Öz
The concept of "work" is an important part of daily life and enables human beings to sustain their lives, and forms the building blocks of the system created to meet the demands of developing technology and innovations. Numerous contracts are made between individuals in working life, whether in writing or not. These employment contracts contain certain commitments and obligations in terms of the employee and the employer. That is to say, business contracts, which have their own types, shows some differences in terms of obligation to fulfill some obligations. Identity confusion experienced in the sharing of responsibilities of the parties and the fulfillment of the legislative provisions, specific to contracts with the purpose of working, may constitute the root cause of occupational accidents. In order to prevent this situation by determining the party responsibilities, it is necessary to distinguish between employment contracts and other contracts with the purpose of working correctly. In this study, work contracts and service contracts are considered as contracts that can be associated with work accident. It is discussed in the doctrine that royalty contracts, which do not have a special regulation, are similar in nature to sub-contracting contracts among the types of contracts that aim to work in some cases. In the study, mainly, specific to the specified contract types, the phenomenon of occupational accident will be addressed on the basis of party responsibilities and work pressure, the connection between the work accident and the type of the contract will be examined, and the principles regarding the calculation of financial compensation resulting from the work accident will also be included. It was aimed to raise awareness, since no study was found on the subject in the literature review conducted within the scope of the relationship between the liability confusion arising from contract types and occupational accidents.