Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ve Yenilikçiliğin Önünde Algıladıkları Engeller

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 363 - 371, 31.12.2019

Sibel Ceylan

Öz

Individual innovativeness feature is the
major key to successful innovation. An examination of situations perceived as
obstacles to innovativeness will help to establish an innovative culture  correctly and planned manner. The study was
conducted to determine innovativeness level and the obstacles to innovative
behavior of nursing students.  This was a
descriptive, cross-sectional study. 279 nursing students were included in the
study. The demographic form, Individual Innovativeness Scale, and the Barriers
to Innovativeness Questionnaire were used for data collection. The average
individual innovativeness score of the students was 63.53 ± 8.58, which is a
low level of innovativeness. The major barriers of the innovativeness were lack
of different lessons to support creativity, not planning adequate activities to
support innovation by educational institutions, and inability to reach current
information effectively due to lack of knowledge of the foreign language,
respectively. As a result of the study, the level of innovativeness of nursing
students was low and major barriers of innovativeness were about education. It
was suggested that the content of nursing education should be innovative,
creative, entrepreneurial, and use innovative teaching methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cross-sectional study, Innovative behaviour, Nursing education

Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students

Öz

Bireysel
yenilikçilik başarılı inovasyonun anahtarıdır. Yenilikçiliğe engel olarak
algılanan durumların incelenmesi, doğru ve planlı bir şekilde yenilikçi bir
kültür oluşturulmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Bu araştırma hemşirelik
öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik düzeylerini ve yenilikçi davranışlarının önündeki
engellerin belirlenmesi için yapılmıştır. Bu araştırma tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel
türdedir. Çalışmaya 279 hemşire öğrenci dahil edilmiştir. Verilerin
toplanmasında demografik form, Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği ve Yenilikçiliğin
Önündeki Engeller Anketi kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin ortalama bireysel
yenilikçilik puanı 63.53 ± 8.58 olup düşük yenilikçilik düzeyindedir.
Yenilikçiliğin önündeki en büyük engeller, yaratıcılığı desteklemek için farklı
derslerin olmaması, eğitim kurumları tarafından inovasyonu desteklemek için
yeterli faaliyetlerin planlanmaması ve sırasıyla yabancı dil bilgisinin
eksikliğinden dolayı mevcut bilgilere etkili bir şekilde ulaşılamaması olarak
belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucuna göre hemşirelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik
düzeyi düşük ve yenilikçiliğin önündeki başlıca engeller eğitim ile ilgiliydi. Hemşirelik
eğitimi içeriğinin yenilikçi, yaratıcı, girişimci olması ve yenilikçi öğretim
yöntemleri kullanması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hemşirelik eğitimi, Hemşirelik öğrencileri, Kesitsel çalışma

Kaynakça

• 1. Braak J. (2001). “Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141-157.
• 2. Goldsmith RE, Foxall GR. (2003). “The measurement of innovativeness”. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.). The international handbook of innovation. Elsevier Science.
• 3. Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. (1977). “Scales for the measurement of innovativeness”. Human Communication Research, 4, 58-65.
• 4. Rogers ME. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth Edition). New York: Free Press.
• 5. International Council of Nurses. (2009). “Delivering quality, serving communities: Nurses leading care innovations”. Geneva, Switzerland.
• 6. Weng RH, Chen WP, Huang CY, Hung CH, Hsu CT. (2016). “Can nurse innovation improve customer perception of service quality and experience?”. Journal of clinical nursing, 25(13-14), 1950-1961.
• 7. Huang CY, Weng RH, Lo YS. (2014). “Exploring the work performance of innovative nurses in hospitals: the views of nurses, nurse managers and customers”. Taiwan Journal of Public Health 33, 497-512.
• 8. Weng RH, Huang CY, Huang JA, Wang MH. (2012). “The cross‐level impact of patient safety climate on nursing innovation: a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey”. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(15‐16), 2262-2274.
• 9. Kalisch BJ, Begeny S. (2010). “Preparation of nursing students for change and innovation”. West J Nurs Res, 32(2), 157-167.
• 10. Kaya H, Işık B, Şenyuva E, Kaya N. (2012). “Nursing students’ individual and professional values”. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(1), 18-26.
• 11. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2013). “Exploring the perceived barriers to innovativeness: Views of Turkish pre-service teachers as technology leaders”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 246-265.
• 12. Lachman VD, Glasgow MES, Donnelly GF. (2009). “Teaching innovation”. Nursing administration quarterly, 33(3), 205-211.
• 13. Yamane T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
• 14. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2010). “Individual Innovativeness Scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38:150-164.
• 15. Bodur G. (2018). “The relationship between individual innovativeness and entrepreneurship tendency of nursing students”. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 5(2), 139- 148.
• 16. Ertuğ N, Kaya H. (2017). “Investigating the individual innovativeness profiles and barriers to innovativeness in undergraduate nursing students”. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 14(3), 192-198.
• 17. Korucu AG, Olpak YZ. (2015). “Examination of teacher candidates individual innovativeness properties from the different variables”. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 111-127.
• 18. Tung LV, Akkadechanunt T, Chontawan R. (2014). “Factors related to innovation behavior among nurses in tertiary general hospitals, the central region, the socialist republic of Vietnam”. Nursing Journal, 41(2), 117-132.
• 19. Kartal YA, Özsoy A, Üner K. (2018). “Determination of individual innovation profiles of midwifery students and factors affecting”. Int J Health Sci Res, 8(4), 104-109.
• 20. Özgür H. (2013). “Exploring of the relationship between critical thinking dispositions and individual innovativeness of ICT pre-service teachers in terms of various variables”. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 409-420.
• 21. Yeğin Hİ. (2017). “Individual innovativeness levels of divinity faculty students”. Abant İzzet Baysal University Graduate School of Social Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 4(17), 239-262.
• 22. Eröz SS. (2017). “The relationship between individual ınnovativeness and locus of control: A research on tourism faculty students”. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 5(1), 46-52.
• 23. Dobre C, Dragomir A, Preda G. (2009). “Consumer innovativeness: A marketing approach”. Management & Marketing, 4(2), 19-34.
• 24. Martín P, Potočnik K, Fras AB. (2017). “Determinants of students’ innovation in higher education”. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1229-1243.
• 25. Babalis T, Xanthakou Y, Kaila M, Stavrou N. (2012). “Research attitude and innovative-creative thinking: Differences between undergraduate male and female students”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1452-1461.
• 26. Kert SB, Tekdal M. (2012). “Comparison of individual innovativeness perception of students attending different education faculties”. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 1150-1161.
• 27. Karadağ A. (2002). “Nursing as a profession”. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 5(2), 1-8.
• 28. Zhiqing Z, Yijuan L, Bing S. (2011). “Analysis on innovative behaviors of nursing undergraduates”. Chinese Nursing Research, 30, 012.
• 29. Uluyol O. (2013). “Research of students’ entrepreneurship tendencies: Sample of Gölbaşi Vocational College”. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(6), 349-372.
• 30. Elçi Ş. (2006). “İnovasyon: kalkınmanın ve rekabetin anahtarı”. Genişletilmiş yeni baskı. Nova Yayınları..
• 31. Lin CL, Wang YN, Tsai HM. (2013). “Innovative thinking in nursing practice”. The Journal of Nursing, 60(2), 97-102.
• 32. Mcsherry R, Douglas M. (2011). “Innovation in nursing practice: a means to tackling the global challenges facing nurses, midwives and nurse leaders and managers in the future”. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(2), 165-169.
• 33. Internet Word Stats. (2017). Top ten languages used in the web. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm