Reclassifying the Threat Categories of Two Rare Plant Species Endemic to Central Anatolia

Abstract

Aethionema turcica and Astragalus beypazaricus are rare endemic plant species restricted to marly-gypsaceous soils from Ankara, Turkey. In a study in 2000, Ae.turcica and A.beypazaricus were classified under the “Least Concern” and “Critically Endangered” threat categories, respectively. This study aimed to reassess the global conservation status of these species according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria by using the recent findings based on their population sizes, distribution areas, and the main threats. Field research was conducted between 2016 and 2018. Additionally, physical-chemical soil tests were run, and the climatic data were utilized to draw bioclimatic conclusions. In Ankara, there are two populations of Ae.turcica, with 359 mature individuals covering 12 km2 AOO and 23.5 km2 EOO areas. A.beypazaricus has only one fragmented population with a total of 5700 mature individuals in Beypazarı, and both AOO and EOO were discovered to be 4 km2. Both species are on the verge of extinction due to habitat fragmentation and loss formed by intense anthropogenic activity. According to the findings, the IUCN threat categories for Ae.turcica and A.beypazaricus were suggested to be reclassified as CR based on the criteria B1ab(ii, iii) and B1ab(ii, iii)+2ab(ii, iii), respectively.

Keywords

• Aethionema turcica H.Duman&Aytaç
• Astragalus beypazaricus Podlech&Aytaç
• Plant Conservation
• IUCN

References

1. V. Muccione, M. Schaepman, Global Change -Terminology Brief Series, University Research Priority Programme on Global Change and Biodiversity, University of Zurich, 2014.
2. P.M. Vitousek, Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change.Ecology, 75(7). pp. 1861-1876, Washington, 1994.
3. W.Steffen, R.A.Sanderson, P.D.Tyson, J.Jäger, P.A. Matson, B. Moore III, F. Oldfield,K. Richardson, H.-J. Schellnhuber, B.L. Turner, R.J. Wasson, Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure. Global Change - The IGBP Series, 2004.
4. D. Tilman, M. Clark, D.R. Williams, K. Kimmel, S. Polasky and C. Packer, Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention, Nature 546(2017) 73–81.
5. D. Skole and C. Tucker, Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260(1993) 1905–1910.
6. S.L. Pimm, G.J. Russell, J.L.Gittleman, and T.M. Brooks, The future of biodiversity. Science 269 (1995) 347–350.
7. N. Myers and A.H. Knoll, The biotic crisis and the future of evolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98 (2001) 5389–5392.
8. W.F. Laurence and E. Yensen, Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats, Biological Conservation 55 (1991) 77–92.

9. E.Z. Baskent, and G.A. Jordan, Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25 (1995) 1830–1849.
10. T.M. Donovan and C.H.Flather, Relationships amongst North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy, Ecological Applications 12 (2002) 364–374.
11. L. Fahrig, Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34(2003)487–515.
12. R. Lande, Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist, 142 (1993) 911–927.
13. I. Hanski, Metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 396 (1998) 41–49.
14. CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity, Turkey. https://www.cbd.int/countries/profile/?country=tr/, (Erişim yılı: 2021)
15. A.Güner, S. Aslan, T. Ekim, M. Vural and M. T. Babaç, Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, 1290 pp. İstanbul, 2012.
16. A.Güner, H.Özhatay, T.Ekim and K.H.C. Başer (eds.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands vol. 11 (Supplement II). Edinburgh University Press, pp. 33, 88, 173, 174, Edinburgh, 2000.
17. H.Duman, Z. Aytac, A new Aethionema from central Anatolia. Karaca Arbor. Mag. 1(2) (1991) 71-73, 1991.
18. T.Ekim, M.Koyuncu, M.Vural, H.Duman, Z.Aytaç, N.Adıgüzel, Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı, 100. Yıl Üniversitesi ve Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Derneği, Ankara, 2000.
19. D.Podlech, Z.Aytaç, Two new species of Astragalus L. sect. Dissitiflori DC. (Fabaceae) from Turkey, Sendtnera, 5 (1998) 265-268.
20. Z.Aytaç, Türkiyenin Tehdit Altındaki Bitkileri: Beyparazı Gevenleri. Bağbahçe Dergisi, 26 (2009) 14-15.
21. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp, 2012. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-2001-001-2nd.pdf
22. IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. 2022. https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
23. GeoCAT, Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool. https://geocat.iucnredlist.org/, (Erişim yılı: 2019)
24. H.Gaussen, L’étude des climats par les courbes ombrothermiques : application à la cartographie, L’Information Géographique, 20(5) (1956) 191-193.
25. L.Emberger, Recherches Sur La Zone Aride. Carte Bioclimatique De La Zone Méditerranéenne (s.XXI. Bölüm) in Paris: UNESCO-FAO, 1963.
26. Y.Akman, İklim ve Biyoiklim (Biyoiklim Metodları ve Türkiye İklimleri), Kariyer Matbaacılık, Ankara, 1999.
27. J.G. Alphen and F.Rios Romero, Gypsiferous soils: Notes On Their Characteristics and Management. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, pp 44, Wageningen, 1971.