During Ripening at Different Storage Temperatures. J Food Sci, 50:1646–1648, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10555.x
27. Watada AE.(1987). Vitamins C, B1, and B2 contents of stored fruits and vegetables as determined by high performance liquid chromatography. J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 112:794–797.
28. Wiley RC.(1994). Preservation methods for minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables, in: Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits & Vegetables, Wiley, R.C. (Ed.), Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 66–134.