Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2011, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 329 - 339, 05.04.2011

Abstract

Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes

Year 2011, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 329 - 339, 05.04.2011

Abstract

Data sets collected from industrial processes may have both a particular type of trend and correlation among adjacent observations (autocorrelation). Existing statistical control charts may individually cope with autocorrelated or trending data. Applying the Shewhart, EWMA, CUSUM, or GMA charts to the uncorrelated residuals of an appropriate time series model for a process is a primary method to deal with autocorrelated process data. In the relevant literature, there exists no study that shows how these charts’ performances change by the addition of a particular type of trend in autocorrelated data. In the present paper, average run lengths of these charts are computed; first, for autocorrelated data which does not include an increasing linear trend, and second, for autocorrelated data which includes an increasing linear trend. It is assumed that stationary AR(1) model and trend stationary first order autoregressive (trend AR(1) for short) model, respectively, are suitable models for the test data. ARL performances are compared within the charts and among the charts. Comparisons are made for different magnitudes of the process mean shift and various levels of autocorrelation. 

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Industrial Engineering
Authors

Aslan Karaoglan

Gunhan Bayhan This is me

Publication Date April 5, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 24 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karaoglan, A., & Bayhan, G. (2011). Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes. Gazi University Journal of Science, 24(2), 329-339.
AMA Karaoglan A, Bayhan G. Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes. Gazi University Journal of Science. April 2011;24(2):329-339.
Chicago Karaoglan, Aslan, and Gunhan Bayhan. “Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes”. Gazi University Journal of Science 24, no. 2 (April 2011): 329-39.
EndNote Karaoglan A, Bayhan G (April 1, 2011) Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes. Gazi University Journal of Science 24 2 329–339.
IEEE A. Karaoglan and G. Bayhan, “Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 329–339, 2011.
ISNAD Karaoglan, Aslan - Bayhan, Gunhan. “Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes”. Gazi University Journal of Science 24/2 (April 2011), 329-339.
JAMA Karaoglan A, Bayhan G. Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2011;24:329–339.
MLA Karaoglan, Aslan and Gunhan Bayhan. “Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 24, no. 2, 2011, pp. 329-3.
Vancouver Karaoglan A, Bayhan G. Performance Comparison of Residual Control Charts for Trend Stationary First Order Autoregressive Processes. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2011;24(2):329-3.