Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yerel Halkın Kruvaziyer Turizmi Farkındalığına Yönelik Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma: Bodrum Örneği

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 151 - 169, 31.12.2017

Şeyma Bayazıt

Öz

Bu çalışmada, yerel halkın kruvaziyer turizmine yönelik farkındalık düzeyinin uygulamalı bir çalışma ile Bodrum varış noktası örneğinde incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, 2017 yılında Bodrum’da gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, saha gözlemleri ve anket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Anket 316 kişilik bir örneklem kitlesi ile yüz-yüze görüşülerek gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin, SPSS paket programından yararlanılarak, betimsel ve çıkarımsal istatistik analizleri yapılmıştır. Bilgi ve farkındalık değişkenlerinin ikili çapraz tablo testi, kruvaziyer gemi seyahati deneyimi olmayan katılımcıların %84’ünün liman yerinin nerede olduğunu bilmediğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, katılımcıların %96’sı turizmin gelişimine olumlu yaklaşırken, sadece %13’ü kruvaziyer turizmini yerelde geliştirilmesi gereken bir turizm çeşidi olarak belirtmiştir. Bulgulara bakılarak Bodrum yerelinde kruvaziyer turizmine yönelik farkındalık düzeyinin zayıf olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, yerel ölçekte kruvaziyer turizmi faaliyetlerini geliştirme ve destinasyonun kruvaziyer turizminden daha fazla pay almasına yönelik politikalar belirleyecek olan sektörel ya da akademik nitelikteki yönetici ve planlayıcılara ileriki çalışmaları için farklı bakış açısı sunma konusunda öneriler getirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kruvaziyer Turizmi Yerel Farkındalık Bodrum

Kaynakça

  • Brida J. G. ve Zapata S. (2009). Cruise tourism: Economic, socio-cultural and environmental impacts. International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing, 1(3), 205-226.
  • Brida J. G., Chiappa G. D., Meleddu M. ve Pulina M. (2012). A comparison of residents' perceptions in two cruise ports in the Mediterranean Sea. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(2), 180-190.
  • Butt N. (2007). The impact of cruise ship generated waste on home ports and ports of call, A study of Southampton. Marine Policy, 31, 591-598.
  • Chase G. ve Alon I. (2011). Evaluating the economic impact of cruise tourism: A case study of Barbados. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 131, 5-18.
  • Cruise Lines International Association Europe, (CLIA-EU) (2015). Report on Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Economies of Europe.
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (CLIA) (2015). Annual Report on Global Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (2016). Report on Statistics and Market in Europe.
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (2016). Report 2017: Cruise Industry Outlook.
  • Dwyer L. ve Forsyth P. (1998). Economic significance of cruise tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 25, 393-415.
  • Dwyer L., Douglas N. ve Livaic Z., (2004). Estimating the economic contribution of a cruise ship visit. Tourism in Marine Environments, 1, 4-12.
  • Field A. (2000). Discovering Statistical Using SPSS for Windows. New Delphi, London: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication.
  • George D. ve Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gibson P. ve Bentley M (2005). A Study of impacts cruise tourism and the south West of England. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 20, 3-4.
  • Gibson P. (2008). Cruising in the 21st century: Who works while others play? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 42-52.
  • Global Ports Holding. Port Statistics. [URL: http://www.globalports.com.tr/ports.php?pID=6]. (Erişim tarihi: 15 Kasım 2017).
  • Guerrero J. I. F., Selva L. M ve Mediana R. P., (2008). Economic impact of Western Mediterranean leisure ports. International Journal of Transport Economic, 35, 251-272.
  • Harril R. (2004). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: A literature review with implications for tourism planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(3).
  • IREA - Regional Quantitative Analysis Research Group (2016). Working paper on the economic impact of cruise activity: The Port of Barcelona. Research Institute of Applied Economics, 13, 30.
  • Jaakson R. (2004). Beyond the tourist bubble? Cruise ship passengers in port. Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 246-250.
  • Johnson D. (2002). Environmentally sustainable cruise tourism. Marine Policy, 26(1), 261-270.
  • Klein R. A. (2007). The politics of environmental activism: A case study of the cruise industry and the environmental movement. Social Research Online. 12. (URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/2/klein.html, erişim tarihi: 10.03.2015).
  • Mackay Y. C. ve Kerstetter D. (2005). An exploration of cruise ship space, group tour behavior, and social interaction. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4).
  • Lekakau M. B. ve Vaggelas G. K. (2011). The Economic Impact of Cruise Local Economies. The Case Of Island. Athens Tourism Conference, 2-3 February 2011, Athens, Greece.
  • Long V. ve Wall G. (1996). Successful tourism in Nusa Lembongan, Indonesia? Tourism Management, 17 (1), 43-50.
  • Marti B.E. (2003). Trends in the world and extended-length cruising (1985-2002). Marine Policy, 28, 199–211.
  • Massimo C. ve Eleonora G. G. (2012). The Ambivalent Zone Between Sea and City – A New Approach to Collective Spaces Based on Maritime Identity of The Cities by the Sea. Urban Cultures Conference 6-7 Aralık 2012, Lizbon.
  • Perucic D. ve Puh B. (2012). Attitudes of citizen of Dubrovnik towards the impact of cruise tourism on Dubrovnik. Tourism And Hospitality Management, 182, 213-228.
  • Pratt S. ve Blake A. (2009). The economic impact of Hawaii's cruise industry. Tourism Analysis, 14(3), 337-351.
  • Radley B., Braun B., James A., Xander ve Kenneth R. W. (2002). The impact of the cruise industry on a region's economy: A case study of Port Canaveral, Florida. Tourism Economics, 8 (3), 281–288.
  • Ryan C., Scodland A., ve Montgomery D. (1998). Resident attitudes to tourism development - A comparative study between the Rangitikei, New Zealand and Bakewell, United Kingdom. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4 (2), 115-130.
  • Sekaran, U. (2000) Research Methods for Business: A Skill Business Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. (4), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • United Nations World Trade Organization (2008). Cruise Tourism – Current Situation and Trends. Madrid, Spain.
  • United Nations World Trade Organization (2012). Cruise Tourism – Current Situation and Trends in Asia and Pasific. 25, 28
  • Wood R. E. (2000). Caribbean cruise tourism, globalization at sea. Annals of Tourism Research. 2, 345-370.

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 151 - 169, 31.12.2017

Şeyma Bayazıt

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Brida J. G. ve Zapata S. (2009). Cruise tourism: Economic, socio-cultural and environmental impacts. International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing, 1(3), 205-226.
  • Brida J. G., Chiappa G. D., Meleddu M. ve Pulina M. (2012). A comparison of residents' perceptions in two cruise ports in the Mediterranean Sea. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(2), 180-190.
  • Butt N. (2007). The impact of cruise ship generated waste on home ports and ports of call, A study of Southampton. Marine Policy, 31, 591-598.
  • Chase G. ve Alon I. (2011). Evaluating the economic impact of cruise tourism: A case study of Barbados. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 131, 5-18.
  • Cruise Lines International Association Europe, (CLIA-EU) (2015). Report on Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Economies of Europe.
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (CLIA) (2015). Annual Report on Global Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (2016). Report on Statistics and Market in Europe.
  • Cruise Lines International Association, (2016). Report 2017: Cruise Industry Outlook.
  • Dwyer L. ve Forsyth P. (1998). Economic significance of cruise tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 25, 393-415.
  • Dwyer L., Douglas N. ve Livaic Z., (2004). Estimating the economic contribution of a cruise ship visit. Tourism in Marine Environments, 1, 4-12.
  • Field A. (2000). Discovering Statistical Using SPSS for Windows. New Delphi, London: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication.
  • George D. ve Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gibson P. ve Bentley M (2005). A Study of impacts cruise tourism and the south West of England. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 20, 3-4.
  • Gibson P. (2008). Cruising in the 21st century: Who works while others play? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 42-52.
  • Global Ports Holding. Port Statistics. [URL: http://www.globalports.com.tr/ports.php?pID=6]. (Erişim tarihi: 15 Kasım 2017).
  • Guerrero J. I. F., Selva L. M ve Mediana R. P., (2008). Economic impact of Western Mediterranean leisure ports. International Journal of Transport Economic, 35, 251-272.
  • Harril R. (2004). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: A literature review with implications for tourism planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(3).
  • IREA - Regional Quantitative Analysis Research Group (2016). Working paper on the economic impact of cruise activity: The Port of Barcelona. Research Institute of Applied Economics, 13, 30.
  • Jaakson R. (2004). Beyond the tourist bubble? Cruise ship passengers in port. Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 246-250.
  • Johnson D. (2002). Environmentally sustainable cruise tourism. Marine Policy, 26(1), 261-270.
  • Klein R. A. (2007). The politics of environmental activism: A case study of the cruise industry and the environmental movement. Social Research Online. 12. (URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/2/klein.html, erişim tarihi: 10.03.2015).
  • Mackay Y. C. ve Kerstetter D. (2005). An exploration of cruise ship space, group tour behavior, and social interaction. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4).
  • Lekakau M. B. ve Vaggelas G. K. (2011). The Economic Impact of Cruise Local Economies. The Case Of Island. Athens Tourism Conference, 2-3 February 2011, Athens, Greece.
  • Long V. ve Wall G. (1996). Successful tourism in Nusa Lembongan, Indonesia? Tourism Management, 17 (1), 43-50.
  • Marti B.E. (2003). Trends in the world and extended-length cruising (1985-2002). Marine Policy, 28, 199–211.
  • Massimo C. ve Eleonora G. G. (2012). The Ambivalent Zone Between Sea and City – A New Approach to Collective Spaces Based on Maritime Identity of The Cities by the Sea. Urban Cultures Conference 6-7 Aralık 2012, Lizbon.
  • Perucic D. ve Puh B. (2012). Attitudes of citizen of Dubrovnik towards the impact of cruise tourism on Dubrovnik. Tourism And Hospitality Management, 182, 213-228.
  • Pratt S. ve Blake A. (2009). The economic impact of Hawaii's cruise industry. Tourism Analysis, 14(3), 337-351.
  • Radley B., Braun B., James A., Xander ve Kenneth R. W. (2002). The impact of the cruise industry on a region's economy: A case study of Port Canaveral, Florida. Tourism Economics, 8 (3), 281–288.
  • Ryan C., Scodland A., ve Montgomery D. (1998). Resident attitudes to tourism development - A comparative study between the Rangitikei, New Zealand and Bakewell, United Kingdom. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4 (2), 115-130.
  • Sekaran, U. (2000) Research Methods for Business: A Skill Business Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. (4), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • United Nations World Trade Organization (2008). Cruise Tourism – Current Situation and Trends. Madrid, Spain.
  • United Nations World Trade Organization (2012). Cruise Tourism – Current Situation and Trends in Asia and Pasific. 25, 28
  • Wood R. E. (2000). Caribbean cruise tourism, globalization at sea. Annals of Tourism Research. 2, 345-370.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Turizm (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Şeyma Bayazıt 0000-0001-6940-436X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2017
Kabul Tarihi 27 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Bayazıt, Ş. (2017). Yerel Halkın Kruvaziyer Turizmi Farkındalığına Yönelik Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma: Bodrum Örneği. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 151-169.

Değerli Araştırmacılar,

Dergimize gönderilen çalışmalar geliş sırasına ve konusuna göre öncelikle editör değerlendirmesinden geçmekte, editör görüşü doğrultusunda hakem değerlendirmesine karar verilmektedir. Değerlendirme süreci tamamlanan çalışmalar da aynı şekilde değerlendirmenin tamamlanma tarihlerine, türlerine ve kapsamlarına göre yayıma kabul edilmektedir. Bu yüzden GTAD'a gönderilen çalışmaların herhangi bir sayıda yayıma kabul edileceğinin planlanarak önerilmemesi gerektiğini tekrar hatırlatmak isteriz. Detaylı bilgi için yayın politkası incelenebilir.