Research Article

The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets

Volume: 1 Number: 1 January 30, 2026
EN TR

The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamic impact of global geopolitical risks (GPR) on both green and conventional real estate markets through a comparative perspective. Utilizing daily data spanning from December 19, 2016, to December 9, 2025, the green real estate market is represented by the Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index, while the conventional market is proxied by the S&P Global REIT Index. Geopolitical risk is measured using the widely recognized index developed by Caldara and Iacoviello (2022). The methodological framework of the study employs the "Quantile-on-Quantile (QQ) Connectedness" approach developed by Gabauer and Stenfors (2024), which captures asymmetric interactions between markets. The empirical findings reveal that both real estate indices exhibit a pronounced quantile-dependent response to geopolitical risk. Specifically, connectedness intensifies during high geopolitical risk regimes, indicating that shock transmission strengthens and market co-movement increases during periods of stress. Furthermore, it is observed that green real estate assets exhibit higher sensitivity to geopolitical stress. This suggests that sustainability-oriented assets may become more vulnerable during periods of elevated uncertainty. In conclusion, geopolitical shocks induce asymmetric and regime-dependent spillovers in real estate markets. These results provide critical implications for effective risk management, strategic portfolio diversification, and the design of macro-prudential policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Abakah, E. J. A., Abdullah, M., Akinsomi, O., & Tiwari, A. K. (2025). Geopolitical risk and real estate stock crash. Finance Research Letters, 80, 107333.
  2. Agoraki, M. E. K., Kouretas, G. P., & Laopodis, N. T. (2022). Geopolitical risks, uncertainty, and stock market performance. Economic and Political Studies, 10(3), 253-265.
  3. Alsadan, A., Alalmaee, H., Zehri, C., & Ben Youssef, W. A. (2025). Geopolitical Shocks and Financial Fragmentation: Impacts on Housing, Bond, and Stock Markets. Review of Development Finance, 15(1), 69-96.
  4. Ando, T., Greenwood-Nimmo, M., & Shin, Y. (2022). Quantile connectedness: modeling tail behavior in the topology of financial networks. Management Science, 68(4), 2401-2431.
  5. Ayadi, E., & Ben Mbarek, N. (2025). The dynamic effects of economic uncertainties and geopolitical risks on Saudi stock market returns: Evidence from local projections. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 264.
  6. Balcilar, M., Bonato, M., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2018). Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS. Economic Systems, 42(2), 295-306.
  7. Barkham, R., & Holberton, R. (2017). The real world of real estate: How economics and geopolitics affect occupiers. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 6(3), 194-204.
  8. Bouras, C., Christou, C., Gupta, R., & Suleman, T. (2019). Geopolitical risks, returns, and volatility in emerging stock markets: Evidence from a panel GARCH model. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(8), 1841-1856.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Financial Markets and Institutions

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 30, 2026

Publication Date

January 30, 2026

Submission Date

December 14, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 31, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Doğan, M. (2026). The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ GAYRİMENKUL ÇALIŞMALARI DERGİSİ, 1(1), 50-63. https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS
AMA
1.Doğan M. The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets. AU_JRES. 2026;1(1):50-63. https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS
Chicago
Doğan, Mesut. 2026. “The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets”. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ GAYRİMENKUL ÇALIŞMALARI DERGİSİ 1 (1): 50-63. https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS.
EndNote
Doğan M (February 1, 2026) The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ GAYRİMENKUL ÇALIŞMALARI DERGİSİ 1 1 50–63.
IEEE
[1]M. Doğan, “The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets”, AU_JRES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–63, Feb. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS
ISNAD
Doğan, Mesut. “The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets”. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ GAYRİMENKUL ÇALIŞMALARI DERGİSİ 1/1 (February 1, 2026): 50-63. https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS.
JAMA
1.Doğan M. The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets. AU_JRES. 2026;1:50–63.
MLA
Doğan, Mesut. “The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets”. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ GAYRİMENKUL ÇALIŞMALARI DERGİSİ, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 50-63, https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS.
Vancouver
1.Mesut Doğan. The Asymmetric Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Green and Conventional Real Estate Markets. AU_JRES [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 1;1(1):50-63. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA54RY74WS