Yıl 2019, Cilt 8 , Sayı 4, Sayfalar 363 - 371 2019-12-31

Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students
Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ve Yenilikçiliğin Önünde Algıladıkları Engeller

Sibel CEYLAN [1]


Bireysel yenilikçilik başarılı inovasyonun anahtarıdır. Yenilikçiliğe engel olarak algılanan durumların incelenmesi, doğru ve planlı bir şekilde yenilikçi bir kültür oluşturulmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Bu araştırma hemşirelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik düzeylerini ve yenilikçi davranışlarının önündeki engellerin belirlenmesi için yapılmıştır. Bu araştırma tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel türdedir. Çalışmaya 279 hemşire öğrenci dahil edilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında demografik form, Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği ve Yenilikçiliğin Önündeki Engeller Anketi kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin ortalama bireysel yenilikçilik puanı 63.53 ± 8.58 olup düşük yenilikçilik düzeyindedir. Yenilikçiliğin önündeki en büyük engeller, yaratıcılığı desteklemek için farklı derslerin olmaması, eğitim kurumları tarafından inovasyonu desteklemek için yeterli faaliyetlerin planlanmaması ve sırasıyla yabancı dil bilgisinin eksikliğinden dolayı mevcut bilgilere etkili bir şekilde ulaşılamaması olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucuna göre hemşirelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik düzeyi düşük ve yenilikçiliğin önündeki başlıca engeller eğitim ile ilgiliydi. Hemşirelik eğitimi içeriğinin yenilikçi, yaratıcı, girişimci olması ve yenilikçi öğretim yöntemleri kullanması önerilmektedir.

Individual innovativeness feature is the major key to successful innovation. An examination of situations perceived as obstacles to innovativeness will help to establish an innovative culture  correctly and planned manner. The study was conducted to determine innovativeness level and the obstacles to innovative behavior of nursing students.  This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. 279 nursing students were included in the study. The demographic form, Individual Innovativeness Scale, and the Barriers to Innovativeness Questionnaire were used for data collection. The average individual innovativeness score of the students was 63.53 ± 8.58, which is a low level of innovativeness. The major barriers of the innovativeness were lack of different lessons to support creativity, not planning adequate activities to support innovation by educational institutions, and inability to reach current information effectively due to lack of knowledge of the foreign language, respectively. As a result of the study, the level of innovativeness of nursing students was low and major barriers of innovativeness were about education. It was suggested that the content of nursing education should be innovative, creative, entrepreneurial, and use innovative teaching methods.

  • 1. Braak J. (2001). “Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141-157.
  • 2. Goldsmith RE, Foxall GR. (2003). “The measurement of innovativeness”. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.). The international handbook of innovation. Elsevier Science.
  • 3. Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. (1977). “Scales for the measurement of innovativeness”. Human Communication Research, 4, 58-65.
  • 4. Rogers ME. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth Edition). New York: Free Press.
  • 5. International Council of Nurses. (2009). “Delivering quality, serving communities: Nurses leading care innovations”. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 6. Weng RH, Chen WP, Huang CY, Hung CH, Hsu CT. (2016). “Can nurse innovation improve customer perception of service quality and experience?”. Journal of clinical nursing, 25(13-14), 1950-1961.
  • 7. Huang CY, Weng RH, Lo YS. (2014). “Exploring the work performance of innovative nurses in hospitals: the views of nurses, nurse managers and customers”. Taiwan Journal of Public Health 33, 497-512.
  • 8. Weng RH, Huang CY, Huang JA, Wang MH. (2012). “The cross‐level impact of patient safety climate on nursing innovation: a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey”. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(15‐16), 2262-2274.
  • 9. Kalisch BJ, Begeny S. (2010). “Preparation of nursing students for change and innovation”. West J Nurs Res, 32(2), 157-167.
  • 10. Kaya H, Işık B, Şenyuva E, Kaya N. (2012). “Nursing students’ individual and professional values”. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(1), 18-26.
  • 11. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2013). “Exploring the perceived barriers to innovativeness: Views of Turkish pre-service teachers as technology leaders”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 246-265.
  • 12. Lachman VD, Glasgow MES, Donnelly GF. (2009). “Teaching innovation”. Nursing administration quarterly, 33(3), 205-211.
  • 13. Yamane T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
  • 14. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2010). “Individual Innovativeness Scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38:150-164.
  • 15. Bodur G. (2018). “The relationship between individual innovativeness and entrepreneurship tendency of nursing students”. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 5(2), 139- 148.
  • 16. Ertuğ N, Kaya H. (2017). “Investigating the individual innovativeness profiles and barriers to innovativeness in undergraduate nursing students”. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 14(3), 192-198.
  • 17. Korucu AG, Olpak YZ. (2015). “Examination of teacher candidates individual innovativeness properties from the different variables”. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 111-127.
  • 18. Tung LV, Akkadechanunt T, Chontawan R. (2014). “Factors related to innovation behavior among nurses in tertiary general hospitals, the central region, the socialist republic of Vietnam”. Nursing Journal, 41(2), 117-132.
  • 19. Kartal YA, Özsoy A, Üner K. (2018). “Determination of individual innovation profiles of midwifery students and factors affecting”. Int J Health Sci Res, 8(4), 104-109.
  • 20. Özgür H. (2013). “Exploring of the relationship between critical thinking dispositions and individual innovativeness of ICT pre-service teachers in terms of various variables”. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 409-420.
  • 21. Yeğin Hİ. (2017). “Individual innovativeness levels of divinity faculty students”. Abant İzzet Baysal University Graduate School of Social Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 4(17), 239-262.
  • 22. Eröz SS. (2017). “The relationship between individual ınnovativeness and locus of control: A research on tourism faculty students”. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 5(1), 46-52.
  • 23. Dobre C, Dragomir A, Preda G. (2009). “Consumer innovativeness: A marketing approach”. Management & Marketing, 4(2), 19-34.
  • 24. Martín P, Potočnik K, Fras AB. (2017). “Determinants of students’ innovation in higher education”. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1229-1243.
  • 25. Babalis T, Xanthakou Y, Kaila M, Stavrou N. (2012). “Research attitude and innovative-creative thinking: Differences between undergraduate male and female students”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1452-1461.
  • 26. Kert SB, Tekdal M. (2012). “Comparison of individual innovativeness perception of students attending different education faculties”. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 1150-1161.
  • 27. Karadağ A. (2002). “Nursing as a profession”. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 5(2), 1-8.
  • 28. Zhiqing Z, Yijuan L, Bing S. (2011). “Analysis on innovative behaviors of nursing undergraduates”. Chinese Nursing Research, 30, 012.
  • 29. Uluyol O. (2013). “Research of students’ entrepreneurship tendencies: Sample of Gölbaşi Vocational College”. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(6), 349-372.
  • 30. Elçi Ş. (2006). “İnovasyon: kalkınmanın ve rekabetin anahtarı”. Genişletilmiş yeni baskı. Nova Yayınları..
  • 31. Lin CL, Wang YN, Tsai HM. (2013). “Innovative thinking in nursing practice”. The Journal of Nursing, 60(2), 97-102.
  • 32. Mcsherry R, Douglas M. (2011). “Innovation in nursing practice: a means to tackling the global challenges facing nurses, midwives and nurse leaders and managers in the future”. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(2), 165-169.
  • 33. Internet Word Stats. (2017). Top ten languages used in the web. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0001-6672-1749
Yazar: Sibel CEYLAN (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 31 Aralık 2019

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { gumussagbil565619, journal = {Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2146-9954}, address = {}, publisher = {Gümüşhane Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {8}, pages = {363 - 371}, doi = {}, title = {Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students}, key = {cite}, author = {CEYLAN, Sibel} }
APA CEYLAN, S . (2019). Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , 8 (4) , 363-371 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gumussagbil/issue/50658/565619
MLA CEYLAN, S . "Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students". Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 8 (2019 ): 363-371 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gumussagbil/issue/50658/565619>
Chicago CEYLAN, S . "Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students". Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 8 (2019 ): 363-371
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students AU - Sibel CEYLAN Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - DO - T2 - Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 363 EP - 371 VL - 8 IS - 4 SN - -2146-9954 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students %A Sibel CEYLAN %T Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students %D 2019 %J Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi %P -2146-9954 %V 8 %N 4 %R %U
ISNAD CEYLAN, Sibel . "Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students". Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 8 / 4 (Aralık 2020): 363-371 .
AMA CEYLAN S . Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 8(4): 363-371.
Vancouver CEYLAN S . Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 8(4): 371-363.