Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

East versus West, Native versus Universal, Religious versus Secular: Debates over Secularism in the Middle East and the Arab Spring

Year 2019, , 1 - 41, 15.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.554015

Abstract

This article examines the debates about the relationship between the secular/ism and religion in the Middle East in terms of the binaries of local versus universal or Orient versus Occident, and how these sets of concept are revisited or revised in the analyses of Arab Spring. The first part of the work offers a comprehensive and critical review of the culturalist and essentialist fundamentals of these binaries and challenges against them in the academic literature. What follows is an evaluation of the Arab Spring in light of the main arguments about Middle Eastern secularism. It questions particularly the arguments that the sociocultural characteristics of the large segment of the protesting masses and their primary demands and slogans resemble those in the recent uprisings in the Western societies and therefore, indicate the death of essentialist East-West dichotomy. On the other hand, it problematizes the way secularity and religiosity is stripped off any political content, by transforming especially the former into a merely “cultural gesture”. 

References

  • AL-ALİ, Nadje, Secularism, Gender and the State in the Middle East: The Egyptian Women’s Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • AL-AZMEH,Aziz, Islams and Modernities, Verso, Londra ve New York, 1996.
  • ASAD, Talal, The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam, Occasional Papers Series, Washington, 1986.
  • ASAD, Talal, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1993.
  • ASAD, Talal, Sekülerliğin Biçimleri: Hıristiyanlık, İslamiyet ve Modernlik, (çev: Ferit Burak Aydar), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 2004.
  • CASANOVA, José, Public Religions in the Modern World, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.
  • CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  • CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh, Rethinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890-1940, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  • CHIBBER, Vivek, Postcolonial Theory and The Specter of Capital, Verso, Londra ve New York, 2013.
  • DABASHI, Hamid, The Arab Spring: The End of Postcolonialism, Zed Books, Londra ve New York, 2012.
  • ENAYAT, Hadi, Islam and Secularism in Postcolonial Thought, Palgrave Macmillan, Londra, 2017.
  • LYNCH, Marc, The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East, Public Affairs, New York, 2012.
  • ASAD, Talal, “Trying to Understand Frence Secularism”, Hent de Vries, (ed.), Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, Fordham University Press, New York, 2006, 494-526.
  • ASAD, Talal, “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz”, Man, 1983, Cilt: 18, Sayı: 2, 237-259.
  • BANGSTAD, Sindre, “Contesting secularism/s: Secularism and Islam in the work of Talal Asad”, Anthropological Theory, 2009, 9, 188-208.
  • BARBATO, Mariano, “Postsecular Revolution: Religion After The End of History”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 38, Sayı: 5, 2012, 1079-1097.
  • BAYAT, Asef, “The Arab Spring and its Surprises”, Development and Change, Cilt: 44, Sayı: 3, 2013, 587-601.
  • CHAMKHİ, Tarek, “Neo-Islamism in the post-Arab Spring”, Contemporary Politics, Cilt:20, Sayı:4, 2014, 453-468.
  • DİRLİK, Arif, “Modernity in Question?: Culture and Religion in an Age of Global Modernity”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, Cilt: 12, Sayı: 2, 2004, 147-168.
  • HASHEMİ, Nader, “The Arab Spring Two Years On: Reflections on Dignity, Democracy, and Devotion”, Ethics & International Affairs, Cilt: 27, Sayı: 2, 2013,207-221.
  • HINNEBUSCH, Raymond, “Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique”, Democratization, Cilt:13, Sayı: 3, 2006, 373-395
  • HINNEBUSCH, Raymond, “Toward a historical sociology of state formation in the Middle East”, Middle East Critique, Cilt:19, Sayı: 3, 2010, 201-216.
  • HOFFMAN, Michael ve Jamal, Amaney, "Religion in the Arab Spring: Between Two Competing Narratives," The Journal of Politics, Cilt: 76, Sayı: 3, 2014, 593-606.
  • KANDİL, Hazem, ”Islamizing Egypt? Testing the limits of Gramscian counterhegemonic strategies”, Theory and Society, Cilt: 40, Sayı: 1, 2011, 37-62.
  • KRÄMER, Gudrun, “Secularity Contested: Religion, Identity and the Public Order in the Arab Middle East,” Marian Burchardt vd., (ed), Comparative Secularities: Religion and Modernity in the Global Age, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2015.
  • LUST, Ellen vd., “After the Arab Spring: Islamism, Secularism, and Democracy”, Current History, Aralık 2012, 362-364.
  • MAVELLİ, Luca ve Petito, Fabio, “The Postsecular in International Relations: an overview”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 38, Sayı: 5, 2012, 931-942.
  • MUFTİ, Aamir R., “Critical Secularism: A Re-introduction to Perilous Times”, boundary 2, Clt: 31, Sayı: 2, 2014, 1-9.
  • MUFTİ, Aamir R., “Why I am not a postsecularist”, boundary 2, Cilt: 40, Sayı:1, 2013, 7-19.
  • ROBBINS, Bruce, “Is the Postcolonial also Postsecular?”, boundary 2, Cilt: 40, Sayı: 1, 2013, 245-262.
  • ROY, Olivier, “Islamic Revival and Democracy: The Case in Tunisia and Egypt”, Cesare Merlini ve Olivier Roy (ed), Arab Society in Revolt: The West’s Mediterranean Challenge, Brookings Institution Press, 2013, 47-52.
  • SPRINGBORG, Robert, "Whither the Arab spring? 1989 or 1848”, The International Spectator, Cilt: 46, Sayı: 3, 2011, 5-12.
  • SUSSER, Asher, “The ‘Arab Spring’: Competing Analytical Paradigms”, Bustan: The Middle East Book Review, Cilt: 3, Sayı: 2, 2012, 109-130.
  • VOLPI, Frédéric ve Stein, Ewan, “Islamism and the state after the Arab uprisings: Between people power and state power”, Democratization, Cilt: 22, Sayı: 2, 2015, 276-293.
  • ZUBAİDA, Sami, “The ‘Arab Spring’ in the historical perspectives of Middle East politics”, Economy and Society, Cilt: 41, Sayı: 4, 2012, 568-579. “The Arab Spring: East Meets West”, Counterpoints, Cilt: 417, 2012, 209-219.
  • AL-AZMEH, Aziz, “Freethinking, Secularism and Arab Spring”, LSE Public Lectures, (Ses Kaydı), 15 Ekim 2012, Wolfson Theater: New Academic Building, http://www.lse.ac.uk/website-archive/newsAnd Media/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=1594 (Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2018).
  • HOROWITZ, David, “A Mass Expression of Outrage Against Injustice” (Bernard Lewis ile röportaj), Jerusalem Post, 25 Şubat 2011, www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=209770, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2018).
  • SCHNEIDER, Nathan, “The Suspicious Revolution”, (Talal Asad ile Söyleşi), The Immanent Frame, 3 Ağustos 2011, https://tif.ssrc.org/ 2011/08/03/the-suspicious-revolution-interview-with-talal-asad/ (Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2018).

Doğu-Batı, Yerel-Evrensel, Dinsel-Seküler: Orta Doğu’da Sekülerizm Tartışmaları ve Arap Baharı

Year 2019, , 1 - 41, 15.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.554015

Abstract

Makale Orta Doğu siyasetinde seküler/izm ve dinsellik ilişkisinin yerel-evrensel ya da Doğu-Batı ikiliği bağlamında nasıl ele alındığına ve Arap Baharı’na ilişkin analizlerde bu kavramsal setlere dair ne tür değişimler ya da süreklilikler gözlendiğine bakmaktadır. İlk bölümde söz konusu ikiliklerin kültürelci ve özcü kaynakları ve bunlara dönük itirazları içeren literatürdeki temel tartışmalar kapsamlı bir eleştirel incelemeden geçirildikten sonra, Arap Baharı Orta Doğu sekülerizmine dair bu tartışmalara referansla değerlendirilmektedir. Özellikle sokağa dökülen kitlelerin önemli bir kesitinin sosyokültürel özellikleri ve öne çıkan yoksulluk, adaletsizlik, otoriterlik gibi temaların Batı’da son yıllardaki protesto hareketlerine benzetilmesi ve bu bağlamda Doğu-Batı özcü ikiliğinin aşılması tezleri incelenmektedir. Öte yandan, bu ikilikle birlikte dinsellik ve sekülerliğin siyasal içeriğinin görünmezleşerek, kimi örneklerde özellikle sekülerliğin tümüyle “kültürel jeste” indirgenmesi tartışılmaktadır.

References

  • AL-ALİ, Nadje, Secularism, Gender and the State in the Middle East: The Egyptian Women’s Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • AL-AZMEH,Aziz, Islams and Modernities, Verso, Londra ve New York, 1996.
  • ASAD, Talal, The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam, Occasional Papers Series, Washington, 1986.
  • ASAD, Talal, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1993.
  • ASAD, Talal, Sekülerliğin Biçimleri: Hıristiyanlık, İslamiyet ve Modernlik, (çev: Ferit Burak Aydar), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 2004.
  • CASANOVA, José, Public Religions in the Modern World, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.
  • CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  • CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh, Rethinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890-1940, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  • CHIBBER, Vivek, Postcolonial Theory and The Specter of Capital, Verso, Londra ve New York, 2013.
  • DABASHI, Hamid, The Arab Spring: The End of Postcolonialism, Zed Books, Londra ve New York, 2012.
  • ENAYAT, Hadi, Islam and Secularism in Postcolonial Thought, Palgrave Macmillan, Londra, 2017.
  • LYNCH, Marc, The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East, Public Affairs, New York, 2012.
  • ASAD, Talal, “Trying to Understand Frence Secularism”, Hent de Vries, (ed.), Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, Fordham University Press, New York, 2006, 494-526.
  • ASAD, Talal, “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz”, Man, 1983, Cilt: 18, Sayı: 2, 237-259.
  • BANGSTAD, Sindre, “Contesting secularism/s: Secularism and Islam in the work of Talal Asad”, Anthropological Theory, 2009, 9, 188-208.
  • BARBATO, Mariano, “Postsecular Revolution: Religion After The End of History”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 38, Sayı: 5, 2012, 1079-1097.
  • BAYAT, Asef, “The Arab Spring and its Surprises”, Development and Change, Cilt: 44, Sayı: 3, 2013, 587-601.
  • CHAMKHİ, Tarek, “Neo-Islamism in the post-Arab Spring”, Contemporary Politics, Cilt:20, Sayı:4, 2014, 453-468.
  • DİRLİK, Arif, “Modernity in Question?: Culture and Religion in an Age of Global Modernity”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, Cilt: 12, Sayı: 2, 2004, 147-168.
  • HASHEMİ, Nader, “The Arab Spring Two Years On: Reflections on Dignity, Democracy, and Devotion”, Ethics & International Affairs, Cilt: 27, Sayı: 2, 2013,207-221.
  • HINNEBUSCH, Raymond, “Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique”, Democratization, Cilt:13, Sayı: 3, 2006, 373-395
  • HINNEBUSCH, Raymond, “Toward a historical sociology of state formation in the Middle East”, Middle East Critique, Cilt:19, Sayı: 3, 2010, 201-216.
  • HOFFMAN, Michael ve Jamal, Amaney, "Religion in the Arab Spring: Between Two Competing Narratives," The Journal of Politics, Cilt: 76, Sayı: 3, 2014, 593-606.
  • KANDİL, Hazem, ”Islamizing Egypt? Testing the limits of Gramscian counterhegemonic strategies”, Theory and Society, Cilt: 40, Sayı: 1, 2011, 37-62.
  • KRÄMER, Gudrun, “Secularity Contested: Religion, Identity and the Public Order in the Arab Middle East,” Marian Burchardt vd., (ed), Comparative Secularities: Religion and Modernity in the Global Age, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2015.
  • LUST, Ellen vd., “After the Arab Spring: Islamism, Secularism, and Democracy”, Current History, Aralık 2012, 362-364.
  • MAVELLİ, Luca ve Petito, Fabio, “The Postsecular in International Relations: an overview”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 38, Sayı: 5, 2012, 931-942.
  • MUFTİ, Aamir R., “Critical Secularism: A Re-introduction to Perilous Times”, boundary 2, Clt: 31, Sayı: 2, 2014, 1-9.
  • MUFTİ, Aamir R., “Why I am not a postsecularist”, boundary 2, Cilt: 40, Sayı:1, 2013, 7-19.
  • ROBBINS, Bruce, “Is the Postcolonial also Postsecular?”, boundary 2, Cilt: 40, Sayı: 1, 2013, 245-262.
  • ROY, Olivier, “Islamic Revival and Democracy: The Case in Tunisia and Egypt”, Cesare Merlini ve Olivier Roy (ed), Arab Society in Revolt: The West’s Mediterranean Challenge, Brookings Institution Press, 2013, 47-52.
  • SPRINGBORG, Robert, "Whither the Arab spring? 1989 or 1848”, The International Spectator, Cilt: 46, Sayı: 3, 2011, 5-12.
  • SUSSER, Asher, “The ‘Arab Spring’: Competing Analytical Paradigms”, Bustan: The Middle East Book Review, Cilt: 3, Sayı: 2, 2012, 109-130.
  • VOLPI, Frédéric ve Stein, Ewan, “Islamism and the state after the Arab uprisings: Between people power and state power”, Democratization, Cilt: 22, Sayı: 2, 2015, 276-293.
  • ZUBAİDA, Sami, “The ‘Arab Spring’ in the historical perspectives of Middle East politics”, Economy and Society, Cilt: 41, Sayı: 4, 2012, 568-579. “The Arab Spring: East Meets West”, Counterpoints, Cilt: 417, 2012, 209-219.
  • AL-AZMEH, Aziz, “Freethinking, Secularism and Arab Spring”, LSE Public Lectures, (Ses Kaydı), 15 Ekim 2012, Wolfson Theater: New Academic Building, http://www.lse.ac.uk/website-archive/newsAnd Media/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=1594 (Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2018).
  • HOROWITZ, David, “A Mass Expression of Outrage Against Injustice” (Bernard Lewis ile röportaj), Jerusalem Post, 25 Şubat 2011, www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=209770, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2018).
  • SCHNEIDER, Nathan, “The Suspicious Revolution”, (Talal Asad ile Söyleşi), The Immanent Frame, 3 Ağustos 2011, https://tif.ssrc.org/ 2011/08/03/the-suspicious-revolution-interview-with-talal-asad/ (Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2018).
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Selin Dingiloğlu This is me

Publication Date April 15, 2019
Submission Date May 28, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

Chicago Dingiloğlu, Selin. “Doğu-Batı, Yerel-Evrensel, Dinsel-Seküler: Orta Doğu’da Sekülerizm Tartışmaları Ve Arap Baharı”. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi 15, no. 29 (April 2019): 1-41. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.554015.