Research Article

Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions

Volume: 31 Number: 2 June 1, 2018
EN

Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions

Abstract

Optimum solution of an anticipated problem is generally reached through minimizing or maximizing a governing real function while sometimes should satisfy various predefined limitations. Selecting an algorithm as a main optimizer plays a key role on the solution process. In this respect, current study intends to compare the performances of two different common metaheuristic optimization algorithms as integrated particle swarm optimizer (iPSO) and teaching and learning based optimizer (TLBO). The TLBO is two-phase algorithm while the iPSO is a single-phase algorithm. Their capabilities are compared over some benchmark cases including mathematical functions and structural optimization problems. To increase the complexity of the test problems both size and topology specifications of the structural systems are simultaneously taken as the decision variables. Achieved results demonstrate the superiority of the iPSO in comparison with TLBO in both search capability and convergence rate.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Mortazavi, A. and Toğan, V., "Simultaneous size, shape, and topology optimization of truss structures using integrated particle swarm optimizer", Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54: 715-736, (2016).
  2. [2] Dede, T. and Togan, V., "A teaching learning based optimization for truss structures with frequency constraints", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 53: 833-845, (2015).
  3. [3] Mortazavi, A. and Togan, V., "Particle Swarm Optimizer integrated with fly-back mechanism and weighted particle for optimization of the truss structures", 11st International congress on advances in civil engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, (2014).
  4. [4] Miguel, L.F.F., Lopez, R.H. and Miguel, L.F.F., "Multimodal size, shape, and topology optimisation of truss structures using the Firefly algorithm", Advances in Engineering Software, 56: 23-37, (2013).
  5. [5] Sonmez, M., "Discrete optimum design of truss structures using artificial bee colony algorithm", Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43: 85-97, (2011).
  6. [6] Aydoğdu, İ., Akın, A. and Saka, M.P., "Design optimization of real world steel space frames using artificial bee colony algorithm with Levy flight distribution", Advances in Engineering Software, 92: 1-14, (2016).
  7. [7] Lamberti, L., "An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures", Computers & Structures, 86: 1936-1953, (2008).
  8. [8] Hasançebi, O., "Adaptive evolution strategies in structural optimization: Enhancing their computational performance with applications to large-scale structures", Computers & Structures, 86: 119-132, (2008).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ali Mortazavi
EGE UNIV
Türkiye

Vedat Toğan
KARADENIZ TEKNIK UNIV
Türkiye

Ayhan Nuhoğlu This is me
EGE UNIV

Publication Date

June 1, 2018

Submission Date

December 26, 2016

Acceptance Date

February 26, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 31 Number: 2

APA
Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V., & Nuhoğlu, A. (2018). Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science, 31(2), 416-435. https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN
AMA
1.Mortazavi A, Toğan V, Nuhoğlu A. Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018;31(2):416-435. https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN
Chicago
Mortazavi, Ali, Vedat Toğan, and Ayhan Nuhoğlu. 2018. “Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions”. Gazi University Journal of Science 31 (2): 416-35. https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN.
EndNote
Mortazavi A, Toğan V, Nuhoğlu A (June 1, 2018) Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science 31 2 416–435.
IEEE
[1]A. Mortazavi, V. Toğan, and A. Nuhoğlu, “Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 416–435, June 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN
ISNAD
Mortazavi, Ali - Toğan, Vedat - Nuhoğlu, Ayhan. “Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions”. Gazi University Journal of Science 31/2 (June 1, 2018): 416-435. https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN.
JAMA
1.Mortazavi A, Toğan V, Nuhoğlu A. Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018;31:416–435.
MLA
Mortazavi, Ali, et al. “Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 31, no. 2, June 2018, pp. 416-35, https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN.
Vancouver
1.Ali Mortazavi, Vedat Toğan, Ayhan Nuhoğlu. Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 1;31(2):416-35. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA85YH27FN